A unified probabilistic model of the perception of three-dimensional structure from optic flow

Biological Cybernetics

Volumn 97, Issue 5-6, 2007, Pages 461-477

  Colas, Francis ^a,b,c   Droulez, Jacques ^a,d   Wexler, Mark ^a,d   Bessière, Pierre ^b,c  

^a Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie   (France)

^b UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^c INRIA RHÔNE ALPES   (France)

^d CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

BAYESIAN MODEL; BAYESIAN PROGRAMMING; STRUCTURE-FROM-MOTION (SFM); THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE;

OPTICAL FLOWS;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; VISUAL ILLUSION;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 40849115238     PISSN: 03401200     EISSN: 14320770     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00422-007-0183-z     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Cornilleau-Pérès V, Wexler M, Droulez J, Marin E, Miège C and Bourdoncle B (2002). Visual perception of planar orientation: dominance of static depth cues over motion cues. Vision Res 42: 1403-1412
2. Dijkstra T, Cornilleau-Pérès V, Gielen C and Droulez J (1995). Perception of three-dimensional shape from ego- and object-motion: comparison between small- and large-field stimuli. Vision Res 35(4): 453-462
3. Domini F and Braunstein M (1998). Recovery of 3-D structure from motion is neither Euclidean nor affine. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24(4): 1273-1295
4. Domini F and Caudek C (1999). Perceiving surface slant from deformation of optic flow. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25(2): 426-444
5. Domini F and Caudek C (2003). 3-D structure perceived from dynamic information: a new theory. Trends Cogn Sci 7(10): 444-449
6. Ernst M and Banks M (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415(6870): 429-433
7. Kersten D, Mamassian P and Yuille A (2004). Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annu Rev Psychol 55: 271-304
8. Koenderik J (1986). Optic flow. Vision Res 26(1): 161-179
9. Landy M, Maloney L, Johnston E and Young M (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision Res 35: 389-412
10. Lebeltel O, Bessière P, Diard J, Mazer E (2004) Bayesian robot programming. Adv Robot 16(1):49-79. http://emotion.inrialpes.fr/bibemotion/2004/ LBDM04/
11. Longuet-Higgins H (1984). The visual ambiguity of a moving plane. Proc R Soc Lond (B Biol Sci) 223: 165-175
12. Mayhew J and Longuet-Higgins H (1982). A computational model of binoculard depth perception. Nature 297(5865): 376-378
13. Naji J and Freeman T (2004). Perceiving depth order during pursuit eye movement. Vision Res 44: 3025-3034
14. Rogers B and Graham M (1979). Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception 8: 125-134
15. Rogers B and Rogers S (1992). Visual and nonvisual information disambiguate surfaces specified by motion parallax. Percept Psychophys 52: 446-452
16. Todd J and Bressan P (1990). The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences. Percept Psychophys 45(5): 419-430
17. Todd J and Norman J (1991). The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences. Percept Psychophys 50(6): 509-523
18. Ullman S (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. MIT Press, Cambridge
19. van Boxtel J, Wexler M, Droulez J (2003) Perception of plane orientation from self-generated and passively observed optic flow. J Vis 3(5):318-332. http://journalofvision.org/3/5/1/
20. Helmholtz H (1867). Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik. Voss, Hamburg
21. Wallach H and O'Connell D (1953). The kinetic depth effect. J Exp Psychol 45: 205-217
22. Wallach H, Stanton J and Becker D (1974). The compensation for movement-produced changes in object orientation. Percept Psychophys 15: 339-343
23. Weiss Y, Simoncelli E and Adelson E (2002). Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nat Neurosci 5(6): 508-510
24. Wexler M (2003). Voluntary head movement and allocentric perception of space. Psychol Sci 14: 340-346
25. Wexler M, Lamouret I and Droulez J (2001a). The stationarity hypothesis: an allocentric criterion in visual perception. Vision Res 41: 3023-3037
26. Wexler M, Panerai F, Lamouret I and Droulez J (2001b). Self-motion and the perception of stationary objects. Nature 409: 85-88