Learning edge momentum: A new account of outcomes in CS1

Computer Science Education

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 37-71

  Robins, Anthony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Bimodal; CS1; CS1 distribution; Edge effects; Grade distribution; Learning edge momentum; Learning to program; LEM; Momentum; Programming

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952510639     PISSN: 08993408     EISSN: 17445175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08993401003612167     Document Type: Review

References (104)

1. ACM. (2001). Computing curricula 2001 computer science final report (December 15, 2001). Retrieved July 3, 2009, from http://www.acm.org/education/education/education/curric_vols/cc2001.pdf
2. Allert, J. (2004). Learning style and factors contributing to success in an introductory computer science course. In Proceedings of the fourth IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT'04) (pp. 385-389). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
3. Anderson, J.A. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications (6th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.
4. Barker, R.J., & Unger, E.A. (1983). A predictor for success in an introductory programming class based upon abstract reasoning development. SIGCSE Bulletin, 15(1), 154-158.
5. Bateman, C.R. (1973). Predicting performance in a basic computer course. In Proceedings of the fifth annual meeting of the American Institute for Decision Sciences (pp. 130-133). Atlanta, GA: AIDS Press.
6. Bauer, R., Mehrens, W.A., & Vinsonhaler, J.F. (1968). Predicting performance in a computer programming course. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 1159-1164.
7. Bell, D. (1976). Programmer selection and programmer errors. The Computer Journal, 19, 202-206.
8. Bennedsen, J., & Caspersen, M.E. (2005). An investigation of potential success factors for an introductory model-driven programming course. In Proceedings of the first international workshop on computing education research (ICER '05) (pp. 155-163). New York: ACM.
9. Bennedsen, J., & Caspersen, M.E. (2006). Abstraction ability as an indicator of success for learning object-oriented programming? SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(2), 39-43.
10. Bennedsen, J., & Caspersen, M.E. (2007). Failure rates in introductory programming. SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(2), 32-36.
11. Bennedsen, J., & Caspersen, M.E. (2008). Optimists have more fun, but do they learn better? On the influence of emotional and social factors on learning introductory computer science. Computer Science Education, 18(1), 1-16.
12. Bereiter, C. (1985). Toward a solution of the learning paradox. Review of Educational Research, 55, 201-226.
13. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.
14. Bergin, S., & Reilly, R.G. (2005a). Programming: factors that influence success. SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(1), 411-415.
15. Bergin, S., & Reilly, R.G. (2005b). The influence of motivation and comfort level on learning to program. In Proceedings of the 17th workshop of the psychology of programming interest group (PPIG 05) (pp. 293-304). Brighton, UK: University of Sussex.
16. Bergin, S., & Reilly, R. (2006). Predicting introductory programming performance: A multiinstitutional multivariate study. Computer Science Education, 16(4), 303-323.
17. Biggs, J.B. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149.
18. Bishop-Clark, C. (1995). Cognitive style, personality, and computer programming. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(2), 241-260.
19. Block, J. (1971). Mastery learning: Theory and practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart, andWinston.
20. Bloom, B., Englehart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longmans.
21. Bonar, J., & Soloway, E. (1989). Preprogramming knowledge: A major source of misconceptions in novice programmers. In E. Soloway & J.C. Spohrer (Eds.), Studying the novice programmer (pp. 324-353). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Bornat, R., Dehnadi, S., & Simon. (2008). Mental models, consistency and programming aptitude. In S. Hamilton & M. Hamilton (Eds.), Proceedings of the tenth Australasian computing education conference (ACE 2008) (pp 53-61). Darlinghurst, Australia: Australian Computer Society.
23. Bush, C.M., & Schkade, L.L. (1985). In search of the perfect programmer. Datamation, 31(6), 128-132.
24. Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (1996). The mind map book. New York: Plume/Penguin Books.
25. Carey, T.T., & Shepherd, M.M. (1988). Towards empirical studies of programming in new paradigms. In Proceedings of the 1988 ACM sixteenth annual conference on computer science (CSC 088) (pp. 72-78). New York, NY: ACM.
26. Chi, M.T.H., & Ohlsson, S. (2005). Complex declarative learning. In K.J. Holyoak & R.G. Morrison (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 371-399). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Cianciolo, A.T., & Sternberg, R.J. (2004). Intelligence: A brief history. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
28. Corney, M. (2009). Designing for engagement: Building IT systems. ALTC first year experience curriculum design symposium 2009 (pp. 19-21). Queensland, Australia: QUT Department of Teaching and Learning Support Services.
29. Cronan, T.P., Embry, P.R., & White, S.D. (1989). Identifying factors that influence performance of non-computing majors in the business computer information systems course. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 21(4), 431-441.
30. Cross, E.M. (1970). The behavioral styles of computer programmers. In Proceedings of the eighth annual SIGCPR conference (pp. 69-91). New York, NY: ACM.
31. Curtis, B. (1984). Fifteen years of psychology in software engineering: Individual differences and cognitive science. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on software engineering (pp. 97-106). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
32. Dehnadi, S. (2006). Abstract for Dehnadi & Bornat (2006). Retrieved June 4, 2009, from http://www.cs.mdx.ac.uk/research/PhDArea/saeed/
33. Dehnadi, S., & Bornat, R. (2006). The camel has two humps. Paper presented at the Little PPIG 2006 workshop, Coventry, UK. Retrieved June, 2009, from http://www.cs.mdx.ac.uk/research/PhDArea/saeed/paper1.pdf
34. de Raadt, M., Hamilton, M., Lister, R., Tutty, J., Baker, B., Box, I., et al. (2005). Approaches to learning in computer programming students and their effect on success. Higher Education in a changing world: Research and Development in Higher Education, 28, 407-414.
35. Dickmann, R.A., & Lockwood, J. (1966). Computer personnel research group, 1966 survey of test use in computer personnel selection. Technical Memo, Johns Hopkins University Silver Spring MD Applied Physics Lab.
36. Evans, G.E., & Simkin, M.G. (1989). What best predicts computer proficiency? Communications of the ACM, 32(11), 1322-1327.
37. Feldman, D.H. (2004). Piaget's stages: the unfinished symphony of cognitive development. New Ideas in Psychology, 22, 175-231.
38. Fincher, S., Baker, B., Box, I., Cutts, Q., de Raadt, M., Haden, P., et al. (2005b). Programmed to succeed? A multi-national, multi-institutional study of introductory programming courses. Computing Laboratory Technical Report 1-05. Canterbury, UK: University of Kent.
39. Fincher, S., Lister, R., Clear, T., Robins, A., Tenenberg, J., & Petre, M. (2005a). Multiinstitutional, multi-national studies in CSEd Research: Some design considerations and trade-offs. In Proceedings of the first international workshop on computing education research (ICER 005) (pp. 111-121). New York, NY: ACM.
40. Forbes, J., & Garcia, D.D. (2007). 'But what do the top-rated schools do?' A survey of introductory computer science curricula. SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(1), 245-246. See also resources retrieved July 4, 2009, from http://www.cs.duke.edu/csed/openwiki/doku.php?id=teaching:start
41. Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
42. Gaskins, I.W., Rauch, S., Gensemer, E., Cunicelli, E., O'Hara, C., Six, L., et al. (1997). Scaffolding the development of intelligence among children who are delayed in learning to read. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 43-73). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
43. Haskell, R.E. (2001). Transfer of learning: Cognition instruction and reasoning. California: Academic Press.
44. Hofstadter, D.R. (2001). Epilogue: Analogy as the core of cognition. In D. Gentner, K.J. Holyoak, & B.N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 499-538). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Holyoak, K.J., Gentner, D., & Kokinov, B.N. (2001). Introduction: The place of analogy in cognition. In D. Gentner, K.J. Holyoak, & B.N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 1-19). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Hu, C. (2004). Rethinking of teaching objects-first. Education and Information Technologies, 9(3), 209-218.
47. Hudak, M.A., & Anderson, D.E. (1990). Formal operations and learning style predict success in statistics and computer science courses. Teaching of Psychology, 17(4), 231-234.
48. Jensen, A.R. (1998). The g factor. Westport, CT: Praeger.
49. Katz, A. (1962). Prediction of success in automatic data processing course. Technical Note 126. U.S. Army Personnel Research Office.
50. Kolb, D.A. (1985). Learning style inventory (revised edition). Boston, MA: McBer and Company.
51. Kölling, M. (1999). The problem of teaching object-oriented programming, Part 1: Languages. Journal of Object Oriented Programming, 11(8), 8-15.
52. Krause, L. (2000). How we learn and why we don't. Cincinnati, OH: Thomson Learning.
53. Kurtz, B.L. (1980). Investigating the relationship between the development of abstract reasoning and performance in an introductory programming class. SIGCSE Bulletin, 12(1), 110-117.
54. Leither, H.E., & Lewis, H.R. (1978). Why Johny can't program: A progress report. SIGCSE Bulletin, 10(1), 266-276.
55. Lister, R. (2000). On blooming first year programming, and its blooming assessment. In A.E. Ellis (Ed.), Proceedings of the Australasian conference on computing education (Melbourne, Australia (ACSE '00) (pp. 158-162). New York, NY: ACM.
56. Lister, R., Berglund, A., Clear, T., Bergin, J., Garvin-Doxas, K., Hanks, B., et al. (2006). Research perspectives on the objects-early debate. SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(4), 146-165.
57. Lister, R., & Leaney, J. (2003). First year programming: Let all the flowers bloom. In T. Greening & R. Lister (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth Australasian computing education conference (ACE 2003) (pp. 221-230). Darlinghurst, Australia: Australian Computer Society.
58. Lorenzen, T., & Chang, H.L. (2006). MasterMind_: A predictor of computer programming aptitude. INROADS-The SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(2), 69-70.
59. Manning, C., & Schütze, H. (1999). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Mayer, D.B., & Stalnaker, A.W. (1968). Selection and evaluation of computer personnel-The research history of SIG/CPR. In Proceedings of the 1968 ACM national conference (23rd ACM national conference) (pp. 657-670). New York, NY: ACM.
61. Mazlack, L.J. (1980). Identifying potential to acquire programming skill. Communications of the ACM, 23(1), 14-17.
62. McNaughton, S., & Leyland, J. (1990). The shifting focus of maternal tutoring across different difficulty levels on a problem solving task. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 147-155.
63. Meyer, J.H.F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning theory and practice-Ten years on (pp. 412-424). Oxford: OCSLD.
64. Morrison, M., & Newman, T.S. (2001). A study of the impact of student background and preparedness on outcomes in CS I. SIGCSE Bulletin, 33(1), 179-183.
65. Myers, I.B. (1980/1995). Gifts differing: Understanding personality type. Mountain View, CA: Davies-Black Publishing. (Original edition 1980; Reprint edition 1995).
66. Newstead, P.R. (1975). Grade and ability predictions in an introductory programming course. SIGCSE Bulletin, 7, 87-91.
67. Pea, R.D., & Kurland, D.M. (1984). On the cognitive prerequisites of learning computer programming. Technical Report No.18, Bank Street College of Education. New York, NY.
68. Pears, A., Seidman, S., Malmi, L., Mannila, L., Adams, E., Bennedsen, J., et al. (2007). A survey of literature on the teaching of introductory programming. SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(4), 204-223.
69. Piaget, J. (1971a). Developmental stages and developmental processes. In D.R. Green, M.P. Ford, & G.B. Flamer (Eds.), Measurement and Piaget (pp. 172-188). New York: McGraw-Hill.
70. Piaget, J. (1971b). The theory of stages in cognitive development. In D.R. Green, M.P. Ford, & G.B. Flamer (Eds.), Measurement and Piaget (pp. 1-11). New York: McGraw-Hill.
71. Pocius, K.E. (1991). Personality factors in human-computer interaction: A review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 7(3), 103-135.
72. Psychometrics I.T. Tests. (2009). Berger aptitude for programming test B-APT Form D. Retrieved July 3, 2009, from http://www.psy-test.com/Baptd.html
73. Reder, L.M. (1982). Elaborations: When do they help and when do they hurt? Text, 2, 211-224.
74. Rieber, R.W. & Robinson, D.K. (Eds.). (2004). The essential Vygotsky. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
75. Robins, A. (1996). Transfer in cognition. Connection science: Journal of neural computing, artificial intelligence and cognitive research, 8, 185-203.
76. Robins, A., Rountree, J., & Rountree, N. (2003). Learning and teaching programming: A review and discussion. Computer Science Education, 13(2), 137-172.
77. Rountree, J., & Rountree, N. (2009). Issues regarding threshold concepts in computer science. In M. Hamilton & T. Clear (Eds.), Proceedings of the eleventh Australasian computing education conference (ACE 2009) (pp. 139-145). Darlinghurst, Australia: Australian Computer Society.
78. Rountree, N., Rountree, J., & Robins, A. (2002). Predictors of success and failure in a CS1 course. SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(4), 121-124.
79. Rountree, N., Rountree, J., Robins, A., & Hannah, R. (2004). Interacting factors that predict success and failure in a CS1 course. SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(4), 101-104.
80. Scholtz, J., & Wiedenbeck, S. (1993). An analysis of novice programmers learning a second language. In Proceedings of the fifth workshop on empirical studies of programmers (pp. 187-205). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
81. Scott, T. (2003). Bloom's taxonomy applied to testing in computer science classes. Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 19(1), 267-274.
82. Simon, Cutts, Q., Fincher, S., Haden, P., Robins, A., Sutton, K., et al. (2006b). The ability to articulate strategy as a predictor of programming skill. In D. Tolhurst & S. Mann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Australasian conference on computing education-Volume 52 (pp. 181-188). Darlinghurst, Australia: Australian Computer Society.
83. Simon, Fincher, S., Robins, A., Baker, B., Box, I., Cutts, Q., et al. (2006a). Predictors of success in a first programming course. In D. Tolhurst & S. Mann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Australasian conference on computing education-Volume 52 (pp. 189-196). Darlinghurst, Australia: Australian Computer Society.
84. Simpson, D. (1973). Psychological testing in computing staff selection: A bibliography. ACM SIGCPR Computer Personnel, 4(1-2), 2-5.
85. Soh, L.K., Samal, A., Person, S., Nugent, G., & Lang, J. (2005). Designing, implementing, and analyzing a placement test for introductory CS courses. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(1), 505-509.
86. Sternberg, R.J. (Ed.). (1982). Handbook of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
87. Subramanian, A., & Joshi, K. (1996). Computer aptitude tests as predictors of novice computer programmer performance. Journal of Information Technology Management, VII(1-2), 31-41.
88. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and instruction, 4, 295-312.
89. Tolhurst, D., Baker, B., Hamer, J., Box, I., Lister, R., Cutts, Q., et al. (2006). Do map drawing styles of novice programmers predict success in programming? A multi-national, multiinstitutional study. In Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Conference on Computing Education, 52, 213-222.
90. Tukiainen, M., & Mönkkönen, E. (2002). Programming aptitude testing as a prediction of learning to program. Proceedings of PPIG, 14, 45-57.
91. Ventura, P.R., Jr. (2005). Identifying predictors of success for an objects-first CS1. Computer Science Education, 15(3), 223-243.
92. Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning: A synthesis. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 1-17). New York: Cambridge University Press.
93. Voss, J.F. (1977). Cognition and instruction: Towards a cognitive theory of learning. In A.M. Lesgold, J.W. Pellegrino, S.D. Fokkema, & R. Glasser (Eds.), Cognitive psychology and instruction (pp. 13-26). New York: Plenum Press.
94. Werth, L.H. (1986). Predicting student performance in a beginning computer science class. SIGCSE Bulletin, 18(1), 138-143.
95. White, G., & Sivitanides, M. (2002). A theory of the relationships between cognitive requirements of computer programming languages and programmers' cognitive characteristics. Journal of Information Systems Education, 13(1), 59-66.
96. Whitley, B.E. Jr. (1996). The relationship of psychological type to computer aptitude, attitudes, and behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(3), 389-406.
97. Whittington, K.J., Bills, D.P., & Lawrence, W.H. (2003). Implementation of alternative pacing in an introductory programming sequence. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on information technology (pp. 47-53). New York, NY: ACM.
98. Wiedenbeck, S. (2005). Factors affecting the success of non-majors in learning to program. In Proceedings of the first international workshop on computing education research (ICER '05) (pp. 13-24). New York, NY: ACM.
99. Wileman, S.A., Konvalina, J., & Stephens, L.J. (1981). Factors influencing success in beginning computer science courses. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 223-226.
100. Wilson, B.C., & Shrock, S. (2006). Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: A study of twelve factors. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 33(1), 184-188.
101. Wolfe, J.M. (1969). Testing for programming aptitude. Datamation, April 1969, 67-72.
102. Woszczynski, A., Haddad, H., & Zgambo, A. (2005a). An IS student's worst nightmare: Programming courses. In 8th annual Southern Association for Information Systems (SAIS) (pp. 130-133). Savannah, GA: SAIS.
103. Woszczynski, A., Haddad, H., & Zgambo, A. (2005b). Towards a model of student success in programming courses. In Proceedings of the 43rd annual Southeast regional conference-Volume 1 (ACM-SE 43) (pp. 301-302). New York, NY: ACM.
104. Woszczynski, A.B., Guthrie, T.C., Chen, T., & Shade, S. (2004). Personality as a predictor of student success in programming principles I. In 7th annual Southern Association for Information Systems (SAIS) (pp. 1-6). Savannah, GA: SAIS.