Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom

Quintessence International

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 234-242

  Burke, F J Trevor ^a   Cheung, Sau Wan ^b   Mjör, Ivar A ^c   Wilson, Nairn H F ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY DENTAL HOSPITAL OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Amalgam; Glass ionomer cement; Primary caries; Resin composite; Restoration; Secondary caries

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EDUCATION; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETREATMENT; STATISTICS;

CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETREATMENT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0033106969     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Mjör IA, Toffinetti F. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Italy. Oper Dent 1992;17:70-73.
2. Friedl K-H, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Germany. Oper Dent 1994; 19:228-232.
3. Mjör IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:58-63.
4. Mjör IA. Glass ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: A preliminary report. Quintessence Int 1996;27: 171-174.
5. Qvist J, Qvist V, Mjör IA. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990;48:297-303.
6. Wilson NHF, Burke FJT, Mjör IA. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int 1997;28:245-248.
7. Burke FJT, Cheung SW, Mjör IA, Wilson NHF. Reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations in Vocational Training Practices. Primary Dent Care (in press).
8. Mjör IA. Placement and replacement of restorations. Oper Dent 1981;6:49-54.
9. Swift EJ, Bader JD, Shugars DA. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: A preliminary report [letter]. Quintessence Int 1996;27:581.
10. Forsten L. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: A preliminary report. [letter]. Quintessence Int 1996; 27:791.
11. Mount GJ. Another letter on glass-ionomer cement restorations [letter]. Quintessence Int 1996;27:582.
12. Levine RS. Experience, skill and knowledge gained by newly qualified dentists during their first year of general practice. Br Dent J 1992;172:97-102.
13. Sidhu SS, Watson TF. Resin-modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1995;8:59-67.
14. Suoto M, Donly KJ. Caries inhibition of glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1994;7:122-124.
15. Cao DS, Hollis RA, Hicken CB, Christensen RB. Fluoride release from glass ionomers, glass ionomer/resins and composites [abstract 260]. J Dent Res 1994;73:184.
16. Randall R, Wilson NHF. Glass ionomers: Systematic review of a secondary caries treatment effect [abstract 378]. J Dent Res 1997;76:1066.
17. Fontana M. Secondary caries: Relation with current criteria used to replace restorations. Gen Dent 1995;43:145-152.
18. Guertsen W, Schoeler U. A 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and Class II composite restorations. J Dent 1997;25:229-232.
19. Smales RJ, Hawthorne WS. Long-term survival of extensive amalgams and posterior crowns. J Dent 1997;25:225-227.
20. Berkey CS, Douglass CW, Valachovic RW, Chauncey HH. Longitudinal radiographic analysis of carious lesion progression. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1988;16:83-90.
21. Mjör IA, Burke FJT, Wilson NHF. The relative cost of different restorations in the UK. Br Dent J 1997;182:286-289.
22. El-Mowafy OM, Lewis DW, Benmergui, Levinton C. Meta-analysis on long-term clinical performance of posterior composites. J Dent 1994;22:33-43.
23. Norman RD, Wright JS, Rydberg RJ, Felkner LL. A 5-year study comparing a posterior composite resin and an amalgam. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:523-529.