Medical students' clinical performance in general practice Triangulating assessments from patients, teachers and students

Medical Teacher

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 333-339

  Braend, Anja Maria ^a   Gran, Sarah Frandsen ^a   Frich, Jan C ^a   Lindbaek, Morten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; OBSERVATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; OBSERVATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77950358146     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/01421590903516866     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Arnold L, Willoughby TL, Calkins EV. 1985. Self-evaluation in undergraduate medical education: A longitudinal perspective. J Med Educ 60:21-28.
2. Benson J, Quince T, Hibble A, Fanshawe T, Emery J. 2005. Impact on patients of expanded, general practice based, student teaching: Observational and qualitative study. BMJ 331:89.
3. Black AE, Church M. 1998. Assessing medical student effectiveness from the psychiatric patient's perspective: The medical student interviewing performance questionnaire. Med Educ 32:472-478.
4. Bowen JL, Irby DM. 2002. Assessing quality and costs of education in the ambulatory setting: A review of the literature. Acad Med 77:621-680.
5. Braend AM, Gran SF, Lindbaek M. 2006. Patients - A useful resource when evaluating medical students' clinical practice? Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening 126:2122-2125.
6. Carline JD, Paauw DS, Thiede KW, Ramsey PG. 1992. Factors affecting the reliability of ratings of students' clinical skills in a medicine clerkship. J Gen Intern Med 7:506-510.
7. Carney PA, Pipas CF, Eliassen MS, Mengshol SC, Fall LH, Schifferdecker KE, Olson AL, Peltier DA, Nierenberg DW. 2002. An analysis of students' clinical experiences in an integrated primary care clerkship. Acad Med 77:681-687.
8. Elnicki DM, Kolarik R, Bardella I. 2003. Third-year medical students' perceptions of effective teaching behaviors in a multidisciplinary ambulatory clerkship. Acad Med 78:815-819.
9. Evans RG, Edwards A, Evans S, Elwyn B, Elwyn G. 2007. Assessing the practising physician using patient surveys: A systematic review of instruments and feedback methods. Fam Pract 24:117-127.
10. Gran SF, Braend AM, Lindbaek M. 2008. Clerkship in general practice - Organized for learning? Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening 128:2443-2445.
11. Gribble RK, Haupt C. 2005. Quantitative and qualitative differences between handout and mailed patient satisfaction surveys. Med Care 43:276-281.
12. Grol R, Wensing M. for the EUROPEP Group. 2000a. Patients evaluate general/family practice: The EUROPEP instrument. Nijmegen: World Organisation of Family Doctors (WONCA)/European Association for Quality in Family Practice. Grol R, Wensing M, Mainz J, Jung HP, Ferreira P, Hearnshaw H, Hjortdahl P
13. Olesen F, Reis S, Ribacke M, et al. 2000b. Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: An international comparison. Br J Gen Pract 50:882-887.
14. Hastings A, Mckinley RK, Fraser RC. 2006. Strengths and weaknesses in the consultation skills of senior medical students: Identification, enhancement and curricular change. Med Educ 40:437-443.
15. Henkin Y, Friedman M, Bouskila D, Kushnir D, Glick S. 1990. The use of patients as student evaluators. Med Teach 12:279-289.
16. Jones R. 2004. Oxford textbook of primary medical care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Kassebaum DG, Eaglen RH. 1999. Shortcomings in the evaluation of students' clinical skills and behaviors in medical school. Acad Med 74:842-849.
18. Langendyk V. 2006. Not knowing that they do not know: Self-assessment accuracy of third-year medical students. Med Educ 40:173-179.
19. Lockyer J. 2003. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies. JCEHP 23:4-12.
20. Moorhead R, Maguire P, Thoo SL. 2004. Giving feedback to learners in the practice. Aust Fam Physician 33:691-695.
21. Norcini J, Burch V. 2007. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE guide no. 31. Med Teach 29:855-871. Norwegian Centre for Informatics in Health and Social Care. Available from: http://www.kith.no/templates/kith- WebPage-1062.aspx
22. Papinczak T, Young L, Groves M, Haynes M. 2007. An analysis of peer, self, and tutor assessment in problem-based learning tutorials. Med Teach 29:e122-e132.
23. Salerno SM, Jackson JL, O'Malley PG. 2003. Interactive faculty development seminars improve the quality of written feedback in ambulatory teaching. J Gen Intern Med 18:831-834.
24. Sargeant J, Mann K, Ferrier S. 2005. Exploring family physicians' reactions to multisource feedback: Perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Med Educ 39:497-504.
25. Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, Van Der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. 2007. Challenges in multisource feedback: Intended and unintended outcomes. Med Educ 41:583-591.
26. Vingerhoets E, Wensing M, Grol R. 2001. Feedback of patients' evaluations of general practice care: A randomised trial. Qual. Health Care 10:224-228.
27. Wilkinson TJ, Fontaine S. 2002. Patients' global ratings of student competence. Unreliable contamination or gold standard? Med Educ 36:1117-1121.
28. Wood L, Hassell A, Whitehouse A, Bullock A, Wall D. 2006. A literature review of multi-source feedback systems within and without health services, leading to 10 tips for their successful design. Med Teach 28:e185-e191.
29. Woolliscroft JO, Tenhaken J, Smith J, Calhoun JG. 1993. Medical students' clinical self-assessments: Comparisons with external measures of performance and the students' self-assessments of overall performance and effort. Acad Med 68:285-294.