Effects of natural and sexual selection on adaptive population divergence and premating isolation in a damselfly

Evolution

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1242-1253

  Svensson, Erik I ^a   Eroukhmanoff, Fabrice ^a,b   Friberg, Magne ^a,c  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^c STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Adaptive ridge; Direct selection; Divergence with gene flow; Fitness valley; Indirect selection; Parapatry; Plasticity

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; COURTSHIP; DAMSELFLY; DIVERGENCE; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; SEXUAL SELECTION;

CALOPTERYX SPLENDENS; ZYGOPTERA;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; INSECT; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; INSECTS; MALE; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 33748531310     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1554/06-036.1     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Arnold, S. J., M. E. Pfrender, and A. G. Jones. 2001. The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution. Genetica 112-113:9-32.
2. Arnqvist, G., and M. Kirkpatrick. 2005. The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: The strength of direct and indirect selection on extrapair copulation behavior in females. Am. Nat. 165:S26-S37.
3. Askew, R. R. 1988. The dragonflies of Europe. Harley Books, Colchester, U.K.
4. Badyaev, A. V., G. E. Hill, M. L. Beck, A. A. Dervan, R. A. Duckworth, K. J. Mcgraw, P. M. Nolan, and L. A. Whittingham. 2002. Sex-biased hatching order and adaptive population divergence in a passerine bird. Science 295:316-318.
5. Benkman, C. W. 2003. Divergent selection drives the adaptive radiation of crossbills. Evolution 57:1176-1181.
6. Benkman, C. W., T. L. Parchman, A. Favis, and A. M. Siepielski. 2003. Reciprocal selection causes a coevolutionary arms race between crossbills and lodgepole pine. Am. Nat. 162:182-194.
7. Bensch, S., D. Hasselquist, B. Nielsen, and B. Hansson. 1998. Higher fitness for philopatric than for immigrant males in a semi-isolated population of great reed warblers. Evolution 52:877-883.
8. Boughman, J. W., H. D. Rundle, and D. Schluter. 2005. Parallel evolution of sexual isolation in sticklebacks. Evolution 59:361-373.
9. Butlin, R. 1987. Speciation by reinforcement. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2:8-13.
10. _. 1989. Reinforcement of pre-mating isolation. Pp. 158-179 in D. Otte and J. A. Endler, eds., Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
11. Corbet, P. S. 1999. Dragonflies: behaviour and ecology of Odonata. Harley Books, Colchester, U.K.
12. Coyne, J. A. and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
13. Coyne, J. A., N. H. Barton, and M. Turelli. 1997. Perspective: a critique of of Sewall Wright's shifting balance theory of evolution. Evolution 51:643-671.
14. Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London.
15. Day, T. 2000. Sexual selection and the evolution of costly female preferences: spatial effects. Evolution 54:715-730.
16. Endler, J. A. 1977. Geographic variation, speciation, and clines. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
17. Fear, K., and T. Price. 1998. The adaptive surface in ecology. Oikos 82:440-448.
18. Fuller, R. C., D. Houle, and J. Travis. 2005. Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences. Am. Nat. 166:437-446.
19. Gavrilets, S. 2000. Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers by sexual conflict. Nature 403:886-889.
20. Gavrilets, S. 2004. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
21. Hamon, T. R. 2005. Measurement of concurrent selection episodes. Evolution 59:1096-1103.
22. Hamon, T. R., and C. J. Foote. 2005. Concurrent natural and sexual selection in wild male sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Evolution 59:1104-1118.
23. Hendry, A. P., and E. B. Taylor. 2004. How much of the variation in adaptive divergence can be explained by gene flow? An evaluation using lake-stream stickleback pairs. Evolution 58:2319-2331.
24. Hendry, A. P., J. K. Wenburg, P. Bentzen, E. C. Volk, and T. P. Quinn. 2000. Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon. Science 290:516-518.
25. Hendry, A. P., E. B. Taylor, and J. D. McPhail. 2002. Adaptive divergence and the balance between selection and gene flow: lake and stream stickleback in the misty system. Evolution 56:1199-1216.
26. Hereford, J., T. F. Hansen, and D. Houle. 2004. Comparing strengths of directional selection: how strong is strong? Evolution 58:2133-2143.
27. Hoekstra, H. E., J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, A. Hoang, C. E. Hill, P. Beerli, and J. G. Kingsolver. 2001. Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:9157-9160.
28. Holland, B., and W. R. Rice. 1998. Perspective: chase-away sexual selection: Antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52:1-7.
29. Iwasa, Y., and A. Pomiankowski. 1995. Continual change in mate preferences. Nature 377:420-422.
30. Janzen, F. J., and H. S. Stern. 1998. Logistic regression for empirical studies of multivariate selection. Evolution 52:1564-1571.
31. Jiggins, C. D., R. E. Naisbit, R. L. Coe, and J. Mallet. 2001. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411:302-305.
32. Kawecki, T. J., and D. Ebert. 2004. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecology Letters 7:1225-1241.
33. King, R. B., and R. Lawson. 1995. Color-pattern variation in Lake Erie water snakes: the role of gene flow. Evolution 49:885-896.
34. Kingsolver, J. G., H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, C. E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gibert, and P. Beerli. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157:245-261.
35. Kirkpatrick, M. 1996. Genes and adaptation: a pocket guide to the theory. Pp. 125-146 in M.R. Rose and G.V. Lauder, eds. Adaptation. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
36. Kirkpatrick, M., and N. H. Barton. 1997. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:1282-1286.
37. Kotiaho, J. S. 2001. Costs of sexual traits: a mismatch between theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Biol. Rev. 76:365-376.
38. Lande, R. 1982. Rapid origin of sexual isolation and character divergence in a cline. Evolution 36:213-223.
39. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
40. Losos, J. B., D. A. Creer, D. Glossip, R. Goellner, A. Hampton, G. Roberts, N. Haskell, P. Taylor, and J. Ettling. 2000. Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in the hindlimb of the lizard Anolis sagrei. Evolution 54:301-305.
41. McPeek, M. A., and J. M. Brown. 2000. Building a regional species pool: diversification of the Enallagma damselflies in Eastern North America. Ecology 421:904-920.
42. Merilä, J., and P. Crnokrak. 2001. Comparisons of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. J. Evol. Biol. 14:892-903.
43. Möller, A. P., and R. Alatalo. 1999. Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 266:85-91.
44. Nosil, P., and B. J. Crespi. 2004. Does gene flow constrain adaptive divergence or vice versa? A test using ecomorphology and sexual isolation in Timema cristinae walking-sticks. Evolution 58:102-112.
45. Nosil, P., B. J. Crespi, and C. P. Sandoval. 2002. Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature 417:440-443.
46. Nosil, P., T. H. Vines, and D. J. Funk. 2005. Perspective: reproductive isolation caused by natural selection against immigrants from divergent habitats. Evolution 59:705-719.
47. Orteiza, N., J. E. Linder, and W. R. Rice. 2005. Sexy sons from remating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system. J. Evol. Biol. 18:1315-1323.
48. Panhuis, T. M., R. Butlin, M. Zuk, and T. Tregenza. 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:364-371.
49. Paulson, D. R. 1974. Reproductive isolation in damselflies. Syst. Zool. 23:40-49.
50. Phillips, P. C., and S. J. Arnold. 1989. Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution 43:1209-1266.
51. Price, T. 1998. Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 353:251-260.
52. Price, T. D., A. Qvarnstrom, and D. E. Irwin. 2003. The role of phenotypic plasticity in driving genetic evolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 270:1433-1440.
53. Rice, W. R., and E. Hostert. 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47: 1637-1653.
54. Rieseberg, L. H., A. Widmer, A. M. Arntz, and J. M. Burke. 2002. Directional selection is the primary cause of phenotypic diversification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:12242-12245.
55. Rowe, L., and D. Houle. 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 263:1415-1421.
56. Schluter, D. 2000. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
57. _. 2001. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:372-380.
58. Schluter, D., and D. Nychka. 1994. Exploring fitness surfaces. Am. Nat. 143:597-616.
59. Seehausen, O., J. J. M. van Alphen, and F. Witte. 1997. Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 277:1808-1811.
60. Servedio, M. R. 2001. Beyond reinforcement: the evolution of premating isolation by direct selection on preferences and postmating, prezygotic incompatibilities. Evolution 55:1909-1920.
61. _. 2004. The evolution of premating isolation: Local adaptation and natural and sexual selection against hybrids. Evolution 58:913-924.
62. Siva-Jothy, M. 1999. Male wing pigmentation may affect reproductive success via female choice in a Calopterygid damselfly (Zygoptera). Behaviour 136:1365-1377.
63. _. 2000. A mechanistic link between parasite resistance and expression of a sexually selected trait in a damselfly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 267:2523-2527.
64. Smith, T. B., R. K. Wayne, D. J. Girman, and M. Bruford. 1997. A role for ecotones in generating rainforest biodiversity. Science 276:1855-1857.
65. Statsoft, I. 2003. STATISTICA (data analysis software system). Vers. 6. Available at: www.statsoft.com.
66. Svensson, E. I., and B. Sinervo. 2000. Experimental excursions on adaptive landscapes: density-dependent selection on egg size. Evolution 54:1396-1403.
67. _. 2004. Spatial scale and temporal component of selection in side-blotched lizards. Am. Nat. 163:726-734.
68. Svensson, E. I., L. Kristoffersen, K. Oskarsson, and S. Bensch. 2004. Molecular population divergence and sexual selection on morphology in the banded demoiselle (Calopteryx splendens). Heredity 93:423-433.
69. Svensson, E. I., J. Abbott, and R. Hardling. 2005. Female polymorphism, frequency dependence, and rapid evolutionary dynamics in natural populations. Am. Nat. 165:567-576.
70. Tynkkynen, K., M. J. Rantala, and J. Suhonen. 2004. Interspecific aggression and character displacement in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens. J. Evol. Biol. 17:759-767.
71. Tynkkynen, K., J. S. Kotiaho, M. Luojumaki, and J. Suhonen. 2005. Interspecific aggression causes negative selection on sexual characters. Evolution 59:1838-1843.
72. Waage, J. K. 1975. Reproductive isolation and potential for character displacement in damselflies, Calopteryx maculata and Calopteryx aequabilis (Odonata-Calopterygidae). Syst. Zool. 24:24-36.
73. _. 1979. Reproductive character displacement in Calopteryx (Odonata: Calopterygiidae). Evolution 33:104-116.
74. West-Eberhard, M. J. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58:155-183.
75. _. 2003. Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
76. Whitlock, M. C., P. C. Phillips, F. B. G. Moore, and S. J. Tonsor. 1995. Multiple fitness peaks and epistasis. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:601-629.
77. Wong, B. B. M., J. S. Keogh, and M. D. Jennions. 2004. Mate recognition in a freshwater fish: geographical distance, genetic differentiation, and variation in female preference for local over foreign males. J. Evol. Biol. 17:701-708.