Modeling three-dimensional morphological structures using spherical harmonics

Evolution

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1003-1016

  Shen, Li ^a   Farid, Hany ^b   McPeek, Mark A ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Dartmouth Department of Computer Science_Dartmouth College   (United States)

^c Dartmouth College   (United States)

Author keywords

Enallagma cerci; Fourier descriptors; Morphological evolution; Shape analysis; Spherical harmonics

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FLY; MORPHOLOGY; NUMERICAL METHOD; SHAPE ANALYSIS; SPHERICAL HARMONICS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HISTOLOGY; INSECT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INSECTS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

ENALLAGMA; ZYGOPTERA;

EID: 62749173576     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00557.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ballard, D. H., and C. M. Brown. 1982. Computer vision. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
2. Besl, P. J., and N. D. McKay. 1992. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intelligence 14 : 239 256.
3. Bookstein, F. L. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England, New York.
4. Bookstein, F. L., R. E. Strauss, J. M. Humphries, B. Chernoff, R. L. Elder, and G. R. Smith. 1982. A comment upon the uses of Fourier methods in systematics. Syst. Zool. 31 : 85 92.
5. Brechbuhler, C., G. Gerig, and O. Kubler. 1995. Parameterization of closed surfaces for 3D shape description. Comp. Vis. Image Understanding 61 : 154 170.
6. Bulow, T. 2004. Spherical diffusion for 3D surface smoothing. IEEE Trans. PAMI 26 : 1650 1654.
7. Davis, M. W., D. P. Flamig, and S. E. Harms. 1997. A physics-based coordinate transformation for 3-D image matching. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 16 : 317 328.
8. Dryden, I. L., and K. V. Mardia. 1998. Statistical shape analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
9. Ehrlich, R., R. B. Pharr Jr., and N. Healy-Williams. 1983. Comments on the validity of Fourier descriptors in systematics: a reply to Bookstein et al. Syst. Zool. 32 : 202 206.
10. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 126 : 1 25.
11. Ferson, S., F. J. Rohlf, and R. K. Koehn. 1985. Measuring shape variation of two-dimensional outlines. Syst. Zool. 34 : 59 68.
12. Floater, M. S., and K. Hormann. 2004. Surface parameterization: a tutorial and survey. Multiresolution in geometric modelling. Springer, Berlin.
13. Foote, M. 1989. Perimeter-based Fourier analysis: a new morphometric method applied to the Trilobite cranidium. J. Paleontol. 63 : 880 885.
14. Funkhouser, T., P. Min, M. Kazhdan, J. Chen, A. Halderman, D. Dobkin, and D. Jacobs. 2003. A search engine for 3D models. ACM Trans. Graphics 22 : 83 105.
15. Gay-Bellile, V., M. Perriollat, A. Bartoli, and P. Sayd. 2006. Image registration by combining thin-plate splines with a 3D morphable model. IEEE Image Proc. 2006 : 1069 1072.
16. Gerig, G., M. Styner, D. Jones, D. Weinberger, and J. Lieberman. 2001a. Shape analysis of brain ventricles using SPHARM. Pp. 171 178. IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis, London.
17. Gerig, G., M. Styner, M. E. Shenton, and J. A. Lieberman. 2001b. Shape versus size: improved understanding of the morphology of brain structures. Pp. 24 32. 4th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2001). Springer, Ultrecht, the Netherlands.
18. Hanson, A. J. 1988. Hyperquadrics: smoothly deformable shapes with convex polyhedral bounds. Comput. Vision Graph. Image Proc. 44 : 191 210.
19. Klingenberg, C. P., and L. R. Monteiro. 2005. Distances and directions in multidimensional shape spaces: implications for morphometric applications. Syst. Biol. 54 : 678 688.
20. Klingenberg, C. P., M. Barluenga, and A. Meyer. 2002. Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution 56 : 1909 1920.
21. Kristensen, E., T. E. Parsons, B. Hallgrimsson, and S. K. Boyd. 2006. A novel method of mean shape comparison for developmental morphology and bone disease research using micro-computed tomography. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 21 : S356 S356.
22. Kuhl, F. P., and C. R. Giardina. 1982. Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Comput. Graph. Image Proc. 18 : 236 258.
23. Liao, S.-H., R.-F. Tong, and J.-X. Dong. 2005. 3D whole tooth model from CT volume using thin-plate splines. IEEE Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design : 600 604.
24. MacLeod, N. 1999. Generalizing and extending the eigenshape method of shape space visualization and analysis. Paleobiology 25 : 107 138.
25. Marcus, L. F., M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice, eds. 1996. Advances in morphometrics. Plenum, New York.
26. McPeek, M. A., L. Shen, J. Z. Torrey, and H. Farid. 2008. The tempo and mode of 3-dimensional morphological evolution in male reproductive structures. Am. Nat. 171 : E158 E178.
27. McPeek, M. A., L. Shen, and H. Farid. 2009. The correlated evolution of 3-dimensional reproductive structures between male and female damselflies. Evolution, in press.
28. Morrison, D. F. 2004. Multivariate statistical methods. McGraw-Hill, New York.
29. Nieman, B. J., A. M. Flenniken, S. L. Adamson, R. M. Henkelman, and J. G. Sled. 2006. Anatomical phenotyping in the brain and skull of a mutant mouse by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Physiol. Genom. 24 : 154 162.
30. C342Y. J. Anat. 211 : 37 52.
31. Paulson, D. R. 1974. Reproductive isolation in damselflies. Syst. Zool. 23 : 40 49.
32. Plyusnin, I., A. R. Evans, A. Karme, A. Gionis, and J. Jernvall. 2008. Automated 3D phenotype analysis using data mining. PLoS One 3 : e1742.
33. Polly, P. D. 2008. Developmental dynamics and G-matrices: can morphometric spaces be used to model phenotypic evolution? Evol. Biol. 35 : 83 96.
34. Rice, S. H. 2004. Developmental associations between traits: covariance and beyond. Genetics 166 : 513 526.
35. Richtsmeier, J. T., V. B. DeLeon, and S. R. Lele. 2002. The promise of geometric morphometrics. Yearbook Phys. Anthropol. 45 : 63 91.
36. Ritchie, D., and G. Kemp. 1999. Fast computation, rotation, and comparison of low resolution spherical harmonic molecular surfaces. J. Comp. Chem. 20 : 383 395.
37. Robertson, H. M., and H. E. H. Paterson. 1982. Mate recognition and mechanical isolation in Enallagma damselflies (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Evolution 36 : 243 250.
38. Rohlf, F. J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55 : 2143 2160.
39. Rohlf, F. J., and J. W. Archie. 1984. A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Syst. Zool. 33 : 302 317.
40. Rohlf, F. J., and L. Marcus. 1993. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8 : 128 132.
41. Schudy, R., and D. Ballard. 1979. Towards an anatomical model of heart motion as seen in 4-D cardiac ultrasound data. The 6th Conference on Computer Applications in Radiology and Computer-Aided Analysis of Radiological Images.
42. Scott, R. S., P. S. Ungar, T. S. Bergstrom, C. A. Brown, F. E. Grine, M. F. Teaford, and A. Walker. 2005. Dental microwear texture analysis shows within-species diet variability in fossil homonins. Nature 436 : 693 695.
43. Shen, L., and F. Makedon. 2006. Spherical mapping for processing of 3-D closed surfaces. Image Vision Comput. 24 : 743 761.
44. Shen, L., J. Ford, F. Makedon, and A. Saykin. 2004. A Surface-based approach for classification of 3D neuroanatomic structures. Intell. Data Anal. 8 : 519 542.
45. Small, C. G. 1996. The statistical theory of shape. Springer, New York.
46. Steppan, S. J., P. C. Phillips, and D. Houle. 2002. Comparative quantitative genetics: evolution of the G matrix. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17 : 320 327.
47. Teanby, N. A. 2006. An icosahedron-based method for even binning of globally distributed remote sensing data. Comput. Geosci. 32 : 1442 1450.
48. Terzopoulos, D., and D. Metaxas. 1991. Dynamic 3D models with local and global deformations: deformable superquadrics. IEEE Trans. PAMI 13 : 703 714.
49. Weisstein, E. W. 2008. Genus. From MathWorld A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Genus.html.
50. Westfall, M. J., and M. L. May. 2006. Damselflies of North America, 2nd edn. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, FL.
51. Zelditch, M. L., W. L. Fink, and D. L. Swiderski. 1995. Morphometrics, homology, and phylogenetics: quantified characters as synapomorphies. Syst. Biol. : 179 189.
52. Zelditch, M. L., D. L. Swiderski, H. D. Sheets, and W. L. Fink. 2004. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, California.
53. Zhou, K., H. Bao, and J. Shi. 2004. 3D surface filtering using spherical harmonics. CAD 36 : 363 375.