Knowledge construction, meaning-making and interaction in CLIL science classroom communities of practice

Language and Education

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 109-127

  Evnitskaya, Natalia ^a   Morton, Tom ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Classroom interaction; CLIL; Communities of practice; Conversation analysis; Meaning making; Multimodal analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952809180     PISSN: 09500782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2010.547199     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Byrnes, H. 2008. Assessing content and language. In Encyclopedia of language and education, Vol. 7: Language testing and assessment, ed. E. Shohamy, 37-52. Berlin: Springer-Kluwer Academic.
2. Coyle, D., P. Hood, and D. Marsh. 2010. Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Creese, A. 2005. Mediating allegations of racism in a multiethnic London school: What speech communities and communities of practice can tell us about discourse and power. In Beyond communities of practice, ed. D.P. Barton and K. Tusting, 55-76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Dalton-Puffer, C. 2007. Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
5. Dalton-Puffer, C., T. Nikula, and U. Smit. 2010. Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6. Dalton-Puffer, C., and U. Smit. 2007. Introduction. In Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse, ed. C. Dalton-Puffer and U. Smit, 7-23. Franktfurt/Vienna: Peter Lang.
7. D'hondt, S., J.-O. Östman, and J. Verschueren, eds. 2009. The pragmatics of interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Drew, P., and J. Heritage. 1992. Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Escobar Urmeneta, C. 2008. Talking English to learn science. A CLIL experience in Barcelona. In 'How we're going about it': Teachers' voices on innovative approaches to teaching and learning languages, ed. M. Dooly and D. Eastment, 127-38. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Press.
10. Ford, C. 1999. Collaborative construction of task activity: Coordinating multiple resources in a high school physics lab. Research on Language and Social Interaction 32, no. 4: 369-408.
11. Ford, M.J., and E.A. Forman. 2006. Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts. Review of Research in Education 30: 1-32.
12. Goodwin, C., and M.H. Goodwin. 2004. Participation. In A companion to linguistic anthropology, ed. A. Duranti, 222-43. Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Graddol, D. 2006. English next. London: British Council.
14. Gullberg, M. 2006. Some reasons for studying gesture and second language acquisition (Hommage à Adam Kendon). IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 44, no. 2: 103-24.
15. Gullberg, M. 2010. Methodological reflections on gesture analysis in second language acquisition and bilingualism research. Second Language Research 26, no. 1: 75-102.
16. Haneda, M. 2006. Classrooms as communities of practice: A reevaluation. TESOL Quarterly 40, no. 4: 807-17.
17. Heath, C. 1992. Gesture's discreet tasks: Multiple relevances in visual conduct and in the contextualization of language. In The contextualization of language, ed. P. Auer and A. di Luzio, 101-27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Hellermann, J. 2008. Social actions for classroom language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
19. Heritage, J. 1984. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, ed. J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 299-345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Houtkoop, H., and H. Mazeland. 1985. Turns and discourse units in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 9, no. 5: 595-620.
21. Hutchby, I., and R. Wooffitt. 2008. Conversation analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
22. Kendon, A. 1990. Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Kendon, A. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Koole, T. 2010. Displays of epistemic access: Student responses to teacher explanations. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43, no. 2: 183-209.
25. Kress, G., C. Jewitt, J. Ogborn, and C. Tsatsarelis. 2001. Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.
26. Kress, G., J. Ogborn, and I. Martins. 1998. A satellite view of language: Some lessons from science classrooms. Language Awareness 7, no. 2: 69-89.
27. Kurhila, S. 2006. Second language interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
28. Lasagabaster, D., and J.M. Sierra. 2010. Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT Journal 64, no. 4: 367-75.
29. Lave, J. 1988. Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Lemke, J.L. 1990. Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
32. Llinares, A., T. Morton, and R. Whittaker. Forthcoming. The role of language in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Lorenzo, F., S. Casal, and P. Moore. 2010. The effects of content and language integrated learning in European education: Key findings from the Andalusian Bilingual Sections evaluation project. Applied Linguistics 31, no. 3: 418-42.
34. McCafferty, S.G. 2002. Gesture and creating zones of proximal development for second language learning. Modern Language Journal 86, no. 2: 192-203.
35. McCafferty, S.G., and G. Stam. 2008. Gesture: Second language acquisition and classroom research. London: Routledge.
36. McNeill, D. 2005. Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37. Mercer, N. 1995. The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
38. Mondada, L. 2007. Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies 9, no. 2: 194-225.
39. Mondada, L. 2008. Doing video for a sequential and multimodal analysis of social interaction: Videotaping institutional telephone calls. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9, no. 3. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0803390 (accessed January 19, 2011).
40. Mortimer, E.F., and P.H. Scott. 2003. Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Buckingham: Open University Press.
41. Pekarek-Doehler, S., and G. Ziegler. 2007. Doing language, doing science and the sequential organization of the immersion classroom. In Language learning and teaching as social interaction, ed. Z. Hua, P. Seedhouse, L. Wei, and V. Cook, 72-86. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
42. Rogoff, B. 1990. Apprenticeship in thinking. Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Roth, W.-M. 2009. Dialogism: A Bakhtinian perspective on science and learning. Rotterdam/Boston: Sense Publishers.
44. Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., and R.M. Jiménez Catalán. 2009. Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
45. Sacks, H., and G. Jefferson. 1992. Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
46. Schegloff, E.A. 1996. Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics. In Studies in anaphora, ed. B. Fox, 437-85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
47. Schegloff, E.A. 2006. Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction, ed. N.J. Enfield and S.C. Levinson, 70-96. Oxford: Berg.
48. Schegloff, E.A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Schwarz, B., T. Dreyfus, and R. Hershkowitz, eds. 2009. Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction. London: Routledge.
50. Seedhouse, P. 2004. The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
51. Sohmer, R., S. Michaels, M.C. O'Connor, and L.B. Resnick. 2009. Guided construction of knowledge in the classroom: The troika of well structured talk, tasks, and tools. In Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction, ed. B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, and R. Hershkowitz, 105-29. London: Routledge.
52. Stivers, T. 2004. No no no' and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research 30, no. 2: 260-93.
53. Stivers, T., and J. Sidnell. 2005. Introduction: Multimodal interaction. Semiotica 156, no. 1: 1-20.
54. Tàpias Nadales, N. Forthcoming. El camí de la tasca a l'activitat: El treball en petit grup en enfocaments AICLE dins de la perspectiva de la Teoria de l'Activitat [The journey from the task to the activity: Small group work in CLIL approaches from the perspective of Activity Theory]. Bellaterra: Journal of Teaching and Learning Language and Literature.
55. Tobin, K. 2006. Aligning the cultures of teaching and learning science in urban high schools. Cultural Studies of Science Education 1, no. 2: 219-52.
56. Wells, G., ed. 2001. Action, talk, and text: Learning and teaching through inquiry. New York: Teachers College Press.
57. Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Woods, D., and C. Fassnacht. 2007. Transana [software]. Madison, WI: The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.
59. Wortham, S. 2001. Interactionally situated cognition: A classroom example. Cognitive Science 25, no. 1: 37-66.
60. Zimmerman, D.H. 1998. Identity, context and interaction. In Identities in talk, ed. C. Antaki and S. Widdicombe, 87-106. London: Sage.