A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 427-435

  da Rosa Rodolpho, Paulo Antônio ^a   Cenci, Maximiliano Sérgio ^b   Donassollo, Tiago Aurélio ^c   Loguércio, Alessandro Dourado ^b   Demarco, Flávio Fernando ^c  

^a Faculty of Dentistry of Piracicaba ^*

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSIDADE DO OESTE DE SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Composite; Failure causes; Posterior restorations; Survival rates

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; GLASS IONOMER; HERCULITE XR; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; P50 COMPOSITE RESIN; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND 2; XR BOND;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL;

ADULT; BICUSPID; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; MOLAR; POLYURETHANES; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 33746303380     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Köhler B., Rasmusson C.-G., and Ödman P. A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. Journal of Dentistry 28 (2000) 111-116
2. Knobloch L.A., Kerby R.E., Seghi R., Berlin J.S., and Clelland N. Fracture toughness of packable and conventional composite materials. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 88 (2002) 307-313
3. Wilson N.H. The evaluation of materials: relationships between laboratory investigations and clinical studies. Operative Dentistry 15 (1990) 149-155
4. Chadwick B., Treasure E., Dummer P., Dunstan F., Gilmour A., Jones R., Phillips C., Stevens J., Rees J., and Richmond S. Challenges with studies investigating longevity of dental restorations-a critique of a systematic review. Journal of Dentisry 29 (2001) 155-161
5. Sakaguchi RL. Review of the current status and challenges for dental posterior restorative composites: clinical, chemistry, and physical behavior considerations. Summary of discussion from the Portland Composites Symposium (POCOS) June 17-19, 2004, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. Dental Materials 2005;21:3-6.
6. Shimizu T., Kitano T., Inoue M., Narikawa K., and Fujii B. Ten-year longitudinal clinical evaluation of a visible light cured posterior composite resin. Dental Materials Journal 14 (1995) 120-134
7. Nordbo H., Leirskar J., and von der Fehr F.R. Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: observations up to 10 years. Quintessence International 29 (1998) 5-11
8. Mair L.H. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Quintessence International 29 (1998) 483-490
9. Collins C.J., Bryant R.W., and Hodge K.L. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. Journal of Dentistry 26 (1998) 311-317
10. Raskin A., Michotte-Theall B., Vreven J., and Wilson N.H. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite 10-year report. Journal of Dentistry 27 (1999) 13-19
11. Raskin A., Setcos J.C., Vreven J., and Wilson N.H. Influence of the isolation method on the 10-year clinical behaviour of posterior resin composite restorations. Clinical Oral Investigations 4 (2000) 148-152
12. Lundin S.A., and Koch G. Class I and II posterior composite resin restorations after 5 and 10 years. Swedish Dental Journal 23 (1999) 165-171
13. Gaengler P., Hoyer I., and Montag R. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 3 (2001) 185-194
14. Turkun L.S., Aktener B.O., and Ates M. Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: a 7-year report. Quintessence International 34 (2003) 418-426
15. Pallesen U., and Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clinical Oral Investigations 7 (2003) 71-79
16. Gaengler P., Hoyer I., Montag R., and Gaebler P. Micromorphological evaluation of posterior composite restorations-a 10-year report. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 31 (2004) 991-1000
17. Wilder Jr. A.D., May Jr. K.N., Bayne S.C., Taylor D.F., and Leinfelder K.F. Seventeen-year clinical study of ultraviolet-cured posterior composite Class I and II restorations. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 11 (1999) 135-142
18. Leinfelder K.F., McCartha C.D., and Wisniewski J.F. Posterior composite resin-a critical review. Journal of American Dental Association 69 (1985) 19-24
19. Brunthaler A., Konig F., Lucas T., Sperr W., and Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clinical Oral Investigations 7 (2003) 63-70
20. Manhart J., Chen H.Y., Hamm G., and Hickel R. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Operative Dentistry 29 (2004) 481-508
21. Wilson M.A., Cowan A.J., Randall R.C., Crisp R.J., and Wilson N.H.F. A practice-based, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative: one-year results. Operative Dentistry 27 (2002) 423-429
22. Baratieri L.N., and Ritter A.V. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 13 (2001) 50-57
23. Lutz E., Krejci I., and Oldenburg T.R. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence International 17 (1986) 777-784
24. Versluis A., Douglas W.H., Cross M., and Sakaguchi R.L. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses?. Journal of Dental Research 75 (1996) 871-878
25. Kaplan E.L., and Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of American Statistical Association 53 (1958) 457-481
26. Anderson S., Auquier A., Hauck W.W., Oakes D., Vandaele W., and Weisberg H.I. Statistical methods for comparative studies. Techniques for bias reduction (1980), John Wiley, New York p. 202-4
27. Willems G., Lambrechts P., Braem M., and Vanherle G. Composite resins in the 21st century. Quintessence International 24 (1993) 641-658
28. Lambrechts P., Braem M., and Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Evaluation of clinical performance for posterior composite resins and dentin adhesives. Operative Dentistry 12 (1987) 53-78
29. Rasmusson C.G., and Lundin S.A. Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: five-year results. Swedish Dental Journal 19 (1995) 173-182
30. Rezwani-Kaminski T., Kamann W., and Gaengler P. Secondary caries susceptibility of teeth with long-term performing composite restorations. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 29 (2002) 1131-1138
31. Jokstad A., Bayne S., Blunck U., Tyas M., and Wilson N. Quality of dental restorations-FDI Commission Project 2-95. International Dental Journal 51 (2001) 117-158
32. Moffa J.P. Comparative performance of amalgam and composite resin restorations and criteria for their use. In: Anusavice K. (Ed). Quality evaluation of dental restorations (1989), Quintessence, Chicago 125-133
33. Wilson N.H., Wilson M.A., Wastell D.G., and Smith G.A. A clinical trial of a visible light cured posterior composite resin restorative material: five-year results. Quintessence International 19 (1988) 675-681
34. Mondelli J., Steagall L., Ishikiriama A., de Lima Navarro M.F., and Soares F.B. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 43 (1980) 419-422
35. Wilson N.H., Wastell D.G., and Norman R.D. Five-year performance of high-copper content amalgam restorations in a multiclinical trial of a posterior composite. Journal of Dentistry 24 (1996) 203-210
36. Kreulen C.M., Tobi H., Gruythuysen R.J., van Amerongen W.E., and Borgmeijer P.J. Replacement risk of amalgam treatment modalities: 15-year results. Journal of Dentistry 26 (1998) 627-632
37. Burke F.J., Cheung S.W., Mjor I.A., and Wilson N.H. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom. Quintessence International 30 (1999) 234-242
38. Mjor I.A., Shen C., Eliasson S.T., and Richter S. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland. Operative Dentistry 27 (2002) 117-123
39. Van Meerbeek B., De Munck J., Yoshida Y., Inoue S., Vargas M., Vijay P., et al. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Operative Dentistry 28 (2003) 215-235
40. Preston A.J., Higham S.M., Agalamanyi E.A., and Mair L.H. Fluoride recharge of aesthetic dental materials. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 26 (1999) 936-940
41. Bogacki R.E., Hunt R.J., del Aguila M., and Smith W.R. Survival analysis of posterior restorations using an insurance claims database. Operative Dentistry 27 (2002) 488-492
42. Sarrett D.C. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dental Materials 21 (2005) 9-20
43. Barnes D.M., Holston A.M., Strassler H.E., and Shires P.J. Evaluation of clinical performance of twelve posterior composite resins with a standardized placement technique. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 2 2 (1990) 36-43
44. Turkun S.L. Clinical evaluation of a self-etching and a one-bottle adhesive system at two years. Journal of Dentistry 31 8 (2003) 527-534
45. Turkun L.S., Turkun M., and Ozata F. Two-year clinical evaluation of a packable resin-based composite. Journal of American Dental Association 134 9 (2003) 1205-1212
46. Busato A.L., Loguercio A.D., Reis A., and de Oliveira Carrilho M.R. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results. American Journal of Dentistry 14 5 (2001) 304-308