The correlated evolution of three-dimensional reproductive structures between male and female damselflies

Evolution

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 73-83

  McPeek, Mark A ^a   Shen, Li ^b   Farid, Hany ^c  

^a Dartmouth College   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Dartmouth Department of Computer Science_Dartmouth College   (United States)

Author keywords

Mate recognition; Mating structures; Morphological evolution; Punctuated change; Reproductive isolation; Spherical harmonics

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FLY; MATE RECOGNITION; MATING BEHAVIOR; MORPHOLOGY; PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; INSECT; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SPECIATION; INSECTS; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REPRODUCTION;

COENAGRIONIDAE; ENALLAGMA; ZYGOPTERA;

EID: 58249144881     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00527.x     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Andersson, M. B. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Arnqvist, G. 1997. The evolution of animal genitalia: distinguishing between hypotheses by single species studies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 60 : 365 379.
3. Arnqvist, G. 1998. Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393 : 784 786.
4. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe. 2002a. Correlated evolution of male and female morphologies in water striders. Evolution 56 : 936 947.
5. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe. 2002b. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415 : 787 789.
6. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe. 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
7. Bertin, A., and D. J. Fairbairn. 2005. One tool, many uses: precopulatory sexual selection on genital morphology in Aquarius remigis. J. Evol. Biol. 18 : 949 961.
8. Besset, D. H. 2001. Object-oriented implementations of numerical methods: an introduction with Java and Smalltalk. Morgan Kaufman Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
9. Blomberg, S. P., T. Garland, Jr., and A. R. Ives. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57 : 717 745.
10. Blows, M. W. 2002. Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269 : 1113 1118.
11. Boake, C. R. B. 2002. Sexual signaling and speciation, a microevolutionary perspective. Genetica 116 : 205 214.
12. Boake, C. R. B., M. P. DeAngelis, and D. K. Andreadis. 1997. Is sexual selection and species recognition a continuum? mating behavior of the stalk-eyed fly Drosophila heteronerura. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 : 12442 12445.
13. Brechbühler, C., G. Gerig, and O. Kubler. 1995. Parameterization of closed surfaces for 3D shape description. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 61 : 154 170.
14. Brennan, P. L. R., R. O. Prum, K. G. McCracken, M. D. Sorenson, R. E. Wilson, and T. R. Birkhead. 2007. Coevolution of male and female genital morphology in waterfowl. Plos One 2 : e418.
15. Brown, J. M., M. A. McPeek, and M. L. May. 2000. A phylogenetic perspective on habitat shifts and diversity in the North American Enallagma damselflies. Syst. Biol. 49 : 697 712.
16. Carson, H. L., and A. R. Templeton 1984. Genetic revolutions in relations to speciation phenomena - the founding of new populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 15 : 97 131.
17. Castellano, S., and P. Cermelli. 2006. Reconciling sexual selection to species recognition: a process-based model of mating decision. J. Theor. Biol. 242 : 529 538.
18. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland MA.
19. Doherty, J. A. 1985. Phonotaxis in the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus degeer: comparisons of choice and no-choice paradigms. J. Comp. Physiol. A 157 : 279 289.
20. Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
21. Dobzhansky, T. 1940. Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am. Nat. 74 : 312 321.
22. Donnelly, T. W. 2004. Distribution of North American Odonata, Part III: Calopterygidae, Lestidae, Coenagrionidae, Protoneuridae, Platystictidae. Bull. Am. Odonatol. 8 : 33 99.
23. Dufour, L. 1844. Anatomie Générale des Dipteres. Ann. Sci. Nat. 1 : 24 264.
24. Eberhard, W. G. 1985. Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
25. Eberhard, W. G. 2005. Sexual morphology of male Sepsis cynipsea (Diptera: Sepsidae): lack of support for the lock-and-key and sexually antagonistic morphological coevolution hypotheses. Can. Entomol. 137 : 551 565.
26. Fairbairn, D. J. R., Vermette, N. N. Kapoor, and N. Zahiri. 2003. Functional morphology of sexually selected genitalia in the water strider Aquarius remigis. Can. J. Zool. 81 : 400 413.
27. Felsenstein, J. 1973. Maximum likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 25 : 471 492.
28. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125 : 1 15.
29. Fincke, O.M. 1982. Lifetime mating success in a natural population of the damselfly Enallagma hageni (Walsh) (Odonata, Coenagrionidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 10 : 293 302.
30. Fincke, O.M. 1986. Lifetime reproductive success and the opportunity for selection in a nonterritorial damselfly (Odonata, Coenagrionidae). Evolution 40 : 791 803.
31. Fincke, O.M. 1997. Conflict resolution in the Odonata: implications for understanding female mating patterns and female choice. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 60 : 201 220.
32. Fincke, O. M., A. Fargevieille, and T. D. Schultz. 2007. Lack of innate preference for morph and species identity in mate-searching Enallagma damselflies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61 : 1121 1131.
33. Freckleton, R. P., P. H. Harvey, and M. Pagel. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160 : 712 726.
34. Garland, T., Jr., P. E. Midford, and A. R. Ives 1999. An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods, and a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral values. Am. Zool. 39 : 374 388.
35. Gavrilets, S. 2000. Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation driven by sexual conflict. Nature 403 : 886 889.
36. Gavrilets, S. 2004. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
37. Gavrilets, S., and C. R. B. Boake. 1998. On the evolution of premating isolation after a founder event. Am. Nat. 152 : 706 716.
38. Gerhardt, H. C. 2005. Acoustic spectral preferences in two cryptic species of grey treefrogs: implications for mate choice and sensory mechanisms. Anim. Behav. 70 : 39 48.
39. Hankison, S. J., and M. R. Morris. 2003. Avoiding a compromise between sexual selection and species recognition: female swordtail fish assess multiple species-specific cues. Behav. Ecol. 14 : 282 287.
40. Hausmann, A. 1999. Falsification of an entomological rule: polymorphic genitalia in geometrid moths. Spixiana 22 : 83 90.
41. Henry, C.S., M. L. M. Wells, and C. M. Simon. 1999. Convergent evolution of courtship songs among cryptic species of the Carnea group of green lacewings (Neuroptera : Chrysopidae : Chrysoperla). Evolution 53 : 1165 1179.
42. Hosken, D. J., and P. Stockley. 2003. Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19 : 87 93.
43. Hoskin, C. J., M. Higgie, K. R. McDonald, and C. Moritz. 2005. Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation. Nature 437 : 1353 1356.
44. Howard, D. J., and S. H. Berlocher. 1998. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
45. Huber, B. A. 2003. Rapid evolution and species-specificity of arthropod genitalia: fact of artifact? Organisms Divers. Evol. 3 : 63 71.
46. Huber, B. A., and A. P. González. 2001. Female genital dimorphism in a spider (Araneae: Pholcidae). J. Zool. Lond. 255 : 301 304.
47. Jocqué, R. 2002. Genitalic polymorphism - a challenge for taxonomy. J. Arachnol. 30 : 298 306.
48. Kelly, J. K., and M. A. F. Noor. 1996. Speciation by reinforcement: a model derived from studies of Drosophila. Genetics 143 : 1485 1497.
49. Kirkpatrick, M. 2000. Reinforcement and divergence under assortative mating. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267 : 1649 1655.
50. Kirkpatrick, M. 2001. Reinforcement during ecological speciation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268 : 1259 1263.
51. Kirkpatrick, M., and V. Ravigné. 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am. Nat. 159 : S22 S35.
52. Kirkpatrick, M., and M. R. Servedio. 1999. The reinforcement of mating preferences on an island. Genetics 151 : 865 884.
53. Klingenberg, C. P., and W. Ekau. 1996. A combined morphometric and phylogenetic analysis of an ecomorphological trend: pelagization in Antarctic fishes (Perciformes: Nototheniidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 59 : 143 177.
54. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78 : 3721 3725.
55. Lande, R. 1982. Rapid origin of sexual isolation and character divergence in a cline. Evolution 36 : 213 223.
56. Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
57. McPeek, M. A., and J. M. Brown. 2000. Building a regional species pool: diversification of the Enallagma damselflies in eastern North American waters. Ecology 81 : 904 920.
58. McPeek, M. A., and S. Gavrilets. 2006. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation. Evolution 60 : 1967 1980.
59. McPeek, M. A., L. Shen, J. Z. Torrey, and H. Farid. 2008. The tempo and mode of 3-dimensional morphological evolution in male reproductive structures. Am. Nat. 171 : E158 E178.
60. Miller, M. N., and O. M. Fincke. 2003. Mistakes in sexual recognition among sympatric Zygoptera vary with time of day and color morphism (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Int. J. Odonatol. 7 : 471 491.
61. Mutanen, M., and A. Kaitala. 2006. Genital variation in a dimorphic moth Selenia tetralunaria (Lepidoptera, Geometridae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 87 : 297 307.
62. Mutanen, M., A. Kaitala, and M. Mönkkönen. 2006. Genital variation within and between three colsely related Euxoa moth species: testing the lock-and-key hypothesis. J. Zool. 268 : 109 119.
63. Noor, M. A. F., and J. L. Feder. 2006. Speciation genetics: evolving approaches. Nature Rev. Gen. 7 : 851 861.
64. O'Meara, B. C., C. Ané, M. J. Sanderson, and P. C. Wainwright. 2006. Testing for different rates of continuous trait evolution using likelihood. Evolution 60 : 922 933.
65. Pagel, M. 1997. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zool. Scripta 26 : 331 348.
66. Payne, R. J. H., and D. C. Krakauer. 1997. Sexual selection, space, and speciation. Evolution 51 : 1 9.
67. Paterson, H. E. H. 1978. More evidence against speciation by reinforcement. S. Afr. J. Sci. 74 : 369 371.
68. Paterson, H. E. H. 1993. Evolution and the recognition concept of species. The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD.
69. Paulson, D. R. 1974. Reproductive isolation in damselflies. Syst. Zool. 23 : 40 49.
70. Pfennig, K. S., and D. W. Pfennig. 2005. Character displacement as the "best of a bad situation": fitness trade-offs resulting from selection to minimize resource and mate competition. Evolution 59 : 2200 2208.
71. Phelps, S. M., A. S. Rand, and M. J. Ryan. 2006. A cognitive framework for mate choice and species recognition. Am. Nat. 167 : 28 42.
72. Polihronakis, M. 2006. Morphometric analysis of intraspecific shape variation in male and female genitalia of Phyllophaga hirticula (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 99 : 144 150.
73. Randler, C. 2002. Avian hybridization, mixed pairing and female choice. Anim. Behav. 63 : 103 119.
74. Ready, J. S., I. Sampaio, H. Schneider, C. Vinson, T. dos Santos, and G. F. Turner. 2006. Colour forms of Amazonian cichlid fish represent reproductively isolated species. J. Evol. Biol. 19 : 1139 1148.
75. Regan, J. L., L. M. Meffert, and E. H. Bryant. 2003. A direct experimental test of founder-flush effects on the evolutionary potential for assortative mating. J. Evol. Biol. 16 : 302 312.
76. Ritchie, D. W., and G. J. Kemp. 1999. Fast computation, rotation, and comparison of low resolution spherical harmonic molecular surfaces. J. Comp. Chem. 20 : 383 395.
77. Robertson, H. M., and H. E. H. Paterson. 1982. Mate recognition and mechanical isolation in Enallagma damselflies (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Evolution 36 : 243 250.
78. Rohlf, F. J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55 : 2143 2160.
79. Ryan, M. J., and A. S. Rand. 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47 : 647 657.
80. Ryan, M. J., and A. S. Rand. 2001. Feature-weighting in signal recognition and discrimination by tungara frogs. Pp. 86 101 in M. J. Ryan, ed. Anuran communication. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C.
81. Seehausen, O., J. J. M. van Alphen, and F. Witte. 1997. Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 277 : 1808 1811.
82. Shapiro, A. M., and A. H. Porter. 1989. The lock-and-key hypothesis: evolutionary and biosystematic interpretation of insect genitalia. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 34 : 231 245.
83. Shaw, K. L. 2000. Interspecific genetics of mate recognition: inheritance of female acoustic preferences in Hawaiian crickets. Evolution 54 : 1303 1312.
84. Shen, L., and F. Makedon. 2006. Spherical mapping for processing of 3-D closed surfaces. Image and Vision Computing 24 : 743 761.
85. Shen, L., H. Huang, F. Makdeon, and A. J. Saykin. 2007. Efficient registration of 3D SPHARM surfaces. CRV 2007: Fourth Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision, Montreal, QC., pp. 81 88.
86. Shen, L., H. Farid, and M. A. McPeek. 2009. Modeling 3-dimensional structures using spherical harmonics. Evolution, in press.
87. Sirot, L. K. 2003. The evolution of insect mating structures through sexual selection. Fla. Entomol. 86 : 124 133.
88. Song, H., and J. W. Wenzel. 2008. Mosaic pattern of genital divergence in three populations of Schistocerca lineata Scudder, 1899 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Cyrtacanthacridinae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 94 : 289 301.
89. Springer, S. A., and B. J. Crespi. 2007. Adaptive gamete-recognition divergence in a hybridizing Mytilus population. Evolution 61 : 772 783.
90. Stoks, R., and M. A. McPeek. 2006. A tale of two diversifications: reciprocal habitat shifts to fill ecological space along the pond permanence gradient. Amer. Natur. 168 : S50 S72.
91. Sved, J. A. 1981a. A two-sex polygenic model for the evolution of premating isolation. I. deterministic theory for natural populations. Genetics 97 : 197 215.
92. Sved, J. A. 1981b. A two-sex polygenic model for the evolution of premating isolation. II. computer simulation of experimental selection procedure. Genetics 97 : 217 235.
93. Swanson, W. J., and V. D. Vacquier. 2002. Reproductive protein evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33 : 161 179.
94. Templeton, A. R. 1979. Once again, why 300 species of Hawaiian Drosophila? Evolution 33 : 513 517.
95. Turgeon, J., R. Stoks, R. A. Thum, J. M. Brown, and M. A. McPeek. 2005. Simultaneous Quaternary radiations of three damselfly clades across the Holarctic. Am. Nat. 165 : E78 E107.
96. Westfall, M. J., and M. L. May. 2006. Damselflies of North America, 2nd edn. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, FL.
97. Wirtz, P. 1999. Mother species-father species: unidirectional hybridization in animals with female choice. Anim. Behav. 58 : 1 12.