Matching boxes: Familiar size influences action programming

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 46, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 2441-2444

  McIntosh, Robert D ^a   Lashley, Gavin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action; Depth cues; Dorsal stream; Perception; Ventral stream

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GRIP STRENGTH; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KNOWLEDGE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION; VISION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADULT; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SIZE PERCEPTION; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 44449143834     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aglioti S., DeSouza J.F.X., and Goodale M.A. Size contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology 5 (1995) 679-685
2. Bridgeman B., Peery S., and Anand S. Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of space. Perception & Psychophysics 59 (1997) 456-469
3. Bruno N. When does action resist visual illusions?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (2001) 379-382
4. Carey D.P., Harvey M., and Milner A.D. Visuomotor sensitivity for shape and orientation in a patient with visual form agnosia. Neuropsychologia 34 (1996) 329-338
5. Dyde R.T., and Milner A.D. Two illusions of perceived orientation: one fools all of the people some of the time; the other fools all of the people all of the time. Experimental Brain Research 144 (2002) 518-527
6. Franz V.H. Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (2001) 457-459
7. Goodale M.A., and Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience 15 (1992) 20-25
8. Holway A.H., and Boring E.G. Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variant. American Journal of Psychology 54 (1941) 21-37
9. Landy M.S., Maloney L.T., Johnston E.B., and Young M. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision Research 35 (1995) 389-412
10. Marotta J.J., and Goodale M.A. The role of familiar size in the control of grasping. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13 (2001) 8-17
11. McIntosh R.D. Seeing size and weight. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 442-444
12. Milner A.D., and Dyde R.T. Why do some perceptual illusions affect visually guided action, when others don't?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003) 10-11
13. Milner A.D., and Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action. 2nd ed. (2007), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
14. Milner A.D., Perrett D.I., Johnston R.S., Benson P.J., Jordan T.R., Heeley D.W., et al. Perception and action in 'visual form agnosia'. Brain 114 (1991) 405-428
15. Mon-Williams M., Tresilian J.R., McIntosh R.D., and Milner A.D. Monocular and binocular distance cues: insights from visual form agnosia I (of III). Experimental Brain Research 139 (2001) 127-136
16. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-113
17. Servos P., and Goodale M.A. Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research 54 (1994) 121-132
18. Smeets J.B.J., and Brenner E. 10 years of illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32 (2006) 1501-1504
19. Wann J.P., Mon-Williams M., McIntosh R.D., Smyth M., and Milner A.D. The role of size and binocular information in guiding reaching: insights from virtual reality and visual form agnosia III (of III). Experimental Brain Research 139 (2001) 143-150