Strategy and issue frames in election campaign coverage: A social cognitive account of framing effects

Journal of Communication

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 26-48

  Rhee, June Woong ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039329169     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1997.tb02715.x     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Bennett, W. L. (1988). News: The politics of illusion (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
2. Bennett, W. L., & Lawrence, R. G. (1995). News icons and the mainstreaming of social change. Journal of Communication, 45(3), 20-39.
3. Biocca, F. (1991). Viewer's mental models of political commercials: Towards a theory of the semantic processing of television. In F. Biocca (Ed.), Television and political advertising: Psychological processes (Vol. 1, pp. 27-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bleske, G. L. (1995, August). Schematic frames and reader learning: The effect of headlines. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educat on in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington, DC.
5. Bransford, J. D., & McCarrell, N. S. (1974). A sketch of a cognitive approach to comprehension. In W. B. Weimer & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes (pp. 189-229). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spirals of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Carley, K. (1993). Coding choices for textual analysis: A comparison of content analysis and map analysis. In P. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology, Vol. 23 (pp. 75-126). Oxford: Blackwell .
8. Collins, A., & Loftus, E. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407-448 .
9. Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1984). How people organize the political world: A schematic model. American Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 95-126.
10. Crigler, A. N., Just, M., & Neuman, W. R. (1994). Interpreting visual audio messages in television news. Journal of Communication, 44(4), 132-149.
11. Ellis, D. G. (1992). From language to communication. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Entman, R. M. (1991). Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6-27.
13. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
14. Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistics theory (pp. 1-88). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
15. Fiske, S. T., Lau, R. R., & Smith, R. A. (1990). On the varieties and utilities of political expertise. Social Cognition, 8(1), 31-48.
16. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.
18. Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on unclear power. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1-37.
20. Geer, J. G., & Kahn, K. F. (1993). Grabbing attention: An experimental investigation of headlines during campaigns. Political Communication, 10(2), 175-191
21. Graber, D. A. (1988). Processing the news: How people tame the information tide (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
22. Graber, D. A. (1990). Seeing Is remembering: How visuals contribute to learning from television news. Journal of Communication, 40(3), 134-155.
23. Graber, D. A. (1993). Mass media and American politics (4th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press .
24. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371-395 .
25. Gunter, B. (1987). Poor reception: Misunderstanding and forgetting broadcast news. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
27. Hamill, R., & Lodge, M. (1986). Cognitive consequences of political sophistication. In R. R. Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition: The 19th annual Carnegie symposium on cognition (pp. 69-93). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Hamill, R., Lodge, M., & Blake, F. (1985). The breadth, depth, and utility of class, partisan, and ideological schemata. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 850-870.
29. Hartley, J. (1982). Understanding news. London: Routledge.
30. Hastie, R. (1986). A primer of information processing theory for the political scientist. In R. R. Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition: The 19th annual Carnegie symposium on cognition (pp. 11-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Higgins, E. T., & Bargh, J. A. (1987). Social cognition and social perception. In M. R. Rosenweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 369-425). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
32. Hsu, M., & Price, V. (1993). Political expertise and affect. Communication Research, 20 (5), 671-695.
33. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. B. (1987). News that matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Jamieson, K. H. (1992). Dirty politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Jamieson, K. H., & Cappella, J. N. (1993, September). The effect of a strategy-based political news schema: A Markle Foundation project report. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association convention, Washington, DC.
37. Johnson, J. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1981). The effect of metaphor or political attitudes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2(4), 305-316.
38. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122-149.
40. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choice, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341-350.
41. Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. New York: Wiley.
42. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163-182.
43. Kintsch, W. (1993). Information accretion and reduction in text processing: Inferences. Discourse Processes, 16(1-2), 193-202.
44. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
45. Kuklinski, J. H., Luskin, R. C., & Bolland, J. (1991). Where is the schema? Going beyond the "S" word in political psychology. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1341-1356.
46. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. Lau, R. R. (1986). Political schemata, candidate evaluation, and voting behavior. In R. R. Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.). Political cognition: The 19th annual Carnegie symposium on cognition (pp. 95-126). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Livingstone, S. M. (1990). Making sense of television. New York Pergamon Press.
49. Luskin, P. C. (1987). Measuring political sophistication. American Journal of Political Science, 31(4), 856-899.
50. Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things passed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 11-151.
51. Mohler, P. P., & Zuell, C. (1990). TEXTPACK PC. Mannheim: ZUMA.
52. Neuman, W. R., Just, M., R., & Crigler, A. N. (1992). Common knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53. Olson, K. M. (1995). The function of form in newspapers' political conflict coverage: The New York Times' shaping of expectations in the Bitburg controversy. Political Communication, 12(1), 43-64.
54. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55-75.
55. Patterson, T. E. (1993). Out of order. New York: Knopf.
56. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in Communication Sciences (pp. 173-212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
57. Rhee, J. W., & Cappella, J. N. (1997). The role of political sophistication in learning from news: Measuring schema development. Communication Research, 24(3), 197-233.
58. Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In D. G. Bobrow & A. M. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding (pp. 211-236). New York: Academic Press.
59. Rumelhart, D. E. (1984). Understanding understanding. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension: Cognition, language and the structure of prose (pp. 1-20). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
60. Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & the PDP Research Group. (1986). Parallel distributed processing (Vol. 1.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Snyder, M., & Uranowitz, S. W. (1978). Reconstructing the past: Some cognitive consequences of person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(9), 941-950.
62. Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Integrative complexity of policy reasoning. In S. Kraus & R. M. Perloff (Eds.), Mass media and political thought (pp. 267-292). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
63. Tetlock, P. E. (1989). Structure and function in political belief systems. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 129-151). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study of construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
65. van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Semantic macrostructures and knowledge frames in discourse comprehension. In M.A. Just & P. A. Carpenter (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 3-32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
67. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
68. Wyer, R. S., Jr., & Martin, L. L. (1986). Person memory: The role of traits, group stereotypes, and specific behaviors in the cognitive representation of persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 (4), 661-675.