Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error

Vision Research

Volumn 43, Issue 23, 2003, Pages 2451-2468

  Oruç, Ipek ^a   Maloney, Laurence T ^a   Landy, Michael S ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Correlated cues; Cue combination; Pictorial depth cues; Slant perception

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL STIMULATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY;

CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 0642343029     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00435-8     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Barlow H.B. Unsupervised learning. Neural Computation. 1:1989;295-311.
2. Barlow H.B., Földiák P. Adaptation and decorrelation in the cortex. Miall C., Durbin R.M., Mitchison G.J. The computing neuron. 1989;54-72 Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, England.
3. Clark J.J., Yuille A.L. Data fusion for sensory information processing systems. 1990;Kluwer, Boston, MA.
4. Cochran W.G. Problems arising in the analysis of a series of similar experiments. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 4(Suppl.):1937;102-118.
5. Cohen A., Sackrowitz H.B. On estimating the common mean of two normal distributions. Annals of Statistics. 2:1974;1274-1282.
6. Efron B., Tibshirani R.J. An introduction to the bootstrap. 1993;Chapman Hall, New York.
7. Ernst M.O., Banks M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature. 415:2002;429-433.
8. Freund J.E. Mathematical statistics. 5th ed. 1992;Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
9. Gepshtein S., Banks M.S. Viewing geometry determines how vision and haptics combine in size perception. Current Biology. 13:2003;483-488.
10. Ghahramani Z., Wolpert D.M., Jordan M.I. Computational models of sensorimotor integration. Morasso P.G., Sanguineti V. Self-organization, computational maps and motor control. 1997;117-147 North-Holland, Amsterdam.
11. Graybill F.A., Deal R.B. Combining unbiased estimators. Biometrics. 15:1959;543-550.
12. Hampel F.R., Ronchetti E.M., Rousseeuw P.J., Stahel W.A. Robust statistics: The approach based on influence functions. 1986;Wiley, New York.
13. Hardy G.H., Littlewood J.E., Pólya G. Inequalities. 1952;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
14. Hillis J.M., Ernst M.O., Banks M.S., Landy M.S. Combining sensory information: Mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses. Science. 298:2002;1627-1630.
15. Jacobs R.A. Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth. Vision Research. 39:1999;3621-3629.
16. Johnston E.B., Cumming B.G., Landy M.S. Integration of stereopsis and motion shape cues. Vision Research. 34:1994;2259-2275.
17. Kaufman L. Sight and mind. 1974;Oxford University Press, London.
18. Keller, T., & Olkin, I. (2002). Combining correlated unbiased estimators of the mean of a normal distribution. Technical Report No. 2002-5. Department of Statistics, Stanford University
19. Knill D.C., Richards W. Perception as Bayesian inference. 1996;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
20. Knill D.C., Saunders J. Humans optimally weight stereo and texture cues to estimate surface slant [abstract]. Journal of Vision. 2(7):2002;400.
21. Kontsevich L.L. Defaults in stereoscopic and kinetic depth perception. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 265:1998;1615-1621.
22. Landy M.S., Kojima H. Ideal cue combination for localizing texture-defined edges. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 18:2001;2307-2320.
23. Landy M.S., Maloney L.T., Johnston E.B., Young M.J. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research. 35:1995;389-412.
24. Maloney L.T. Statistical decision theory and biological vision. Heyer D., Mausfeld R. Perception and the physical world. 2002;145-189 Wiley, New York.
25. Mamassian P., Landy M.S. Observer biases in the 3D interpretation of line drawings. Vision Research. 38:1998;2817-2832.
26. Mamassian P., Landy M.S. Interaction of visual prior constraints. Vision Research. 41:2001;2653-2688.
27. Mamassian P., Landy M.S., Maloney L.T. Bayesian modeling of visual perception. Rao R.P.N., Olshausen B.A., Lewicki M.S. Probabilistic models of perception and brain function. 2002;13-36 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
28. Mardia K.V., Kent J.T., Bibby J.M. Multivariate analysis. 1979;Academic Press, New York.
29. Mood A., Graybill F.A., Boes D.C. Introduction to the theory of statistics. 3rd ed. 1974;McGraw-Hill, New York.
30. Rao R.P.M., Olshausen B.A., Lewicki M.S. Probabilistic models of perception and brain function. 2002;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
31. Strang G. Linear algebra and its applications. 3rd ed. 1988;Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego.
32. Trommershäuser J., Maloney L.T., Landy M.S. Statistical decision theory and trade-offs in the control of motor response. Spatial Vision. 16:2003;255-275.
33. Trommershäuser J., Maloney L.T., Landy M.S. Statistical decision theory and the selection of rapid, goal-directed movements. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 20:2003;1419-1433.
34. Van Beers R.J., Sittig A.C., Denier van der Gon J.J. The precision of proprioceptive position sense. Experimental Brain Research. 122:1998;367-377.
35. Van Beers R.J., Sittig A.C., Denier van der Gon J.J. Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. Journal of Neurophysiology. 81:1999;1355-1364.
36. Watt R.J., Morgan M.J., Ward R.M. Stimulus features that determine the visual location of a bright bar. Investigative Ophthalmology & Vision Science. 24:1983;66-71.
37. Young M.J., Landy M.S., Maloney L.T. A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues. Vision Research. 33:1993;2685-2696.
38. Yuille A.L., Bülthoff H.H. Bayesian decision theory and psychophysics. Knill D.C., Richards W. Perception as Bayesian inference. 1996;123-161 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
39. Zacks S. Unbiased estimation of the common mean of two normal distributions based on small samples of equal size. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 61:1966;467-476.