A practice-based, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative: One-year results

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 423-429

  Wilson, M A ^a,d   Cowan, A J ^a   Randall, R C ^a,b   Crisp, R J ^a   Wilson, N H F ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b 3M COMPANY   (United States)

^c Department of Restorative Dentistry ^*

^d UNIVERSITY DENTAL HOSPITAL OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTAL ALLOY; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FILTEK Z250; RESIN; SINGLE BOND;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0036730429     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bader JD & Ismail AI (1999) A primer on outcomes in dentistry Journal of Public Health in Dentistry 59(3) 131-135.
2. Condon JR & Ferracane JL (2000) Assessing the effect of composite formulation on polymerization stress Journal of the American Dental Association 131(4) 497-503.
3. Craig RG (1997) Direct esthetic restorative materials in Craig RG & Ward ML (ed) Restorative Dental Materials St Louis (MO) Mosby 252-253.
4. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ & Feilzer A (1984) The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerisation contraction stress Journal of Dental Research 63(12) 1396-1399.
5. Dauvillier BS, Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ & Davidson CL (2000) Visco-elsatic parameters of dental restorative materials during setting Journal of Dental Research 79(3) 818-823.
6. Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Byerley TJ & Chappelow CC (1993) Adhesives and non-shrinking dental resins of the future Quintessence International 24(9) 632-640.
7. Fallowfield MG (1996) Evidence based assessment? British Dental Journal 180(8) 281-282.
8. Gleick J (1987) Chaos: Making of a New Science New York, Viking.
9. Griffiths BM, Naasen M, Sherriff M & Watson TF (1999) Variable polymerisation shrinkage and the interfacial micropermeability of a dentin bonding system Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 1(2) 119-131.
10. Han L, Okamoto A & Iwaku M (1990) The effects of various clinical factors on marginal enamel microcracks produced around composite restoration Dental Materials Journal 11 26-37.
11. Hopkins LM & Eaton KA (1996) Research in general dental practice - what is involved? Part 1. General considerations Primary Dental Care 3(2) 71-74.
12. Jenicek M (1989) Meta-analysis in medicine. Where we are and where we want to go Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 42(1) 35-44.
13. Jensen ME & Chan DCN (1985) Polymerisation shrinkage and microleakage in Vanherle G, Smith DC (ed) Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials St Paul (MN) Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co 243-262.
14. Jörgensen KD, Asmussen E & Shimokobe H (1975) Enamel damages caused by contracting restorative resins Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 83(2) 120-122.
15. Kemp-Scholte CM & Davidson CL (1988) Marginal sealing of curing contraction gaps in Class V composite resin restorations Journal of Dental Research 67(5) 841-845.
16. Kemp-Scholte CM & Davidson CL (1990) Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility Journal of Dental Research 69(6) 1240-1243.
17. Kinomoto Y & Torii M (1998) Photoelastic analysis of polymerization contraction stresses in resin composite restorations Journal of Dentistry 26(2) 165-171.
18. Mackie IC (1998) Evidence-based research in the primary dental care setting British Dental Journal 184(1) 6.
19. Mehl A, Hickel R & Kunzelmann K-H (1997) Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without "softstart- polymerization" Journal of Dentistry 25(3-4) 321-330.
20. Randall RC & Wilson NH (1999) Clinical testing of restorative materials: Some historic landmarks Journal of Dentistry 27(8) 543-550.
21. Sakaguchi RL & Berge HX (1998) Reduced light energy density decreases post-gel contraction while maintaining degree of conversion in composites Journal of Dentistry 26(8) 695-700.
22. Tjan AH & Tan DE (1991) Microleakage at gingival margins of Class V composite resin restorations rebonded with various low viscosity resin systems Quintessence International 22(7) 565-573.
23. Uno S & Shimokobe H (1994) Contraction stress and marginal adaptation of composite restorations in dentinal cavity Dental Materials Journal 13(1) 19-24.
24. Wilson NH, Dunne SM & Gainesford ID (1997) Current materials and techniques for direct restorations in posterior teeth. Part 2: Resin composite systems International Dental Journal 47(4) 185-193.
25. Wilson NH & Mjör IA (1997) Practice-based research: Importance, challenges and prospects. A personal view Primary Dental Care 4(1) 5-6.
26. Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF & Tagami J (2001) The effects of bonding system and light curing method on reducing stress of different C-factor cavities Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 3(2) 177-183.