The evolution and evolutionary consequences of marginal thermostability in proteins

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 79, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1396-1407

  Goldstein, Richard A ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Molecular evolution; Neutral evolution; Protein evolution; Protein thermodynamics; Unstructured proteins

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; DENATURATION; GENE MUTATION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STABILITY; SIMULATION; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; THERMOSTABILITY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUTATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEINS; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 79954542203     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22964     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Elena SF, Lenski RE. Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 2003; 4: 457-469.
2. Godfrey-Smith P. Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
3. Dill KA, Bromberg S, Yue K, Fiebig KM, Yee DP, Thomas PD, Chan HS. Principles of protein folding-a perspective from exact simple models. Protein Sci 1995; 4: 561-602.
4. Taverna DM, Goldstein RA. Why are proteins marginally stable? Proteins 2002; 46: 105-109.
5. Williams PD, Pollock DD, Goldstein RG. Functionality and the evolution of marginal stability in proteins: inferences from lattice simulations. Evol Bioinform Online 2006; 2: 1-11.
6. Williams PD, Pollock DD, Blackburne BP, Goldstein RA. Assessing the accuracy of ancestral protein reconstruction methods. PLoS Comput Biol 2006; 2: e69.
7. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromol 1985; 18: 534-552.
8. Mok YK, Kay CM, Kay LE, Forman-Kay J. NOE data demonstrating a compact unfolded state for an SH3 domain under non-denaturing conditions. J Mol Biol 1999; 289: 619-638.
9. Shan B, Eliezer D, Raleigh DP. The unfolded state of the C-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein L9 contains both native and non-native structure. Biochemistry 2009; 48: 4707-4719.
10. Shortle D. The denatured state (the other half of the folding equation) and its role in protein stability. FASEB J 1996; 10: 27-34.
11. Lindqvist Y, Johansson E, Kaija H, Vihko P, Schneider G. Three-dimensional structure of a mammalian purple acid phosphatase at 2.2 A resolution with a mu-(hydr)oxo bridged di-iron center. J Mol Biol 1999; 291: 135-147.
12. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16: 111-120.
13. Crow JF, Kimura M. An introduction to population genetics theory. New York: Harper & Row; 1970.
14. Kimura M. Some problems of stochastic processes in genetics. Ann Math Stat 1957; 28: 882-901.
15. Kimura M. On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics 1962; 47: 713-719.
16. Somero GN. Proteins and temperature. Ann Rev Physiol 1995; 57: 43-68.
17. Zavodszky P, Kardos J, Svingor A, Petsko GA. Adjustment of conformational flexibility is a key event in the thermal adaptation of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 7406-7411.
18. Tokuriki N, Stricher F, Schymkowitz J, Serrano L, Tawfik DS. The stability effects of protein mutations appear to be universally distributed. J Mol Biol 2007; 369: 1318-1332.
19. Bloom JD, Labthavikul ST, Otey CR, Arnold FH. Protein stability promotes evolvability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 5869-5874.
20. Bloom JD, Raval A, Wilke CO. Thermodynamics of neutral protein evolution. Genetics 2007; 175: 255-266.
21. Bloom JD, Silberg JJ, Wilke CO, Drummond DA, Adami C, Arnold FH. Thermodynamic prediction of protein neutrality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 606-611.
22. Beadle BM, Shoichet BK. Structural bases of stability-function tradeoffs in enzymes. J Mol Biol 2002; 321: 285-296.
23. Daniel RM, Dunn RV, Finney JL, Smith JC. The role of dynamics in enzyme activity. Ann Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2003; 32: 69-92.
24. DePristo MA, Weinreich DM, Hartl DL. Missense meanderings in sequence space: a biophysical view of protein evolution. Nat Rev Genet 2005; 6: 678-687.
25. Fields PA. Review: protein function at thermal extremes: balancing stability and flexibility. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 2001; 129: 417-431.
26. Schreiber C, Buckle AM, Fersht AR. Stability and function: two constraints in the evolution of barstar and other proteins. Structure 1994; 2: 945-951.
27. Giver L, Gershenson A, Freskgard PO, Arnold FH. Directed evolution of a thermostable esterase. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 12809-12813.
28. Serrano L, Day AG, Fersht AR. Step-wise mutation of barnase to binase-a procedure for engineering increased stability of proteins and an experimental-analysis of the evolution of protein stability. J Mol Biol 1993; 233: 305312.
29. Van den Burg B, Vriend G, Veltman OR, Eijsink VGH. Engineering an enzyme to resist boiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 2056-2060.
30. Zhao HM, Arnold FH. Directed evolution converts subtilisin E into a functional equivalent of thermitase. Protein Eng 1999; 12: 47-53.
31. Tokuriki N, Stricher F, Serrano L, Tawfik DS. How protein stability and new functions trade off. PLoS Comput Biol 2008; 4: e1000002.
32. Bastolla U, Moya A, Viguera E, van Ham RC. Genomic determinants of protein folding thermodynamics in prokaryotic organisms. J Mol Biol 2004; 343: 1451-1466.
33. Mendez R, Fritsche M, Porto M, Bastolla U. Mutation bias favors protein folding stability in the evolution of small populations. PLoS Comput Biol 2010; 6: e1000767.
34. Lambert JD, Moran NA. Deleterious mutations destabilize ribosomal RNA in endosymbiotic bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 4458-4462.
35. Dunker AK, Obradovic Z, Romero P, Garner EC, Brown CJ. Intrinsic protein disorder in complete genomes. Genome Inform Workshop Genome Inform 2000; 11: 161-171.
36. Tokuriki N, Oldfield CJ, Uversky VN, Berezovsky IN, Tawfik DS. Do viral proteins possess unique biophysical features? Trends Biochem Sci 2009; 34: 53-59.
37. Bershtein S, Segal M, Bekerman R, Tokuriki N, Tawfik D. Robustness-epistasis link shapes the fitness landscape of a randomly drifting protein. Nature 2006; 444: 929-932.
38. Tokuriki N, Tawfik DS. Stability effects of mutations and protein evolvability. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009; 19: 596-604.
39. Drummond DA, Wilke CO. Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell 2008; 134: 341-352.
40. Drummond DA, Wilke CO. The evolutionary consequences of erroneous protein synthesis. Nat Rev Genet 2009; 10: 715-724.
41. Wilke CO, Bloom JD, Drummond DA, Raval A. Predicting the tolerance of proteins to random amino acid substitution. Biophys J 2005; 89: 3714-3720.
42. Goodey NM, Benkovic SJ. Allosteric regulation and catalysis emerge via a common route. Nat Chem Biol 2008; 4: 474-482.
43. Kirschner M, Gerhart J. Evolvability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 8420-8427.
44. Babajide A, Farber R, Hofacker IL, Inman J, Lapedes AS, Stadler PF. Exploring protein sequence space using knowledge-based potentials. J Theor Biol 2001; 212: 35-46.
45. Bornberg-Bauer E. How are model protein structures distributed in sequence space? Biophys J 1997; 73: 2393-2403.
46. Bryan PN, Orban J. Proteins that switch folds. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2010; 20: 482-488.
47. James LC, Tawfik DS. Conformational diversity and protein evolution-a 60-year-old hypothesis revisited. Trends Biochem Sci 2003; 28: 361-368.
48. Tokuriki N, Tawfik DS. Protein dynamism and evolvability. Science 2009; 324: 203-207.
49. Baldwin JM. A new factor in evolution. Am Nat 1896; 30: 441-451.
50. Morgan CL. On modification and variation. Science 1896; 4: 733-740.
51. Osborn HL. Ontogenic and phylogenic variation. Science 1896; 4: 786-789.
52. Ancel LW, Fontana W. Plasticity, evolvability, and modularity in RNA. J Exp Zool 2000; 288: 242-283.