Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations

Quintessence International

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 785-789

  Prakki, Anuradha ^a,b   Cilli, Renato ^a   Saad, João Otávio Chalup ^b   Rodrigues, José Roberto ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b Paulista State University ^*  (Brazil)

Author keywords

Class II cavity; Clinical trial; Long term study; Proximal contact; Resin composite; Restorative technique

Indexed keywords

POLYESTER; RESIN; STEEL;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TECHNIQUE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MATRIX BANDS; POLYESTERS; STEEL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 4944224962     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Newell DH, John V, Kim SJ. A technique of occlusal adjustment for food impaction in the presence of tight proximal contacts. Oper Dent 2002;27:95-100.
2. Saad JOC, Prakki A, Rodrigues JR, Pagani C. Clinical comparative assessment of condensable resin and amalgam restorations with different superficial finishing [in Portuguese]. J Bras Clin Odontol Int 2001;5:395-399.
3. Cvitko E, Denehy G, Boyer DB. Effect of matrix systems and polymerization techniques on microleakage of class II resin composite restorations. Am J Dent 1992;5:321-323.
4. Maitland RI. Current concepts in successful posterior class II direct composites. Dent Econ 1993;83:101-103.
5. Guichet DL, Yoshinobu D, Caputo AA. Effect of splinting and interproximal contact tightness on load transfer by implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:528-535.
6. Nordbo H, Leirskar J, von der Fehr FR. Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: Observations up to 10 years. Restorative Dent 1998;29:5-11.
7. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson VP, Hoston AM, Gingell JC. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin. Quintessence Int 1991;22:143-151.
8. Osborne JW, Gale EN, Fergusson GW. One-year and two-year clinical evaluation of a composite resin vs. amalgam. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:795-800.
9. Raskin A, Michotte-Theall B, Vreven J, Wilson NHF. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite 10-year report. J Dent 1999;27:13-19.
10. Bott B, Hanning M. Optimizing class II composite resin aesthetic restorations by the use of ceramic inserts. J Esthet Dent 1995;7:110-117.
11. Baratieri LN, Monteiro S Jr, Correa M, Ritter AV. Posterior resin composite restorations: A new technique. Oper Dent 1996;27:733-738.
12. Busato ALS, Barbosa AN, Bueno M, Baldissera RA. Dentística: Restaurações Em Dentes Posteriores. São Paulo: Artes Médicas, 1996:221-249.
13. Leinfelder KF. A report on a new condensable composite resin. Compendium 1998;19:230-237.
14. Wilson NHF, Cowan AJ, Unterbrink G, Wilson MA, Crisp RJ. A clinical evaluation of class II composites placed using a decoupling technique. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:319-329.
15. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. The importance of proximal curing in posterior composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1992;23:605-609.
16. Kays BT, Sneed WD, Nuckles DB. Microhardness of class II composite resin restorations with different matrices and light positions. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:487-490.
17. Neiva IF. An in vitro study of the effect of restorative technique on marginal leakage in posterior composites. Oper Dent 1998;23:282-289.
18. Wendt SL Jr, Ziemiecki TL, Leinfelder KF. Proximal wear rates by tooth position of resin composite restorations. J Dent 1996;24:33-39.