Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 45-49

  Gordan, Valeria V ^a,b   Shen, Chiayi ^a   Watson, Ronald E ^b   Mjor, Ivar A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b Department of Operative Dentistry ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN; BEAUTIFIL RESTORATIVE; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; FLUORIDE VARNISH; FLUOROBOND; RESIN CEMENT; TOOTH CEMENT;

ADULT; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CHI SQUARE TEST; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; EVALUATION; FISHER EXACT TEST; HUMAN; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PHYSICIAN; RATING SCALE; RECORDING; SCORING SYSTEM; STAINING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOOTH COLOR; TOOTH DISEASE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADULT; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FLUORIDES, TOPICAL; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MIDDLE AGED; RECURRENCE; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 18244404561     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA. 2-year clinical evaluation of Class I posterior composites. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 150-152.
2. Kohler B, Rasmusson CG, Odman P. A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. J Dent 2000 28:111-116.
3. Turkun LS, Aktener BO, Ates M. Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: One 7-year report. Quintessence Int 2003; 34:418-426.
4. Kiremitci A, Bolay S, Gurgan S. Two-year performance of glass-ceramic insert-resin composite restorations: Clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation. Quintessence Int 1998; 29:417-421.
5. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Rodrigues Filho LE, Busato AL. One-year clinical evaluation of posterior packable resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2001;26:427-434.
6. Ernst CP, Martin M, Stuff S, Willershausen B. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for posterior teeth after three years. Clin Oral Investig 2001;5: 148-155.
7. Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodge KL. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent 1998 26:311-317.
8. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Int Dent J 2000; 50:360-366.
9. Baratieri LN, Ritter AV. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001; 13:50-57.
10. Turkun LS, Aktener BO. Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of different posterior composite resin materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:196-203.
11. Wilson AD. Developments in glass-ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2: 438-446.
12. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Gingell JC, Gilner PP. A clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material. J Am Dent Assoc 1995, 126: 1245-1253.
13. Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Monting JS. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation. Oper Dent 2000 25: 259-264.
14. Demirci M, Ersev H, Ucok M. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class III cavities: Three-year results. Oper Dent 2002 27:223-230.
15. Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Smales RJ, Wei SH. Clinical evaluation of Dyract AP restorative in permanent molars: 2-year results. Am J Dent 2002 15:403-406.
16. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 1994; 73:1212-1220.
17. Nakajima M, Ogata M, Okuda M, Tagami J, Sano H, Pashley DH. Bonding to caries-affected dentin using self-etching primers. Am J Dent 1999; 12:309-314.
18. Opdam NJM, Roeters JJM, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and post-operative sensitivity in Class 2 composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 1998;26: 555-562.
19. Gordan VV, Mjör IA. Short and long-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity of an experimental resin-based restorative material. Oper Dent 2002;27:543-548.
20. Gordan VV, Mjör IA, Vasquez O, Watson RE, Wilson NHF. Two-year clinical evaluation of a new self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material. J Esthet Rest Dent 2002;14:296-302.
21. Brunthaler A, Konig F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: A review. Clin Oral Investig. 2003; 7: 63-70.
22. Wilson NHF, Norman RD and co-investigators of the multicentre clinical evaluation. Five-year findings of a multiclinical trial for a posterior composite. J Dent 1991; 19: 153-159.
23. Nuckles DB, Fingar WW. Six-month and one-year clinical evaluation of a composite resin for class II restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1975; 91: 1017-1022.
24. Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Monting JS. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: Results of a two-year clinical evaluation. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 259-264.
25. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. USGPO Publ. No. 790-244. San Francisco: US Public Health Service, 1971.
26. Hayashi M, Wilson NHF. Marginal deterioration as a predictor of failure of a posterior composite. Eur J Oral Sci 2003; 111:155-162.
27. Pallesen U, Qvist V. Clinical evaluation of three posterior composite resins: 10-year report. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 404 (Abstr 30).
28. Fukushima M, Setcos JC, Iwaku M. Posterior composite restoration failures in five-year clinical studies. J Dent Res 1992; 71:204 (Abstr 792).
29. Rowe AHR. A five year study of the clinical performance of a posterior composite resin restorative material. J Dent 1989; 17:S6-S9.
30. Letzel H. Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicentre clinical trial. J Dent 1989; 17:S10-S17.
31. Mjör IA. The bases for everyday real life operative dentistry. Oper Dent 2001; 26:521-524.
32. Fukushima M, Setcos JC, Phillips RW. Marginal fracture of posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1988; 117: 577-583.
33. Hayashi M, Wilson NHF, Watts DC. Quality of marginal adaptation evaluation of posterior composites in clinical trials. J Dent Res 2003;82:59-63.
34. Yap AUJ, Tham SY, Zhu LY, Lee HK. Short-term fluoride release from various aesthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 2002, 27:259-265.
35. Stangel I, Barolet RY. Clinical evaluation of two posterior composite resins: Two year results. J Oral Rehabil 1990; 17:257-263.
36. Brunson WD, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Robertson TM, Wilder AD, Taylor DF. Three-year evaluation of a self-cured posterior composite resin. Dent Mater 1989; 5: 127-132.
37. Wilson NHF. Performance of occlusin in butt-joint and bevel-edged preparations: Five years results. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 92-98.
38. Wendt SL, Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of Clearfil Photo posterior: 3-year results. Am J Dent 1992; 6:121-125.
39. Pashley DH, Livingston MJ, Reeder OW, Horner RJ. Effects of the degree of tubule occlusion on the permeability of human dentine in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 1978; 23:1127-1133.
40. Pashley DH, Michelich V, Kehl T. Dentin permeability: Effects of smear layer removal. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46: 531-537
41. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE. Evaluation of adhesive systems using acidic primers. Am J Dent 1997; 10: 219-223.
42. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE. Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 1998;23: 244-249.
43. Pashley DH. The effects of acid etching on the pulpodentin complex. Oper Dent 1992;17: 229-242.