Fuzzy computing based rainfall-runoff model for real time flood forecasting

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 955-968

  Nayak, P C ^a   Sudheer, K P ^b   Ramasastri, K S ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HYDROLOGY   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MADRAS   (India)

Author keywords

Clustering algorithm; Flood forecasting; Fuzzy modelling

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; DATA ACQUISITION; FUZZY CONTROL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PRECIPITATION (METEOROLOGY); RAIN; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; RUNOFF; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STREAM FLOW; WEATHER FORECASTING;

FUZZY COMPUTING; FUZZY MODELS; REAL TIME FLOOD FORECASTING;

FLOODS;

FLOOD FORECASTING; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; REAL TIME; RIVER BASIN; RIVER FLOW;

ASIA; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; INDIA; NARMADA BASIN; SOUTH ASIA; WORLD;

EID: 14844352523     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5553     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Amorocho J, Brandstetter A. 1971. A critique of current methods of hydrologic systems investigations. Eos (Transactions of the American Geophysical Union) 45: 307-321.
2. Anders U, Korn O. 1999. Model selection in neural networks. Neural Networks 12: 309-323.
3. Beven KJ. 1996a. A discussion of distributed hydrological modelling. In Distributed Hydrological Modelling, Abbott MB, Refsgarrd JC (eds). Kluwer: Dordecht; 255-278.
4. Beven KJ. 1996b. Response to comments on A discussion of distributed hydrological modelling by JC Refsgarrd et al. In Distributed Hydrological Modelling, Abbott MB, Refsgarrd JC (eds). Kluwer: Dordecht; 289-296.
5. Campolo M, Andreussi P, Soldati A. 1999. River flood forecasting with neural network model. Water Resources Research 35(4): 1191-1197.
6. Chiu S. 1994. Fuzzy model identification based on cluster estimation. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 2(3): 267-278.
7. Fujita M, Zhu M-L, Nakoa T, Ishi C. 1992. An application of fuzzy set theory to runoff prediction. Proceedings of the Sixth IAHR International Symposium on Stochastic Hydraulics, Taipei, Taiwan; 727-734.
8. Garrick M, Cunnane C, Nash JE. 1978. A criterion of efficiency for rainfall-runoff models. Journal of Hydrology 36: 375-381.
9. Hsu K, Gupta VH, Soorooshian S. 1995. Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resources Research 31 (10): 2517-2530.
10. Hundecha Y, Bardossy A, Theisen H-W. 2001. Development of a fuzzy logic based rainfall-runoff model. Hydrological Sciences Journal 46(3): 363-377.
11. Ikeda S, Ochiai M, Sawaragi Y. 1976. Sequential GMDH algorithm and its applications to river flow prediction. IEEE Transactions of System Management and Cybernetics 6(7): 473-479.
12. Jain A, Ormsbee LE. 2002. Evaluation of short-term water demand forecast modeling techniques: conventional methods versus AI. Journal of the American Water Works Association 94(7): 64-72.
13. Jain A, Varshney AK, Joshi UC. 2001. Short-term water demand forecast modeling at IIT Kanpur using artificial neural networks. Water Resources Management 15(5): 299-321.
14. Kruse R, Gebhardt J, Klawonn F. 1994. Foundations of Fuzzy Systems Wiley: New York.
15. Legates DR, McCabe Jr. GJ. 1999. Evaluating the use of 'goodness-of-fit' measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resources Research 35(1): 233-241.
16. Mamdani EH, Assilian S. 1975. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 7(1): 1-13.
17. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: 1. A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10: 282-290.
18. Porporato A, Ridolfi L. 2001. Multivariate nonlinear prediction of river flows. Journal of Hydrology 248: 109-122.
19. Schulz K, Huwe B. 1997. Water flow modeling in the unsaturated zone with imprecise parameters using a fuzzy approach. Journal of Hydrology 201: 211-229.
20. Schulz K, Huwe B, Peiffer S. 1999. Parameter uncertainty in chemical equilibrium calculations using fuzzy set theory. Journal of Hydrology 217: 119-134.
21. See L, Openshaw S. 1999. Applying soft computing approaches to river level forecasting. Hydrological Sciences Journal 44(5): 763-779.
22. Shamseldin AY. 1997. Application of a neural network technique to rainfall-runoff modeling. Journal of Hydrology 199: 272-294.
23. Stuber M, Gemmar P, Greving M. 2000. Machine supported development of fuzzy-flood forecast systems. European Conference on Advances in Flood Research, Potsdam, PIK Report 65, Bronstert A, Bismuth C, Menzel L (eds), Reprint of Proceedings, Vol. 2; 504-515.
24. Sudheer KP, Jain SK. 2003. Radial basis function neural networks for modeling stage discharge relationship. Journal of Hydrological Engineering American Society of Civil Engineers 8(3): 161-164.
25. Sudheer KP, Gosain AK, Ramasastri KS. 2002. A data-driven algorithm for constructing artificial neural network rainfall-runoff models. Hydrological Processes 16: 1325-1330.
26. Sudheer KP, Nayak PC, Ramasastri KS. 2003. Improving peak flow estimates in artificial neural network river flow models. Hydrological Processes 17(1): 677-686.
27. Takagi T, Sugeno M. 1985. Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 15(1): 116-132.
28. Theodoridis S, Koutroumbas K. 1999. Pattern Recognition. Academic Press: New York; 482-483.
29. Tokar AS, Markus M. 2000. Precipitation-runoff modeling using artificial neural network and conceptual models. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers 5(2): 156-161.
30. Yager R, Filev D. 1994. Generation of fuzzy rules by mountain clustering. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 2(3): 209-219.
31. Zadeh LA. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8(3): 338-353.
32. Zhu M-L, Fujita M. 1994. Comparison between fuzzy reasoning and neural network method to forecast runoff discharge. Journal of Hydroscience and Hydraulic Engineering 12(2): 131-141.
33. Zhu M-L, Fujita M, Hashimoto N, Kudo M. 1994. Long lead time forecast of runoff using fuzzy reasoning method. Journal of the Japanese Society of Hydrology and Water Resources 7(2): 83-89.