Budding yeast Mph1 promotes sister chromatid interactions by a mechanism involving strand invasion

DNA Repair

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 45-55

  Ede, Christopher ^a   Rudolph, Christian J ^a   Lehmann, Sabrina ^a   Schürer, K Anke ^a   Kramer, Wilfried ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Budding yeast; DEAH helicases; DNA lesion bypass; Homologous recombination; Mph1; Sister chromatid interaction

Indexed keywords

4 NITROQUINOLINE 1 OXIDE; DNA; HELICASE; MPH1 PROTEIN; RAD51 PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BUDDING; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA STRAND; FUNGAL COLONIZATION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVERTANT; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE; YEAST;

4-NITROQUINOLINE-1-OXIDE; COCCIDIOSTATS; DEAD-BOX RNA HELICASES; DNA DAMAGE; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; DRUG RESISTANCE; GENTAMICINS; MUTATION; RAD51 RECOMBINASE; RAD52 DNA REPAIR AND RECOMBINATION PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 78650418917     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Bernstein C., Bernstein H. Aging, Sex and DNA Repair 1991, Adacemic Press, Inc., New York.
2. Fazlieva R., Spittle C.S., Morrissey D., Hayashi H., Yan H., Matsumoto Y. Proofreading exonuclease activity of human DNA polymerase delta and its effects on lesion-bypass DNA synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:2854-2866.
3. Khare V., Eckert K.A. The proofreading 3'->5' exonuclease activity of DNA polymerases: a kinetic barrier to translesion DNA synthesis. Mutat. Res. 2002, 510:45-54.
4. Pages V., Janel-Bintz R., Fuchs R.P. Pol III proofreading activity prevents lesion bypass as evidenced by its molecular signature within E. coli cells. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 352:501-509.
5. Sabouri N., Viberg J., Goyal D.K., Johansson E., Chabes A. Evidence for lesion bypass by yeast replicative DNA polymerases during DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:5660-5667.
6. Waters L.S., Minesinger B.K., Wiltrout M.E., D'Souza S., Woodruff R.V., Walker G.C. Eukaryotic translesion polymerases and their roles and regulation in DNA damage tolerance. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2009, 73:134-154.
7. McCulloch S.D., Kunkel T.A. The fidelity of DNA synthesis by eukaryotic replicative and translesion synthesis polymerases. Cell Res. 2008, 18:148-161.
8. Unk I., Hajdu I., Blastyak A., Haracska L. Role of yeast Rad5 and its human orthologs, HLTF and SHPRH in DNA damage tolerance. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2010, 9:257-267.
9. Andersen P.L., Xu F., Xiao W. Eukaryotic DNA damage tolerance and translesion synthesis through covalent modifications of PCNA. Cell Res. 2008, 18:162-173.
10. Schiestl R.H., Prakash S., Prakash L. The SRS2 suppressor of rad6 mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae acts by channeling DNA lesions into the RAD52 DNA repair pathway. Genetics 1990, 124:817-831.
11. Ulrich H.D. The srs2 suppressor of UV sensitivity acts specifically on the RAD5- and MMS2-dependent branch of the RAD6 pathway. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29:3487-3494.
12. Ball L.G., Zhang K., Cobb J.A., Boone C., Xiao W. The yeast Shu complex couples error-free post-replication repair to homologous recombination. Mol. Microbiol. 2009, 73:89-102.
13. Krogh B.O., Symington L.S. Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2004, 38:233-271.
14. San Filippo J., Sung P., Klein H. Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2008, 77:229-257.
15. Li X., Heyer W.D. Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance. Cell Res. 2008, 18:99-113.
16. Whitby M.C. The FANCM family of DNA helicases/translocases. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2010, 9:224-236.
17. Entian K.D., Schuster T., Hegemann J.H., Becher D., Feldmann H., Güldener U., Götz R., Hansen M., Hollenberg C.P., Jansen G., Kramer W., Klein S., Kötter P., Kricke J., Launhardt H., Mannhaupt G., Maierl A., Meyer P., Mewes W., Munder T., Niedenthal R.K., Ramezani Rad M., Röhmer A., Römer A., Hinnen A., et al. Functional analysis of 150 deletion mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a systematic approach. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1999, 262:683-702.
18. Scheller J., Schürer A., Rudolph C., Hettwer S., Kramer W. MPH1, a yeast gene encoding a DEAH protein, plays a role in protection of the genome from spontaneous and chemically induced damage. Genetics 2000, 155:1069-1081.
19. Quah S.K., von Borstel R.C., Hastings P.J. The origin of spontaneous mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1980, 96:819-839.
20. Schürer K.A., Rudolph C., Ulrich H.D., Kramer W. Yeast MPH1 gene functions in an error-free DNA damage bypass pathway that requires genes from homologous recombination, but not from postreplicative repair. Genetics 2004, 166:1673-1686.
21. Prakash R., Krejci L., Van Komen S., Schürer K.A., Kramer W., Sung P. Saccharomyces cerevisiae MPH1 gene, required for homologous recombination-mediated mutation avoidance, encodes a 3' to 5' DNA helicase. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:7854-7860.
22. Schmidt K.H., Viebranz E.B., Harris L.B., Mirzaei-Souderjani H., Syed S., Medicus R. Defects in DNA lesion bypass lead to spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements and increased cell death. Eukaryot. Cell 2010, 9:315-324.
23. Panico E.R., Ede C., Schildmann M., Schürer K.A., Kramer W. Genetic evidence for a role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mph1 in recombinational DNA repair under replicative stress. Yeast 2010, 27:11-27.
24. Prakash R., Satory D., Dray E., Papusha A., Scheller J., Kramer W., Krejci L., Klein H., Haber J.E., Sung P., Ira G. Yeast Mph1 helicase dissociates Rad51-made D-loops: implications for crossover control in mitotic recombination. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:67-79.
25. Banerjee S., Smith S., Oum J.H., Liaw H.J., Hwang J.Y., Sikdar N., Motegi A., Lee S.E., Myung K. Mph1p promotes gross chromosomal rearrangement through partial inhibition of homologous recombination. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 181:1083-1093.
26. Kang Y.H., Kang M.J., Kim J.H., Lee C.H., Cho I.T., Hurwitz J., Seo Y.S. The MPH1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae functions in Okazaki fragment processing. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:10376-10386.
27. Komori K., Fujikane R., Shinagawa H., Ishino Y. Novel endonuclease in Archaea cleaving DNA with various branched structure. Genes Genet. Syst. 2002, 77:227-241.
28. Sun W., Nandi S., Osman F., Ahn J.S., Jakovleska J., Lorenz A., Whitby M.C. The FANCM ortholog Fml1 promotes recombination at stalled replication forks and limits crossing over during DNA double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell 2008, 32:118-128.
29. Chen Y.H., Choi K., Szakal B., Arenz J., Duan X., Ye H., Branzei D., Zhao X. Interplay between the Smc5/6 complex and the Mph1 helicase in recombinational repair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:21252-21257.
30. Nishino T., Komori K., Ishino Y., Morikawa K. X-ray and biochemical anatomy of an archaeal XPF/Rad1/Mus81 family nuclease: similarity between its endonuclease domain and restriction enzymes. Structure (Camb.) 2003, 11:445-457.
31. Nishino T., Komori K., Tsuchiya D., Ishino Y., Morikawa K. Crystal structure and functional implications of Pyrococcus furiosus hef helicase domain involved in branched DNA processing. Structure (Camb.) 2005, 13:143-153.
32. Komori K., Hidaka M., Horiuchi T., Fujikane R., Shinagawa H., Ishino Y. Cooperation of the N-terminal helicase and C-terminal endonuclease activities of archaeal Hef protein in processing stalled replication forks. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:53175-53185.
33. Moldovan G.L., D'Andrea A.D. How the fanconi anemia pathway guards the genome. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2009, 43:223-249.
34. Mosedale G., Niedzwiedz W., Alpi A., Perrina F., Pereira-Leal J.B., Johnson M., Langevin F., Pace P., Patel K.J. The vertebrate Hef ortholog is a component of the Fanconi anemia tumor-suppressor pathway. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2005, 12:763-771.
35. Meetei A.R., Medhurst A.L., Ling C., Xue Y., Singh T.R., Bier P., Steltenpool J., Stone S., Dokal I., Mathew C.G., Hoatlin M., Joenje H., de Winter J.P., Wang W. A human ortholog of archaeal DNA repair protein Hef is defective in Fanconi anemia complementation group M. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37:958-963.
36. Ciccia A., Ling C., Coulthard R., Yan Z., Xue Y., Meetei A.R., Laghmani el H., Joenje H., McDonald N., de Winter J.P., Wang W., West S.C. Identification of FAAP24, a Fanconi anemia core complex protein that interacts with FANCM. Mol. Cell 2007, 25:331-343.
37. Singh T.R., Bakker S.T., Agarwal S., Jansen M., Grassman E., Godthelp B.C., Ali A.M., Du C.H., Rooimans M.A., Fan Q., Wahengbam K., Steltenpool J., Andreassen P.R., Williams D.A., Joenje H., de Winter J.P., Meetei A.R. Impaired FANCD2 monoubiquitination and hypersensitivity to camptothecin uniquely characterize Fanconi anemia complementation group M. Blood 2009, 114:174-180.
38. Rosado I.V., Niedzwiedz W., Alpi A.F., Patel K.J. The Walker B motif in avian FANCM is required to limit sister chromatid exchanges but is dispensable for DNA crosslink repair. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:4360-4370.
39. Gari K., Decaillet C., Delannoy M., Wu L., Constantinou A. Remodeling of DNA replication structures by the branch point translocase FANCM. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:16107-16112.
40. Gari K., Decaillet C., Stasiak A.Z., Stasiak A., Constantinou A. The Fanconi anemia protein FANCM can promote branch migration of Holliday junctions and replication forks. Mol. Cell 2008, 29:141-148.
41. Luke-Glaser S., Luke B., Grossi S., Constantinou A. FANCM regulates DNA chain elongation and is stabilized by S-phase checkpoint signalling. EMBO J. 2009, 29:795-805.
42. Schwab R.A., Blackford A.N., Niedzwiedz W. ATR activation and replication fork restart are defective in FANCM-deficient cells. EMBO J. 2010, 29:806-818.
43. Singh T.R., Saro D., Ali A.M., Zheng X.F., Du C.H., Killen M.W., Sachpatzidis A., Wahengbam K., Pierce A.J., Xiong Y., Sung P., Meetei A.R. MHF1-MHF2, a histone-fold-containing protein complex, participates in the Fanconi anemia pathway via FANCM. Mol. Cell 2010, 37:879-886.
44. Yan Z., Delannoy M., Ling C., Daee D., Osman F., Muniandy P.A., Shen X., Oostra A.B., Du H., Steltenpool J., Lin T., Schuster B., Decaillet C., Stasiak A., Stasiak A.Z., Stone S., Hoatlin M.E., Schindler D., Woodcock C.L., Joenje H., Sen R., de Winter J.P., Li L., Seidman M.M., Whitby M.C., Myung K., Constantinou A., Wang W. A histone-fold complex and FANCM form a conserved DNA-remodeling complex to maintain genome stability. Mol. Cell 2010, 37:865-878.
45. Wach A., Brachat A., Pohlmann R., Philippsen P. New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1994, 10:1793-1808.
46. Gietz R.D., Sugino A. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene 1988, 74:527-534.
47. Rothstein R. Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991, 194:281-301.
48. Wach A., Brachat A., Alberti-Segui C., Rebischung C., Philippsen P. Heterologous HIS3 marker and GFP reporter modules for PCR-targeting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1997, 13:1065-1075.
49. Gietz D., St Jean A., Woods R.A., Schiestl R.H. Improved method for high efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20:1425.
50. Gietz R.D., Woods R.A. Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods Enzymol. 2002, 350:87-96.
51. Lea D.E., Coulson C.A. The distribution of mutants in bacterial populations. J. Genet. 1948, 49:248-264.
52. Kadyk L.C., Hartwell L.H. Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1992, 132:387-402.
53. Fasullo M.T., Davis R.W. Recombinational substrates designed to study recombination between unique and repetitive sequences in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1987, 84:6215-6219.
54. McIlwraith M.J., Vaisman A., Liu Y., Fanning E., Woodgate R., West S.C. Human DNA polymerase eta promotes DNA synthesis from strand invasion intermediates of homologous recombination. Mol. Cell 2005, 20:783-792.
55. Streisinger G., Okada Y., Emrich J., Newton J., Tsugita A., Terzaghi E., Inouye M. Frameshift mutations and the genetic code. This paper is dedicated to Professor Theodosius Dobzhansky on the occasion of his 66th birthday. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 1966, 31:77-84.
56. Ivanov E.L., Sugawara N., Fishman-Lobell J., Haber J.E. Genetic requirements for the single-strand annealing pathway of double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1996, 142:693-704.
57. Sugawara N., Haber J.E. Characterization of double-strand break-induced recombination: homology requirements and single-stranded DNA formation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1992, 12:563-575.
58. Kawamoto T., Araki K., Sonoda E., Yamashita Y.M., Harada K., Kikuchi K., Masutani C., Hanaoka F., Nozaki K., Hashimoto N., Takeda S. Dual roles for DNA polymerase eta in homologous DNA recombination and translesion DNA synthesis. Mol. Cell 2005, 20:793-799.
59. Li X., Stith C.M., Burgers P.M., Heyer W.D. PCNA is required for initiation of recombination-associated DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase delta. Mol. Cell 2009, 36:704-713.
60. Prakash S., Prakash L. Translesion DNA synthesis in eukaryotes: a one- or two-polymerase affair. Genes Dev. 2002, 16:1872-1883.
61. Lawrence C.W., Hinkle D.C. DNA polymerase zeta and the control of DNA damage induced mutagenesis in eukaryotes. Cancer Surv. 1996, 28:21-31.
62. Mann C., Davis R.W. Instability of dicentric plasmids in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1983, 80:228-232.
63. Koshland D., Rutledge L., Fitzgerald-Hayes M., Hartwell L.H. A genetic analysis of dicentric minichromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 1987, 48:801-812.
64. Tsukamoto Y., Kato J., Ikeda H. Budding yeast Rad50, Mre11, Xrs2, and Hdf1, but not Rad52, are involved in the formation of deletions on a dicentric plasmid. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1997, 255:543-547.
65. Kagawa W., Kurumizaka H., Ikawa S., Yokoyama S., Shibata T. Homologous pairing promoted by the human Rad52 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276:35201-35208.
66. Rattray A.J., Symington L.S. Use of a chromosomal inverted repeat to demonstrate that the RAD51 and RAD52 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae have different roles in mitotic recombination. Genetics 1994, 138:587-595.
67. Malkova A., Ivanov E.L., Haber J.E. Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93:7131-7136.
68. VanHulle K., Lemoine F.J., Narayanan V., Downing B., Hull K., McCullough C., Bellinger M., Lobachev K., Petes T.D., Malkova A. Inverted DNA repeats channel repair of distant double-strand breaks into chromatid fusions and chromosomal rearrangements. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27:2601-2614.
69. Strumberg D., Pilon A.A., Smith M., Hickey R., Malkas L., Pommier Y. Conversion of topoisomerase I cleavage complexes on the leading strand of ribosomal DNA into 5'-phosphorylated DNA double-strand breaks by replication runoff. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20:3977-3987.
70. K.A. Schürer, Zur Funktion des MPH1-Gens von Saccharomyces cerevisiae bei der rekombinativen Umgehung von replikationsarretierenden DNA-Schäden. Ph.D. thesis, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, 2003.
71. Nasmyth K., Haering C.H. Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2009, 43:525-558.
72. Paques F., Haber J.E. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1999, 63:349-404.
73. Malkova A., Signon L., Schaefer C.B., Naylor M.L., Theis J.F., Newlon C.S., Haber J.E. RAD51-independent break-induced replication to repair a broken chromosome depends on a distant enhancer site. Genes Dev. 2001, 15:1055-1060.
74. Lopes M., Foiani M., Sogo J.M. Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. Mol. Cell 2006, 21:15-27.
75. Heller R.C., Marians K.J. Replication fork reactivation downstream of a blocked nascent leading strand. Nature 2006, 439:557-562.
76. Whitby M.C., Osman F., Dixon J. Cleavage of model replication forks by fission yeast Mus81-Eme1 and budding yeast Mus81-Mms4. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:6928-6935.
77. Higgins N.P., Kato K., Strauss B. A model for replication repair in mammalian cells. J. Mol. Biol. 1976, 101:417-425.
78. Fujiwara Y., Tatsumi M. Replicative bypass repair of ultraviolet damage to DNA of mammalian cells: caffeine sensitive and caffeine resistant mechanisms. Mutat. Res. 1976, 37:91-110.
79. McGlynn P., Lloyd R.G. Genome stability and the processing of damaged replication forks by RecG. Trends Genet. 2002, 18:413-419.
80. Rudolph C., Schürer K.A., Kramer W. Facing stalled replication forks: the intricacies of doing the right thing. Genome Integrity: Facets and Perspectives 2007, 105-152. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. D.-H. Lankenau (Ed.).
81. Li X., Heyer W.D. RAD54 controls access to the invading 3'-OH end after RAD51-mediated DNA strand invasion in homologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:638-646.
82. Sogo J.M., Stahl H., Koller T., Knippers R. Structure of replicating simian virus 40 minichromosomes. The replication fork, core histone segregation and terminal structures. J. Mol. Biol. 1986, 189:189-204.
83. Groth A., Rocha W., Verreault A., Almouzni G. Chromatin challenges during DNA replication and repair. Cell 2007, 128:721-733.
84. Eggler A.L., Inman R.B., Cox M.M. The Rad51-dependent pairing of long DNA substrates is stabilized by replication protein A. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:39280-39288.
85. Mankouri H.W., Ngo H.P., Hickson I.D. Esc2 and Sgs1 act in functionally distinct branches of the homologous recombination repair pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 2009, 20:1683-1694.
86. Wu L., Hickson I.D. The Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination. Nature 2003, 426:870-874.