Species recognition and patterns of population variation in the reproductive structures of a damselfly genus

Evolution

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 419-428

  McPeek, Mark A ^a   Symes, Laurel B ^a   Zong, Denise M ^a   McPeek, Curtis L ^a  

^a Dartmouth College   (United States)

Author keywords

Enallagma; Mate choice; Odonata; Population variation; Species recognition

Indexed keywords

DAMSELFLY; MATE CHOICE; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY; SELECTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; INSECT; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FEMALE; INSECTS; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; PHENOTYPE; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

ENALLAGMA; ODONATA; ZYGOPTERA;

EID: 79251485304     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01138.x     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Anderson, M. J. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust. Ecol. 26:32-46.
2. Andersson, M. B. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
3. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe 2002a. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415:787-789.
4. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe 2002b. Correlated evolution of male and female morphologies in water striders. Evolution 56:936-947.
5. Bertin, A., and D. J. Fairbairn 2005. One tool, many uses: precopulatory sexual selection on genital morphology in Aquarius remigis. J. Evol. Biol. 18:949-961.
6. Bertin, A., and D. J. Fairbairn 2007. The form of sexual selection on male genitalia cannot be inferred from within-population variance and allometry: a case study in Aquarius remigis. Evolution 61:825-837.
7. Bonduriansky, R. 2007. Sexual selection and allometry: a critical reappraisal of the evidence and ideas. Evolution 61:838-849.
8. Boughman, J. 2001. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411:944-948.
9. Brechbühler, C., G. Gerig, and O. Kubler 1995. Parameterization of closed surfaces for 3D shape description. Comp. Vision Image Understand. 61:154-170.
10. Butler, R. G., and P. G. deMaynadier 2008. The significance of aquatic and shoreline habitat integrity to the conservation of lacustrine damselflies (Odonata). J. Insect Conserv. 12:23-36.
11. Butlin, R. 1987. Speciation by reinforcement. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2:8-13.
12. Butlin, R. 1995. Genetic variation in mating signals and responses. Pp. 327-366 in M. D. Lambert and G. H. Spencer, eds. Speciation and the recognition concept. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland
13. Day, T. 2000. Sexual selection and the evolution of costly female preferences: spatial effects. Evolution 54:715-730.
14. Dobzhansky, T. 1940. Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am. Nat. 74:312-321.
15. Donnelly, T. W. 2004. Distribution of North American Odonata, Part III: Calopterygidae, Lestidae, Coenagrionidae, Protoneuridae, Platystictidae. Bull. Am. Odonatol. 8:33-99.
16. Dufour, L. 1844. Anatomie générale des Dipteres. Annales des Sciences Naturelles Zoologie et Biologie Animale 1:244-264.
17. Eberhard, W. G. 1985. Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
18. Eberhard, W. G. 2004. Rapid divergent evolution of sexual morphology: comparative tests of antagonistic coevolution and traditional female choice. Evolution 58:1947-1970.
19. Eberhard, W. G. 2005. Sexual morphology of male Sepsis cynipsea (Diptera: Sepsidae): lack of support for lock-and-key and sexually antagonistic morphological coevolution hypotheses. Canadian Entomol. 137:551-565.
20. Endler, J. A. 1977. Geographic variation, speciation, and clines. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
21. Endler, J. A. 1992. Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am. Natur. 139:S125-S153.
22. Ferreira, M., and J. W. H. Ferguson 2002. Geographic vairaiton in the calling song of the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) and its relevance to mate recognition and mate choice. J. Zool. 257:163-170.
23. Fincke, O. M. 1982. Lifetime mating success in a natural population of the damselfly Enallagma hageni (Walsh) (Odonata, Coenagrionidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 10:293-302.
24. Fincke, O. M., A. Fargevieille, and T. D. Schultz 2007. Lack of innate preference for morph and species identity in mate-searching Enallagma damselflies. Behavi. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61:1121-1131.
25. Fuller, R. C., D. Houle, and J. Travis 2005. Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences. Am. Natur. 166:437-446.
26. Garrison, R. W. 1984. Revision of the genus Enallagma of the United States west of the Rocky Mountains and identification of certain larvae by discriminant analysis (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). University of California Publications in Entomology 105:1-129.
27. Gerhardt, H. C. 2005. Acoustic spectral preferences in two cryptic species of grey treefrogs: implications for mate choice and sensory mechanisms. Animal Behav. 70:39-48.
28. Gosden, T. P., and E. I. Svensson 2008. Spatial and temporal dynamics in a sexual selection mosaic. Evolution 62:845-856.
29. Grether, G. F. 1996. Intrasexual competition alone favors a sexually dimorphic ornament in the rubyspot damselfly Hetaerina americana. Evolution 50:1939-1948.
30. Grafen, A. 1990. Biological signals as handicaps. J. Theoret. Biol. 144, 517-546.
31. Hankison, S. J., and M. R. Morris 2002. Sexual selection and species recognition in the pygmy swordtail, Xiphophorus pygmaeus: conflicting preferences. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51:140-145.
32. Hankison, S. J., and M. R. Morris 2003. Avoiding a compromise between sexual selection and species recognition: female swordtail fish assess multiple speices-speciic cues. Behav. Ecol. 14:282-287.
33. Hoskin, C. J., and M. Higgie 2010. Speciation via species interactions: the divergence of mating traits within species. Ecol. Lett. 13:409-420.
34. Hosken, D. J., and P. Stockley 2003. Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:87-93.
35. Howard, D. J. 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. Pp. 46-69 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, New York
36. Huber, B. A. 2003. Rapid evolution and species-specificity of arthropod genitalia: fact of artifact? Organ. Diver. Evol. 3:63-71.
37. Johnson, D. M., and P. H. Crowley 1980. Habitat and seasonal segregation among coexisting odonate larvae. Odonatologica 9:297-308.
38. Kirkpatrick, M. 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female mate choice. Evolution 36:1-12.
39. Koenig, W. D. 1991. Levels of female choice in the white-tailed skimmer Plathemis lydia (Odonata: Libellulidae). Behaviour 119:193-224.
40. Koenig, W. D., and S. S. Albano 1987. Lifetime reproductive success, selection, and the opportunity for selection in the white-tailed skimmer Plathemis lydia (Odonata: Libellulidae). Evolution 41:22-36.
41. Krieger, F., and E. Krieger-Loibl 1958. Beiträge zum Verhalten von Ischura elegans und I. pumilio (Odonata). Z. Tierpsycholo. 15:82-93.
42. Kwiatkowski, M. A., and B. K. Sullivan 2002. Geographic variation in sexual selection among populations of an iguanid lizard, Sauromalyus obesus (=ater). Evolution 56:2039-2051.
43. Kutner, M. H., C. J. Nachtsheim, J. Neter, and W. Li 2005. Applied linear regression models, 5th ed. McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston
44. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 78:3721-3725.
45. Lande, R. 1982. Rapid origin of sexual isolation and character divergence in a cline. Evolution 36:213-223.
46. McPeek, M. A. 1990. Determination of species composition in the Enallagma damselfly assemblages of permanent lakes. Ecology 71:83-98.
47. McPeek, M. A. 1998. The consequences of changing the top predator in a food web: a comparative experimental approach. Ecol. Monographs 68:1-23.
48. McPeek, M. A., and S. Gavrilets 2006. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation. Evolution 60:1967-1980.
49. McPeek, M. A., L. Shen, J. Z. Torrey, and H. Farid 2008. The tempo and mode of 3-dimensional morphological evolution in male reproductive structures. Am. Natur. 171:E158-E178.
50. McPeek, M. A., L. Shen, and H. Farid 2009. The correlated evolution of 3-dimensional reproductive structures between male and female damselflies. Evolution 63:73-83.
51. Møller, A. P., and R. V. Alatalo 1999. Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proceedings for the Royal Society of London, B 266:85-91.
52. Morrison, D. F. 2004. Multivariate statistical methods, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York
53. Mutanen, M., A. Kaitala, and M. Mönkkönen 2006. Genital variation within and between three closely related Euxoa moth species: testing the lock-and-key hypothesis. J. Zool. London 268:109-119.
54. Neff, B. D., and T. E. Pitcher 2005. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Mol. Ecol. 14:19-38.
55. Paterson, H. E. H. 1993. Evolution and the recognition concept of species. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland
56. Paulson, D. R. 1974. Reproductive isolation in damselflies. System. Zool. 23:40-49.
57. Pfennig, K. S. 1998. The evolution of mate choice and the potential for conflict between species and mate-quality recognition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 265:1743-1748.
58. Phelps, S. M., S. A. Rand, and M. J. Ryan 2006. A cognitive framework for mate choice and species recognition. Am. Natur. 167:28-42.
59. Punzalan, D., F. H. Rodd, and L. Rowe 2010. Temporally variable multivariate sexual selection on sexually dimorphic traits in a wild insect population. Am. Natur. 175:401-414.
60. Ritchie, D. W., and G. J. Kemp 1999. Fast computation, rotation, and comparison of low resolution spherical harmonic molecular surfaces. J. Comp. Chem. 20:383-395.
61. Robertson, H. M., and H. E. H. Paterson 1982. Mate recognition and mechanical isolation in Enallagma damselflies (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Evolution 36:243-250.
62. Ryan, M. J., W. Rand, P. L. Hurd, S. M. Phelps, and A. S. Rand 2003. Generalization in response to mate recognition signals. Am. Natur. 161:380-394.
63. Searcy, W. A., and S. Nowicki 2000. Male-male competition and female choice in the evolution of vocal signaling. Pp. 301-315 in Y. Espmark, T. Amundsen, and G. Rosenqvist, eds. Animal signals. Tapir Academic, Trondheim, Norway
64. Servedio, M. R. 2001. Beyond reinforcement: the evolution of premating isolation by direct selection on preferences and postmating, prezygotic incompatibilities. Evolution 55:1909-1920.
65. Shapiro, A. M., and A. H. Porter 1989. The lock-and-key hypothesis: evolutionary and biosystematic interpretation of insect genitalia. Ann. Rev. Ecol. System. 34:231-245.
66. Shaw, K. L. 2000. Interspecific genetics of mate recognition: inheritance of female acoustic preferences in Hawaiian crickets. Evolution 54:1303-1312.
67. Shen, L., H. Huang, F. Makdeon, and A. J. Saykin 2007. Efficient registration of 3D SPHARM surfaces. CRV 2007: Fourth Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision, Montreal, QC, Pp. 81-88.
68. Shen, L., H. Farid, and M. A. McPeek 2009. Modeling 3-dimensional morphological structures using spherical harmonics. Evolution 63:1003-1016.
69. Siepielski, A. M., K.-L. Hung, E. E. B. Bein, and M. A. McPeek 2010. Experimental evidence for neutral community dynamics governing an insect assemblage. Ecology 91:847-857.
70. Simmons, L. W., M. Zuk, and J. T. Rotenberry 2001. Geographic variation in female preference functions and male songs of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Evolution 55:1386-1394.
71. Stoks, R., M. A. McPeek, and J. L. Mitchell 2003. The evolution of anti-predator behavior as lineages adapt to different habitats: damselflies in fish and dragonfly lakes. Evolution 57:574-585.
72. Stoks, R., J. L. Nystrom, M. L. May, and M. A. McPeek 2005. Parallel evolution in ecological and reproductive traits to produce cryptic damselfly species across the Holarctic. Evolution 59:1976-1988.
73. Svensson, E. I., L. Kristoffersen, K. Oskarsson, and S. Bensch 2004. Molecular population divergence and sexual selection on morphology in the banded demoiselle (Calopteryx splendens). Heredity 93:423-433.
74. Svensson, E. I., F. Eroukhmanoff, and M. Friberg 2006. Effects of natural and sexual selection on adaptive population divergence and premating isolation in a damselfly. Evolution 60:1242-1253.
75. Svensson, E. I., K. Karlsson, M. Friberg, and F. Eroukhmanoff 2007. Gender differences in species recognition and the evolution of asymmetric sexual isolation. Curr. Biol. 17:1943-1947.
76. Swanson, W. J., and V. D. Vacquier 2002. Reproductive protein evolution. Ann. Rev. Ecol. System. 33:161-179.
77. Templeton, A. R. 1979. Once again, why 300 species of Hawaiian Drosophila? Evolution 33:513-517.
78. Tennessen, K. J. 1982. Review of reproductive isolating barriers in Odonata. Adv. Odonatol. 1:251-265.
79. Turgeon, J., R. Stoks, R. A. Thum, J. M. Brown, and M. A. McPeek 2005. Simultaneous Quaternary radiations of three damselfly clades across the Holarctic. Am. Natur. 165:E78-E107.
80. Tynkkynen, K., M. J. Rantala, and J. Suhonen 2004. Interspecific aggression and character displacement in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens. J. Evol. Biol. 17:759-767.
81. Waage, J. K. 1975. Reproductive isolation and the potential for character displacement in the damselflies, Calopteryx maculata and C. aequabilis (Odonata: Calopterygidae). System. Zool. 24:24-36.
82. Waage, J. K. 1979. Character displacement in Caloptyeryx (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Evolution 33:104-116.
83. Wellenreuther, M., K. Tynkkynen, and E. I. Svensson 2010. Simulating range expansion: male species recognition and loss of premating isolation in damselflies. Evolution 64:242-252.
84. Westfall, M. J., and M. L. May 2006. Damselflies of North America, 2nd ed. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, Florida