A tilted frame deceives the eye and the hand

Journal of Vision

Volumn 8, Issue 16, 2008, Pages

  Li, Wenxun ^a   Matin, Ethel ^b   Bertz, Jeremiah W ^a   Matin, Leonard ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Egocentric localization; Perception and action; Rod and frame illusion; Sensorimotor behavior; Space perception; Spatial localization; Visually guided manual reaching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HAND; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ORIENTATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

ADULT; ARM; HAND; HUMANS; OCULAR PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58149327078     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/8.16.18     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J. F., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679-685.
2. Baizer, J. S., Ungerleider, L. G., & Desimone, R. (1991). Organization of visual inputs to the inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in macaques. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 168-190.
3. Berti, A., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Coding near and far space. In H. Karnath, A. D. Milner, & G. Vallar (Eds.), The cognitive and neural bases of spatial neglect (pp. 119-129). New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Bertz, J. W., Li, W., & Matin, L. (2005). The influences of visual pitch on visually perceived eye level, visually perceived pitch, felt head orientation, and felt hand orientation [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):882, 882a, http://journalofvision.org/5/8/882/, doi:10.1167/5.8.882.
5. Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G., & Nagle, M. (1979). Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 692-700.
6. Bruno, N. (2001). When does action resist visual illusions? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 379-382.
7. Carey, D. P. (2001). Do action systems resist visual illusions? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 109-113.
8. Chelette, T., Li, W., Esken, R., & Matin, L. (1995). Visual perception of eye level (VPEL) under high g while viewing a pitched visual field. Annual Meeting of Aerospace Medical Association, A55.
9. Cohen, M. M. (1973). Elevator illusion: Influences of otolith organ activity and neck proprioception. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 401-406.
10. Daprati, E., & Gentilucci, M. (1997). Grasping an illusion. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1577-1582.
11. Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Gentilucci, M., Luppino, G., et al. (1992). Space coding by premotor cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 89, 686-690.
12. Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Luppino, G.,Matelli,M., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4). Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, 141-157.
13. Franz, V. H. (2001). Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 457-459.
14. Gentilucci,M., Scandolara, C., Pigarev, I. N., & Rizzolatti, G. (1983). Visual responses in the postarcuate cortex (area 6) of the monkey that are independent of eye position. Experimental Brain Research, 50, 464-468.
15. Georgopoulos, A. P., Schwartz, A. B., & Kettner, R. E. (1986). Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science, 233, 1416-1419.
16. Goodale, M. A., & Haffenden, A. (1998). Frames of reference for perception and action in human visual system. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 22, 161-172.
17. Goodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., Jakobson, L. S., & Carey, D. P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349, 154-156.
18. Goodale, M. A., & Murphy, K. J. (1997). Action and perception in the visual periphery. In P. Their & H. Karnath (Eds.). Parietal lobe contributions to orientation in 3D space (pp. 447-461). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
19. Graziano, M. S., & Gross, C. G. (1994). Mapping space with neurons. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 3, 164-167.
20. Graziano, M. S. A., & Gross, C. G. (1995). The representation of extrapersonal space: A possible role for bimodal, visual-tactile neurons. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (chapter 67, pp. 1021-1034). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Graziano, M. S., Hu, X. T., & Gross, C. G. (1997). Visuo-spatial properties of ventral premotor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 2268-2292.
22. Haffenden, A. M., & Goodale, M. A. (2000). Independent effects of pictorial displays on perception and action. Vision Research, 40, 1597-1607.
23. Harris, C. S. (1965). Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision. Psychological Review, 72, 419-444.
24. Held, R. (1965). Plasticity in sensory-motor systems. Scientific American, 213, 84-94.
25. Held, R. (1968). Dissociation of visual functions by deprivation and rearrangement. Psychologische Forschung, 31, 338-348.
26. Held, R., Ingle, D., Schneider, G., & Trevarthen, C. (1967). Locating and identifying: Two modes of visual processing. Psychologische Forschung, 31, 42-43.
27. Helmholtz, H. von (1866). Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik, Leipzig: Voss. (English translation from 3rd ed., 1925). In J. P. C. Southall (Ed.), A treatise on physiological optics (vol. 3). New York: Dover, 1963.
28. Ingle, D. (1967). Two visual mechanisms underlying the behavior of fish. Psychologische Forschung, 31, 44-51.
29. Jeannerod, M. (1988). The neural and behavioral organization of goal-directed movements. In Oxford psychology (series 15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Jeannerod, M. (1997). The cognitive neuroscience of action. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publication.
31. Kornheiser, A. S. (1976). Adaptation to laterally displaced vision: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 783-816.
32. Li, W., Dallal, N., & Matin, L. (2001). Influences of visual pitch and visual yaw on visually perceived eye level (VPEL) and straight ahead (VPSA) for erect and rolled-to-horizontal observers. Vision Research, 41, 2873-2894.
33. Li, W., & Matin, L. (1993). Eye and head position, visual pitch and perceived eye level. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 34, 1311.
34. Li, W., & Matin, L. (1996). Visually perceived eye level is influenced identically by lines from erect and pitched planes. Perception, 25, 831-852.
35. Li, W., & Matin, L. (1998). Change in visually perceived eye level without change in perceived pitch. Perception, 27, 553-572.
36. Li, W., & Matin, L. (2004). The time course of hand-to-body distance dependence and memory dependence of manual pointing and height-matching accuracy to a mislocalized visual target [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4(8):838, 838a, http://journalofvision.org/4/8/838/, doi:10.1167/4.8.838.
37. Li, W., & Matin, L. (2005a). Two wrongs make a right: Linear increase of accuracy of visually-guided manual pointing, reaching, and height-matching with increase in hand-to-body distance. Vision Research, 45, 533-550.
38. Li, W., & Matin, L. (2005b). Visual induction of visually perceived vertical (VPV) by 1-line and 2-line roll-tilted and pitched visual fields. Vision Research, 45, 2037-2057.
39. Li, W., & Matin, L. (2005c). The rod-and-frame effect: The whole is less than the sum of its parts. Perception, 34, 699-716.
40. Mach, E. (1894/1943). Popular scientific lectures, translated by T. J. McCormick (1898). (pp. 272, 286-290). La Salle, Ill.: The Open Court.
41. Matin, L., & Fox, C. R. (1986). Perceived eye level: Elevation jointly determined by visual pitch, EEPI, and gravity. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 27, 333.
42. Matin, L., & Fox, C. R. (1989). Visually perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: Linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity. Vision Research, 29, 315-324.
43. Matin, L., & Li, W. X. (1992). Visually perceived eye level: Changes induced by pitched-from-vertical 2-line visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 257-289.
44. Matin, L., & Li, W. (1994a). Mirror symmetry and parallelism: Two opposite rules for the identity transform in space perception and their unified treatment by the great circle model. Spatial Vision, 8, 469-489.
45. Matin, L., & Li, W. (1994b). Spatial summation among parallel lines across wide separation (50°): Spatial localization and the great circle model. Vision Research, 34, 2577-2598.
46. Matin, L., & Li, W. (1994c). The influence of the orientation of a stationary single line in darkness on the visual perception of eye level. Vision Research, 34, 311-330.
47. Matin, L., & Li, W. (1995). Multimodal basis for egocentric spatial localization and orientation. Journal of Vestibular Research, 5, 499-518.
48. Matin, L., & Li, W. (1999). Averaging and summation of influences on visually perceived eye level between two long lines differing in pitch or roll-tilt. Vision Research, 39, 307-329.
49. Matin, L., & Li, W. (2001). Neural model for processing the influence of visual orientation on visually perceived eye level (VPEL). Vision Research, 41, 2845-2872.
50. Matin, L., Li, W., & Bertz, J. W. (2004). Distance-contingent accuracy of manual matches to line orientations misperceived under the 2-line rod-and-frame illusion [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4(8):380, 380a, http://journalofvision.org/4/8/380/, doi:10.1167/ 4.8.380.
51. Matin, L., Picoult, E., Stevens, J. K., Edwards, M. W., Jr., Young, D., & MacArthur, R. (1982). Oculoparalytic illusion: Visual-field dependent mislocalizations by humans partially paralyzed with curare. Science, 216, 198-201.
52. Matin, L., Stevens, J. K., & Picoult, E. (1983). Perceptual consequences of experimental extraocular muscle paralysis. In A. Hein & M. Jeannerod (Eds.), Spatially oriented behavior (chapter 14, pp. 243-262). New York: Springer.
53. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. New York: Oxford University Press.
54. Morel, A., & Bullier, J. (1990). Anatomical segregation of two cortical visual pathways in the macaque monkey. Visual Neuroscience, 4, 555-578.
55. Post, R. B., Welch, R. B., & Olson, K. E. (2004). Persistent visual-action dissociation with the rod-and-frame effect [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4(8):837, 837a, http://journalofvision.org/4/ 8/837/, doi:10.1167/4.8.837.
56. Prinz, W., & Hommel, B., (Eds.) (2002). Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance (vol. XIX). New York: Oxford University Press.
57. Rizzolatti, G., Matelli, M., & Pavesi, G. (1983). Deficits in attention and movement following the removal of postarcuate (area 6) and prearcuate (area 8) cortex in macaque monkeys. Brain, 106, 655-673.
58. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., & Sheliga, B. M. (1994). Space and selective attention. In C. Umiltá & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance: Conscious and non-conscious information processing (vol. 15, pp. 232-265). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
59. Rizzolatti, G., Scandolara, C., Matelli, M., & Gentilucci, M. (1981). Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses. Behavioural Brain Research, 2, 147-163.
60. Robison, E., Li, W., & Matin, L. (1995). Manual matches to the elevation of visually mislocalized targets. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 36/4, S358.
61. Schneider, G. E. (1967). Contrasting visuomotor functions of tectum and cortex in the golden hamster. Psychologische Forschung, 31, 52-62.
62. Schneider, G. E. (1969). Two visual systems. Science, 163, 895-902.
63. Servos, P., Matin, L., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). Dissociation between two modes of spatial processing by a visual form agnosic. Neuroreport, 6, 1893-1896.
64. Stoper, A. (1997). Environmental pitch and three types of pointing. Perception, 26, 99.
65. Trevarthen, C. B. (1968). Two mechanisms of vision in primates. Psychologische Forschung, 31, 299-348.
66. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (chapter 18, pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67. Welch, R. B. (1978). Perceptual modification. New York: Academic Press.
68. Welch, R. B. (1986). Adaptation of space perception. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), The handbook of perception and performance (vol. 1, pp. 24.1-24.45). New York: Wiley and Sons.
69. Welch, R. B., & Post, R. B. (1996). Accuracy and adaptation of reaching and pointing in pitched visual environments. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 383-389.
70. Witkin, H. A. (1949). Perception of body position and of the position of the visual field. Psychology Monograph, 63, 1-46.
71. Witkin, H. A., & Asch, S. E. (1948). Studies in space perception. IV. Further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 762-782.