Field emission behavior of vertically aligned ZnO nanowire planar cathodes

Journal of Applied Physics

Volumn 109, Issue 5, 2011, Pages

  Semet, V ^a   Binh, Vu Thien ^a   Pauporte Th ^b   Joulaud, L ^c   Vermersch, F J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

^c SAINT GOBAIN RECHERCHE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

A-PLANE; CONDUCTIVE SURFACES; EXPERIMENTAL DATA ANALYSIS; FE PROPERTIES; FIELD-EMISSION BEHAVIOR; FOWLER-NORDHEIM PLOTS; LIMITING VALUES; MACROSCOPIC FIELDS; NANOWIRE ARRAYS; PHYSICAL PROCESS; PLANAR CATHODES; RAPID EVOLUTION; SCANNING ANODE FIELD EMISSION MICROSCOPIES; SHUT DOWN; STRONG ELECTRIC FIELDS; SURFACE BARRIER; TIP GEOMETRY; VERTICALLY ALIGNED; ZNO; ZNO NANOSTRUCTURES; ZNO NANOWIRES;

CHARGE TRANSFER; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; DATA REDUCTION; ELECTRIC FIELDS; ELECTRIC WIRE; FIELD EMISSION; FIELD EMISSION DISPLAYS; FIELD EMISSION MICROSCOPES; ION EXCHANGE; NANOWIRES; ZINC; ZINC OXIDE;

FIELD EMISSION CATHODES;

EID: 79953004160     PISSN: 00218979     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.3549837     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. C. A. Spindt, J. Appl. Phys. 39 (7), 3504 (1968). 10.1063/1.1656810
2. K. B. K. Teo, S. B. Lee, M. Chhowalla, V. Semet, Vu Thien Binh, O. Groening, M. Castignolles, A. Loiseau, G. Pirio, P. Legagneux, D. Pribat, D. G. Hasko, H. Ahmed, G. A. J. Amaratunga, and W. I. Milne, Nanotechnology 14 (2), 204 (2003). 10.1088/0957-4484/14/2/321
3. C. J. Lee, T. J. Lee, S. C. Lyu, Y. Zhang, H. Ruh, and H. J. Lee, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 (19), 3648 (2002). 10.1063/1.1518810 (Pubitemid 35427980)
4. E. McGlynn, M. O. Henry, and J. P. Mosnier, in The Oxford Handbook of Nanoscience and Technology, edited by, A. V. Narlikar, and, B. Y. Yu, (Oxford University Press, New York, 2010), Vol. II, pp. 523-571.
5. H. El Belghiti, T. Pauporté, and D. Lincot, Phys. Status Solidi A 205 (10), 2360 (2008). 10.1002/pssa.200879443
6. T. Pauporté, E. Jouanno, F. Pelle, B. Viana, and P. Aschehoug, J. Phys. Chem. C 113 (24), 10422 (2009). 10.1021/jp9010179
7. Y. H. Yang, B. Wang, N. S. Xu, and G. W. Yang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (4), 043108 (2006). 10.1063/1.2234838 (Pubitemid 44147592)
8. Y. B. Li, Y. Bando, and D. Golberg, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 (18), 3603 (2004). 10.1063/1.1738174
9. G. Meng, X. D. Fang, Y. K. Zhou, J. Seo, W. W. Dong, S. Hasegawa, H. Asahi, H. Tambo, M. G. Kong, and L. Li, J. Alloys Compd. 491 (1-2), 72 (2010). 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.11.038
10. J. C. She, Z. M. Xiao, Y. H. Yang, S. Z. Deng, J. Chen, G. W. Yang, and N. S. Xu, ACS Nano. 2 (10), 2015 (2008). 10.1021/nn800283u
11. Z. M. Xiao, J. C. She, Z. B. Li, Y. H. Yang, G. W. Yang, S. Z. Deng, J. Chen, and N. S. Xu, J. Appl. Phys. 106 (1), 014310 (2009). 10.1063/1.3168445
12. V. Semet, R. Mouton, and Vu Thien Binh., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 23 (2), 671 (2005). 10.1116/1.1857911 (Pubitemid 43126479)
13. T. Pauporté, G. Bataille, L. Joulaud, and F. J. Vermersch, J. Phys. Chem. C 114 (1), 194 (2010). 10.1021/jp9087145
14. O. Lupan and T. Pauporté, J. Cryst. Growth. 312 (16-17), 2454 (2010). 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.05.022
15. N. R. de Tacconi, C. R. Chenthamarakshan, K. Rajeshwar, T. Pauporte, and D. Lincot, Electrochem. Commun. 5 (3), 220 (2003). 10.1016/S1388-2481(03)00021-3
16. Vu Thien Binh, in The Oxford Handbook of Nanoscience and Technology, edited by, A. V. Narlikar, and, Y. Y. Fu, (Oxford University Press, New York, 2010), Vol. III, pp. 736-788.
17. R. G. Forbes, C. J. Edgcombe, and U. Valdre, Ultramicroscopy. 95 (1-4), 57 (2003). 10.1016/S0304-3991(02)00297-8 (Pubitemid 36132144)
18. F. H. Read and N. J. Bowring, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 519 (1-2), 305 (2004). 10.1016/j.nima.2003.11.167
19. K. Jacobi, G. Zwicker, and A. Gutmann, Surf. Sci. 141 (1), 109 (1984). 10.1016/0039-6028(84)90199-7
20. S. Li, J. L. Li, Q. Jiang, and G. W. Yang, J. Appl. Phys. 108 (2), 024302 (2010). 10.1063/1.3462407
21. C. Herring and M. H. Nichols, Rev. Mod. Phys. 21 (2), 185 (1949). 10.1103/RevModPhys.21.185
22. G. M. Fleming and J. E. Henderson, Phys Rev. 58 (10), 887 (1940). 10.1103/PhysRev.58.887
23. G. M. Fleming and J. E. Henderson, Phys Rev. 59 (11), 907 (1941). 10.1103/PhysRev.59.907
24. The Nottingham effect is classically known as the energy losses accompanying field emission and thermionic emission. The difference in the average energy of the electrons emitted by the cathode and those supplied to the cathode results in a variation of power and in a corresponding variation of temperature, i.e., cooling or heating of the surface cathode.
25. D. C. Look, J. W. Hemsky, and J. R. Sizelove, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (12), 2552 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2552
26. J. Z. Zeng, S. Z. Deng, J. C. She, H. He, and N. S. Xu, J. Appl. Phys. 108 (5), 054305 (2010). 10.1063/1.3481061
27. R. Nagar, R. Teki, N. Koratkar, V. G. Sathe, D. Kanjilal, B. R. Mehta, J. P. Singh, X. X. Huang, C. L. Cheng, Y. T. Chen, and Y. F. Chen, J. Appl. Phys. 108 (6), 063519 (2010). 10.1063/1.3482026
28. O. Lupan, T. Pauporté, L. Chow, B. Viana, F. Pellé, L. K. Ono, B. Roldan Cuenya, and H. Heinrich, Appl. Surf. Sci. 256 (6), 1895 (2010). 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.10.032