The dynamic state of protein turnover: It's about time

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 293-303

  Hinkson, Izumi V ^a   Elias, Joshua E ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEOME;

HUMAN; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN METABOLISM; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; REVIEW;

AMINO ACIDS; ANIMALS; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMANS; ISOTOPE LABELING; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEINS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79955536138     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.02.002     Document Type: Review

References (97)

1. Foster G.L., et al. Studies in protein metabolism: V The utilization of ammonia for amino acid and creatine formation in animals. J. Biol. Chem. 1939, 127:319-327.
2. Ratner S., et al. Studies in protein metabolism: XIV The chemical interaction of dietary glycine and body proteins in rats. J. Biol. Chem. 1940, 134:665-676.
3. Schoenheimer R., et al. Studies in protein metabolism: VII The metabolism of tyrosine. J. Biol. Chem. 1939, 127:333-334.
4. Schoenheimer R., et al. Studies in protein metabolism: X. The metabolic activity of body proteins investigated with l(-)-leucine containing two isotopes. J. Biol. Chem. 1939, 130:703-732.
5. Schoenheimer R. The Dynamic State of Body Constituents 1942, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 78.
6. Furuno K., et al. Role of different proteolytic systems in the degradation of muscle proteins during denervation atrophy. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265:8550-8557.
7. Lewin B. Second golden age of molecular biology. Nature 1970, 227:1009-1013.
8. Hughey J.J., et al. Computational modeling of mammalian signaling networks. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 2010, 2:194-209.
9. Jeong H., et al. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 2000, 407:651-654.
10. Fonseca R., et al. A balance of protein synthesis and proteasome-dependent degradation determines the maintenance of LTP. Neuron 2006, 52:239-245.
11. Nedvetsky P.I., et al. Reciprocal regulation of aquaporin-2 abundance and degradation by protein kinase A and p38-MAP kinase. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2010, 21:1645-1656.
12. Gygi S.P., et al. Correlation between protein and mRNA abundance in yeast. Mol. Cell Biol. 1999, 19:1720-1730.
13. Ideker T., et al. Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science 2001, 292:929-934.
14. Griffin T.J., et al. Complementary profiling of gene expression at the transcriptome and proteome levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2002, 1:323-333.
15. Kislinger T., et al. Global survey of organ and organelle protein expression in mouse: combined proteomic and transcriptomic profiling. Cell 2006, 125:173-186.
16. Chen G., et al. Discordant protein and mRNA expression in lung adenocarcinomas. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2002, 1:304-313.
17. Schoenheimer R., et al. The application of the nitrogen isotope N15 for the study of protein metabolism. Science 1938, 88:599-600.
18. Schoenheimer R., Rittenberg D. The application of isotopes to the study of intermediary metabolism. Science 1938, 87:p221-226.
19. Arias I.M., et al. Studies on the synthesis and degradation of proteins of the endoplasmic reticulum of rat liver. J. Biol. Chem. 1969, 244:3303-3315.
20. Larrabee K.L., et al. The relative rates of protein synthesis and degradation in a growing culture of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 1980, 255:4125-4130.
21. Mosteller R.D., et al. Metabolism of individual proteins in exponentially growing Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 1980, 255:2524-2532.
22. Obrig T.G., et al. The mechanism by which cycloheximide and related glutarimide antibiotics inhibit peptide synthesis on reticulocyte ribosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 1971, 246:174-181.
23. Martin S.J., et al. Induction of apoptosis (programmed cell death) in human leukemic HL-60 cells by inhibition of RNA or protein synthesis. J. Immunol. 1990, 145:1859-1867.
24. Belle A., et al. Quantification of protein half-lives in the budding yeast proteome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:13004-21309.
25. Yen H.C., et al. Global protein stability profiling in mammalian cells. Science 2008, 322:918-923.
26. Eden E., et al. Proteome half-life dynamics in living human cells. Science 2011, 331:764-768.
27. Yen H.C., Elledge S.J. Identification of SCF ubiquitin ligase substrates by global protein stability profiling. Science 2008, 322:923-929.
28. Cohen A.A., et al. Dynamic proteomics of individual cancer cells in response to a drug. Science 2008, 322:1511-1516.
29. Arava Y., et al. Dissecting eukaryotic translation and its control by ribosome density mapping. Nucleic. Acids Res. 2005, 33:2421-2432.
30. Arava Y., et al. Genome-wide analysis of mRNA translation profiles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:3889-3894.
31. Ingolia N.T., et al. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 2009, 324:218-223.
32. Pratt J.M., et al. Dynamics of protein turnover, a missing dimension in proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2002, 1:579-591.
33. Picotti P., et al. Full dynamic range proteome analysis of S. cerevisiae by targeted proteomics. Cell 2009, 138:795-806.
34. de Godoy L.M., et al. Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast. Nature 2008, 455:1251-1254.
35. Mann M. Functional and quantitative proteomics using SILAC. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7:952-958.
36. Ong S.E., et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2002, 1:376-386.
37. Price J.C., et al. Analysis of proteome dynamics in the mouse brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:14508-14513.
38. Doherty M.K., et al. Turnover of the human proteome: determination of protein intracellular stability by dynamic SILAC. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8:104-112.
39. Cargile B.J., et al. Synthesis/degradation ratio mass spectrometry for measuring relative dynamic protein turnover. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76:86-97.
40. Jayapal K.P., et al. Multitagging proteomic strategy to estimate protein turnover rates in dynamic systems. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9:2087-2097.
41. Milner E., et al. The turnover kinetics of major histocompatibility complex peptides of human cancer cells. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2006, 5:357-365.
42. Rao P.K., et al. Determination of global protein turnover in stressed mycobacterium cells using hybrid-linear ion trap-fourier transform mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80:396-406.
43. Ross P.L., et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2004, 3:1154-1169.
44. Schulze W.X., Usadel B. Quantitation in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61:491-516.
45. Casado P., Cutillas P.R. A self-validating quantitative mass spectrometry method for assessing the accuracy of high-content phosphoproteomic experiments. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2011, 10, M110.003079.
46. Walther T.C., Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics in cell biology. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 190:491-500.
47. Syka J.E., et al. Novel linear quadrupole ion trap/FT mass spectrometer: performance characterization and use in the comparative analysis of histone H3 post-translational modifications. J. Proteome Res. 2004, 3:621-626.
48. Makarov A., et al. Performance evaluation of a hybrid linear ion trap/orbitrap mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78:2113-2120.
49. Olsen J.V., et al. A dual pressure linear ion trap Orbitrap instrument with very high sequencing speed. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2009, 8:2759-2769.
50. Doherty M.K., et al. Proteome dynamics in complex organisms: using stable isotopes to monitor individual protein turnover rates. Proteomics 2005, 5:522-533.
51. Ahrens C.H., et al. Generating and navigating proteome maps using mass spectrometry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:789-801.
52. Peng J., et al. Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome. J. Proteome Res. 2003, 2:43-50.
53. Washburn M.P., et al. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19:242-247.
54. Zhang X., et al. Multi-dimensional liquid chromatography in proteomics--a review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 664:101-113.
55. Perkins D.N., et al. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20:3551-3567.
56. Eng J.K., et al. An Approach to Correlate Tandem Mass-Spectral Data of Peptides with Amino-Acid-Sequences in a Protein Database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 5:976-989.
57. Craig R., Beavis R.C. TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:1466-1467.
58. Geer L.Y., et al. Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 2004, 3:958-964.
59. Elias J.E., Gygi S.P. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2007, 4:207-214.
60. Keller A., et al. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74:5383-5392.
61. Nesvizhskii A.I., et al. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75:4646-4658.
62. Zhang B., et al. Proteomic parsimony through bipartite graph analysis improves accuracy and transparency. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6:3549-3557.
63. Cox J., Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26:1367-1372.
64. Domon B., Aebersold R. Challenges and opportunities in proteomics data analysis. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2006, 5:1921-1926.
65. Mueller L.N., et al. An assessment of software solutions for the analysis of mass spectrometry based quantitative proteomics data. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7:51-61.
66. Nesvizhskii A.I., et al. Analysis and validation of proteomic data generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2007, 4:787-797.
67. Elias J.E., et al. Comparative evaluation of mass spectrometry platforms used in large-scale proteomics investigations. Nat. Methods 2005, 2:667-675.
68. Oberg A.L., Vitek O. Statistical design of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8:2144-2156.
69. Tabb D.L., et al. Repeatability and reproducibility in proteomic identifications by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9:761-776.
70. Millward D.J. Protein turnover in skeletal muscle I. The measurement of rates of synthesis and catabolism of skeletal muscle protein using (14C)Na2CO3 to label protein. Clin. Sci. 1970, 39:577-590.
71. Millward D.J. A simple method for measuring protein turnover in the liver: the effects of starvation and low protein feeding on liver protein metabolism in the rat. Gut 1971, 12:495.
72. Zee B.M., et al. In vivo residue-specific histone methylation dynamics. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:3341-3350.
73. Strahl B.D., Allis C.D. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 2000, 403:41-45.
74. Conrad C., Gerlich D.W. Automated microscopy for high-content RNAi screening. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 188:453-461.
75. Roukos V., et al. Descriptive no more: the dawn of high-throughput microscopy. Trends Cell Biol. 2010, 20:503-506.
76. Held M., et al. CellCognition: time-resolved phenotype annotation in high-throughput live cell imaging. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:747-754.
77. Jones T.R., et al. Scoring diverse cellular morphologies in image-based screens with iterative feedback and machine learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:1826-1831.
78. Picotti P., et al. High-throughput generation of selected reaction-monitoring assays for proteins and proteomes. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:43-46.
79. Keshishian H., et al. Quantitative, multiplexed assays for low abundance proteins in plasma by targeted mass spectrometry and stable isotope dilution. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2007, 6:2212-2229.
80. Kiyonami R., et al. Increased selectivity, analytical precision, and throughput in targeted proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2011, 10. M110.002931.
81. Bachmair A., et al. In vivo half-life of a protein is a function of its amino-terminal residue. Science 1986, 234:179-186.
82. Dice J.F., Goldberg A.L. Relationship between in vivo degradative rates and isoelectric points of proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1975, 72:3893-3897.
83. Dice J.F., Goldberg A.L. A statistical analysis of the relationship between degradative rates and molecular weights of proteins. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1975, 170:213-219.
84. Miller S., et al. The accessible surface area and stability of oligomeric proteins. Nature 1987, 328:834-836.
85. Dice J.F., et al. Studies on the relationship between the degradative rates of proteins in vivo and their isoelectric points. Biochem. J. 1979, 178:305-312.
86. Levy F., et al. Using ubiquitin to follow the metabolic fate of a protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93:4907-4912.
87. Buchler N.E., et al. Nonlinear protein degradation and the function of genetic circuits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:9559-9564.
88. Mandelstam J. Turnover of protein in starved bacteria and its relationship to the induced synthesis of enzyme. Nature 1957, 179:1179-1181.
89. Mandelstam J. Turnover of protein in growing and non-growing populations of Escherichia coli. Biochem. J. 1958, 69:110-119.
90. Koch A.L., Levy H.R. Protein turnover in growing cultures of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 1955, 217:947-957.
91. Yewdell J.W., et al. Making sense of mass destruction: quantitating MHC class I antigen presentation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2003, 3:952-961.
92. Ong S.E., et al. Properties of 13C-substituted arginine in stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC). J. Proteome Res. 2003, 2:173-181.
93. Bicho C.C., et al. A genetic engineering solution to the " arginine conversion problem" in stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC). Mol. Cell Proteomics 2010, 9:1567-1577.
94. Wheatley D.N., Inglis M.S. Turnover of nascent proteins in HeLa-S3 cells and the quasi-linear incorporation kinetics of amino acids. Cell Biol. Int. Rep. 1985, 9:463-470.
95. Li Q. Advances in protein turnover analysis at the global level and biological insights. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2010, 29:717-736.
96. Andersen J.S., et al. Nucleolar proteome dynamics. Nature 2005, 433:77-83.
97. Malmstrom J., et al. Advances in proteomic workflows for systems biology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2007, 18:378-384.