Ploidy dictates repair pathway choice under DNA replication stress

Genetics

Volumn 187, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1031-1040

  Li, Xin Chenglin ^a,b,c   Tye, Bik K ^a  

^a Program on Infrastructure Policy   (United States)

^b University of Massachusetts Medical School ^*  (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; HELICASE; MINICHROMOSOME MAINTENANCE PROTEIN; NUCLEIC ACID BINDING PROTEIN; PROTEIN RAD6; RAD52 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLELE; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL CYCLE M PHASE; CELL TYPE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; ENZYME DEFECT; GENETIC INSTABILITY; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETIC STABILITY; HAPLOIDY; HETEROZYGOSITY; MOLECULAR STABILITY; MOUSE; MUTANT; NONHUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPLICATION STRESS; STRESS; YEAST;

CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DIPLOIDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA HELICASES; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, FUNGAL; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; GENETIC LOCI; HAPLOIDY; HETEROZYGOTE; MUTATION; RAD51 RECOMBINASE; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UBIQUITIN-CONJUGATING ENZYMES;

MUS;

EID: 79955405745     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 00166731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.125450     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aparicio, O. M., D. M. Weinstein and S. P. Bell, 1997 Components and dynamics of DNA replication complexes in S-cerevisiae: redistribution of MCM proteins and Cdc45p during S phase. Cell 91: 59-69.
2. Barbour, L., and W. Xiao, 2003 Regulation of alternative replication bypass pathways at stalled replication forks and its effects on genome stability: a yeast model. Mutat. Res. 532: 137-155.
3. Barbour, L., and W. Xiao, 2006 Mating type regulation of cellular tolerance to DNA damage is specific to the DNA post-replication repair and mutagenesis pathway. Mol. Microbiol. 59: 637-650.
4. Bochman, M. L., and A. Schwacha, 2008 The Mcm2-7 complex has in vitro helicase activity. Mol. Cell 31: 287-293.
5. Branzei, D., and M. Foiani, 2005 The DNA damage response during DNA replication. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17: 568-575.
6. Clarke, D. J., M. Segal, S. Jensen and S. I. Reed, 2001 Mec1p regulates Pds1p levels in S phase: complex coordination of DNA replication and mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 3: 619-627.
7. Costanzo, V., T. Paull, M. Gottesman and J. Gautier, 2004 Mre11 assembles linear DNA fragments into DNA damage signaling complexes. PLoS Biol. 2: E110.
8. De Godoy, L. M. F., J. V. Olsen, J. Cox, M. L. Nielsen, N. C. Hubner et al., 2008 Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast. Nature 455: 1251-1254.
9. Durand, J., J. Birdsell and C. Wills, 1993 Pleiotropic effects of heterozygosity at the mating-type locus of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae on repair, recombination and transformation. Mutat. Res. 290: 239-247.
10. Fan, H. Y., K. K. Cheng and H. L. Klein, 1996 Mutations in the RNA polymerase II transcription machinery suppress the hyperrecombination mutant hpr1 Delta of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 142: 749-759.
11. Frank-Vaillant, M., and S. Marcand, 2001 NHEJ regulation by mating type is exercised through a novel protein, Lif2p, essential to the ligase IV pathway. Genes Dev. 15: 3005-3012.
12. Friis, J., and H. Roman, 1968 The effect of the mating-type alleles on intragenic recombination in yeast. Genetics 59: 33-36.
13. Galitski, T., A. J. Saldanha, C. A. Styles, E. S. Lander and G. R. Fink, 1999 Ploidy regulation of gene expression. Science 285: 251-254.
14. Gangloff, S., C. Soustelle and F. Fabre, 2000 Homologous recombination is responsible for cell death in the absence of the Sgs1 and Srs2 helicases. Nat. Genet. 25: 192-194.
15. Gudmundsdottir, K., C. J. Lord and A. Ashworth, 2007 The proteasome is involved in determining differential utilization of double-strand break repair pathways. Oncogene 26: 7601-7606.
16. Halazonetis, T. D., V. G. Gorgoulis and J. Bartek, 2008 An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science 319: 1352-1355.
17. Hartwell, L. H., and D. Smith, 1985 Altered fidelity of mitotic chromosome transmission in cell cycle mutants of S. cerevisiae. Genetics 110: 381-395.
18. Heude, M., and F. Fabre, 1993 a/Alpha-control of DNA repair in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: genetic and physiological aspects. Genetics 133: 489-498.
19. Jain, S., N. Sugawara, J. Lydeard, M. Vaze, N. T. Le Gac et al., 2009 A recombination execution checkpoint regulates the choice of homologous recombination pathway during DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev. 23: 291-303.
20. Kanellis, P., M. Gagliardi, J. P. Banath, R. K. Szilard, S. Nakada et al., 2007 A screen for suppressors of gross chromosomal rearrangements identifies a conserved role for PLP in preventing DNA lesions. PLoS Genet. 3: e134.
21. Katou, Y., Y. Kanoh, M. Bando, H. Noguchi, H. Tanaka et al., 2003 S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424: 1078-1083.
22. Kokoska, R. J., L. Stefanovic, J. Demai and T. D. Petes, 2000 Increased rates of genomic deletions generated by mutations in the yeast gene encoding DNA polymerase delta or by decreases in the cellular levels of DNA polymerase delta. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 7490-7504.
23. Lea, D. E., and C. A. Coulson, 1949 The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations. J. Genet. 49: 264-285.
24. Li, X. C., B. C. Barringer and D. A. Barbash, 2009a The pachytene checkpoint and its relationship to evolutionary patterns of polyploidization and hybrid sterility. Heredity 102: 24-30.
25. Li, X. C., J. C. Schimenti and B. K. Tye, 2009b Aneuploidy and improved growth are coincident but not causal in a yeast cancer model. PLoS Biol. 7: e1000161.
26. Limbo, O., C. Chahwan, Y. Yamada, R.A. M. De Bruin, C. Wittenberg et al., 2007 Ctp1 is a cell-cycle-regulated protein that functions with Mre11 complex to control double-strand break repair by homologous recombination. Mol. Cell 28: 134-146.
27. Mao, Z. Y., M. Bozzella, A. Seluanov and V. Gorbunova, 2008 DNA repair by nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination during cell cycle in human cells. Cell Cycle 7: 2902-2906.
28. Martin, S. G., T. Laroche, N. Suka, M. Grunstein and S. M. Gasser, 1999 Relocalization of telomeric Ku and SIR proteins in response to DNA strand breaks in yeast. Cell 97: 621-633.
29. Meyer, D. H., and A. M. Bailis, 2008 Mating type influences chromosome loss and replicative senescence in telomerase-deficient budding yeast by Dnl4-dependent telomere fusion. Mol. Microbiol. 69: 1246-1254.
30. Mimitou, E. P., and L. S. Symington, 2008 Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455: 770-774.
31. P'ques, F., and J. E. Haber, 1999 Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63: 349-404.
32. Saeki, T., I. Machida and S. Nakai, 1980 Genetic control of diploid recovery after gamma-irradiation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 73: 251-265.
33. Saleh-Gohari, N., H. E. Bryant, N. Schultz, K. M. Parker, T. N. Cassel et al., 2005 Spontaneous homologous recombination is induced by collapsed replication forks that are caused by endogenous DNA single-strand breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25: 7158-7169.
34. Sarkisian, C. J., B. A. Keister, D.B. Stairs, R. B. Boxer, S.E. Moody et al., 2007 Dose-dependent oncogene-induced senescence in vivo and its evasion during mammary tumorigenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 9: 493-505.
35. Shima, N., A. Alcaraz, I. Liachko, T. R. Buske, C. A. Andrews et al., 2007a A viable allele of Mcm4 causes chromosome instability and mammary adenocarcinomas in mice. Nat. Genet. 39: 93-98.
36. Shima, N., T. R. Buske and J. C. Schimenti, 2007b Genetic screen for chromosome instability in mice: Mcm4 and breast cancer. Cell Cycle 6: 1135-1140.
37. Shrivastav, M., L. P. De Haro and J. A. Nickoloff, 2008 Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Cell Res. 18: 134-147.
38. Sia, E. A., R. J. Kokoska, M. Dominska, P. Greenwell and T. D. Petes, 1997 Microsatellite instability in yeast: dependence on repeat unit size and DNAmismatch repair genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 2851-2858.
39. Storchova, Z., A. Breneman, J. Cande, J. Dunn, K. Burbank et al., 2006 Genome-wide genetic analysis of polyploidy in yeast. Nature 443: 541-547.
40. Takata, M., M. S. Sasaki, E. Sonoda, C. Morrison, M. Hashimoto et al., 1998 Homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining pathways of DNA double-strand break repair have overlapping roles in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 17: 5497-5508.
41. Ulrich, H. D., and S. Jentsch, 2000 Two RING finger proteins mediate cooperation between ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in DNA repair. EMBO J. 19: 3388-3397.
42. Valencia-Burton, M., M. Oki, J. Johnson, T. A. Seier, R. Kamakaka et al., 2006 Different mating-type-regulated genes affect the DNA repair defects of Saccharomyces RAD51, RAD52, and RAD55 mutants. Genetics 174: 41-55.
43. Valencia, M., M. Bentele, M. B. Vaze, G. Herrmann, E. Kraus et al., 2001 NEJ1 controls non-homologous end joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 414: 666-669.
44. Wu, C. Y., P. A. Rolfe, D.K. Gifford and G. R. Fink, 2010 Control of transcription by cell size. PLoS Biol. 8: e1000523.
45. Xu, H., C. Boone and H. L. Klein, 2004 Mrc1 is required for sister chromatid cohesion to aid in recombination repair of spontaneous damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24: 7082-7090.
46. Yun, M. H., and K. Hiom, 2009 CtIP-BRCA1 modulates the choice of DNA double-strand-break repair pathway throughout the cell cycle. Nature 459: 460-463.