Reprinting the classic article on USPHS evaluation methods for measuring the clinical research performance of restorative materials

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 209-214

  Bayne, Stephen C ^a   Schmalz, Gottfried ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Clinical evaluation; Dental materials; Evaluator calibration; Restorative procedures; Standards

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; DENTAL RESEARCH; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

CALIBRATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESEARCH; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GUIDELINES; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; OBSERVER VARIATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE;

EID: 31044448169     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-005-0017-0     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs 1989 American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines: Composite resins for posterior restorations American Dental Association Chicago 1-13
2. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs 1996 American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines: Restorative materials American Dental Association Chicago 1-14
3. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs 1998 American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines: Products for treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity American Dental Association Chicago 1-15
4. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs 1998 American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines: Home use tooth-whitening products American Dental Association Chicago 1-14
5. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs 2001 Revised American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines: Dentin and enamel adhesives American Dental Association Chicago 1-9
6. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs 2001 American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines: Composite resins for posterior restorations American Dental Association Chicago 1-12
7. Bader JD, Shugars DA, Rozier G, Lohr KN, Bonito AJ, Nelson JP, Jackman AM (2001) Diagnosis and management of dental caries. Evid Rep Technol Assess 36:1-4
8. Cantor R, Webber RL, Stroud L, Ryge G (1969) Methods for evaluating facial prosthetic materials. J Prosthet Dent 21:324-332 10.1016/ 0022-3913(69)90295-9
9. Cvar J, Ryge G (1971) Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. US DHEW Document, US PHS 790244, Printing Office, San Francisco, pp 1-42
10. Jendresen MD, Phillips RW (1968) A clinical comparison of four posterior intermediate restorative materials. Technical report SAM-TR Dec, pp 1-10
11. Ryge G (1966) Clinical evaluation of adhesive restorative materials. In: Austin RH, Wilsdorf HGF, Phillips RW (eds) Adhesive restorative dental materials II. Proceedings of a workshop held at the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, December 8-9, 1965. National Institute of Dental Research, Public Health Service Publication No 1494
12. G Ryge 1977 Development of clinical testing of materials In RG Craig ed. Dental materials review University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor 192-204
13. Ryge G (1980) Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 35:347-358
14. Ryge G, DeVincenzi RG (1983) Assessment of the clinical quality of health care. Search for a reliable method. Eval Health Prof 6:311-326 10262733
15. Ryge G, Snyder M (1973) Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 87:369-377 4515696
16. Ryge G, Jendresen MD, Glantz PO, Mjor I (1981) Standardization of clinical investigators for studies of restorative materials. Swed Dent J 5:235-239 6949331
17. Wilder AD, May KN, Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Leinfelder KF (1999) Seventeen-year clinical study of ultraviolet-cured posterior composite Class I and II restorations. J Esthet Dent 11:135-142 10825870
18. Zerhouni E (2003) Medicine. NIH Roadmap. Science 302:63-72 10.1126/ science.1091867