Two visual streams: Interconnections do not imply duplication of function

Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 65-68

  Goodale, Melvyn A ^a   Milner, A David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DORSAL VISUAL STREAM; HAND GRIP; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SEMANTICS; VENTRAL VISUAL STREAM; VISUAL FEEDBACK; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL PROCESSING; VISUAL SYSTEM; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 78650194065     PISSN: 17588928     EISSN: 17588936     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17588920903511635     Document Type: Note

References (189)

1. Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J. F. X., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679-685.
2. Andersen, R. A., Essick, G. K., & Siegel, R. M. (1985). Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. Science, 230(4724), 456-458.
3. Andrews, T. J., Schluppeck, D., Homfray, D., Matthews, P., & Blakemore, C. (2002). Activity in the fusiform gyrus predicts conscious perception of Rubin's vase-face illusion. NeuroImage, 17, 890-901.
4. Arnott, S. R., Binns, M. A., Grady, C. L., and Alain, C. (2004). Assessing the auditory dual-pathway model in humans. NeuroImage, 22, 401-408.
5. Batista, A. P., Buneo, C. A., Snyder, L. H., & Andersen, R. A. (1999). Reach plans in eye-centred coordinates. Science, 285, 257-260.
6. Battaglia-Mayer, A., & Caminiti, R. (2002) Optic ataxia as a result of the breakdown of the global tuning fields of parietal neurones. Brain, 125, 225-237.
7. Bautista, A. B., & Korienek, G. G. (1999). Manual aiming in the presence of visual frames of reference. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 36(4), 153-166.
8. Beckers, G., & Hömberg, V. (1992). Cerebral visual-motion blindness: Transitory akinetopsia induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of human area V5. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 249, 173-178.
9. Belin, P., & Zatorre, R. J. (2000). 'What', 'where' and 'how' in auditory cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 965-966.
10. Bradshaw, M. F., & Watt, S. J. (2002). A dissociation of perception and action in normal human observers: The effect of temporal-delay. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1766-1778.
11. Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. J. (1996). Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object. Experimental Brain Research, 111, 473-476.
12. Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G., & Nagle, M. (1979). Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 692-700.
13. Bridgeman B., Peery S., & Anand S. (1997). Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 456-469.
14. Bruno, N. (2001). When does action resist visual illusions? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 379-382.
15. Bruno, N., Bernardis, P., & Gentilucci, M. (2008). Visually guided pointing, the Muller-Lyer illusion, and the functional interpretation of the dorsal-ventral split: Conclusions from 33 independent studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 423-437.
16. Bruno, N., & Franz, V. H. (2009). When is grasping affected by the Muller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1421-1433.
17. Buneo, C. A., & Andersen, R. A. (2006). The posterior parietal cortex: Sensorimotor interface for the planning and online control of visually guided movements. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2594-2606.
18. Buxbaum, L. J., & Coslett, H. B. (1997). Subtypes of optic ataxia: Reframing the disconnection account. Neurocase, 3, 159-166.
19. Cant, J. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2007). Attention to form or surface properties modulates different regions of human occipitotemporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 713-731.
20. Carey, D. P. (2001). Do action systems resist visual illusions? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 109-113.
21. Carey, D. P., Harvey, M., & Milner, A. D. (1996). Visuomotor sensitivity for shape and orientation in a patient with visual form agnosia. Neuropsychologia, 34(5), 329-337.
22. Clark, A. (2009). Perception, action, and experience: Unraveling the golden braid. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1460-1468.
23. Clarke, S., Bellmann, A., Meuli, R. A., Assal, G., & Steck, A. J. (2000). Auditory agnosia and auditory spatial deficits following left hemispheric lesions: Evidence for distinct processing pathways. Neuropsychologia, 38, 797-807.
24. Coello, Y., & Iwanow, O. (2006). Effect of structuring the workspace on cognitive and sensorimotor distance estimation: No dissociation between perception and action. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 278-289.
25. Coello, Y., & Magne, P. (2000). Determination of target distance in a structured environment: Selection of visual information for action. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 489-519.
26. Connolly, J. D., Andersen, R. A., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). FMRI evidence for a 'parietal reach region' in the human brain. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 140-145.
27. Crowe, D. A., Averbeck, B. B., & Chafee, M. V. (2008). Neural ensemble decoding reveals a correlate of viewerto object-centered spatial transformation in monkey parietal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 5218-5228.
28. Danckert, J., Maruff, P., Kinsella, G., de Graaff, S., & Currie, J. (1998). Investigating form and colour perception in blindsight using an interference task. Neuro-Report, 9, 2919-2925.
29. Danckert, J., & Rossetti, Y. (2005). Blindsight in action: What can the different sub-types of blindsight tell us about the control of visually guided actions? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 29, 1035-1046.
30. Dassonville, P., & Bala, J. K. (2004). Perception, action, and Roelofs effect: A mere illusion of dissociation. PLoS Biology, 2, 1936-1945.
31. Dassonville, P., Bridgeman, B., Bala, J. K., Thiem, P., & Sampanes, A. (2004). The induced Roelofs effect: Two visual systems or the shift of a single reference frame? Vision Research, 44, 603-611.
32. de'Sperati, C., & Baud-Bovy, G. (2008). Blind saccades: An asynchrony between seeing and looking. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 4317-4321.
33. Dijkerman, H. C., & De Haan, E. H. F. (2007). Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 189-201.
34. Dijkerman, H. C., McIntosh, R. D., Schindler, I., Nijboer, T. C. W., & Milner, A. D. (2009). Choosing between alternative wrist postures: Action planning needs perception. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1476-1482.
35. Dijkerman, H. C., & Milner, A. D. (1997). Copying without perceiving: Motor imagery in visual form agnosia. NeuroReport, 8, 729-732.
36. Dijkerman, H. C., & Milner, A. D. (1998). The perception and prehension of objects oriented in the depth plane. II. Dissociated orientation functions in normal subjects. Experimental Brain Research, 118, 408-414.
37. Dijkerman, H. C., Milner, A. D., & Carey, D. P. (1998). Grasping spatial relationships: Failure to demonstrate allocentric visual coding in a patient with visual form agnosia. Consciousness and Cognition, 7, 424-437.
38. Dijkerman, H. C., Milner, A. D., & Carey, D. P. (1999). Prehension of objects oriented in depth: Motion parallax restores performance of a visual form agnosic when binocular vision is unavailable. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1505-1510.
39. Dixon, P., & Glover, S. (2004). Action and memory. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 143-174). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
40. Dixon, P., & Glover, S. (2009). Perseveration and contrast effects in grasping. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1578-1584.
41. Driver, J., & Vuilleumier, P. (2001). Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction. Cognition, 79, 39-88.
42. Elliott, D., & Madalena, J. (1987). The influence of premovement visual information on manual aiming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 541-559.
43. Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 825-850.
44. Flanagan, J. R., & Beltzner, M. A. (2000). Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size-weight illusion. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 737-741.
45. Franz, V. H. (2001). Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 457-459.
46. Franz, V. H., & Gegenfurtner, K. (2008). Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 920-950.
47. Franz, V. H., Gegenfurtner, K. R., Bulthoff, H. H., & Fahle, M. (2000). Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science, 11, 20-25.
48. Franz, V. H., Hesse, C., & Kollath, S. (2009). Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: No shift from dorsal to ventral control. Neuropsychologia: Perception and Action, 47, 1518-1531.
49. Ganel, T., Tanzer, M., & Goodale, M. A. (2008). A double dissociation between action and perception in the context of visual illusions: Opposite effects of real and illusory size. Psychological Science, 19, 221-225.
50. Gillam, B., & Chambers, D. (1985). Size and position are incongruous: Measurements on the Muller-Lyer figure. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 549-556.
51. Glover, S. (2002). Visual illusion affect planning but not control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 288-292.
52. Goebel, R., Khorram-Sefat, D., Muckli, L., Hacker, H., & Singer, W. (1998). The constructive nature of vision: Direct evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of apparent motion and motion imagery. European Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 1563-1573.
53. Goodale, M. A. (1997). Visual routes to perception and action in the cerebral cortex. In M. Jeannerod & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 11, pp. 91-109). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
54. Goodale, M. A. (2008). Action without perception in human vision. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 891-919.
55. Goodale, M. A., & Humphrey, G. K. (1998). The objects of action and perception. Cognition, 67, 181-207.
56. Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S., & Keillor, J. M. (1994a). Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia, 32, 1159-1178.
57. Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S., Milner, A. D., Perrett, D. I., Benson, P. J., & Hietanen, J. K. (1994b). The nature and limits of orientation and pattern processing supporting visuomotor control in a visual form agnosic. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 46-56.
58. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience, 15, 20-25.
59. Goodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., Jakobson, L. S., & Carey, D. P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349, 154-156.
60. Goodale, M. A., Westwood, D. A., & Milner, A. D. (2003). Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action. Progress in Brain Research, 144, 131-144.
61. Gordon, A. M., Forssberg, H., Johansson, R. S., & Westling, G. (1991). Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip. Experimental Brain Research, 83, 477-482.
62. Greenwald, H. S., Knill, D. C., & Saunders, J. A. (2005). Integrating visual cues for motor control: A matter of time. Vision Research, 45, 1975-1989.
63. Grill-Spector, K., Kushnir, T., Edelman, S., Avidan, G., Itzchak, Y., & Malach, R. (1999). Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron, 24, 187-203.
64. Hall, D. A. (2003). Auditory pathways: Are 'what' and 'where' appropriate? Current Biology, 13, R406-R408.
65. Hay, L., & Redon, C. (2006). Response delay and spatial representation in pointing movements. Neuroscience Letters, 408, 194-198.
66. He, S., Cohen, E. R., & Hu, X. P. (1998). Close correlation between activity in brain area MT/V5 and the perception of a visual motion aftereffect. Current Biology, 8, 1215-1218.
67. Heath, M., Rival, C., Westwood, D. A., & Neely, K. (2005). Time course analysis of closed-and open-loop grasping of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 179-185.
68. Hesse, C., & Franz, V.H. (2009). Memory mechanisms in grasping. Neuropsychologia: Perception and Action, 47, 1532-1545.
69. Himmelbach, M., & Karnath, H. O. (2005). Dorsal and ventral stream interaction: Contributions from optic ataxia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 632-640.
70. Himmelbach, M., Nau, M., Zündorf, I., Erb, M., Perenin, M.-T., & Karnath, H.-O. (2009). Brain activation during immediate and delayed reaching in optic ataxia. Neuropsychologia: Perception and Action, 47, 1508-1517.
71. Hu, Y., Eagleson, R., & Goodale, M. (1999). The effects of delay on the kinematics of grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 126, 109-116.
72. Hu, Y., & Goodale, M. A. (2000). Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 856-868.
73. Itoh, K., Fujii, Y., Kwee, I. L., & Nakada, T. (2005). MT+/ V5 activation without conscious motion perception: A high-field fMRI study. Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences, 4, 69-74.
74. Jackson, S. R., Newport, R., Husain, M., Fowlie, J. E., O'Donoghue, M., & Bajaj, N. (2009). There may be more to reaching than meets the eye: Re-thinking optic ataxia. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1397-1408.
75. Jackson, S. R., Newport, R., Mort, D., & Husain, M. (2005). Where the eye looks, the hand follows: Limb-dependent magnetic misreaching in optic ataxia. Current Biology, 15, 42-46.
76. Jackson, S. R., & Shaw, A. (2000). The Ponzo illusion affects grip-force but not grip-aperture scaling during prehension movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 418-423.
77. James, T. W., Culham, J., Humphrey, G. K., Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: A fMRI study. Brain, 126, 2463-2475.
78. James, T. W., Humphrey, G. K., Gati, J. S., Menon, R. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2002). Differential effects of viewpoint on object-driven activation in dorsal and ventral streams. Neuron, 35, 793-801.
79. Jax, S. A., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Evidence that the dorsal stream does not only control visually guided actions in real time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 425-441.
80. Jeannerod, M., & Jacob, P. (2005). Visual cognition: A new look at the two-visual systems model. Neuropsychologia, 43, 301-312.
81. Kaas, J. H., & Hackett, T. A. (1999). 'What' and 'where' processing in auditory cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1045-1047.
82. Kaneoke, Y., Bundou, M., Koyama, S., Suzuki, H., & Kakigi, R. (1997). Human cortical area responding to stimuli in apparent motion. NeuroReport, 8, 677-682.
83. Karnath, H. O., & Perenin, M. T. (2005). Cortical control of visually guided reaching: Evidence from patients with optic ataxia. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1561-1569.
84. Karnath, H. O., Rüter, J., Mandler, A., & Himmelbach, M. (2009). The anatomy of object recognition: Visual form agnosia caused by medial occipitotemporal stroke. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 5854-5862.
85. Knill, D. C. (2005). Reaching for visual cues to depth: The brain combines depth cues differently for motor control and perception. Journal of Vision, 5, 103-115.
86. Koch, C. (2004) The quest for consciousness: A neuroscientific approach. Englewood, CO: Roberts & Co.
87. Konen, C. S., & Kastner, S. (2008). Two hierarchically organized neural systems for object information in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 224-231.
88. Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 48-55.
89. Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science, 293(5534), 1506-1509.
90. Krigolson, O., Clark, N., Heath, M., & Binsted, G. (2007). The proximity of visual landmarks impacts reaching performance. Spatial Vision, 20, 317-336.
91. Krigolson, A., & Heath, M. (2004). Background visual cues and memory-guided reaching. Human Movement Science, 23, 861-877.
92. Kubovy, M., & Van Valkenburg, D. (2001). Auditory and visual objects. Cognition, 80, 97-126.
93. Lamme, V. A. (2001). Blindsight: The role of feedforward and feedback corticocortical connections. Acta Psychologica, 107, 209-228.
94. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., & Young, M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 3, 389-412.
95. Li, W., & Matin, L. (2004). Two wrongs make a right: Linear increase of accuracy of visually-guided manual pointing, reaching, and height-matching with increase in hand-to-body distance. Vision Research, 45, 533-550.
96. Li, W, Matin, E., Bertz, J. W., & Matin, L. (2008). A tilted frame deceives the eye and the hand. Journal of Vision, 8, 1-16.
97. Logothetis, N. K., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). Visual object recognition. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19, 577-621.
98. López-Moliner, J., Smeets, J. B. J., & Brenner, E. (2003). Comparing the sensitivity of manual pursuit and perceptual judgments to pictorial depth effects. Psychological Science, 14(3), 232-236.
99. Mack, A., Heuer, F., Villardi, K., & Chambers, D. (1985). The dissociation of position and extent in Muller-Lyer figures. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 335-344.
100. Magne, P., & Coello, Y. (2002). Retinal and extra-retinal contribution to position coding. Behavioural Brain Research, 136, 277-287.
101. McIntosh, R. D. (2000). Seeing size and weight. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 442-444.
102. McIntosh, R. D., Dijkerman, H. C., Mon-Williams, M., & Milner, A. D. (2004). Grasping what is graspable: Evidence from visual form agnosia. Cortex, 40, 695-702.
103. McIntosh, R. D., & Lashley, G. (2008). Matching boxes: Familiar size influences action programming. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2441-2444.
104. McIntosh, R. D., McClements, K. I., Schindler, I., Cassidy, T. P., Birchall, D., & Milner, A. D. (2004). Avoidance of obstacles in the absence of visual awareness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences, 271, 15-20.
105. Michel, F., & Henaff, M. A. (2004). Seeing without the occipito-parietal cortex: Simultagnosia as a shrinkage of the attentional visual field. Behavioural Neurology, 15, 3-13.
106. Milner, A. D. (1995). Cerebral correlates of visual awareness. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1117-1130.
107. Milner, A. D. (1998). Streams and consciousness: Visual awareness and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 25-30.
108. Milner, A. D. (2008). Visual awareness and human action. In L. Weiskrantz & M. Davies (Eds.), Frontiers in consciousness research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
109. Milner, A. D., Dijkerman, H. C., Pisella, L., McIntosh, R.D., Tilikete, C., Vighetto, A., et al. (2001). Grasping the past: Delay can improve visuomotor performance. Current Biology, 11, 1896-1901.
110. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
111. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2006). The visual brain in action (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
112. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2008). Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia, 46, 774-785.
113. Milner, A. D., Paulignan, Y., Dijkerman, H. C., Michel, F., & Jeannerod, M. (1999). A paradoxical improvement of misreaching in optic ataxia: New evidence for two separate neural systems for visual localization. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 266, 2225-2229.
114. Milner, A. D., Perrett, D. I., Johnston, R. S., Benson, P. J., Jordan, T. R., Heeley, D. W., et al. (1991). Perception and action in 'visual form agnosia'. Brain, 114, 405-428.
115. Mon-Williams, M., & Bull, R. (2000). The Judd illusion: Evidence for two visual streams or two experimental conditions? Experimental Brain Research, 130, 273-276.
116. Mon-Williams, M., McIntosh, R. D., & Milner, A. D. (2001). Vertical gaze angle as a distance cue for programming reaching: Insights from visual form agnosia II (of III). Experimental Brain Research, 139, 137-142.
117. Mon-Williams, M., & Murray, A. H. (2000). The size of visual size cue used for programming manipulative forces during precision grip. Experimental Brain Research, 135, 405-410.
118. Mon-Williams, M., Tresilian, J. R., McIntosh, R. D., & Milner, A. D. (2001). Monocular and binocular distance cues: Insights from visual form agnosia I (of III). Experimental Brain Research, 139, 127-136.
119. Mountcastle, V. B., Lynch, J. C., Georgopoulos, A. P., Sakata, H., & Acuña, C. (1975). Posterior parietal association cortex of the monkey: Command function of operations within extrapersonal space. Journal of Neurophysiology, 38, 871-908.
120. Moutoussis, K., & Zeki, S. (2008). Motion processing, directional selectivity, and conscious visual perception in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 16362-16367.
121. Murphy, K. J., Racicot, C. I., & Goodale, M. A. (1996). The use of visuomotor cues as a strategy for making perceptual judgements in a patient with visual form agnosia. Neuropsychology, 10, 396-401.
122. Murray, S. O., Boyaci, H., & Kersten, D. (2006). The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 429-434.
123. Neri, P. (2005). A stereoscopic look at visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 1823-1826.
124. Newport, R., & Jackson, S. R. (2006). The posterior parietal cortex and prism adaptation. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2757-2765.
125. Obhi, S. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2005). The effects of landmarks on the performance of delayed and real-time pointing movements. Experimental Brain Research, 167, 335-344.
126. Pavani, F., Boscagli, I., Benvenuti, F., Rabuffetti, M., & Farne, A. (1999). Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion? Experimental Brain Research, 127, 95-101.
127. Pellijeff, A., Bonilha, L., Morgan, P. S., McKenzie, K., & Jackson, S. R. (2006). Parietal updating of limb posture: An event-related fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2685-2690.
128. Perenin, M. T., & Vighetto, A. (1988). Optic ataxia: A specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. Brain, 111, 643-674.
129. Pisella, L., Binkofski, F., Lasek, K., Toni, I., & Rossetti, Y. (2006). No double-dissociation between optic ataxia and visual agnosia: Multiple sub-streams for multiple visuo-manual integrations. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2734-2748.
130. Pisella, L., Sergio, L., Blangero, A., Torchin, H., Vighetto, A. & Rossetti, Y. (in press). Optic ataxia and the function of the dorsal stream: Contribution to perception and action. Neuropsychologia. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia. 2009.06.020
131. Post, R. B., & Welch, R. B. (1996). Is there dissociation of perceptual and motor responses to figural illusions? Perception, 25, 569-581.
132. Prado, J., Clavagnier, S., Otzenberger, H., Scheiber, C., Kennedy, H., & Perenin, M.-T. (2005). Two cortical systems for reaching in central and peripheral vision. Neuron, 48, 849-858.
133. Pulvermuller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(7), 576-582.
134. Read, J. C. A., Phillipson, G. P., Milner, A. D., & Parker, A. J. (2008). Binocular depth perception in a human subject with bilateral lesions of the lateral occipital cortical area. FENS Abstracts, 4, A190.13.
135. Redon, C., & Hay, L. (2005). Role of visual context and oculomotor conditions in pointing accuracy. NeuroReport, 16, 2065-2067.
136. Rees, G. (2007). Neural correlates of the contents of visual awareness in humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 877-886.
137. Rees, G., Kreiman, G., & Koch, C. (2002). Neural correlates of consciousness in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 261-270.
138. Rice-Cohen, N., Cross, E. S., Tunik, E., Grafton, S. T., & Culham, J. C. (2009). Ventral and dorsal stream contributions to the online control of immediate and delayed grasping: A TMS approach. Neuropsychologia: Perception and Action, 47, 1553-1562.
139. Rice, N. J., Edwards, M. G., Schindler, I., Punt, T. D., McIntosh, R. D., Humphreys, G. W., et al. (2008). Delay abolishes the obstacle avoidance deficit in unilateral optic ataxia. Neuropsychologia, 46, 1549-1557.
140. Rice, N. J., McIntosh, R. D., Schindler, I., Mon-Williams, M., Demonet, J. F., & Milner, A. D. (2006). Intact automatic avoidance of obstacles in patients with visual form agnosia. Experimental Brain Research, 174, 176-188.
141. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Jacobson, S., Pluck, G., Bateman, A., & Edwards, M. (2004). Impaired orientation discrimination and localisation following parietal damage: On the interplay between dorsal and ventral processes in visual perception. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 597-623.
142. Rizzolatti, G., & Matelli, M. (2003). Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: Anatomy and functions. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 146-157.
143. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., & Sheliga, B. M. (1994). Space and selective attention. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing (pp. 231-265). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
144. Rogers, G., Smith, D., & Schenk, T. (2009). Immediate and delayed actions share a common visuomotor transformation mechanism: A prism adaptation study. Neuropsychologia: Perception and Action, 47, 1546-1552.
145. Rossetti, Y. (1998). Implicit short-lived motor representations of space in brain damaged and healthy subjects. Consciousness and Cognition, 7, 520-558.
146. Rossetti, Y., Pisella, L., & Vighetto, A. (2003). Optic ataxia revisited: Visually guided action versus immediate visuomotor control. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 171-179.
147. Rossetti, Y., Revol, P., McIntosh, R., Pisella, L., Rode, G., Danckert, J., et al. (2005). Visually guided reaching: Bilateral posterior parietal lesions cause a switch from fast visuomotor to slow cognitive control. Neuropsychologia, 43, 162-177.
148. Salzman, C. D., Britten, K. H., & Newsome, W. T. (1990). Cortical microstimulation influences perceptual judgments of motion direction. Nature, 346, 174-177.
149. Sawamura, H., Georgieva, S., Vogels, R., Vanduffel, W., & Orban, G. A. (2005). Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess adaptation and size invariance of shape processing by humans and monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 4294-4306.
150. Schenk, T. (2006). An allocentric rather than perceptual deficit in patient D.F. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1369-1370.
151. Schenk, T., Ellison, A., Rice, N. J., & Milner, A. D. (2005). The role of V5/MT+ in the control of catching movements: An rTMS study. Neuropsychologia, 43, 189-198.
152. Schenk, T., Mai, N., Ditterich, J., & Zihl, J. (2000). Can a motion-blind patient reach for moving objects? European Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 3351-3360.
153. Schenk, T., & McIntosh, R. D. (2010). Do we have independent visual streams for perception and action? Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 52-62.
154. Schenk, T., & Milner, A. D. (2006). Concurrent visuomotor behaviour improves form discrimination in a patient with visual form agnosia. European Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 1495-1503.
155. Schenk, T., Schindler, I., McIntosh, R. D., & Milner, A. D. (2005). The use of visual feedback is independent of visual awareness: Evidence from visual extinction. Experimental Brain Research, 167, 95-102.
156. Schenk, T., & Zihl, J. (1997). Visual motion perception after brain damage: I. Deficits in global motion perception. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1289-1297.
157. Schindler, I., Rice, N. J., McIntosh, R. D., Rossetti, Y., Vighetto, A., & Milner, A. D. (2006). Automatic avoidance of obstacles is a dorsal stream function: Evidence from optic ataxia. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 779-784.
158. Singhal, A., Kaufman, L., Valyear, K., & Culham, J. C. (2006). fMRI reactivation of the human lateral occipital complex during delayed actions to remembered objects. Visual Cognition, 14, 122-125.
159. Smeets, J. B. J., & Brenner, E. (2006). 10 years of illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1501-1504.
160. Smeets, J. B. J., & Brenner, E. (2008). Grasping Weber's law. Current Biology, 18(23), R1089-R1090.
161. Smeets, J. B. J., Brenner, E., de Grave, D. D. J., & Cuijpers, R. H. (2002). Illusions in action: Consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes. Experimental Brain Research, 147(2), 135-144.
162. Smeets, J. B. J., van den Dobbelsteen, J. J., de Grave, D. D. J., van Beers, R. J., & Brenner, E. (2006). Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(49), 18781-18786.
163. Snyder, L. H., Grieve, K. L., Brotchie, P., & Andersen, R. A. (1998). Separate body-and world-referenced representations of visual space in parietal cortex. Nature, 394, 887-891.
164. Srivastava, S., Orban, G. A., De Mazière, P. A., & Janssen, P. (2009). A distinct representation of three-dimensional shape in macaque anterior intraparietal area: Fast, metric, and coarse. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 10613-10626.
165. Stöttinger, E., & Perner, J. (2006). Dissociating size representation for action and for conscious judgment: Grasping visual illusions without apparent obstacles. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 269-284.
166. Striemer, C., Blangero, A., Rossetti, Y., Boisson, D., Rode, G., Vighetto, A., et al. (2007). Deficits in peripheral visual attention in patients with optic ataxia. Neuroreport, 18, 1171-1175.
167. Striemer, C. L., Chapman, C. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2009). "Real-time" obstacle avoidance in the absence of primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 15996-16001.
168. Striemer, C., Locklin, J., Blangero, A., Rossetti, Y., Pisella, L., & Danckert, J. (2009). Attention for action? Examining the link between attention and visuomotor control deficits in a patient with optic ataxia. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1491-1499.
169. Tootell, R. B. H., Reppas, J. B., Dale, A. M., Look, R. B., Sereno, M. I., Malach, R., et al. (1995). Visual-motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic-resonance-imaging. Nature, 375, 139-141.
170. Tootell, R. B. H., Tsao, D., & Vanduffel, W. (2003). Neuroimaging weighs in: Humans meet macaques in "primate" visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3981-3989.
171. Trevethan, C. T., Sahraie, A., & Weiskrantz, L. (2007). Form discrimination in a case of blindsight. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2092-2103.
172. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale & R. J. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
173. Valyear, K. F., & Culham, J. C. (2009). Observing learned object-specific functional grasps preferentially activates the ventral stream. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Advance online publication. Retrieved October 31, 2009. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21256
174. Valyear, K. F., Culham, J. C., Sharif, N., Westwood, D., & Goodale, M. A. (2006). A double dissociation between sensitivity to changes in object identity and object orientation in the ventral and dorsal visual streams: A human fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 44, 218-228.
175. van Elk, M., van Schie, H. T., & Bekkering, H. (2009). Action semantic knowledge about objects is supported by functional motor activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(4), 1118-1128.
176. van Elk, M., van Schie, H. T., & Bekkering, H. (2010). Semantics in the motor system: Motor-cortical beta oscillations reflect implicit knowledge of end-postures for object-use. Manuscript submitted for publication.
177. Van Essen, D. C. (1985). Functional organization of primate visual cortex. In A. Peters & E. G. Jones (Eds.), Visual cortex (Vol. 3, pp. 259-329). New York: Plenum Press.
178. Van Essen, D. C. (2005). Corticocortical and thalamocortical information flow in the primate visual system. Progress in Brain Research, 149, 173-185.
179. van Mierlo, C. M., Louw, S., Smeets, J. B. J., & Brenner, E. (2009). Slant cues are processed with different latencies for the online control of movement. Journal of Vision, 9(3), Art. 25, 1-8.
180. Vishton, P. M., Pea, J. G., Cutting, J. E., & Nunez, L. N. (1999). Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: Relative versus absolute, not perception versus action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1659-1672.
181. Vuilleumier, P., Henson, R. N., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2002). Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 491-499.
182. Warren, J. E., Wise, R. J. S. & Warren, J. D. (2005). Sounds do-able: auditory-motor transformations and the posterior temporal plane. Trends In Neurosciences, 28, 636-643.
183. Weiskrantz, L. (1986). Blindsight: A case study and implications. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
184. Weiskrantz, L. (1987). Residual vision in a scotoma: A follow-up-study of form discrimination. Brain, 110, 77-92.
185. Westwood, D. A., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action. Spatial Vision, 16, 243-254.
186. Westwood, D. A., Heath, M., & Roy, E. A. (2001). The accuracy of reaching movements in brief delay conditions. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 304-310.
187. Westwood, D. A., McEachern, T., & Roy, E. A. (2001). Delayed grasping of a Muller-Lyer figure. Experimental Brain Research, 141, 166-173.
188. Wraga, M., Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2000). Perception-action dissociations of a walkable Muller-Lyer configuration. Psychological Science, 11, 239-243.
189. Zihl, J., Von Cramon, D., & Mai, N. (1983). Selective disturbance of movement vision after bilateral braindamage. Brain, 106, 313-340.