Peer feedback as an aid to learning - What do we want? Feedback. When do we want it? Now!

Medical Teacher

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Cushing, Annie ^a   Abbott, Stephen ^b   Lothian, Doug ^a   Hall, Angela ^c   Westwood, Olwyn M R ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEARNING; MEDICAL STUDENT; NURSING STUDENT; PEER GROUP; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; TEACHING; TIME;

FEEDBACK; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; LEARNING; PATIENT SIMULATION; PEER GROUP; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; STUDENTS, NURSING; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79551559196     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.542522     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Archer J, Norcini J, Southgate L, Heard S, Davies H. 2008. Mini-PAT (Peer Assessment Tool): A valid component of a National Assessment Programme in the UK? Adv Health Sci Educ 13:181-192.
2. Asghar A. 2010. Reciprocal peer coaching and its use as a formative assessment strategy for first-year students. Assess Eval High Educ 35(4):403-417.
3. Bergman D, Savage C, Wahlstrom R, Sandahl C. 2008. Teaching group dynamics - Do we know what we are doing? An approach to evaluation. Med Teach 30(1):55-61.
4. Biggs J. 2003. Teaching for quality learning at university. 2nd ed. Berkshire, UK: SRHE and Open University Press.
5. Bing-You RG, Paterson P, Levine MA. 1997. Feedback falling on deaf ears: Residents' receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility. Med Teach 19:40-44.
6. Boehler ML, Rogers DA, Schwind CJ, Mayforth R, Quin J, Williams RG, Dunnington G. 2006. An investigation of medical student reactions to feedback: A randomised control trial. Med Educ 40:746-749.
7. Boud D. 2000. Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Stud Contin Educ 22(2):151-167.
8. Braend AM, Gran SF, Frich JC, Lindbaek M. 2010. Medical students' clinical performance in general practice - Triangulating assessments from patients, teachers and students. Med Teach 32(4):333-339.
9. Brazeau C, Boyd L, Crosson J. 2002. Changing an existing OSCE to a teaching tool: The making of a teaching OSCE. Acad Med 77(9):932.
10. Brown E, Gibbs G, Glover C. 2003. Evaluation tools for investigating the impact of assessment regimes on student learning.
11. Chambers SL, Schmittgen J, Allan CR. 2000. Evaluation of peer teaching in a pharmaceutical laboratory. Am J Pharm Educ 64:283-288.
12. Cox R. 2008. Vicarious learning and case-based teaching: Developing health science students' clinical reasoning skills. Teach Learn Res Brief Oct. 2008, No. 54.
13. Edmondson A. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behaviour in work teams. Adm Sci Q 44:350-383.
14. Ende J. 1983. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA 250:777-781.
15. Evans DJR, Cuffe T. 2009. Near-peer teaching in anatomy: An Approach for deeper learning. Anat Sci Educ 2:227-233.
16. Frankel AS, Leonard MW, Denham CR. 2006. Fair and just culture, team behaviour, and leadership engagement: The tools to achieve high reliability. Health Serv Res 4(2):1690-1709.
17. Gielen S, Peeters E, Dochy F, Onghena P, Struyven K. 2010. Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learn Instr 20:304-315.
18. Glynn LG, MacFarlane A, Kelly M, Cantillon P, Murphy AW. 2006. Helping each other to learn - A process evaluation of peer assisted learning. BMC Med Educ 6:18.
19. Heaven C, Clegg J, Maguire P. 2006. Transfer of communication skills training from workshop to workplace: The impact of clinical supervision. Patient Educ Couns 60:313-325.
20. Henning JM, Weidner TG, Marty MC. 2008. Peer assisted learning in clinical education: Literature review. Athl Train Educ J 3:844-890.
21. Hewson MG, Little ML. 1998. Giving feedback: Verification of recommended techniques. J Gen Intern Med 13:111-116.
22. Kernan WN, Quagliarello V, Green ML. 2005. Student faculty rounds: A peer-mediated learning activity for internal medicine clerkships. Med Teach 27(2):140-144.
23. Ladyshewksy RK. Developing health professionals through the use of reciprocal peer coaching. In Herrmann A, Kulski MM, editors. Flexible futures in tertiary teaching. Proceedings of the 9th Annual teaching learning forum, 2000 February 2-4. Perth: Curtin University of Technology.
24. Ladyshewsky RK. 2002. A quasi-experimental study of the differences in performance and clinical reasoning using individual learning versus reciprocal peer coaching. Physiother Theory Pract 18(1):17-31.
25. Lui NF, Carless D. 2006. Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teach High Educ 11(3):279-290.
26. McKay J, Murphy DJ, Bowie P, Schuck M-L, Lough M, Eva KW. 2007. Development and testing of an assessment instrument for formative peer review of significant event analysis. Qual Saf Health Care 16:150-153.
27. Nelson MN, Schunn CD. 2009. The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instr Sci 37:375-401.
28. Nicol D, MacFarlane-Dick D. 2006. Rethinking formative assessment in HE: A theoretical model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud High Educ 31(2):199-218.
29. Paskin Z, Peile E. 2010. Final year medical students' views on simulatedbased teaching: A comparison with best evidence medical education systematic review. Med Teach 32:569-577.
30. Patri M. 2002. The influence of peer feedback on self-and peer-assessment of oral skills. Lang Test 19(2):109-131.
31. Sargent J, Mann K, Sinclair D, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. 2007. Challenges in multisource feedback: Intended and unintended outcomes. Med Educ 41:583-591.
32. Shin E, Wilkins E, Ainsworth J. 2009. Perception vs. reality: peer feedback practices to enhance preservice teacher reflection during an elementary early clinical experience Accessed 6 June 2009.
33. Ten Cate ThJ, Durning S. 2007a. Dimensions and psychology of peer teaching in medical education. Med Teach 29:546-552.
34. Ten Cate Th J, Durning S. 2007b. Peer teaching in medical education: Twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Med Teach 29:591-599.
35. Topping KJ. 2005. Trends in peer learning. Educ Psychol 25(6):631-645.
36. van den Berg I, Admiraal W, Pilot A. 2006. Peer assessment in university teaching: Evaluating seven course designs. Assess Eval High Educ 31(1):19-36.
37. Van Gennip NAE, Seger MSR, Tillema HH. 2010. Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Learn Instr 20:280-290.
38. Weaver M. 2006. Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors' written responses. Assess Eval High Educ 31(3):379-394.
39. Westwood OMR, Leinster S, Weinberg JR. 2008. A health care curriculum for the 21st century: Time for flexibility? J. R Soc Med 101(2):59-62.