Argumentation in Science Education: A Model-based Framework

Science and Education

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 103-140

  Böttcher, Florian ^a   Meisert, Anke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HILDESHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79651471477     PISSN: 09267220     EISSN: 15731901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11191-010-9304-5     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Albe, V. (2008). Students' positions and considerations of scientific evidence about a controversial socioscientific issue. Science & Education, 17, 805-827.
2. Baguley, T., & Payne, S. J. (2000). Long-term memory for spatial and temporal mental models includes construction processes and model structure. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A(2), 479-512.
3. Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education. Science Education, 92, 473-498.
4. Clement, J. J. (2008). Student/teacher co-construction of visualizable models in large group discussion. In J. J. Clement & M. A. Rea-Ramirez (Eds.), Model based learning and instruction in science. Dordrecht: Springer.
5. Clement, J. J., & Rea-Ramirez, M. A. (Eds.). (2008). Model based learning and instruction in science. Dordrecht: Springer.
6. Develaki, M. (2007). The model-based view of scientific theories and the structuring of school science programmes. Science & Education, 16, 725-749.
7. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
8. Erduran, S. (2008). Methodological foundations in the study of argumentation in science classrooms. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
9. Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Argumentation in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
10. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPing into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88, 915-933.
11. Felton, M., & Kuhn, D. (2001). The development of argumentive discourse skill. Discourse Processes, 32(2& 3), 135-153.
12. Garcia-Mila, M., & Andersen, C. (2008). Cognitive foundations of learning argumentation. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
13. Giere, R. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
14. Giere, R. (1992). The cognitive construction of scientific knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 22, 95-107.
15. Giere, R. (1999). Science without laws. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
16. Giere, R. (2001). A new framework for teaching scientific reasoning. Argumentation, 15, 21-33.
17. Giere, R. (2004). How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science, 71, 742-752.
18. Giere, R. (2010). An agent-based conception of models and scientific representation. Synthese, 172, 269-281.
19. Giere, R., Bickle, J., & Mauldin, R. F. (2006). Understanding scientific reasoning. Belmont, Calif (et al.): Thomson Wadsworth.
20. Gilbert, S. W. (1991). Model building and a definition of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 73-79.
21. Grandy, R. E. (1997). Constructivisms and objectivity: Disentangling metaphysics from pedagogy. Science & Education, 6, 43-53.
22. Halloun, I. A. (2007). Mediated modelling in science education. Science & Education, 16, 653-697.
23. Held, C., Knauff, M., & Vosgerau, G. (Eds.). (2006). Mental models and the mind. Amsterdam (et al.): Elsevier.
24. Hildebrand, D., Bilica, K., & Capps, J. (2008). Addressing controversies in science education: A pragmatic approach to evolution education. Science & Education, 17, 1033-1052.
25. Hodson, D. (1992). In search of a meaningful relationship: An exploration of some issues relating to integration in science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 541-562.
26. Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2008). Systematicity: The nature of science. Philosophia, 36, 167-180.
27. Izquierdo-Aymerich, M., & Aduriz-Bravo, A. (2003). Epistemological foundations of school science. Science & Education, 12, 27-43.
28. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodríguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (Eds.) (2000). "Doing the Lesson" or "Doing Science": Arguments in High School Genetics. Science Education 84, 757-792.
29. Jiminéz-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education. An overview. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
30. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge (et al.): Cambridge University Press.
31. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2006). Mental models, sentential reasoning, and illusory inferences. In C. Held, M. Knauff, G. Vosgerau, et al. (Eds.), Mental models and the mind. Amsterdam (et al.): Elsevier.
32. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2009). How we reason. Oxford (et al.): Oxford University Press.
33. Kelly, G. J., & Chen, C. (1999). The sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral written discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 883-915.
34. Kelly, G. J., Druker, S., & Chen, C. (1998). Students' reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 20(7), 849-871.
35. Kelly, G. J., & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of University Oceanography students' use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86(3), 314-342.
36. Koponen, I. T. (2007). Models and modelling in physics education: A critical re-analysis of philosophical underpinnings and suggestions for revisions. Science & Education, 16, 751-773.
37. Koslowski, B. (1996). Theory and evidence: The development of scientific reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 219-337.
39. Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(5), 178-181.
40. Kuhn, D. (2001). How do people know? Psychological Science, 12(1), 1-8.
41. Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. Jr. (2004). Metacognition: A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 268-273.
42. Kuhn, D., & Franklin, S. (2006). The second decade: What develops (and How). In W. Damon, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology 2-Cognition, perception and language. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
43. Kuhn, D., & Pearsall, S. (1998). Relations between Metastrategic knowledge and strategic claims. Cognitive Development, 13, 227-247.
44. Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), 287-315.
45. Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74(5), 1245-1260.
46. Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2007). Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(2), 90-104.
47. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge (et al.): Cambridge University Press.
48. Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Cambridge (et al.): Harvard University Press.
49. Lawson, A. (2003). The nature and development of hypothetico-predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1387-1408.
50. Matthews, M. R. (1997). Introductory comments on philosophy and constructivism in science education. Science & Education, 6, 5-14.
51. Matthews, M. R. (2007). Models in science and in science education: An introduction. Science & Education, 16, 647-652.
52. Meisert, A. (2008). Vom Modellwissen zum Modellverständnis-Elemente einer umfassenden Modellkompetenz und deren Fundierung durch lernerseitige Kriterien zur Klassifikation von Modellen. ZfDN, 243-261.
53. Metzinger, T. (2003). Being no one: The self-model theory of subjectivity. Cambridge (et al.): MIT Press.
54. Nersessian, N. J. (2002). The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science. In P. Carruthers, S. Stich, & M. Siegal (Eds.), The cognitive basis of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Nersessian, N. J. (2008a). Creating scientific concepts. Cambridge (et al.): MIT Press.
56. Nersessian, N. J. (2008b). Mental modelling in conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change. New York: Routledge.
57. Núñez Oviedo, M. C. & Clement, J. (2003). Model competition: A strategy based on model based teaching and learning theory. Proceedings of NARST, Philadelphia, PA, March 23-26, http://www-unix. oit. umass. edu/~clement/pdf/model_competition. pdf (06-10-2010).
58. Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
59. Patronis, T. (1999). Students' argumentation in decision-making on a socio-scientific issue: Implications for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 745-754.
60. Portides, D. P. (2007). The relation between idealisation and approximation in scientific model construction. Science & Education, 16, 699-724.
61. Rea-Ramirez, M. A., Clement, J., & Núñez-Oviedo, M. C. (2008). An instructional model derived from model construction and criticism theory. In J. J. Clement & M. A. Rea-Ramírez (Eds.), Model based learning and instruction in science. Dordrecht: Springer.
62. Sadler, T. D., & Donelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463-1488.
63. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138.
64. Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, 92, 447-472.
65. Schaeken, W., Vandierendonck, A., Schroyens, W., & d'Ydewalle, G. (2007). The mental models theory of reasoning. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
66. Seel, N. M. (2006). Mental models in learning situations. In C. Held, M. Knauff, & G. Vosgerau (Eds.), Mental models and the mind. Amsterdam (et al.): Elsevier.
67. Silva, C. C. (2007). The role of models and analogies in the electromagnetic theory: A historical case study. Science & Education, 16, 835-848.
68. Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 235-260.
69. Suppe, F. (1989). The semantic conception of theories and scientific realism. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
70. Suppe, F. (2000). Understanding scientific theories: An assessment of developments 1969-1998. Philosophy of Science, 67, 102-115.
71. Tamayo, A. O., & Sanmartí, N. (2007). High-school students' conceptual evolution of the respiration concept from the perspective of Giere's cognitive science model. International Journal of Science Education, 29(2), 215-248.
72. Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge (et al.): Cambridge University Press.
74. van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge (et al.): Cambridge University Press.
75. van Fraassen, B. (1980a). The scientific image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
76. van Fraassen, B. (1980b). Theory construction and experiment: An empiricist view. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association, 2, 663-677.
77. von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of How Students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101-131.
78. Voss, J. F., & van Dyke, J. A. (2001). Argumentation in psychology: Background comments. Discourse Processes, 32(2& 3), 89-111.
79. Walton, D. N. (1996). Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
80. Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62.