Visual object recognition

Annual Review of Neuroscience

Volumn 19, Issue , 1996, Pages 577-621

  Logothetis, Nikos K ^a   Sheinberg, David L ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

electrophysiology; inferotemporal cortex; monkey; object representation; perceptual categorization

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMAN; LEARNING; MONKEY; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 0029985785     PISSN: 0147006X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.003045     Document Type: Review

References (229)

1. Adolphs R, Tranel D, Damasio H, Damasio A. 1994. Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdala. Nature 372:669-72
2. Aloimonos Y, ed. 1993. Active Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
3. Amaral DG, Price JL. 1984. Amygdalo-cortical projections in the monkey (macaca fascicularis). J. Comp. Neurol. 230:465-96
4. Andersen RA. 1989. Visual and eye movement functions of the posterior parietal cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 12:377-403
5. Anderson JA, Silverstein JW, Ritz SA, Jones RS. 1977. Distinctive features, categorical perception, and probability learning: some applications of a neural model. Psychol. Rev. 84:413-51
6. Baizer JS, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG. 1993. Comparison of subcortical connections of inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in monkeys. Vis. Neurosci. 10:59-72
7. Banks WP, Krajicek D. 1991. Perception. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 42:305-31
8. Barbas H. 1988. Anatomic organization of basoventral and mediodorsal visual recipient prefrontal regions in the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 276:313-42
9. Barbas H, Mesulam MM. 1981. Organization of afferent input to subdivisions of area 8 in the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 200: 407-31
10. Bartram DJ. 1974. The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming. Cogn. Psychol. 6:325-56
11. Bartram DJ. 1976. Levels of coding in picture-picture comparison tasks. Mem. Cogn. 4: 593-602
12. Baylis GC, Rolls ET, Leonard CM. 1987. Functional subdivisions of the temporal lobe neocortex. J. Neurosci. 7:330-42
13. Benton AL. 1980. The neuropsychology of facial recognition. Am. Psychol. 35:176-86
14. Biederman I. 1987. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol. Rev. 94:115-47
15. Biederman I, Cooper EE. 1991. Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception 20:585-95
16. Biederman I, Cooper EE. 1992. Size invariance in visual object priming. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 18:121-33
17. Biederman I, Gerhardstein PC. 1993. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 19:1162-82
18. Blanchard DC, Blanchard RJ. 1972. Innate and conditioned reactions to threat in rats with amygdaloid lesions. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 81:281-90
19. Bodamer J. 1947. Die Prosop-Agnosie (Die Agnosie des Physiognomieerkennens). Arch. Psychiatr. Nervenkr. 179:6-54
20. Bomba PC, Siqueland ER. 1983. The nature and structure of infant form categories. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 35:294-328
21. Bornstein MH, Gross CG, Wolf JZ. 1978. Perceptual similarity of mirror images in infancy. Cognition 6:89-116
22. Bornstein MH, Sroka H, Munitz H. 1969. Prosopagnosia with animal face agnosia. Cortex 5:164-69
23. Boussaoud D, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG. 1991. Visual topography of area TEO in the macaque. J. Comp. Neurol. 306:554-75
24. Bowman RS, Sutherland NS. 1970. Shape discrimination by goldfish: coding of irregularities. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 72:90-97
25. Brothers L, Ring B. 1993. Mesial temporal neurons in the macaque monkey with responses selective for aspects of social stimuli. Behav. Brain Res. 57:53-61
26. Brown R. 1958. How shall a thing be called? Psychol. Rev. 65:14-21
27. Brace CJ. 1982. Face recognition by monkeys: absence of an inversion effect. Neuropsychologia 20:515-21
28. Bruce V. 1982. Changing faces: visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition. Br. J. Psychol. 73:105-16
29. Bülthoff HH, Edelman S. 1992. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:60-64
30. Bushnell IWR, Sai F, Mullin JT. 1989. Neonatal recognition of the mother's face. J. Dev. Psychol. 7:3-15
31. Carey S, Diamond R. 1977. From piecemeal to configuration representation of faces. Science 195:312-13
32. Cavanagh P. 1987. Reconstructing the third dimension: interactions between color, texture, motion, binocular disparity and shape. Comp. Vis. Graphics Image Proc. 37:171-95
33. Cerella J. 1979. Visual classes and natural categories in the pigeon. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 5:68-77
34. Cooper LA, Schacter DL, Delaney SM, Ballesteros S, Moore C. 1992. Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: effects of size and rotation. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 18:43-57
35. Corballis MC, McLaren R. 1984. Winding one's ps and qs: mental rotation and mirror-image discrimination. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 10:318-27
36. Corballis MC, Zbrodoff NJ, Shetzer LI, Butler PB. 1978. Decisions about identity and orientation of rotated letters and digits. Mem. Cogn. 6:98-107
37. Critchley M, ed. 1953. The Parietal Lobes. New York: Hafner
38. Damasio AR. 1985. Disorders of complex visual processing: agnosia, achromatopsia, Balint's syndrome, and related difficulties of orientation and construction. In Principles of Behavioural Neurology, ed. MM Mesulam, pp. 259-88. Philadelphia: Davis Co.
39. Damasio AR, Benton AL. 1979. Impairment of hand movements under visual guidance. Neurology 29:170-78
40. Damasio AR, Damasio H, Van Hoesen GW. 1982. Prosopagnosia: anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms. Neurology 32:331-41
41. Damasio AR, Tranel D, Damasio H. 1990. Face agnosia and the neural substrate of memory. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 13:89-109
42. Davis M. 1992. The role of amygdala in fear and anxiety. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 15:352-75
43. Davis RT. 1974. Monkeys as Perceivers. New York: Academic
44. De Renzi E. 1986. Slowly progressive visual agnosia or apraxia without dementia. Cortex 22:171-80
45. De Renzi E, Faglioni P, Spinnler H. 1968. The performance of patients with unilateral brain damage on face recognition tasks. Cortex 4:17-34
46. Desimone R, Albright TD, Gross CG, Bruce CJ. 1984. Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque. J. Neurosci. 4:2051-62
47. Desimone R, Fleming JFR, Gross CG. 1980. Prestriate afferents to inferior temporal cortex: an HRP study. Brain Res. 184:41-55
48. Desimone R, Gross CG. 1979. Visual areas in the temporal cortex of the macaque. Brain Res. 178:363-80
49. Desimone R, Schein SJ. 1987. Visual properties of neurons in area V4 of the macaque: sensitivity to stimulus form. J. Neurophysiol. 57:835-67
50. Desimone R, Ungerleider LG. 1989. Neural mechanisms of visual processing in monkeys. In Handbook of Neuropsychology, ed. F Boller, J Grafman, 2:267-99. Amsterdam: Elsevier
51. Diamond R, Carey S. 1986. Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. J. Exp. Psychol. 115:107-17
52. Distler C, Boussaoud D, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG. 1993. Cortical connections of inferior temporal area TEO in macaque monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 334:125-50
53. Edelman S, Bülthoff HH. 1992. Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of 3D objects. Vis. Res. 32: 2385-400
54. Eimas PD, Quinn PC. 1994. Studies on the formation of perceptually based basic-level categories in young infants. Child Devel. 65: 903-17
55. Eley MG. 1982. Identifying rotated letter-like symbols. Mem. Cogn. 10:25-32
56. Ellis R, Allport DA, Humphreys GW, Collis J. 1989. Varieties of object constancy. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 41A:775-96
57. Fantz RL. 1964. Visual experience in infants: decreased attention to familiar patterns relative to novel ones. Science 146:668-70
58. Farah MJ. 1990. Visual Agnosia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
59. Farah MJ, McMullen PA, Meyer MM. 1991. Can recognition of living things be selectively impaired? Neuropsychologia 29:185-93
60. Farah MJ, Rochlin R, Klein KL. 1994. Orientation invariance and geometric primitives in shape recognition. Cogn. Sci. 18:325-44
61. Farah MJ, Wilson KD, Drain HM, Tanaka JR. 1995. The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: evidence for mandatory, face-specific mechanisms. Vis. Res. 35: 2089-93
62. Faust C, ed. 1955. Die zerebralen Herdstürungen nach Hinterhauptverletzungen und ihre Beurteilung. Stuttgart: Thieme
63. Felleman DJ, Van Essen DC. 1991. Distributed hierarchical processing in primate cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 1:1-47
64. Foster DH, Kahn JI. 1985. Internal representations and operations in the visual comparison of transformed patterns: effects of pattern point-inversion, positional symmetry, and separation. Biol. Cybern. 51:305-12
65. Franks JJ, Bransford JD. 1971. Abstraction of visual patterns. J. Exp. Psychol. 90:65-74
66. Fujita I, Tanaka K, Ito M, Cheng K. 1992. Columns for visual features of objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature 360: 343-46
67. Gaffan D, Heywood CA. 1993. A spurious category-specific visual agnosia for living things in human and nonhuman primates. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5:118-28
68. Gallant JL, Braun J, Van Essen DC. 1993. Selectivity for polar, hyperbolic, and cartesian gratings in macaque visual cortex. Science 259:100-3
69. Gauthier I. 1995. Becoming a "greeble" expert: exploring the face recognition mechanism. MS thesis. Yale Univ.
70. Gawne TJ, Richmond BJ. 1993. How independent are the messages carried by adjacent inferior temporal cortical neurons? J. Neurosci. 13:2758-71
71. Goodale MA, Milner AD, Jakobson LS, Carey DP. 1991. A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 349:154-56
72. Goren CC, Sarty M, Wu RWK. 1975. Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. Pediatrics 56:544-49
73. Gross CG. 1973. Visual functions of inferotemporal cortex. In Handbook of Sensory Physiology, ed. R Jung, 7/3B:451-82. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
74. Gross CG. 1994. How inferior temporal cortex became a visual area. Cereb. Cortex 4:455-69
75. Gross CG, Bender DB, Mishkin M. 1977. Contributions of the corpus callosum and the anterior commissure to visual activation of inferior temporal neurons. Brain Res. 131: 227-39
76. Gross CG, Rocha-Miranda CE, Bender DB. 1972. Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the macaque. J. Neurophysiol. 35:96-111
77. Gross CG, Rodman HR, Gochin PM, Colombo MW. 1993. Inferior temporal cortex as a pattern recognition device. In Computational Learning and Cognition: Proc. 3rd NEC Res. Symp., ed. E Baum, p. 44. Slam: NEC Res.
78. Grüsser OJ, Landis T, eds. 1991. Visual Agnosias and Other Disturbances of Visual Perception and Cognition. London: Macmillan
79. Haaxma R, Kuypers HGJM. 1975. Intrahemispheric cortical connexions and visual guidance of hand and finger movements in the rhesus monkey. Brain 98:239-60
80. Hasselmo ME, Rolls ET, Baylis GC, Nalwa V. 1989. Object-centered encoding by face-selective neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey. Exp. Brain Res. 75:417-29
81. Haxby JV, Grady CL, Horwitz B, Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M, et al. 1991. Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:1621-25
82. Hermstein RJ, Loveland DH. 1964. Complex visual concept in the pigeon. Science 146: 549-51
83. Herrnstein RJ, Loveland DH, Cable C. 1976. Natural concepts in pigeons. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Proc. 2:285-302
84. Herzog AG, Van Hoesen GW. 1976. Temporal neocortical afferent connections to the amygdala in the rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 115:57-69
85. Heywood CA, Cowey A. 1992. The role of the 'face-cell' area in the discrimination and recognition of faces by monkeys. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 335:31-38
86. Homa D, Chambliss D. 1975. The relative contributions of common and distinctive information on the abstraction from ill-defined categories. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Learn. Mem. 1:351-59
87. Homa D, Cross J, Cornell D, Goldman D, Shwartz S. 1973. Prototype abstraction and classification of new instances as a function of number of instances defining the proto-type. J. Exp. Psychol. 101:116-22
88. Homa D, Sterling S, Trepel L. 1981. Limitations of exemplar-based generalization and the abstraction of categorical information. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Learn. Mem. 7:418-39
89. Homa D, Vosburgh R. 1976. Category breadth and the abstraction of prototypical information. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Learn. Mem. 2:322-30
90. Humphrey GK, Khan SC. 1992. Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects. Can. J. Psychol. 46:170-90
91. Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ. 1987a. To See But Not To See: A Case Study of Visual Agnosia. Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum
92. Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ, eds. 1987b. Visual Object Processing: A Cognitive Neuropsychological Approach. Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum
93. Insausti R, Amaral DG, Cowan WM. 1987. The entorhinal cortex of the monkey. II. Cortical afferents. J. Comp. Neurol. 264:356-95
94. Ito M, Fujita I, Tamura H, Tanaka K. 1994. Processing of contrast polarity of visual images in inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. Cereb. Cortex 4:499-508
95. Ito M, Tamura H, Fujita I, Tanaka K. 1995. Size and position invariance of neuronal responses in monkey inferotemporal cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 73:218-26
96. Iwai E. 1978. The visual learning area in the inferotemporal cortex of monkeys. In Integrative Control Functions of the Brain, ed. M Ito, pp. 419-27. Tokyo: Kodansha
97. Iwai E. 1981. Visual mechanisms in the temporal and prestriate association cortices of the monkey. Adv. Physiol. Sci. 17:279-86
98. Iwai E. 1985. Neuropsychological basis of pattern vision in macaque monkeys. Vis. Res. 25:425-39
99. Iwai E, Mishkin M. 1969. Further evidence on the locus of the visual area in the temporal lobe of the monkey. Exp. Neurol. 25:585-94
100. Iwai E, Yukie M. 1987. Amygdalofugal and amygdalopetal connections with modality-specific visual cortical areas in macaques (macaca fuscata, m. mulatto and m. fascicularis). J. Comp. Neurol. 261:362-87
101. Jeannerod M, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G, Sakata H. 1995. Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends Neurosci. 7:314-20
102. Johnson MH, Dziurawiec S, Ellis H, Morton J. 1991. Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition 40:1-19
103. Jolicoeur P. 1985. The time to name disoriented natural objects. Mem. Cogn. 13:289-303
104. Jolicoeur P. 1987. A size-congruency effect in memory for visual shape. Mem. Cogn. 15: 531-43
105. Jolicoeur P, Gluck MA, Kosslyn SM. 1984. Pictures and names: making the connection. Cogn. Psychol. 16:243-75
106. Katz D, ed. 1953. Studien zur experimentellen Psychologie. Basel: Schwabe
107. Knapp AG, Anderson JA. 1984. Theory of categorization based on distributed memory storage. J. Exp. Psychol. 10:616-37
108. Kobatake E, Tanaka K. 1994. Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 71:856-67
109. Kobatake E, Tanaka K, Wang G, Tamori Y. 1993. Effects of adult learning on the stimulus selectivity of cells in the inferotemporal cortex. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 19:975
110. Koenderink JJ. 1990. Solid Shape. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
111. Landis T, Regard M, Bliestle A, Kleihues P. 1988. Prosopagnosia and agnosia for non-canonical views. An autopsied case. Brain 111:1287-97
112. Leonard CM, Rolls ET, Wilson FA, Baylis GC. 1985. Neurons in the amygdala of the monkey with responses selective for faces. Behav. Brain. Res. 15:159-76
113. Lhermitte F, Chain F, Escourolle R, Ducarne B, Pillon B. 1972. Etude anotomo-clinique d'un cas de prosopagnosie. Rev. Neurol. 126: 329-46
114. Lhermitte F, Pillon B. 1975. La prosopagnosie. Role de l'hemisphere droit dans la perception visuelle. Rev. Neurol. 131:791-812
115. Liu Z, Knill DC, Kersten D. 1995. Object classification for human and ideal observers. Vis. Res. 35:549-68
116. Logothetis NK. 1994. Physiological studies of motion inputs. In Visual Detection of Motion, ed. AT Smith, RJ Snowden, pp. 177-216. New York: Academic
117. Logothetis NK, Pauls J. 1995. Psychophysical and physiological evidence for viewer-centered representations in the primate. Cereb. Cortex 5:270-88
118. Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Bülthoff HH, Poggio T. 1994. View-dependent object recognition by monkeys. Curr. Biol. 4:401-14
119. Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Poggio T. 1995. Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Curr. Biol. 5:552-63
120. Lorenz K. 1971. Studies in Animal and Human Behaviour. Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
121. Lynch JC. 1980. The functional organization of posterior parietal association cortex. Behav. Brain Sci. 3:485-534
122. Macrae D, Trolle W. 1956. The defect of function in visual agnosia. Brain 79:94-110
123. Marr D. 1982. Vision. New York: Freeman
124. Marr D, Nishihara HK. 1978. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 200:269-94
125. Marsolek CJ. 1995. Abstract visual-form representation in the left cerebral hemisphere. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept Perform. 21:375-86
126. McClelland JL, Rumelhart DE. 1985. Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. J. Exp. Psychol. 114:159-88
127. McMullen B, Jolicoeur P. 1992. The reference frame and effects of orientation on finding the top of rotated objects. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 18:802-20
128. Mikami A, Kubota K. 1980. Inferotemporal neuron activities and color discrimination with delay. Brain Res. 182:65-78
129. Milliken B, Jolicoeur P. 1992. Size effects in visual recognition memory are determined by perceived size. Mem. Cogn. 20:83-95
130. Milner AD, Heywood CA. 1989. A disorder of lightness discrimination in a case of visual form agnosia. Cortex 25:489-94
131. Mishkin M, Appenzeller T. 1987. The anatomy of memory. Sci. Am. 256:80-89
132. Miyashita Y. 1993. Inferior temporal cortex: where visual perception meets memory. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 16:245-63
133. Mountcastle VB, Motter BC, Steinmetz MA, Duffy CJ. 1984. Looking and seeing: the visual functions of the parietal lobe. In Dynamic Aspects of Neocortical Function, ed. GM Edelman, WE Call, WM Cowan, pp. 159-93. New York: Wiley
134. Murphy GL, Brownell HH. 1985. Category differentiation in object recognition: typicality constraints on the basic category advantage. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 11:70-84
135. Murray JE, Jolicoeur P, McMullen PA, Ingleton M. 1993. Orientation-invariant transfer of training in the identification of rotated natural objects. Mem. Cogn. 21:604-10
136. Nazir TA, O'Regan JK. 1990. Some results on translation invariance in the human visual system. Spatial Vis. 5:81-100
137. Nieuwenhuys R, Voogd J, van Huijzen C. 1980. Das Zentrainervensystem des Menschen. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
138. Ojemann GA, Ojemann JG, Haglund M, Holmes M, Lettich E. 1993. Visually related activity in human temporal cortical neurons. In Functional Organisation of the Human Cortex, ed. B Gulyaas, D Ottoson, PE Roland, pp. 279-89. Oxford: Pergamon
139. Oram MW, Perrett DI. 1994. Modeling visual recognition from neurobiological constraints. Neural Networks 7:945-72
140. O'Regan JK. 1992. Solving the 'real' mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory. Can. J. Psych. 46:461-88
141. Palmer SE. 1977. Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation. Cogn. Psychol. 9: 441-74
142. Palmer SE, Rosch E, Chase P. 1981. Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In Attention and Performance IX, ed. J Long, A Baddeley, pp. 135-51. Hillsdale: Erlbaum
143. Pentland AP. 1986. Perceptual organization and the representation of natural form. Artif. Intell. 28:293-331
144. Perrett DI, Harries MH, Bevan R, Thomas S, Benson PJ, et al. 1989. Frameworks of analysis for the neural representation of animate objects and actions. J. Exp. Biol. 146:87-113
145. Perrett DI, Hietanen JK, Oram MW, Benson PJ. 1992. Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 335:23-30
146. Perrett DI, Oram MW. 1993. Neurophysiology of shape processing. Image Vis. Comput. 11: 317-33
147. Perrett DI, Rolls ET, Caan W. 1979. Temporal lobe cells of the monkey with visual responses selective for faces. Neurosci. Lett. Suppl. S3:S358
148. Perrett DI, Rolls ET, Caan W. 1982. Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 47:329-42
149. Perrett DI, Smith PAJ, Potter DD, Mistlin AJ, Head AS, et al. 1985. Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 223:293-317
150. Piaget J. 1969. The Mechanisms of Perception. Transl. M. Cook. New York: Basic Books
151. Pinker S. 1985. Visual cognition: an introduction. In Visual Cognition. ed. S Pinker, pp. 1-63. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
152. Poggio T. 1990. A theory of how the brain might work. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 55:899-910
153. Posner MI, Goldsmith R, Welton KE. 1967. Perceived distance and the classification of distorted patterns. J. Exp. Psychol. 73:28-38
154. Posner MI, Keele SW. 1968. On the genesis of abstract ideas. J. Exp. Psychol. 77:353-63
155. Posner MI, Keele SW. 1970. Retention of abstract ideas. J. Exp. Psychol. 83:304-8
156. Quinn PC, Eimas PD. 1986. Categorization in early infancy. Merrill-Palmer Q. 32:331-63
157. Quinn PC, Eimas PD, Rosenkrantz SL. 1993. Evidence for representations of perceptually similar natural categories by 3-month-old and 4-month-old infants. Perception 22:463-75
158. Ramachandran VS. 1990. Perceiving shape from shading. In The Perceptual World. ed. I Rock. pp. 127-38. New York: Freeman
159. Reed SK. 1972. Pattern recognition and categorization. Cogn. Psychol. 3:382-407
160. Richmond BJ, Optican LM, Podell M, Spitzer H. 1987. Temporal encoding of two-dimensional patterns by single units in primate inferior temporal cortex. 1. Response characteristics. J. Neurophysiol. 57:132-46
161. Robinson DL, Goldberg ME, Stanton GB. 1978. Parietal association cortex in the primate: sensory mechanisms and behavioral modulations. J. Neurophysiol. 41:910-32
162. Rock I, DiVita J. 1987. A case of viewer-centered object perception. Cogn. Psychol. 19: 280-93
163. Rock I, DiVita J, Barbeito R. 1981. The effect on form perception of change of orientation in the third dimension. J. Exp. Psychol. 7: 719-32
164. Rock I, Wheeler D, Tudor L. 1989. Can we imagine how objects look from other viewpoints? Cogn. Psychol. 21:185-210
165. Rockland KS, Saleem KS, Tanaka K. 1994. Divergent feedback connections from areas V4 and TEO in the macaque. Vis. Neurosci. 11:579-600
166. Rodman HR, Ò Scalaidhe SP, Gross CG. 1993. Response properties of neurons in temporal cortical visual areas of infant monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 70:1115-36
167. Rolls ET. 1984. Neurons in the cortex of the temporal lobe and in the amygdala of the monkey with responses selective for faces. Hum. Neurobiol. 3:209-22
168. Rolls ET. 1992a. Neurophysiolgy and functions of the primate amygdala. In The Amygdala, ed. JP Aggleton, pp. 143-65. New York: Wiley-Liss
169. Rolls ET. 1992b. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying face processing within and beyond the temporal cortical visual areas. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 35:11-21
170. Rolls ET. 1994. Brain mechanisms for invariant visual recognition and learning. Behav. Process. 22:113-38
171. Rosch E, Mervis CB, Gray WD, Johnson DM, Boyes-Braem P. 1976a. Basic objects in natural categories. Cogn. Psychol. 8:382-439
172. Rosch E, Simpson C, Miller RS. 1976b. Structural bases of typicality effects. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 2:491-502
173. Rosenfeld SA, Van Hoesen GW. 1979. Face recognition in the rhesus monkey. Neuropsychologia 17:503-9
174. Ryan CME. 1982. Concept formation and individual recognition in the domestic chicken (gallus gallus). Behav. Anal. Lett. 2:213-20
175. Sakata H, Taira M. 1994. Parietal control of hand action. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 4:847-56
176. Sanghera MK, Rolls ET, Roper-Hall A. 1979. Visual responses of neurons in the dorsolateral amygdala of the alert monkey. Exp. Neurol. 63:610-26
177. Sáry C, Vogels R, Orban GA. 1993. Cue-invariant shape selectivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons. Science 260:995-97
178. Sato T, Kawamura T, Iwai E. 1980. Responsiveness of inferotemporal single units to visual pattern stimuli in monkeys performing discrimination. Exp. Brain Res. 38:313-19
179. Schwanz EL, Desimone R, Albright TD, Gross CG. 1983. Shape recognition and inferior temporal neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:5776-78
180. Seltzer B, Pandya DN. 1978. Afferent cortical connections and architectonics of the superior temporal sulcus and surrounding cortex in the rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 149:1-24
181. Seltzer B, Pandya DN. 1994. Parietal, temporal, and occipital projections to cortex of the superior temporal sulcus in the rhesus monkey: a retrograde tracer study. J. Comp. Neurol. 343:445-63
182. Sereno A, Maunsell JHR. 1995. Spatial and shape selective sensory and attentional effects in neurons in the macaque lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. Suppl. 36:S692
183. Sergent J, Ohta S, MacDonald B. 1992. Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. Brain 115:15-36
184. Shinar D, Owen DH. 1973. Effects of form rotation on the speed of classification: the development of shape constancy. Percept. Psychophys. 14:149-54
185. Shiwa T. 1987. Corticocortical projections to the monkey temporal lobe with particular reference to the visual processing pathways. Arch. Ital. Biol. 125:139-54
186. Simion F, Bagnara S, Roncato S, Umilta C. 1982. Transformation processes upon the visual code. Percept. Psychophys. 31:13-25
187. Snowden RJ. 1994. Motion processing in the primate cerebral cortex. In Visual Detection of Motion, ed. AT Smith, RJ Snowden, pp. 51-83. New York: Academic
188. Srinivas K. 1993. Perceptual specificity in non-verbal priming. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 19:582-602
189. Strange W, Kenney T, Kessel F, Jenkins J. 1970. Abstraction over time of prototypes from distortions of random dot patterns. J. Exp. Psychol. 83:508-10
190. Suzuki WA, Amaral DG. 1994. Topographic organization of the reciprocal connections between the monkey entorhinal cortex and the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices. J. Neurosci. 14:1856-77
191. Taira M, Mine S, Georgopoulos AP, Murata A, Sakata H. 1990. Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movement. Exp. Brain Res. 83:29-36
192. Tanaka JW, Taylor M. 1991. Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cogn. Psychol. 23:457-82
193. Tanaka K. 1993. Neuronal mechanisms of object recognition. Science 262:685-88
194. Tanaka K. 1996. Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 19:109-39
195. Tanaka K, Saito HA, Fukada Y, Moriya M. 1991. Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 66:170-89
196. Tan M, Pinker S. 1989. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cogn. Psychol. 21:233-82
197. Tarr MJ. 1995. Rotating objects to recognize them: a case study of the role of mental transformations in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychol. Bull. Rev. 2: 55-82
198. Tranel D, Damasio AR, Damasio H. 1988. Intact recognition of facial expression, gender, and age in patients with impaired recognition of face identity. Neurology 38:690-96
199. Tulving E, Schacter DL. 1990. Priming and human memory systems. Science 247:301-6
200. Turner BH, Mishkin M, Knapp M. 1980. Organization of the amygdalopetal projections from modality specific cortical association areas in the monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 191: 515-43
201. Tversky B, Hemenway K. 1984. Objects, parts, and categories. J. Exp. Psychol. 113:169-93
202. Ullman S. 1989. Aligning pictorial descriptions: an approach to object recognition. Cognition 32:193-254
203. Ungerleider LG, Desimone R. 1986. Projections to the superior temporal sulcus from the central and peripheral field representations of VI and V2. J. Comp. Neurol. 248:147-63
204. Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M. 1982. Two cortical visual systems. In Analysis of Visual Behavior, ed. DJ Ingle, pp. 549-86. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
205. Valentine T. 1988. Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. Br. J. Psychol. 79:471-92
206. Van Hoesen GW. 1982. The parahippocampal gyms: new observations regarding its cortical connections in the monkey. Trends Neurosci. 52:345-50
207. Vetter T, Poggio T, Bülthoff HH. 1994. The importance of symmetry and virtual views in three-dimensional object recognition. Curr. Biol. 4:18-23
208. Vishton PM, Cutting JE. 1995. Veridical size perception for action reaching vs. estimating. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. Suppl. 36:S358
209. Von Bonin G, Bailey P. 1947. The Neocortex of Macaca Mulatta. Urbana, IL: Univ. III. Press. 4th ed.
210. Von Bonin G, Bailey P. 1950. The Neocortex of the Chimpanzee. Urbana, IL: Univ. III. Press
211. Wachsmuth E, Oram MW, Perrett DI. 1994. Recognition of objects and their component parts: responses of single units in the temporal cortex of the macaque. Cereb. Cortex 4: 509-22
212. Warrington EK, Taylor AM. 1973. The contribution of the right parietal lobe to object recognition. Cortex 9:152-64
213. Watanabe S, Ito Y. 1991. Discrimination of individuals in pigeons. Bird Behav. 9:20-29
214. Watanabe S, Lea SEG, Dittrich WH. 1993. What can we learn from experiments on pigeon concept discrimination? In Vision, Brain, and Behavior in Birds, ed. HP Zeigler, HJ Bischof, pp. 351-76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
215. Waxman AM, Seibert M, Bernardon AM, Fay DA. 1993. Neural systems for automatic target learning and recognition. Lincoln Lab J. 6:77-116
216. Webster MJ, Bachevalier J, Ungerleider LG. 1993. Subcortical connections of inferior temporal areas TE and TEO in macaque monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 335:73-91
217. Weiskrantz L. 1956. Behavioral changes associated with ablation of the amygdaloid complex in monkeys. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 49:381-91
218. Whiteley AM, Warrington EK. 1977. Prosopagnosia: a clinical, psychological, and anatomical study of three patients. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 40:395-403
219. Williams GV, Rolls ET, Leonard CM, Stern C. 1993. Neuronal responses in the ventral striatum of the behaving macaque. Behav. Brain Res. 55:243-52
220. Wilson FA, Rolls ET. 1993. The effects of stimulus novelty and familiarity on neuronal activity in the amygdala of monkeys performing recognition memory tasks. Exp. Brain Res. 93:367-82
221. Wilson FAW, Ò Scalaidhe SP, Goldman-Rakic PS. 1994. Functional synergism between putative gamma-aminobutyrate-containing neurons and pyramidal neurons in prefrontal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 91:4009-13
222. Yamane S, Kaji S, Kawano K. 1988. What facial features activate face neurons in the inferotemporal cortex of the monkey? Exp. Brain Res. 73:209-14
223. Yeterian EH, Van Hoesen GW. 1978. Corticostriate projections in the rhesus monkey: the organization of certain cortico-caudate connections. Brain Res. 139:43-63
224. Young AW, Hellawell D, Hay DC. 1987. Configurational information in face perception. Perception 16:747-60
225. Young MP. 1993. Visual cortex: modules for pattern recognition. Curr. Biol. 3:44-46
226. Young MP, Yamane S. 1992. An analysis at the population level of the processing of faces in the inferotemporal cortex. In Brain Mechanisms of Perception and Memory: From Neuron to Behaviour, ed. L Squire, T Ono, M Fukuda, D Perrett, pp. 47-71. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
227. Yukie M, Iwai E. 1988. Direct projections from the ventral TE area of the inferotemporal cortex to hippocampal field CAI in the monkey. Neurosci. Lett. 88:6-10
228. Zeki SM. 1973. Comparison of the cortical degeneration in the visual regions of the temporal lobe of the monkey following section of the anterior commissure and the splenium. J. Comp. Neurol. 148:167-76
229. Zola-Morgan S, Squire LR. 1993. Neuroanatomy of memory. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 16:547-63