Personifying the radical: How news framing polarizes security concerns and tolerance judgments

Human Communication Research

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 337-364

  Keum, Heejo ^a   Hillback, Elliott D ^b   Rojas, Hernando ^b   De Zuniga, Homero Gil ^b   Shah, Dhavan V ^b   McLeod, Douglas M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26444440433     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: 14682958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/hcr/31.3.337     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ball-Rokeach, S. J., & Loges, W. E. (1994). Choosing equality: The correspondence between attitudes about race and the value of equality. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 9-19.
2. Ball-Rokeach, S. J., & Loges, W. E. (1996). Making choices: Media roles in the construction of value choices. In C. Seligman & M. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 277-298). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 27-51.
4. Bobo, L. & Licari, F. (1989). Education and political tolerance: Testing the effects of cognitive sophistication and target group affect. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 285-308.
5. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
6. Chong, D. (1994). Tolerance and social adjustment to new norms and practices. Political Behavior, 16, 21-53.
7. Gaertner, L., & Insko, C.A. (2001). On the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm: Norms as moderators of the expression of intergroup bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 143-154.
8. Goldberg, M. (2004). Lost liberties: Outlawing dissent. Salon. Retrieved from http://www.salonmag.com/news/feature/2004/02/11/cointelpro/index_np.html
9. Golebiowska, E. A. (1996). The "pictures in our heads" and individual-targeted tolerance. The Journal of Politics, 58(4), 1010-1034.
10. Green, J. C., & Guth, J. L. (1991). Religion, representatives, and roll calls. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 16, 571-584.
11. Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103(2), 336-355.
12. Hurwitz, J., & Mondak, J. J. (2002). Democratic principles, discrimination and political intolerance. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 93-118.
13. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1985). Public opinion and political action. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 659-741). New York: Random House.
16. Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
17. Krosnick, J. A., Berent, M. K., & Boninger, D. S. (1994). Pockets of responsibility in the American electorate: Findings of a research program on attitude importance. Political Communication, 11, 391-411.
18. Kuklinski, J. H., Riggle, E., Ottati, V. Schwarz, N., & Wyer, R. S. Jr. (1991). The cognitive and affective bases of political tolerance judgments. American Journal of Political Science, 35(1), 1-27.
19. Lakoff, G. (2004). Dow't think of an elephant: Know your values and frame the debate, White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing Company
20. Upset, S. M., & Raab, E. (1970). The politics of unreason: Right-wing extremism in America, 1790-1970. New York: Harper and Row.
21. Marcus, G. E., Sullivan, J. L., Theiss-Morse, E., & Wood, S., L. (1995). With malice towards some: How people make civil liberties judgments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. McLeod, D.M., & Hertog, J.K. (1999). Social control and the mass media's role in the regulation of protest groups: The communicative acts perspective. In D. Demers and K. Viswanath (Eds.) Mass media, social control and social change. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
23. Nelson, T., Clawson, R., & Oxley, Z. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. The American Political Science Review, 91, 567-583.
24. Ng, S. H. (1981). Equity theory and the allocation of rewards between groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 439-444.
25. Nunn, C. Z., Crockett, H. J., & Williams, J. A. (1978). Tolerance for nonconformity: A national survey of Americans' changing commitment to civil liberties. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
26. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. Barnett & F. Boster (Eds.) Progress in communication sciences (pp.173-212). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
27. Rabbie, J. M., Schot, J. C., & Visser, L. (1989). Social identity theory: A conceptual and empirical critique from the perspective of a behavioral interaction model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 171-202.
28. Shah, D. V. (2001). The collision of convictions: Values framing and value judgments. In R. P. Hart and D. Shaw (Eds.), Communication and U.S. elections: New agendas. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
29. Shah, D. V., Domke, D., & Wackman, D. B. (1996). To thine own self be true: Values, framing and voter decision-making strategies. Communication Research, 23, 509-560.
30. Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., Schmierbach, M., Zubric, J. (2004). The interplay of news frames on cognitive complexity. Human Communication Research, 30, 102-120.
31. Sotirovic, M., & McLeod, J. M. (2001). Values, communication behavior, and political participation. Political Communication, 18, 273-300.
32. Stouffer, S. A., (1963). Communism, conformity and civil liberties: A cross-section of the nation speaks its mind. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith. Original work published 1955
33. Sullivan, J. L., & Marcus, G. E. (1988). A note on "trends in political tolerance." Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 26-32.
34. Sullivan, J. L., Marcus, G. E., Feldman, S., & Piereson, J. (1981). The sources of political tolerance: A multivariate analysis. The American Political Science Review, 75, 92-106.
35. Sullivan, J. L., Piereson J., & Marcus, G. E. (1979). An Alternative conceptualization of political tolerance: Illusory increases 1950s-1970s. The American Political Science Review, 73, 781-794.
36. Sullivan, J. L., Piereson, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1982). Political tolerance and American democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Susskind, J., Maurer, K., Thakkar, V., Hamilton, D.L., & Sherman, J.W. (1999). Perceiving individuals and groups: Expectancies, dispositional inferences, and causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 181-191.
38. Tajfel, H., & Billig, M. (1974). Familiarity and categorization in intergroup behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 159-170.
39. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp.33-47).
40. Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R. P., & Flarnent, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
41. Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 819-827.
42. Tetlock, P. E., Armor, D., & Peterson, R. S. (1994). The slavery debate in Antebellum America: Cognitive Style, value conflict, and the limits of compromise, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 115-126.
43. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York- Basil Blackwell.