Discriminating constant from variable angular velocities in structure from motion

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 60, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 747-760

  Domini, Fulvio ^a,b   Caudek, Corrado ^a   Turner, Jessica ^b   Favretto, Alessia ^c  

^a AREA Science Park ^*  (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY;

DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032113534     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206060     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. BRAUNSTEIN, M. L., HOFFMAN, D. D., & POLLICK, F. E. (1990). Discriminating rigid from nonrigid motion: Minimum points and views. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 205-214.
2. CAUDEK, C., & DOMINI, F. (1998). Perceived orientation of axis of rotation in structure-from-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 609-621.
3. CORTESE, J. M., & ANDERSEN, G. J. (1991). Recovery of 3-D shape from deforming contours. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 315-327.
4. DOMINI, F., CAUDEK, C., & GERBINO, W. (1995). Perception of surface attitude in structure from motion displays. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 36, 1694.
5. DOMINI, F., CAUDEK, C., & PROFFITT, D. R. (1997). Misperceptions of angular velocities influence the perception of rigidity in the kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1111-1129.
6. HILDRETH, E. (1984). The measurement of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. HOFFMAN, D. D. (1982). Inferring local surface orientation from motion fields. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 72, 888-892.
8. HOFFMAN, D. D., & BENNETT, B. (1985). Inferring the relative 3-D positions of two moving points. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2, 350-353.
9. HOFFMAN, D. D., & BENNETT, B. (1986). The computation of structure from fixed axis motion: Rigid structures. Biological Cybernetics, 54, 71-83.
10. KAISER, M. K. (1990). Angular velocity discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 149-156.
11. KAISER, M. K., & CALDERONE, J. B. (1991). Factors influencing perceived angular velocity. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 428-434.
12. KOENDERINK, J. J. (1986). Optic flow. Vision Research, 26, 161-179.
13. KOENDERINK, J. J., & VAN DOORN, A. J. (1975). Invariant properties of the motion parallax field due to the movement of rigid bodies relative to an observer. Optica Acta, 22, 773-791.
14. KOENDERINK, J. J., & VAN DOORN, A. J. (1976). Local structure of movement parallax of the plane. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 66, 717-723.
15. LITER, J. C., BRAUNSTEIN, M. L., & HOFFMAN, D. D. (1993). Inferring structure from motion in 2-view and multi-view displays. Perception, 22, 1441-1465.
16. LITER, J. C., BRAUNSTEIN, M. L., & HOFFMAN, D. D. (1994). Detection of one versus two objects in structure from motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 11, 3162-3166.
17. MARASCUILO, L. A. (1970). Extensions of the significance test for one-parameter signal detection hypotheses. Psychometrika, 35, 237-243.
18. MCKEE, S. P. (1981). A local mechanism for differential velocity detection. Vision Research, 21, 491-500.
19. NORMAN, J. F., & TODD, J. T. (1994). Perception of rigid motion in depth from the optical deformations of shadows and occlusion boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 344-356.
20. PETERSIK, J. T. (1991). Perception of three-dimensional angular rotation. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 465-474.
21. TODD, J. T., AKERSTROM, R. A., REICHEL, F. D., & HAYES, W. (1988). Apparent rotation in three-dimensional space: Effects of temporal, spatial, and structural factors. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 179-188.
22. TODD, J. T., & BRESSAN, P. (1990). The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics. 48, 419-430.
23. TODD, J. T., & NORMAN, J. F. (1991). The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 509-523.
24. ULLMAN, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. WINER, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.