Task Effects on Focus on Form in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 95, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 115-132

  Yilmaz, Yucel ^a  

^a SAKARYA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952802844     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01143.x     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Aston, G. (1986). Trouble-shooting in interaction with learners: The more the merrier? Applied Linguistics, 7, 128-143.
2. Beauvois, M. H. (1992). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 455-464.
3. Beauvois, M. H. (1998). Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 198-217.
4. Berge, Z., & Collins, M. (1995). Computer-mediated communication and the online classroom: Overview and perspectives (Vol. 1). Creskill, NJ Hampton Press.
5. Blake, R. (2000). Computer-mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4, 120-136.
6. Blake, R., & Zyzik, E. (2003). Who's helping whom: Learner/heritage-speakers' networked discussion in Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 24, 519-544.
7. Brown, G., Anderson, A., Shillcock, R., & Yule, G. (1984). Teaching talk. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
8. Chapelle, A. C. (2004). Learning through online communication: Findings and implications from second language research. American Sociological Review, 51, 541-554.
9. Choi, M. Y. (2000). Effects of recasts on irregular past tense verb morphology in Web-chat. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu.
10. Chun, D. M. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22, 17-31.
11. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. A. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC APA Books.
12. Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367-383.
13. de la Fuente, M. (2002). Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabulary: The roles of input and output in receptive and productive acquisition of words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 81-112.
14. de la Fuente, M. (2003). Is SLA interactionist theory relevant to CALL? A study on the effect of computer-mediated interaction in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16, 47-81.
15. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ Ablex.
16. Doughty, C., & Pica, T. (1986). "Information gap" tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 20, 305-325.
17. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998a). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. New York Cambridge University Press.
18. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998b). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-262). New York Cambridge University Press.
19. Duff, P. A. (1986). Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learners: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 147-181). Rowley, MA Newbury House.
20. Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51(Suppl. 1), 1-46.
21. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. New York Oxford University Press.
22. Ellis, R., & He, X. (1999). The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 285-301.
23. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Basturkmen, B. (2006). Disentangling focus on form: A response to Sheen and O'Neill (2005). Applied Linguistics, 27, 135-141.
24. Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension, and L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 44, 449-491.
25. Fernandez-García, M. F., & Arbelaiz, A. M. (2003). Learners' interactions: A comparison of oral and computer-assisted written conversations. ReCALL, 15, 113-136.
26. García Mayo, M. P. (2002). The effectiveness of two form-focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 156-175.
27. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum.
28. Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Pica, T. (1998). The role of input and interaction in second language acquisition: Introduction to the special issue. Modern Language Journal, 82, 299-307.
29. Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55, 575-611.
30. Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. (1985a). Task variation and nonnative/nonnative negotiation of meaning. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 149-161). Rowley, MA Newbury House.
31. Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. (1985b). Variation in native speaker speech modification to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 37-57.
32. Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283-302.
33. Granena, G. (2006). Age, proficiency level and interactional skills: Evidence from breakdowns in production. In C. Muñoz (Ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning (pp. 183-208). Clevedon, England Multilingual Matters.
34. Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. (Research Rep. No. 3). Champaign, IL National Council of Teachers of English.
35. Iwasaki, J., & Oliver, R. (2003). Chat-line interaction and negative feedback. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 17, 60-73.
36. Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study of ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541-577.
37. Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effect on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-478.
38. Kitade, K. (2000). L2 learners' discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in Internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13, 143-166.
39. Kotter, M. (2003). Negotiation of meaning and codeswitching in online tandems. Language Learning & Technology, 7, 145-172.
40. Kowal, M, & Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students' language awareness. Language Awareness, 3, 73-93.
41. Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1997). From semantic to syntactic processing: How can we promote metalinguistic awareness in the French immersion classroom? In R. K. Johnson & M. Swain (Eds.), Immersion education: International perspectives (pp. 284-309). Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
42. Lai, C., & Zhao, Y. (2006). Noticing and text-based chat. Language Learning & Technology, 10, 102-120.
43. Lapkin, S., Swain, M., & Smith, M. (2002). Reformulation and the learning of French pronominal verbs in a Canadian French immersion context. Modern Language Journal, 86, 485-507.
44. Lee, L. (2002). Synchronous online exchanges: A study of modification devices on non-native discourse. System, 30, 275-288.
45. Leeser, M. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8, 55-81.
46. Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361-386.
47. Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536-556.
48. Long, M. H. (1980). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
49. Long, M. H. (1983a). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 177-193.
50. Long, M. H. (1983b). Native speaker/nonnative speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126-141.
51. Long, M. H. (1989). Task, group, and task-group interactions. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL, 8, 1-26.
52. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam Benjamins.
53. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York Academic Press.
54. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA (pp. 15-41). New York Cambridge University Press.
55. Lyster, R. (2001). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 51, 265-301.
56. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
57. Malmqvist, A. (2005). How does group discussion in reconstruction tasks affect written language output? Language Awareness, 14, 128-141.
58. Morris, F. (2005). Child-to-child interaction and corrective feedback in a computer mediated L2 class. Language Learning & Technology, 9, 29-45.
59. Nobuyoshi, J., & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition. ELT Journal, 47, 203-210.
60. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
61. Oliver, R. (2002). The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions. Modern Language Journal, 86, 97-111.
62. Ortega, L. (1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning & Technology, 1, 82-89.
63. Ortega, L (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109-148.
64. Payne, J. S., & Whitney, P. J. (2002). Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20, 7-32.
65. Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
66. Pica, T. (1987). Second-language acquisition, social interaction, and the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 8, 3-21.
67. Pica, T. (1994a). Questions from the language classroom: Research perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 49-79.
68. Pica, T. (1994b). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
69. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63-90.
70. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, England Multilingual Matters.
71. Pica, T., Kang, H., & Sauro, S. (2006). Information gap tasks: Their multiple roles and contributions to interaction research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 301-338.
72. Porter, P. (1986). How learners talk to each other: Input and interaction in task-centered discussions. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 200-222). Rowley, MA Newbury House.
73. Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27-57.
74. Rollet, G., & Tremblay, R. (1975). Speaking and writing with comic strips. Montréal Centre Educatif et Culturel.
75. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversation ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA Newbury House.
76. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford Oxford University Press.
77. Skehan, P. (2001). Tasks and language performance assessment. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 167-185). London Longman.
78. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001) Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183-205). Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
79. Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. Modern Language Journal, 87, 38-57.
80. Smith, B. (2004). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 365-398.
81. Smith, B. (2008). Methodological hurdles in capturing CMC data: The case of the missing self-repair. Language Learning & Technology, 12, 85-103.
82. Smith, B., & Gorsuch, G. J. (2004). Synchronous computer mediated communication captured by usability lab technologies: New interpretations. System, 32, 553-575.
83. Sotillo, S. M. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4, 82-119.
84. Spada, N. (1997). Form-focussed instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30, 73-87.
85. Storch, N. (1998). Comparing second language learners' attention to form across tasks. Language Awareness, 7, 176-191.
86. Storch, N. (2001) Comparing ESL learners' attention to grammar on three different collaborative tasks. RELC Journal, 32, 104-124.
87. Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119-158.
88. Sullivan, N., & Pratt, E. (1996). A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 29, 491-501.
89. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford Oxford University Press.
90. Swain, M. (1997). Collaborative dialogue: Its contribution to second language learning. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 34, 115-132.
91. Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-484). Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum.
92. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-337.
93. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and assessment (pp. 99-119). London Longman.
94. Toyoda, E., & Harrison, R. (2002). Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning & Technology, 6, 82-99.
95. Tudini, E. (2003). Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning & Technology, 7, 141-159.
96. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287-301.
97. Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford Oxford University Press.
98. Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 7-26.
99. Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 81, 470-481.
100. Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49, 583-625.
101. Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29, 325-340.
102. Yilmaz, Y., & Yuksel, D. (2008, April). Effects of modality and perceptual salience on recasts. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC.