Daily river flow forecasting using wavelet ANN hybrid models

Journal of Hydroinformatics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 49-63

  Pramanik, Niranjan ^a   Panda, Rabindra K ^a   Singh, Adarsh ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; Discrete wavelet transformation; Flow forecasting

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651297519     PISSN: 14647141     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/hydro.2010.040     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Adamowski, J. F. 2008 Development of a short-term stream flood forecasting method for snowmelt driven floods based on wavelet and cross-wavelet analysis. J. Hydrol. 353, 247-266.
2. Anctil, F. & Tape, D. G. 2004 An exploration of artificial neural network rainfall-runoff forecasting combined with wavelet decomposition. J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 3, 21-128.
3. Aqil, M., Kita, I., Yano, A. & Nishiyama, S. 2007 A comparative study of artificial neural networks and neuro-fuzzy in continuous modeling of the daily and hourly behaviour of runoff. J. Hydrol. 337, 22-34.
4. ASCE Task Committee 2000a-Artificial neural networks in hydrology I: preliminary concepts. J. Hydrol. Eng. 5(2), 115-123.
5. ASCE Task Committee 2000b Artificial neural networks in hydrology II: hydrologic application. J. Hydrol. Eng. 5(2), 124-137.
6. Aussem, A., Campbell, J. & Murtagh, F. 1998 Wavelet-based feature extraction and decomposition strategies for financial forecasting. J. Comput. Intell. Finance 6, 5-12.
7. Bray, M. & Han, D. 2004 Identification of support vector machines for runoff modeling. J. Hydroinformatics 6(4), 265-280.
8. Cannas, B., Fanni, A., Sias, G., Tronci, S. & Zedda, M. K. 2005 Stream flow forecasting using neural networks and wavelet analysis. Eur. Geosci. Union 7, 45-51.
9. Cannas, B., Fanni, A., See, L. & Sias, G. 2006 Data pre-processing for river flow forecasting using neural networks: wavelet transforms and data partitioning. Phys. Chem. Earth 31(18), 1164-1171.
10. Chau, K. W. 2006 Particle swarm optimization training algorithm for ANNs in stage prediction of Shing Mun River. J. Hydrol. 329 (3-4), 363-367.
11. Chau, K. W., Wu, C. L. & Li, Y. S. 2005 Comparison of several flood forecasting models in Yangtze river. J. Hydrol. Eng. 10, 485-491.
12. Chou, C.-M. & Wang, R.-Y. 2004 Application of wavelet-based multi-model Kalman filters to real-time flood forecasting. Hydrol. Process. 18, 987-1008.
13. Coulibaly, P., Anctil, F. & Bobee, B. 2000 Daily reservoir inflow forecasting using artificial neural networks with stopped training approach. J. Hydrol. 230, 244-257.
14. Dawson, C. W. & Wilby, R. L. 1999 A comparison of artificial neural networks used for river forecasting. Hydrol. Earth Sys. Sci. 3(4), 529-540.
15. Dawson, C. W. & Wilby, R. L. 2001 Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 25, 80-108.
16. Draper, N. R. & Smith, H. 1998 Applied Regression Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
17. Evora, N. D. & Coulibaly, P. 2009 Recent advances in data-driven modeling of remote sensing applications in hydrology. J. Hydroinformatics 11 (3-4), 194-201.
18. Gautam, M. R., Watanabe, K. & Saegusa, H. 2000 Runoff analysis in humid forest catchments with artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol. 235, 117-136.
19. Giustolisi, O. & Savic, D. A. 2004 A novel genetic programming strategy: evolutionary polynomial regression. In Proceedings of Hydroinformatics 2004 (ed. S. Y. Liong, X. Phoon & V. Babovic), Vol. 1, pp. 787-794. World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore.
20. Giustolisi, O. & Savic, D. A. 2006 A symbolic data-driven technique based on evolutionary polynomial regression. J. Hydroinformatics 8(3), 207-222.
21. Giustolisi, O. & Savic, D. A. 2009 Advances in data-driven analyses and modeling using EPR-MOGA. J. Hydroinformatics 11 (3-4), 225-236.
22. Gunn, S. R. 1998 Support vector machines for classification and regression. ISIS Tech. Report. ISIS-1-98, Image Speech Intelligent System Research Group, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
23. Han, D., Kwong, T. & Li, S. 2006 Uncertainties in real-time flood forecasting with neural networks. Hydrol. Process. 21(2), 223-228.
24. Han, D., Chan, L. & Zhu, N. 2007 Flood forecasting using support vector machines. J. Hydroinformatics 9(4), 267-276.
25. Haykin, S. 1994 Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. Macmillan, New York, USA.
26. Hsu, K. L., Gupta, H. V. & Sorooshian, S. 1995 Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resour. Res. 31, 2517-2530.
27. Jacquin, A. P. & Shamseldin, A. Y. 2009 Review of the application of fuzzy inference systems in river flow forecasting. J. Hydroinformatics 11 (3-4), 202-210.
28. Jain, S. K., Agarwal, P. K. & Singh, V. P. 2007 Hydrology and Water Resources of India. Springer, The Netherlands.
29. Karunanithi, N., Grenney, W. J., Whitley, D. & Bovee, K. 1994 Neural networks for stream flow prediction. J. Comput. Civ. 8(2), 201-220.
30. Kim, T. W. & Valdes, J. B. 2003 Nonlinear model for drought forecasting based on a conjunction of wavelet transforms and neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng. 8(6), 319-328.
31. Kishor, N. & Singh, S. P. 2007 Nonlinear predictive control for a NNARX hydro plant model. Neural Comput. Appl. 16(2), 101-108.
32. Kisi, O. 2004 River flow modeling using artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng. 9(1), 60-63.
33. Kisi, O. 2007 Streamflow forecasting using different artificial neural network algorithms. J. Hydrol. Eng. 12(5), 532-539.
34. Kisi, O. 2008a River flow forecasting and estimation using different artificial neural network techniques. Hydrol. Res. 39(1), 27-40.
35. Kisi, O. 2008b Stream flow forecasting using neuro-wavelet technique. Hydrol. Process. 22(20), 4142-4152.
36. Kisi, O. 2009a Neural network and wavelet conjunction model for modeling monthly level fluctuations of Van Lake in Turkey. Hydrol. Process. 23(14), 2081-2092.
37. Kisi, O. 2009b Neural networks and wavelet conjunction model for intermittent streamflow forecasting. J. Hydrol. Eng. 14(8), 773-782.
38. Kisi, O. & Cigizoglu, H. K. 2007 Comparison of different ANN techniques in river flow prediction. Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. 24(3), 211-231.
39. Koza, J. R. 1992 Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
40. Kumar, A. R. S., Sudheer, K. P., Jain, S. K. & Agarwal, P. K. 2005 Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural networks: comparison of network types. Hydrol. Process. 19, 1277-1291.
41. Labat, D. 2005 Recent advances in wavelet analyses: part 1. A review of concepts. J. Hydrol. 314 (1-4), 275-288.
42. Labat, D., Ababou, R. & Mangin, A. 1999 Wavelet analysis in Karstic hydrology 2nd part: rainfall-runoff cross-wavelet analysis. C. R. Acad. Sci. IIA Earth Planet. Sci. 329, 881-887.
43. Labat, D., Ababou, R. & Mangin, A. 2000 Rainfall-runoff relationships for karstic springs. part II: continuous wavelet and discrete orthogonal multiresolution analyses. J. Hydrol. 238, 149-178.
44. Liong, C. & Shizhong, J. 2006 Wavelet characteristics of hydrologic time series in upstream of the Longchuan stream. J. Am. Sci. 2(2), 82-87.
45. Maier, H. R. & Dandy, G. C. 2000 Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Environ. Model. Softw. 15, 101-124.
46. Mallat, S. G. 1998 A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, p. 577. Academic, San Diego.
47. Mukerji, A., Chatterjee, C. & Raghuwanshi, N. S. 2009 Flood forecasting using ANN, Neuro-Fuzzy, and Neuro-GA Models. J. Hydrol. Eng. 14(6), 647-652.
48. Nayak, P. C., Sudheer, K. P. & Ramasastri, K. S. 2005 Fuzzy computing based rainfall-runoff model for real time flood forecasting. Hydrol. Process. 19, 955-958.
49. Nayak, P. C., Sudheer, K. P. & Jain, S. K. 2007 Rainfall-runoff modeling through hybrid intelligent system. Water Resour. Res. 43, 1-17.
50. Nourani, V., Alami, M. T. & Aminfar, M. H. 2008 A combined neural-wavelet model for prediction of Ligvanchai watershed precipitation. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 22(3), 466-472.
51. Partal, T. & Kisi, O. 2007 Wavelet and Neuro-fuzzy conjunction model for precipitation forecasting. J. Hydrol. 342 (1-2), 199-212.
52. Pramanik, N. & Panda, R. K. 2009 Application of neural network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems for stream flow prediction. Hydrol. Sci. J. 54(2), 247-260.
53. Priddy, L. K. & Keller, E. P. 2005 Artificial Neural Networks, an Introduction. SPIE Press, Bellingham, Washington.
54. Rao, R. M. & Bopardikar, A. S. 1998 Wavelet Transforms: Introduction to Theory and Applications, p. 310. Addison-Wesley, MA.
55. Remesan, R., Shamim, M. A., Han, D. & Mathew, J. 2009 Runoff prediction using an integrated hybrid modelling scheme. J. Hydrol. 372 (1-4), 48-60.
56. Saco, P. & Kumar, P. 2000 Coherent modes in multiscale variability of streamflow over the united states. Water Resour. Res. 36, 1049-1068.
57. Sahoo, G. B. & Ray, C. 2006 Flow forecasting for a Hawaii stream using rating curves and neural networks. J. Hydrol. 317, 63-80.
58. Shanker, M., Hu, M. Y. & Hung, M. S. 1996 Effect of data normalization on neural network training. Int. J. Manage. Sci. 24, 385-397.
59. Shrestha, R. R., Theobald, S. & Nestmann, F. 2005 Simulation of flood flow in a stream system using artificial neural networks. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 9(4), 313-321.
60. Singh, A., Panda, R. K. & Pramanik, N. 2009 Appropriate data normalization range for daily river flow forecasting using an artificial neural network. In Hydroinformatics in Hydrology, Hydrogeology and Water Resources 2009 (ed. I. D. Cluckie, Y. Chen, V. Babovic, L. Konikow, A. Mynett, S. Demuth & D. Savic), Vol. 331, pp. 51-57. IAHS Publication, UK.
61. Smith, L. C., Turcotte, D. L. & Isacks, B. L. 1998 Stream flow characterization and feature detection using a discrete wavelet transform. Hydrol. Process. 12, 233-249.
62. Sudheer, K. P., Gosain, A. K. & Ramasastri, K. S. 2002 A data-driven algorithm for constructing artificial neural network rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol. Process. 16, 1325-1330.
63. Tokar, A. S. & Johnson, P. A. 1999 Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng. 4(3), 232-239.
64. Torrence, C. & Compo, G. 1998 A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 79(1), 61-78.
65. Wang, D. & Ding, J. 2003 Wavelet network model and its application to the prediction of hydrology. Nat. Sci. 1, 67-71.
66. Wilby, R. L., Abrahart, R. J. & Dawson, C. W. 2003 Detection of conceptual model rainfall-runoff processes inside an artificial neural network. Hydrol. Sci. J. 48(2), 163-181.
67. Zealand, C. M., Burn, D. H. & Simonovic, S. P. 1999 Short term streamflow forecasting using artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol. 214, 32-48.
68. Zhang, B. L. & Dong, Z. Y. 2001 An adaptive neural-wavelet model for short term load forecasting. Electric Power Syst. Res. 59(2), 121-129.
69. Zheng, T., Girgis, A. A. & Makram, E. B. 2000 A hybrid wavelet-Kalman filter method for load forecasting. Electric Power Syst. Res. 54, 11-17.
70. Zhou, H., Wu, L. & Guo, Y. 2006 Mid and long term hydrologic forecasting for drainage are based on NWNNW and FRM. In Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, pp. 7-12. ISDA.