Sensitive detection of chemical-induced genotoxicity by the Cypridina secretory luciferase reporter assay, using DNA repair-deficient strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Yeast

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 265-278

  Ochi, Yukari ^a   Sugawara, Harumi ^a   Iwami, Mio ^a   Tanaka, Megumi ^a   Eki, Toshihiko ^a  

^a TOYOHASHI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Antitumour compounds; Cypridina secretory luciferase; DNA repair; Gene deletion mutants; Genotoxicity; Yeast based reporter assay

Indexed keywords

ALKYLATING AGENT; BETA GALACTOSIDASE; CAMPTOTHECIN; CISPLATIN; CYPRIDINA SECRETORY LUCIFERASE; LUCIFERASE; METHYL METHANESULPHONATE; MITOMYCIN C; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL INDUCED GENOTOXICITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELETION MUTANT; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME ASSAY; ENZYME BLOOD LEVEL; FUNGAL STRAIN; GENOTOXICITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

DNA REPAIR; GENES, REPORTER; LUCIFERASES; MUTAGENICITY TESTS; MUTAGENS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CYPRIDINA; CYPRIDINA NOCTILUCA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 79953287015     PISSN: 0749503X     EISSN: 10970061     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/yea.1837     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Afanassiev V, Sefton M, Anantachaiyong T, et al. 2000. Application of yeast cells transformed with GFP expression constructs containing the RAD54 or RNR2 promoter as a test for the genotoxic potential of chemical substances. Mutat Res 464: 297-308.
2. Ames BN, Durston WE, Yamasaki E, Lee FD. 1973. Carcinogens are mutagens: a simple test system combining liver homogenates for activation and bacteria for detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70: 2281-2285.
3. Baynton K, Bresson-Roy A, Fuchs RP. 1998. Analysis of damage tolerance pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a requirement for Rev3 DNA polymerase in translesion synthesis. Mol Cell Biol 18: 960-966.
4. Beljanski V, Marzilli LG, Doetsch PW. 2004. DNA damage-processing pathways involved in the eukaryotic cellular response to anticancer DNA cross-linking drugs. Mol Pharmacol 65: 1496-1506.
5. Benton MG, Glasser NR, Palecek SP. 2008. Deletion of MAG1 and MRE11 enhances the sensitivity of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HUG1P- GFP promoter-reporter construct to genotoxicity. Biosens Bioelectron 24: 736-741.
6. Beranek DT. 1990. Distribution of methyl and ethyl adducts following alkylation with monofunctional alkylating agents. Mutat Res 231: 11-30.
7. Bianchi V, Pontis E, Reichard P. 1986. Changes of deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate pools induced by hydroxyurea and their relation to DNA synthesis. J Biol Chem 261: 16037-16042.
8. Boronat S, Piña B. 2006. Development of RNR3- and RAD54- GUS reporters for testing genotoxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Anal Bioanal Chem 386: 1625-1632.
9. Boulton SJ, Jackson SP. 1996. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku70 potentiates illegitimate DNA double-strand break repair and serves as a barrier to error-prone DNA repair pathways. EMBO J 15: 5093-5103.
10. Brendel M, Bonatto D, Strauss M, et al. 2003. Role of PSO genes in repair of DNA damage of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res 544: 179-193.
11. Broomfield S, Chow BL, Xiao W. 1998. MMS2, encoding a ubiquitin-conjugating-enzyme-like protein, is a member of the yeast error-free postreplication repair pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 5678-5683.
12. Burke D, Dawson D, Stearns T. 2000. Methods in Yeast Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
13. Cahill PA, Knight AW, Billinton N, et al. 2004. The GreenScreen genotoxicity assay: a screening validation programme. Mutagenesis 19: 105-119.
14. Chang M, Bellaoui M, Boone C, Brown GW. 2002. A genome-wide screen for methyl methanesulfonate-sensitive mutants reveals genes required for S phase progression in the presence of DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 16934-16939.
15. Chu G. 1994. Cellular responses to cisplatin. The roles of DNA-binding proteins and DNA repair. J Biol Chem 269: 787-790.
16. Coyle MB, Strauss B. 1970. Cell killing and the accumulation of breaks in the DNA of HEp-2 cells incubated in the presence of hydroxyurea. Cancer Res 30: 2314-2319.
17. Elledge SJ, Zhou Z, Allen JB, Navas TA. 1993. DNA damage and cell cycle regulation of ribonucleotide reductase. Bioessays 15: 333-339.
18. Emter R, Heese-Peck A, Kralli A. 2002. ERG6 and PDR5 regulate small lipophilic drug accumulation in yeast cells via distinct mechanisms. FEBS Lett 521: 57-61.
19. Endo-Ichikawa Y, Kohno H, Tokunaga R, Taketani S. 1995. Induction in the gene RNR3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae upon exposure to different agents related to carcinogenesis. Biochem Pharmacol 50: 1695-1699.
20. Friedberg EC, Walker G, Siede W. 1995. DNA Repair and Mutagenesis. American Society for Microbiology Press: Washington, DC.
21. Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, et al. 2000. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 11: 4241-4257.
22. Giaever G, Flaherty P, Kumm J, et al. 2004. Chemogenomic profiling: identifying the functional interactions of small molecules in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 793-798.
23. Gietz D, St Jean A, Woods RA, Schiestl RH. 1992. Improved method for high efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells. Nucleic Acids Res 20: 1425.
24. Grossmann KF, Ward AM, Matkovic ME, et al. 2001. S. cerevisiae has three pathways for DNA interstrand crosslink repair. Mutat Res 487: 73-83.
25. 2 after cisplatin treatment. Mutat Res 461: 1-13.
26. Hartwell LH, Szankasi P, Roberts CJ, et al. 1997. Integrating genetic approaches into the discovery of anticancer drugs. Science 278: 1064-1068.
27. Hofmann RM, Pickart CM. 1999. Noncanonical MMS2-encoded ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme functions in assembly of novel polyubiquitin chains for DNA repair. Cell 96: 645-653.
28. Ichikawa K, Eki T. 2006. A novel yeast-based reporter assay system for the sensitive detection of genotoxic agents mediated by a DNA damage-inducible LexA-GAL4 protein. J Biochem 139: 105-112.
29. Interthal H, Heyer WD. 2000. MUS81 encodes a novel helix-hairpin-helix protein involved in the response to UV- and methylation-induced DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet 263: 812-827.
30. Jelinsky SA, Samson LD. 1999. Global response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to an alkylating agent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 1486-1491.
31. Jia X, Xiao W. 2003. Compromised DNA repair enhances sensitivity of the yeast RNR3-lacZ genotoxicity testing system. Toxicol Sci 75: 82-88.
32. Jia X, Zhu Y, Xiao W. 2002. A stable and sensitive genotoxic testing system based on DNA damage-induced gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res 519: 83-92.
33. Kaliraman V, Mullen JR, Fricke WM, et al. 2001. Functional overlap between Sgs1-Top3 and the Mms4-Mus81 endonuclease. Genes Dev 15: 2730-2740.
34. Kanjou N, Nagao A, Ohmiya Y, Ohgiya S. 2007. Yeast mutant with efficient secretion identified by a novel secretory reporter, Cluc. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 358: 429-434.
35. Kolodner RD, Marsischky GT. 1999. Eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair. Curr Opin Genet Dev 9: 89-96.
36. Leduc A, He CH, Ramotar D. 2003. Disruption of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell-wall pathway gene SLG1 causes hypersensitivity to the antitumor drug bleomycin. Mol Genet Genom 269: 78-89.
37. Lee W, St Onge RP, Proctor M, et al. 2005. Genome-wide requirements for resistance to functionally distinct DNA-damaging agents. PLoS Genet 1: e24.
38. Lichtenberg-Frate H, Schmitt M, Gellert G, Ludwig J. 2003. A yeast-based method for the detection of cyto- and genotoxicity. Toxicol In Vitro 17: 709-716.
39. Liu X, Kramer JA, Swaffield JC, et al. 2008. Development of a high throughput yeast-based assay for detection of metabolically activated genotoxins. Mutat Res 653: 63-69.
40. Maeda K, Kosaka H, Yagishita K, Umezawa H. 1956. A new antibiotic, phleomycin. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 9: 82-85.
41. Melcher K, Sharma B, Ding WV, Nolden M. 2000. Zero background yeast reporter plasmids. Gene 247: 53-61.
42. Nakajima Y, Kobayashi K, Yamagishi K, et al. 2004. cDNA cloning and characterization of a secreted luciferase from the luminous Japanese ostracod, Cypridina noctiluca. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 68: 565-570.
43. Oda Y, Nakamura S, Oki I, et al. 1985. Evaluation of the new system (umu-test) for the detection of environmental mutagens and carcinogens. Mutat Res 147: 219-229.
44. Parsons AB, Brost RL, Ding H, et al. 2004. Integration of chemical-genetic and genetic interaction data links bioactive compounds to cellular target pathways. Nat Biotechnol 22: 62-69.
45. Pommier Y. 2009. DNA topoisomerase I inhibitors: chemistry, biology, and interfacial inhibition. Chem Rev 109: 2894-2902.
46. Prolla TA, Christie DM, Liskay RM. 1994. Dual requirement in yeast DNA mismatch repair for MLH1 and PMS1, two homologs of the bacterial mutL gene. Mol Cell Biol 14: 407-415.
47. Quillardet P, Huisman O, D'Ari R, Hofnung M. 1982. SOS chromotest, a direct assay of induction of an SOS function in Escherichia coli K-12 to measure genotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79: 5971-5975.
48. Ramotar D, Popoff SC, Gralla EB, Demple B. 1991. Cellular role of yeast Apn1 apurinic endonuclease/3'-diesterase: repair of oxidative and alkylation DNA damage and control of spontaneous mutation. Mol Cell Biol 11: 4537-4544.
49. Schiestl RH, Prakash S. 1990. RAD10, an excision repair gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is involved in the RAD1 pathway of mitotic recombination. Mol Cell Biol 10: 2485-2491.
50. Simon JA, Bedalov A. 2004. Yeast as a model system for anticancer drug discovery. Nat Rev Cancer 4: 481-492.
51. Simon JA, Szankasi P, Nguyen DK, et al. 2000. Differential toxicities of anticancer agents among DNA repair and checkpoint mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cancer Res 60: 328-333.
52. Sleigh MJ. 1976. The mechanism of DNA breakage by phleomycin in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res 3: 891-901.
53. Staleva L, Waltscheva L, Golovinsky E, Venkov P. 1996. Enhanced cell permeability increases the sensitivity of a yeast test for mutagens. Mutat Res 370: 81-89.
54. Symington LS. 2002. Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66: 630-670.
55. Tanaka N, Yamaguchi H, Umezawa H. 1963. Mechanism of action of phleomycin, a tumor-inhibitory antibiotic. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 10: 171-174.
56. Tochigi Y, Sato N, Sahara T, et al. 2010. Sensitive and convenient yeast reporter assay for high-throughput analysis by using a secretory luciferase from Cypridina noctiluca. Anal Chem 82: 5768-5776.
57. Tomasz M. 1995. Mitomycin C: small, fast and deadly (but very selective). Chem Biol 2: 575-579.
58. Ulrich HD, Jentsch S. 2000. Two RING finger proteins mediate cooperation between ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in DNA repair. EMBO J 19: 3388-3397.
59. Van Gompel J, Woestenborghs F, Beerens D, et al. 2005. An assessment of the utility of the yeast GreenScreen assay in pharmaceutical screening. Mutagenesis 20: 449-454.
60. Walmsley RM, Billinton N, Heyer WD. 1997. Green fluorescent protein as a reporter for the DNA damage-induced gene RAD54 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 13: 1535-1545.
61. Walsh L, Hastwell PW, Keenan PO, et al. 2005. Genetic modification and variations in solvent increase the sensitivity of the yeast RAD54- GFP genotoxicity assay. Mutagenesis 20: 317-327.
62. Weinert TA, Hartwell LH. 1988. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 241: 317-322.
63. Westerink WM, Stevenson JC, Lauwers A, et al. 2009. Evaluation of the Vitotox and RadarScreen assays for the rapid assessment of genotoxicity in the early research phase of drug development. Mutat Res 676: 113-130.
64. Winzeler EA, Shoemaker DD, Astromoff A, et al. 1999. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285: 901-906.
65. Wu HI, Brown JA, Dorie MJ, et al. 2004. Genome-wide identification of genes conferring resistance to the anticancer agents cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and mitomycin C. Cancer Res 64: 3940-3948.
66. Xiao W, Chow BL. 1998. Synergism between yeast nucleotide and base excision repair pathways in the protection against DNA methylation damage. Curr Genet 33: 92-99.
67. Xiao W, Chow BL, Hanna M, Doetsch PW. 2001. Deletion of the MAG1 DNA glycosylase gene suppresses alkylation-induced killing and mutagenesis in yeast cells lacking AP endonucleases. Mutat Res 487: 137-147.
68. Yu Z, Chen J, Ford BN, et al. 1999. Human DNA repair systems: an overview. Environ Mol Mutagen 33: 3-20.
69. Zhang M, Hanna M, Li J, et al. 2010. Creation of a hyperpermeable yeast strain to genotoxic agents through combined inactivation of PDR and CWP genes. Toxicol Sci 113: 401-411.