The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-analysis

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 23-55

  Kühberger, Anton ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041022383     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2781     Document Type: Article

References (177)

1. Aquino K., Steisel V., Kay A. The effects of resource distribution, voice, and decision framing on the provision of public goods. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 36:1992;665-687.
2. Arkes H. R., Blumer C. The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 35:1985;124-140.
3. Bangert-Drowns B. L. Review of developments in meta-analytic method. Psychological Bulletin. 99:1986;388-399.
4. Banks S. M., Salovey P., Greener S., Rothman A. J., Moyer A., Beauvais J., Epel E. The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychology. 14:1995;178-184.
5. Bateman T. S., Zeithaml C. P. The psychological context of strategic decisions: a model and convergent experimental findings. Strategic Management Journal. 10:1989;59-74.
6. Bazerman M. H., Magliozzi T., Neale M. A. Integrative bargaining in a competitive market. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 3:1985;294-313.
7. Block L. G., Keller P. A. When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior. Journal of Marketing Research. 32:1995;192-203.
8. Boettcher W. A. Context, methods, numbers, and words: Prospect theory in international relations. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 39:1995;561-583.
9. Bohm P., Lind H. A note on the robustness of a classical framing result. Special issue: Experimental economics. Journal of Economic Psychology. 13:1992;355-361.
10. Bottom W. P. Adaptive reference points in integrative bargaining. Contemporary issues in decision making. 1990;Elsevier, North-Holland. p. 429-447.
11. Bottom W. P., Studt A. Framing effects and the distributive aspect of integrative bargaining. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 56:1993;459-474.
12. Brewer M. B., Kramer R. M. Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 50:1986;543-549.
13. Brier V. M., Connell B. C. Ambiguity seeking in multiattribute decisions: Effects of optimism and message framing. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 7:1994;169-181.
14. Carey S. Conceptual change in childhood. 1985;MIT Press, Cambridge.
15. Casey J. T., Delquie P. Stated vs. implicit willingness to pay under risk. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 61:1995;123-137.
16. Chang O., Nichols D. R., Schultz J. J. Taxpayer attitudes toward tax audit risk. Journal of Economic Psychology. 8:1987;299-309.
17. Cooper H. M., Hedges L. V. The handbook of research synthesis. 1994;Sage, New York.
18. Christensen C., Heckerling P., Mackesy-Amiti M. E., Bernstein L. M., Elstein A. S. Framing bias among expert and novice physicians. Academic Medicine. 66:1991;76-78.
19. Christensen C., Heckerling P., Mackesy-Amiti M. E., Bernstein L. M., Elstein A. S. Pervasiveness of framing effects among physicians and medical students. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 8:1995;169-180.
20. Cohen M., Jaffray J. Y., Said T. Experimental comparison of individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty for gains and for losses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 39:1987;1-22.
21. Curley S. P., Yates J. F., Abrams R. A. Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 38:1986;230-256.
22. Davis M. A., Bobko P. Contextual effects on escalation processes in public sector decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 37:1986;121-138.
23. De Dreu C. K. W., Carnevale P. J. D., Emans B. J. M., van de Vliert E. Effects of gain-loss frames in negotiation: Loss aversion, mismatching, and frame adoption. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 60:1994;90-107.
24. De Dreu C. K. W., Emans B. J. M., Van de Vliert E. The influence of own cognitive and other's communicated gain or loss frame on negotiation behavior. International Journal of Conflict Management. 3:1992a;115-132.
25. De Dreu C. K. W., Emans B. J. M., Van de Vliert E. Frames of reference and cooperative social decision making. European Journal of Social Psychology. 22:1992b;297-302.
26. Diamond L., Lerch F. J. Fading frames - Data presentation and framing effects. Decision Sciences. 23:1992;1050-1071.
27. Dickson G. C. A. A comparison of attitudes towards risk among business managers. Journal of Occupational Psychology. 54:1981;157-164.
28. Duchon D., Dunegan K. J., Barton S. L. Framing the problem and making decisions - The facts are not enough. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 36:1989;25-27.
29. Duncan W. A., LaRue D., Reckers P. M. J. An empirical examination of the influence of selected economic and noneconomic variables on decision making by tax professionals. Advances in Taxation. 2:1989;91-106.
30. Dunegan K. J. Framing, cognitive modes, and image theory - Toward an understanding of a glass half full. Journal of Applied Psychology. 78:1993;491-503.
31. Elliott C. S., Archibald R. B. Subjective framing and attitudes towards risk. Journal of Economic Psychology. 10:1989;321-328.
32. Eraker S. A., Sox H. C. Assessment of patients' preferences for therapeutic outcomes. Medical Decision Making. 1:1981;29-39.
33. Erev I., Wallsten T. S. The effect of explicit probabilities on decision weights and on the reflection effect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 6:1993;221-241.
34. Fagley N. S. A note concerning reflection effects versus framing effects. Psychological Bulletin. 113:1993;451-452.
35. Fagley N. S., Miller P. M. The effects of decision framing on choice of risky vs certain options. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 39:1987;264-277.
36. Fagley N. S., Miller P. M. The effect of framing on choice: Interactions with risk-taking propensity, cognitive style, and sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 16:1990;496-510.
37. Fischer G. W., Kamlet M. S., Fienberg S. E., Schkade D. Risk preferences for gains and losses in multiple objective decision making. Management Science. 32:1986;1065-1086.
38. Fishburn P. C. Mean-risk analysis with risk associated with below-target returns. American Economic Review. 67:1977;116-126.
39. Fishburn P. C., Kochenberger G. A. Two-piece von Neumann-Morgenstern utility functions. Decision Sciences. 10:1979;503-518.
40. Fleishman J. A. The effects of decision framing and others' behavior on cooperation in a social dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 32:1988;162-180.
41. Friedman M., Savage L. J. The utility analysis of choices involving risk. Journal of Political Economy. 56:1948;279-304.
42. Frisch B. Reasons for framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 54:1993;399-429.
43. Ganzach Y., Karsahi N. Message framing and buying behavior: A field experiment. Journal of Business Research. 32:1995;11-17.
44. Gigerenzer G., Hoffrage U., Kleinbölting H. Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review. 98:1991;506-528.
45. Gigerenzer G., Hug K. Domain-specific reasoning: social contracts, cheating and perspective change. Cognition. 43:1992;127-171.
46. Glass G. V., McGraw B., Smith M. L. Meta-analysis in social research. 1981;Sage, Beverly Hills.
47. Goldstein W. M., Einhorn H. J. Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. Psychological Review. 94:1987;236-254.
48. Goldstein W. M., Weber E. U. Content and discontent: Indications and implications of domain specificity in preferential decision making. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. 32:1995;83-136.
49. Gregory R., Lichtenstein S., MacGregor D. The role of past states in determining reference points for policy decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 55:1993;195-206.
50. Grewal D., Gotlieb J., Marmorstein H. The moderating effects of message framing and source credibility on the price-perceived risk relationship. Journal of Consumer Research. 21:1994;145-153.
51. Hedges L. V., Olkin I. Statistical methods for meat-analysis. 1985;Academic Press, New York.
52. Hershey J. C., Schoemaker P. J. Prospect theory's reflection hypothesis: A critical examination. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 25:1980;395-418.
53. Highhouse S., Paese P. W. Problem domain and prospect frame: Choice under opportunity versus threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 22:1996;124-132.
54. Highhouse S., Paese P. W., Leatherberry T. Contrast effects on strategic issue planning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 65:1996;95-105.
55. Highhouse S., Yüce P. Perspectives, perceptions, and risk-taking behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 65:1996;159-167.
56. Hirschfeld L. A., Gelman S. A. Mapping the mind. 1994;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
57. Hogarth R. M., Einhorn H. J. Venture theory: A model of decision weights. Management Science. 36:1990;780-803.
58. Hollenbeck J. R., Ilgen D. R., Phillips J. M., Hedlund J. Decision risk in dynamic two-stage contexts: Beyond the status quo. Journal of Applied Psychology. 79:1994;592-598.
59. Huber V. L., Neale M. A., Northcraft G. B. Decision bias and personnel selection strategies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 40:1987;136-147.
60. Hughes K. K. Decision making by patients with breast cancer: The role of information in treatment selection. Oncology Nursing Forum. 20:1993;623-628.
61. Jacoby A., Baker G., Chadwick D., Johnson A. The impact of counseling with a practical statistical model on patients' decision-making about treatment for epilepsy: findings from a pilot study. Epilepsy Research. 16:1993;207-214.
62. Jackson S. E., Dutton J. E. Discerning threats and opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly. 33:1988;370-387.
63. Johnson B. T. DSTAT: Software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures (Version 1.10). 1989, 1993;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
64. Johnson E. J., Hershey J., Meszaros J., Kunreuther H. Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 7:1993;35-51.
65. Jou J. W., Shanteau J., Harris R. J. An information processing view of framing effects: The role of causal schemas in decision making. Memory & Cognition. 24:1996;1-15.
66. Jungermann H., Schütz H., Theiβen A., Doefke C. Determinanten, Korrelate und Konsequenzen der Beurteilung von Risiken fur die eigene Gesundheit. Zeitschrift für Arbeitsund Organisationspsychologie. 35:1991;59-67.
67. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 47:1979;263-291.
68. Kahneman D., Tversky A. The psychology of preferences. Scientific American. 246:1982;160-173.
69. Kameda T., Davis J. H. The function of the reference point in individual and group risk decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 46:1990;55-76.
70. Komorita S. S. Cooperative choice in decomposed social dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 13:1987;53-63.
71. Komorita S. S., Carnevale P. Motivational arousal vs. decision framing in social dilemmas. Liebrand W., Messick D., Wilke H. Social dilemmas. 1992;209-223 Pergamon, New York.
72. Kopp J. Zur Stabilität von Framing-Effekten bei Entscheidungssituationen - eine Replikation und Modifikation des "Asian disease problem" von Kahneman und Tversky. Zeitschrift fuer Sozialpsychologie. 1995;107-118.
73. Kramer R. M. Windows of vulnerability or cognitive illusions? Cognitive processes and the nuclear arms race. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 25:1989;79-100.
74. Krzysztofowicz R. Strength of preference and risk attitude in utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 31:1983;88-113.
75. Kühberger A. The framing of decisions: A new look at old problems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 62:1995;230-240.
76. Kühberger A. Theoretical conceptions of framing effects in risky decisions. Ranyard R., Crozier W. R., Svenson O. Decision making: cognitive models and explanations. 1997;Routledge, London.
77. Kühberger, A. Huber, O. Decision Making with Missing Information: A Verbal Protocol Study, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology.
78. Lalor K. M., Hailey B. J. The effects of message framing and feelings of susceptibility to breast cancer on reported frequency of breast self-examination. International Quarterly of Community Health Education. 10:1990;183-192.
79. Lant T. K., Montgomery D. B. Learning from strategic success and failure. Journal of Business Research. 15:1987;503-517.
80. LaRue D., Reckers P. M. J. An empirical examination of the influence of selected factors on professional tax preparers' decision processes. Advances in Accounting. 7:1989;37-50.
81. Lauver D., Rubin M. Message framing, dispositional optimism, and follow-up for abnormal Papanicolaou tests. Research in Nursing and Health. 13:1990;199-207.
82. Leclerc F., Schmitt B. H., Dubé L. Waiting time and decision making: Is time like money. Journal of Consumer Research. 22:1995;110-119.
83. Lerman C., Ross E., Boyce A., Gorchov P. M. The impact of mailing psychoeducational materials to women with abnormal mammograms. American Journal of Public Health. 82:1992;729-730.
84. Levin I. P. Associative effects of information framing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 25:1987;85-86.
85. Levin I. P., Chapman D. P. Risk taking, frame of reference, and characterization of victim groups in AIDS treatment decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 26:1990;421-434.
86. Levin I. P., Chapman D. P. Risky decision making and allocation of resources for leukemia and AIDS programs. Health Psychology. 12:1993;110-117.
87. Levin I. P., Johnson R. D., Davis M. L. How information frame influences risky decisions: Between-subjects and within-subject comparisons. Journal of Economic Psychology. 8:1987;43-54.
88. Levin I. P., Johnson R. D., Deldin P. J., Carstens L. M., Cressey L. J., Davis C. R. Framing effects in decisions with completely and incompletely described alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 38:1986;8-64.
89. Levin I. P., Johnson R. D., Russo C. P., Deldin P. J. Framing effects in judgment tasks with varying amounts of information. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 36:1985;362-377.
90. Li S., Adams A. S. Is there something more important behind framing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 62:1995;216-219.
91. Loke W. H., Tan K. F. Effects of framing and missing information in expert and novice judgment. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 30:1992;187-190.
92. Maheswaran D., Meyers-Levy J. The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research. 27:1990;361-367.
93. Mannix E. A., Tinsley C. H., Bazerman M. Negotiating over time: Impediments to integrative solutions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 62:1995;241-251.
94. Mano H. Risk-taking, framing effects, and affect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 57:1994;38-58.
95. March J. G., Shapira Z. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science. 33:1987;1404-1418.
96. Markowitz H. The utility of wealth. Journal of Political Economy. 60:1952;151-158.
97. Marteau T. M. Framing of information: Its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients. British Journal of Social Psychology. 28:1989;89-94.
98. Matsuda N., Ihara J., Kusumi T. Belief, preference and willingness under ambiguity. Japanese Psychological Research. 36:1994;29-40.
99. Maule A. J. Positive and negative decision frames: A verbal protocol analysis of the Asian disease problem of Tversky and Kahneman. Montgomery H., Svenson O. Process and structure in human decision making. 1989;163-180 Wiley, Chichester.
100. Maule A. J. Framing elaborations and their effects on choice behaviour: a comparison across problem isomorphs and subjects with different levels of expertise. Caverni J.-P., Bar-Hillel M., Barron H., Jungermann H. Contributions to decision making-I. 1994;281-300 North-Holland, Amsterdam.
101. McCusker C., Carnevale P. J. Framing in resource dilemmas: Loss aversion and the moderating effects of sanctions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 6:1995;190-201.
102. McDaniel W. C., Sistrunk F. Management dilemmas and decisions: Impact of framing and anticipated responses. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 35:1991;21-42.
103. McGuire T. W., Kiesler S., Siegel J. Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 52:1987;917-930.
104. McNeil B. J., Pauker S. G., Sox H. C., Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. The New England Journal of Medicine. 306:1982;1259-1262.
105. Meyerowitz B. E., Chaiken S. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination. Attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 52:1987;500-510.
106. Miller P. M., Fagley N. S. The effects of framing, problem variations, and providing rationale on choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 17:1991;517-522.
107. Neale M. A., Bazerman M. H. The effects of framing and negotiator overconfidence on bargaining behaviors and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal. 28:1985;34-49.
108. Neale M. A., Bazerman M. H., Northcraft G. B., Alperson C. Choice shift effects in group decisions: A decision bias perspective. International Journal of Small Group Research. March, 1986;33-42.
109. Neale M. A., Huber V. L., Northcraft G. B. The framing of negotiations: Contextual versus task frames. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 39:1987;228-241.
110. Newberry K. J., Reckers P. M. J., Wyndelts R. W. An examination of tax practitioner decisions: The role of preparer sanctions and framing effects associated with client condition. Journal of Economic Psychology. 14:1993;439-452.
111. Nightingale S. D. Risk preference and laboratory use. Medical Decision Making. 7:1987;168-172.
112. Nightingale S. D., Grant M. Risk preference and decision making in critical care situations. Chest. 93:1988;684-687.
113. O'Connor A. M. C., Boyd N. F., Trichler D. L., Kriukov Y., Sutherland H., Till J. E. Eliciting preferences for alternative cancer drug treatments. Medical Decision Making. 5:1985;453-463.
114. Olekalns M., Frey B. F. Market forces, negotiator frames and transaction outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology. 24:1994;403-416.
115. Olszanski R., Lewicka M. Risk preferences for gains and losses in depressed and non-depressed subjects. Polish Psychological Bulletin. 19:1988;77-89.
116. Osborn R. N., Jackson D. H. Leaders, riverboat gamblers, or purposeful unintended consequences in the management of complex, dangerous technologies. Academy of Management Journal. 31:1988;924-947.
117. Paese P. W. Effect of framing on actual time allocation decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 61:1995;67-76.
118. Paese P. W., Bieser M., Tubbs M. E. Framing Effects and Choice Shifts in-Group Decision-Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 56:1993;149-165.
119. Payne J. W., Laughhunn D. J., Crum R. Translation of gambles and aspiration level effects in risky choice behavior. Management Science. 26:1980;1039-1060.
120. Payne J. W., Laughhunn D. J., Crum R. Multiattribute risky choice behavior: The editing of complex prospects. Management Science. 30:1984;1350-1361.
121. Pany K., Reckers P. M. J. With- vs. Between-subjects experimental designs: A study of demand effects. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 7:1987;39-53.
122. Perner, J. Gschaider, A. Kühberger, A. Schrofner, S. Predicting others through simulation or by theory? A method to decide, Mind & Language.
123. Puto C. P. The framing of buying decisions. Journal of Consumer Research. 14:1987;301-315.
124. Qualls W. J., Puto C. P. Organizational climate and decision framing: An integrated approach to analyzing industrial buying decisions. Journal of Marketing Research. 26:1989;179-192.
125. Quattrone G. A., Tversky A. Contrasting rational and psychological analyses of political choice. American Political Science Review. 82:1988;719-736.
126. Reyna V. F, Brainerd C. J. Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in choice: Gist extraction, truncation, and conversion. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 4:1991;249-262.
127. Reyna V. F., Ellis S. C. Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in children's risky decision making. Psychological Science. 5:1994;275-279.
128. Ritov I., Baron J., Hershey J. C. Framing effects in the evaluation of multiple risk reduction. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 6:1993;145-159.
129. Robben H. S. Decision frame and opportunity as determinants of tax cheating: An international experimental study. Journal of Economical Psychology. 11:1990;341-364.
130. Rosenthal R. The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin. 86:1979;638-641.
131. Rosenthal R. Meta-analytic procedures for social research. 1991;Sage, London.
132. Rosenthal R., Rosnow R. L. Essentials of behavioral research. 1991;McGraw-Hill, New York.
133. Rosenthal R., Rubin D. B. Comparing effect sizes of independent sdudies. Psychological Bulletin. 92:1982;500-504.
134. Roszkowski M. J., Snelbecker G. E. Effects of framing on measures of risk tolerance: Financial planners are not immune. Journal of Behavioral Economics. 19:1991;237-246.
135. Rothman A. J., Salovey P., Antone C., Keough K., Martin C. D. The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 29:1993;408-433.
136. Rowe D., Puto C. P. Do consumers' reference points affect their buying decisions. Advances in Consumer Research. 14:1987;182-187.
137. Rutte C. G., Wilke H. A., Messick D. M. The effects of framing social dilemmas as give-some or take-some games. British Journal of Social Psychology. 26:1987;103-108.
138. Rybash J. M., Roodin P. A. The framing heuristic influences judgments about younger and older adults' decision to refuse medical treatment. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 3:1991;171-180.
139. Samuelson W., Zeckhauser R. Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1:1988;7-59.
140. Sanders D. L., Wyndelts R. W. An examination of tax practitioners' decisions under uncertainty. Advances in Taxation. 2:1989;41-72.
141. Schadewald M. S. Reference point effects in taxpayer decision making. Journal of the American Taxation Association. 1989;68-84.
142. Schepanski A., Kelsey D. Testing for framing effects in taxpayer compliance decisions. Journal of the American Taxation Association. 1990;60-77.
143. Schepanski A., Shearer T. A prospect theory account of the income tax withholding phenomenon. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 63:1995;174-186.
144. Schneider S. L. Framing and conflict: Aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 18:1992;1040-1057.
145. Schoorman F. D., Mayer R. C., Douglas C. A., Hetrick C. T. Escalation of commitment and the framing effect: An empirical investigation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 24:1994;509-528.
146. Schurr P. H. Effects of gain and loss decision frames on risky purchase decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology. 72:1987;351-358.
147. Sebora T. C., Cornwall J. R. Expected utility theory vs. prospect theory: Implications for strategic decision makers. Journal of Managerial Issues. 7:1995;41-61.
148. Shafir E. B., Osherson D. N., Smith E. E. The advantage model: A comparative theory of evaluation and choice under risk. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 55:1993;325-378.
149. Shelley M. K., Omer T. C. Intertemporal framing issues in management compensation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 66:1996;42-58.
150. Sitkin S. B. Learning from failure: The strategy of small losses. Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Research in organizational behavior. 14:1992;231-266 JAI Press, Greenwich.
151. Sitkin S. B., Pablo A. L. Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy on Management Review. 17:1992;9-38.
152. Sitkin S. B., Weingart L. R. Determinants of risky decision-making behavior: A test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity. Academy of Management Journal. 38:1995;1573-1592.
153. Smith S. M., Levin I. P. Need for cognition and choice framing effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 9:1996;283-290.
154. Smith S. M., Petty R. E. Message framing and persuasion: A message processing analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 22:1996;257-268.
155. Staw B. M., Sandelands L. E., Dutton J. E. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly. 26:1981;501-524.
156. Steffen V. J., Sternberg L., Teegarden L. A., Shepherd K. Practice and persuasive frame: Effects on beliefs, intention, and performance of a cancer self-examination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 24:1994;897-925.
157. Svenson O., Benson III L. Framing and time pressure in decision making. Svenson O., Maule A. J. Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. 1993;133-144 Plenum Press, New York.
158. Svyantek D. J., DeShon R. P., Siler M. T. The illusion of certainty: A catastrophe model of decision framing. Current Psychology Research and Reviews. 10:1991;199-209.
159. Takemura K. Effect of decision time on framing of decision: A case for risky choice behaviors. Psychologia - An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient. 35:1992;180-185.
160. Takemura K. The effect of decision frame and decision justification on risky choice. Japanese Psychological Research. 35:1993;36-40.
161. Takemura K. Influence of elaboration on the framing of decision. Journal of Psychology. 128:1994;33-39.
162. Tindale R. S., Sheffey S., Scott L. A. Framing and group decision-making - Do cognitive changes parallel preference changes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 55:1993;470-485.
163. Toland A., O'Neill P. A test of prospect theory. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 4:1983;53-56.
164. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 211:1981;453-458.
165. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business. 59:1986;251-278.
166. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 5:1992;297-323.
167. Van der Pligt J., Van Schie E. Frames of reference, judgment and preference. Stroebe W., Hewstone M. European review of social psychology. 1:1990;61-80 Wiley, New York.
168. Van Schie E. C. M., Van der Pligt J. Problem representation, frame preference, and risky choice. Acta Psychologica. 75:1990;243-259.
169. Van Schie E. C. M., Van der Pligt J. Influencing risk preference in decision making: The effects of framing and salience. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 63:1995;264-275.
170. Wang X. T. Framing effects: Dynamics and task domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 68:1996;145-157.
171. Wang X. T., Johnston V. S. Perceived social context and risk preference: A re-examination of framing effects in a life-death decision problem. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 8:1995;279-293.
172. Wegener D. T., Petty R. E., Klein D. J. Effects of mood on high elaboration attitude change: The mediating role of likelihood judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology. 24:1994;25-43.
173. Westenberg M.R. M., Koele P. Response modes and decision strategies. Borcherding K., Larichev O. I., Messick D. M. Contemporary issues in decision making. 1990;159-170 Elsevier, North Holland.
174. Wiener J. L., Gentry J. W., Miller R. K. The framing of the insurance purchase decision. Advances in Consumer Research. 13:1986;251-256.
175. Wilson D. K., Kaplan R. M., Schneiderman L. J. Framing of decisions and selections of alternatives in health care. Social Behaviour. 2:1987;51-59.
176. Wilson D. K., Wallston K. A., King J. E. Effect of contract framing, motivation to quit, and self-efficacy on smoking reduction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 20:1990;531-547.
177. Zaat J. O., Van Eijk J. T. General practitioners' uncertainty, risk preference, and the use of laboratory tests. Medical Care. 30:1992;846-854.