Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: No shift from dorsal to ventral control

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1518-1531

  Franz, V H ^a   Hesse, C ^b   Kollath, S ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Action; Dorsal; M ller Lyer; Perception; Ventral

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PATHWAYS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 63049118979     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.029     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Aglioti S., DeSouza J.F.X., and Goodale M.A. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology 5 6 (1995) 679-685
2. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 10 (1997) 433-436
3. Bridgeman B., Kirch M., and Sperling A. Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Perception & Psychophysics 29 (1981) 336-342
4. Bridgeman B., Peery S., and Anand S. Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics 59 3 (1997) 456-469
5. Buonaccorsi J.P. Fieller's theorem. In: El-Shaarawi A.H., and Piegorsch W.W. (Eds). Encyclopedia of environmetrics (2001), Wiley, New York 773-775
6. Cantor G.N. A note on a methodological error commonly committed in medical and psychological research. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 61 (1956) 17-18
7. Coren S., and Girgus J.S. A comparison of five methods of illusion measurement. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation 4 5 (1972) 240-244
8. Daprati E., and Gentilucci M. Grasping an illusion. Neuropsychologia 35 (1997) 1577-1582
9. Dassonville P., and Bala J.K. Are the original Roelofs effect and the induced Roelofs effect confounded by the same expansion of remembered space?. Vision Research 44 (2004) 1025-1029
10. Dassonville P., and Bala J.K. Perception, action, and Roelofs effect: A mere illusion of dissociation. Public Library of Science/Biology 2 11 (2004) 1936-1945
11. Dassonville P., Bridgeman B., Bala J.K., Thiem P., and Sampanes A. The induced Roelofs effect: Two visual systems or the shift of a single reference frame?. Vision Research 44 (2004) 603-611
12. Franz V.H. Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 11 (2001) 457-459
13. Franz V.H. Manual size estimation: A neuropsychological measure of perception?. Experimental Brain Research 151 4 (2003) 471-477
14. Franz, V.H. (submitted for publication; preprint at arXiv:0710.2024). Ratios: A short guide to confidence limits and proper use.
15. Franz V.H., Bülthoff H.H., and Fahle M. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: Obstacle-avoidance is not the explanation. Experimental Brain Research 149 4 (2003) 470-477
16. Franz V.H., Fahle M., Bülthoff H.H., and Gegenfurtner K.R. Effects of visual illusions on grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 5 (2001) 1124-1144
17. Franz V.H., and Gegenfurtner K.R. Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation. Cognitive Neuropsychology 25 (2008) 920-950
18. Franz V.H., Gegenfurtner K.R., Bülthoff H.H., and Fahle M. Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science 11 1 (2000) 20-25
19. Franz V.H., Scharnowski F., and Gegenfurtner K.R. Illusion effects on grasping are temporally constant, not dynamic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 6 (2005) 1359-1378
20. Gentilucci M., Chieffi S., Daprati E., Saetti M.C., and Toni I. Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia 34 5 (1996) 369-376
21. Gillam B., and Chambers D. Size and position are incongruous-Measurements on the Müller-Lyer figure. Perception & Psychophysics 37 (1985) 549-556
22. Glover S. Visual illusions affect planning but not control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 7 (2002) 288-292
23. Glover S. Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 1 (2004) 3-23
24. Glover S., and Dixon P. Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: Evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 560-572
25. Glover S., and Dixon P. Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: Support for a planning/control model of action. Perception & Psychophysics 64 2 (2002) 266-278
26. Gonzalez C.L.R., Ganel T., and Goodale M.A. Hemispheric specialization for the visual control of action is independent of handedness. Journal of Neurophysiology 95 (2006) 3496-3501
27. Goodale, M.A. (2006, October 27). Visual duplicity: Action without perception in the human visual system. The XIV. Kanizsa lecture, Triest, Italy.
28. Goodale M.A. Action without perception in human vision. Cognitive Neuropsychology 25 (2008) 891-919
29. Goodale M.A., and Westwood D.A. An evolving view of duplex vision: Separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 14 (2004) 203-211
30. Goodale M.A., Westwood D.A., and Milner A.D. Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action. Progress in Brain Research 144 (2004) 131-144
31. Haffenden A.M., and Goodale M.A. The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10 1 (1998) 122-136
32. Haffenden A.M., Schiff K.C., and Goodale M.A. The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: Nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp. Current Biology 11 3 (2001) 177-181
33. Handlovsky I., Hansen S., Lee T.D., and Elliott D. The Ebbinghaus illusion affects on-line movement control. Neuroscience Letters 366 3 (2004) 308-311
34. Heath M., Rival C., and Binsted G. Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion. Experimental Brain Research 158 3 (2004) 378-384
35. Heath M., Rival C., and Neely K. Visual feedback schedules influence visuomotor resistance to the Müller-Lyer figures. Experimental Brain Research 168 (2006) 348-356
36. Hesse C., and Franz V.H. Memory mechanisms in grasping. Neuropsychologia 47 (2009) 1532-1545
37. Hu Y., Eagleson R., and Goodale M.A. The effects of delay on the kinematics of grasping. Experimental Brain Research 126 (1999) 109-116
38. Hu Y., and Goodale M.A. Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12 5 (2000) 856-868
39. Jeannerod M. Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In: Long J., and Baddeley A. (Eds). Attention and performance vol. 9 (1981), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 153-168
40. Jeannerod M. The timing of natural prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior 16 3 (1984) 235-254
41. Mack A., Heuer F., Villardi K., and Chambers D. The dissociation of position and extent in Müller-Lyer figures. Perception & Psychophysics 37 (1985) 335-344
42. Meegan D.V., Glazebrook C.M., Dhillon V.P., Tremblay L., Welsh T.N., and Elliott D. The Müller-Lyer illusion affects the planning and control of manual aiming movements. Experimental Brain Research 155 (2004) 37-47
43. Milgram P. A spectacle-mounted liquid-crystal tachistoscope. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 19 5 (1987) 449-456
44. Milner A.D., and Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action (1995), Oxford University Press, Oxford
45. Milner D., and Dyde R. Why do some perceptual illusions affect visually guided action, when others don't?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 1 (2003) 10-11
46. Pavani F., Boscagli I., Benvenuti F., Rabuffetti M., and Farnè A. Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?. Experimental Brain Research 127 (1999) 95-101
47. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10 (1997) 437-442
48. Pisella L., Binkofski F., Lasek K., Toni I., and Rossetti Y. No double-dissociation between optic ataxia and visual agnosia: Multiple sub-streams for multiple visuo-manual integrations. Neuropsychologia 44 (2006) 2734-2748
49. Post R.B., and Welch R.B. Is there dissociation of perceptual and motor responses to figural illusions?. Perception 25 5 (1996) 569-581
50. R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. ISBN:3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org.
51. Schenk T. An allocentric rather than perceptual deficit in patient DF. Nature Neuroscience 9 (2006) 1369-1370
52. Smeets J.B.J., and Brenner E. A new view on grasping. Motor Control 3 (1999) 237-271
53. Smeets J.B.J., and Brenner E. 10 years of illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 32 (2006) 1501-1504
54. van Donkelaar P. Pointing movements are affected by size-contrast illusions. Experimental Brain Research 125 (1999) 517-520
55. Westwood D.A., and Goodale M.A. Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action. Spatial Vision 16 3-4 (2003) 243-254
56. Westwood D.A., Heath M., and Roy E.A. The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension. Experimental Brain Research 134 4 (2000) 456-463
57. Westwood D.A., McEachern T., and Roy E.A. Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure. Experimental Brain Research 141 (2001) 166-173
58. Woodworth R. The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review Monograph 3 2 (1899) 1-114