Effects of metallic or translucent matrices for class II composite restorations: 4-year clinical follow-up findings

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 39-47

  Demarco, Flávio Fernando ^a   Pereira Cenci, Tatiana ^a   de Almeida André, Dárvi ^a   de Barbosa, Renata Pereira Sousa ^a   Piva, Evandro ^a   Cenci, Maximiliano Sérgio ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Clinical evaluations; Composite restorations; Longevity; Randomized clinical trial

Indexed keywords

EID: 78751647517     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-009-0362-5     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Trushkowsky RD, Burgess JO (2002) Complex single-tooth restorations. Dent Clin North Am 46: 341-365.
2. Wilder AD Jr, May KN Jr, Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Leinfelder KF (1999) Seventeen-year clinical study of ultraviolet-cured posterior composite class I and II restorations. J Esthet Dent 11: 135-142.
3. da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguercio AD, Demarco FF (2006) A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings. J Dent 34: 427-435.
4. Köhler B, Rasmusson C-G, Ödman P (2000) A five-year clinical evaluation of class II composite resin restorations. J Dent 28: 111-116.
5. Mjör IA (1998) The location of clinically diagnosed secondary caries. Quintessence Int 29: 313-317.
6. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Cheung SW, Mjör IA (2001) Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. J Dent 29: 317-324.
7. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hamm G, Hickel R (2004) Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 29: 481-508.
8. Wilson NH (1990) The evaluation of materials: relationships between laboratory investigations and clinical studies. Oper Dent 15: 149-155.
9. Keogh TP, Bertolotti RL (2001) Creating tight, anatomically correct interproximal contacts. Dent Clin North Am 45: 83-102.
10. Peumans M, van Meerbeek B, Asscherickx K, Simon S, Abe Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2001) Do condensable composites help to achieve better proximal contacts? Dent Mater 17: 533-541.
11. Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Bronkhorst EM, Burgersdijk RC, Dorfer CE (2006) A randomized clinical trial on proximal contacts of posterior composites. J Dent 34: 292-297.
12. Loomans BA, Roeters FJ, Opdam NJ, Kuijs RH (2008) The effect of proximal contour on marginal ridge fracture of class II composite resin restorations. J Dent 36: 828-832.
13. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson VP, Holston AM, Gingell JC (1991) A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin. Quintessence Int 22: 143-151.
14. Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH (1998) Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 26: 555-562.
15. Lutz F, Krejci I, Luescher B, Oldenburg TR (1986) Improved proximal margin adaptation of class II composite resin restorations by use of light-reflecting wedges. Quintessence Int 17: 659-664.
16. Lösche GM (1999) Marginal adaptation of class II composite fillings: guided polymerization vs reduced light intensity. J Adhes Dent 1: 31-39.
17. Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Carvalho RM (2005) Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage. J Dent 33: 603-610.
18. Prakki A, Cilli R, Saad JO, Rodrigues JR (2004) Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of class II esthetic direct restorations. Quintessence Int 35: 785-789.
19. Mullejans R, Badawi MO, Raab WH, Lang H (2003) An in vitro comparison of metal and transparent matrices used for bonded class II resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 28: 122-126.
20. Verluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH (1998) Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res 77: 1435-1445.
21. Cenci MS, Lund RG, Pereira CL, de Carvalho RM, Demarco FF (2006) In vivo and in vitro evaluation of class II composite resin restorations with different matrix systems. J Adhes Dent 8: 127-132.
22. Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Pereira CL, Lund RG, Carvalho RM (2007) One year clinical comparison of metal and translucent matrices in class II resin composite restorations. Am J Dent 20: 41-45.
23. Demarco FF, Cenci MS, Lima FG, Donassollo TA, André Dde A, Leida FL (2007) Class II composite restorations with metallic and translucent matrices: 2-year follow-up findings. J Dent 35: 231-237.
24. Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M (2005) Influence of food-simulating solutions and finsh on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent 33: 389-398.
25. Burke FJT, Lucarotti PSK, Holder RL (2005) Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (part 4): influence of time and place. J Dent 33: 837-847.
26. Brunthaler A, Konig F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A (2003) Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Invest 7: 63-70.
27. Köhler B, Rasmusson CG, Odman P (2000) A five-year clinical evaluation of class II composite resin restorations. J Dent 28: 111-116.
28. Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF (2000) Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up. J Dent 28: 375-382.
29. Gordan VV, Shen C, Watson RE, Mjor IA (2005) Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material. Am J Dent 18: 45-49.
30. Venturini D, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM (2006) Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness, and microleakage of resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 31: 11-17.
31. Wilson MA, Cowan AJ, Randall RC, Crisp RJ, Wilson NH (2002) A practice-based, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative: one-year results. Oper Dent 27: 423-429.
32. Bayne SC, Schmalz G (2005) Reprinting the classic article on USPHS evaluation methods for measuring the clinical research performance of restorative materials. Clin Oral Invest 9: 1-6.
33. Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjör IA, Wilson NH (1999) Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int 30: 234-242.
34. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE (2000) Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Int Dent J 50: 361-366.
35. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA (2007) Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations. J Adhes Dent 9: 469-475.
36. Nordbo H, Leirskar J, Von der Fehr FR (1998) Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: observations up to 10 years. Quintessence Int 29: 5-11.
37. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R (2001) Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report. J Adhes Dent 3: 185-194.
38. Turkun LS, Aktener BO (2001) Twenty-four-month clinical evaluation of different posterior composite resin materials. J Am Dent Assoc 132: 196-203.
39. Fano L, Fano V, Ma WY, Wang XG, Zhu F (2005) Adhesiveness of dental resin-based restorative materials investigated with atomic force microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 73: 35-42.
40. Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Pashley DH, Peters MC, Lai SC, Yiu CK, Cheong C (2003) Aging affects two modes of nanoleakage expression in bonded dentin. J Dent Res 82: 537-541.
41. Wendt SL Jr, Ziemiecki TL, Leinfelder KF (1996) Proximal wear rates by tooth position of resin composite restorations. J Dent 24: 33-39.