Interspecific aggression and character displacement in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 759-767

  Tynkkynen, K ^a   Rantala, M J ^a,b   Suhonen, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Calopterygidae; Interspecific interactions; Odonata; Reinforcement; Reproductive character displacement; Species recognition; Sympatry; Territory holding ability

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT; DAMSELFLY; RECOGNITION;

AGGRESSION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOLUTION; FINLAND; FORELIMB; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; INSECT; PHYSIOLOGY; PIGMENTATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TERRITORIALITY;

AGGRESSION; ANIMALS; EVOLUTION; FINLAND; INSECTS; PIGMENTATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TERRITORIALITY; WING;

ANIMALIA; CALOPTERYGIDAE; CALOPTERYX; CALOPTERYX SPLENDENS; CALOPTERYX VIRGO; INSECTA; ODONATA; ZYGOPTERA;

EID: 3042822570     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00733.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Alatalo, R.V., Gustafsson, L. & Lundberg, A. 1994. Male coloration and species recognition in sympatric flycatchers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 256: 113-118.
2. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
3. Anholt, B.R. 1990. An experimental separation of interference and exploitative competition in a larval damselfly. Ecology 71: 1483-1493.
4. Bonnet, E & Van de Peer, Y. 2002. zt - a software tool for simple and partial Mantel tests. J. Stat. Software 7(10): 1-12.
5. Butcher, G.S. & Rohwer, S. 1989. The evolution of conspicuous and distinctive coloration for communication in birds. Curr. Ornithol. 6: 51-108.
6. Butlin, R. 1987. Speciation by reinforcement. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2: 8-13.
7. Butlin, R. 1989. Reinforcement of premating isolation. In: Speciation and its Consequences (D. Otte & J. A. Endler, eds), pp. 159-179. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland.
8. Corbet, P.S. 1999. Dragonflies: Behaviour and Ecology of Odonata. Harley Books, Essex.
9. Cordero, A. 1995. Correlates of male mating success in two natural populations of the damselfly Ischnura graellsii (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Ecol. Entomol. 20: 213-222.
10. Cordoba-Aguilar, A. 2002. Wing pigmentation in territorial male damselflies, Calopteryx haemorrhoidalis: a possible relation to sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 63: 759-766.
11. Cordoba-Aguilar, A., Salamanca-Ocaña, J.C. & Lopezaraiza, M. 2003. Female reproductive decisions and parasite burden in a calopterygid damselfly (Insecta: Odonata). Anim. Behav. 66: 81-87.
12. De Marchi, G. 1990. Precopulatory reproductive isolation and wing colour dimorphism in Calopteryx splendens females in southern Italy (Zygoptera: Calopterygidae). Odonatologica 19: 243-250.
13. Dumont, H.J., Mertens, J. & De Coster, W. 1993. The Calopteryx splendens-cline in southwestern France, analyzed by quantitative wingspot analysis (Zygoptera: Calopterygidae). Odonatologica 22: 345-351.
14. Fincke, O.M. 1988. Sources of variation in lifetime reproductive success in a nonterritorial damselfly (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). In: Reproductive Success: Studies of Individual Variation of Contrasting Breeding Systems (T. H. Glutton-Brock, ed.), pp. 24-43. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
15. Genner, M.J., Turner, G.F. & Hawkins, S.J. 1999. Resource control by territorial male cichlid fish in Lake Malawi. J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 522-529.
16. Gibbons, D.W. & Pain, D. 1992. The influence of river flow rate on the breeding behavior of Calopteryx damselflies. J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 283-289.
17. Grether, G.F. 1996. Sexual selection and survival selection on wing coloration and body size in the rubyspot damselfly Hetaerina americana. Evolution 50: 1939-1948.
18. Higgie, M., Chenoweth, S. & Blows, M.W. 2000. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290: 519-521.
19. Hooper, R.E. & Siva-Jothy, M.T. 1997. "Flybys": a prereproductive remote assessment behavior of female Calopteryx splendens xanthostoma (Odonata: Calopterygidae). J. Insect Behav. 10: 165-175.
20. Howard, D.J. 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In: Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process (R.G., Harrison, ed.), pp. 46-69. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
21. Jennions, M.D., Møller, A.P. & Petrie, M. 2001. Sexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis. Q. Rev. Biol. 76: 3-36.
22. Jiggins, C.D., Naisbit, R.E., Coe, R.L. & Mallet, J. 2001. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411: 302-305.
23. Koskimäki, J., Rantala, M.J., Taskinen, J., Tynkkynen, K. & Suhonen, J. 2004. Immunocompetence and resource holding potential in the damselfly, Calopteryx virgo L. Behav. Ecol. 15: 169-173.
24. Kotiaho, J.S., Simmons, L.W. & Tomkins, J.L. 2001. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410: 684-686.
25. Lessells, C.M. & Boag, P.T. 1987. Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104: 116-121.
26. Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland.
27. Møller, A.P. & Alatalo, R.V. 1999. Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 85-91.
28. Marden, J.H. & Rollins, R.A. 1994. Assessment of energy reserves by damselflies engaged in aerial contest for mating territories. Anim. Behav. 48: 1023-1030.
29. Marden, J.H. & Waage, J.K. 1990. Escalated damselfly territorial contests are energetic wars of attrition. Anim. Behav. 39: 954-959.
30. Marshall, J.L., Arnold, M.L. & Howard, D.J. 2002. Reinforcement: the road not taken. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 558-563.
31. Marvin, G.A. 1998. Interspecific aggression and spatial relationships in the salamanders Plethodon kentucki and Plethodon glutinosus: evidence of interspecific interference competition. Can. J. Zool. 76: 94-103.
32. May, M.L. 1984. Energetics of adult Anisoptera, with special reference to feeding and reproductive behavior. Adv. Odonatol. 2: 95-115.
33. Murray, B.G., Jr 1981. The origins of adaptive interspecific territorialism. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 56: 1-22.
34. Nishikawa, K.C. 1987. Interspecific aggressive behaviour in salamanders: species-specific interference or misidentification? Anim. Behav. 35: 263-270.
35. Noor, M.A. 1995. Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature 375: 674-675.
36. Noor, M.A.F. 1999. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83: 503-508.
37. Pajunen, V.I. 1966. Aggressive behaviour and territoriality in a population of Calopteryx virgo L. (Odon., Calopterygidae). Ann. Zool. Fenn. 3: 201-214.
38. Pfennig, D.W. & Murphy, P.J. 2002. How fluctuating competition and phenotypic plasticity mediate species divergence. Evolution 56: 1217-1228.
39. Plaistow, S. & Siva-Jothy, M.T. 1996. Energetic constraints and male mate-securing tactics in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens xanthostoma (Charpentier). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 1233-1238.
40. Pomiankowski, A. & Møller, A.P. 1995. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260: 21-29.
41. Rantala, M.J., Koskimäki, J., Taskinen, J., Tynkkynen, K. & Suhonen, J. 2000. Immunocompetence, developmental stability and wingspot size in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens L. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 2453-2457.
42. Sætre, G.-P., Král, M. & Bicík, V. 1993. Experimental evidence for interspecific female mimicry in sympatric Ficedula flycatchers. Evolution 47: 939-945.
43. Sætre, G.-P., Moum, T., Bures, S., Král, M., Adamjan, M. & Moreno, J. 1997. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387: 589-592.
44. Saloniemi, I. 1993. An environmental explanation for the character displacement pattern in Hydrobia snails. Oikos 67: 75-80.
45. Schluter, D. 2000. Ecological character displacement in adaptive radiation. Am. Nat. 156: S4-S16.
46. Schütte, C. & Schrimpf, I. 2002. Explaining species distribution in running water systems: larval respiration and growth of two Calopteryx species (Odonata, Zygoptera). Arch. Hydrobiol. 153: 217-229.
47. Siva-Jothy, M.T. 1999. Male wing pigmentation may affect reproductive success via female choice in a calopterygid damselfly (Zygoptera). Behaviour 136: 1365-1377.
48. Siva-Jothy, M.T. 2000. A mechanistic link between parasite resistance and expression of a sexually selected trait in a damselfly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 2523-2527.
49. Siva-Jothy, M.T. & Hooper, R.E. 1995. The disposition and genetic diversity of stored sperm in females of the damselfly Calopteryx splendens xanthostoma (Charpentier). Proc. R. Soc. Land. B 259: 313-318.
50. Siva-Jothy, M.T., Gibbons, D.W. & Pain, D. 1995. Female oviposition-site preference and egg hatching success in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens xanthostoma. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 37: 39-44.
51. Valle, K.J. 1937. Geozoologisessa suhteessa mielenkiintoinen sudenkorento. Luonnon ystävä 41: 49-55.
52. Valtonen, P. 1980. Die Verbreitung der Finnischen Libellen (Odonata). Notul. Entomol. 60: 199-215.
53. Van Buskirk, J. 1987. Density-dependent population dynamics in larvae of the dragonfly Pachydiplax longipennis: a field experiment. Oecologia 72: 221-225.
54. Veen, T., Borge, T., Griffith, S.C., Sætre, G.-P., Bures, S., Gustafsson, L. & Sheldon, B.C. 2001. Hybridization and adaptive mate choice in flycatchers. Nature 411: 45-50.
55. Waage, J.K. 1975. Reproductive isolation and the potential for character displacement in the damselflies, Calopteryx maculata and C. aequabilis (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Syst. Zool. 24: 24-36.
56. Waage, J.K. 1979. Reproductive character displacement in Calopteryx (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Evolution 33: 104-116.
57. Waage, J.K. 1988. Confusion over residency and the escalation of damselfly territorial disputes. Anim. Behav. 36: 586-595.
58. Zar, J.H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.