Effect of structuring the workspace on cognitive and sensorimotor distance estimation: No dissociation between perception and action

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 278-289

  Coello, Yann ^a,b   Iwanow, Orianne ^a  

^a UNIV LILLE   (France)

^b Univ Lille   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; BIOMECHANICS; COGNITION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; VISION; WORKPLACE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; COGNITION; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION; WORKPLACE;

EID: 33745775520     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193675     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. ALLPORT, D. A. (1989). Visual attention. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), The foundations of cognitive science (pp. 658-664). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. BINGHAM, G. P. (1993). Perceiving the size of trees: Form as information about scale. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1139-1161.
3. BINGHAM, G. P., & PAGANO, C. C. (1998). The necessity of a perception/ action approach to definite distance perception: Monocular distance perception to guide reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 145-168.
4. BINKOFSKI, F., DOHLE, C., POSSE, S., STEPHAN, K. M., HEFTER, H., SEITZ, R. J., & FREUND, H. J. (1998). Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension: A combined lesion and functional MRI activation study. Neurology, 50, 1253-1259.
5. BINSTED, G., & ELLIOTT, D. (1999). Ocular perturbations and retinal/ extraretinal information: The coordination of saccadic and manual movements. Experimental Brain Research, 127, 193-206.
6. BOOTSMA, R. J., BAKKER, F. C., VAN SNIPPENBERG, F. J., & TDLOHREG, C. W. (1992). The effects of anxiety on perceiving the reachability of passing objects. Ecological Psychology, 4, 1-16.
7. BOUSSAOUD, D., UNGERLEIDER, L. G., & DESIMONE, R. (1990). Pathways for motion analysis: Cortical connections of the medial superior temporal and fundus of the superior temporal visual areas in the macaque. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 296, 462-495.
8. BRIDGEMAN, B. (1991). Separate visual representations for perception and for visually guided behavior. In S. R. Ellis, M. K. Kaiser, & A. C. Grunwald (Eds.), Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments (pp. 316-327). London: Taylor & Francis.
9. BRIDGEMAN, B. (2000). Interactions between vision for perception and vision for behavior. In Y. Rossetti & A. Revonsuo (Eds.), Beyond dissociation: Interaction between dissociated implicit and explicit processing (pp. 17-40). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
10. BRIDGEMAN, B., PEERY, S., & ANAND, S. (1997). Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 456-469.
11. CARELLO, C., GROSOFSKY, A., REICHEL, F. D., SOLOMON, H. Y., & TURVEY, M. T. (1989). Visually perceiving what is reachable. Ecological Psychology, 1, 27-54.
12. CAREY, D. P., DIJKERMAN, H. C., & MILNER, A. D. (1998). Perception and action in depth. Consciousness & Cognition, 7, 438-453.
13. COELLO, Y. (2002). Role of environmental cues in position coding. In J. A. Da Silva, E. H. Matsushima, & N. P. Ribeiro-Filho (Eds.), Fechner Day 2002 (pp. 252-258). Rio de Janeiro: Legis Summa.
14. COELLO, Y., & GREALY, M. A. (1997). Effect of size and frame of visual field on the accuracy of an aiming movement. Perception, 26, 287-300.
15. COELLO, Y., MAGNE, P., & PLENACOSTE, P. (2000). The contribution of retinal signal to the specification of target distance in a visuo-manual task. Current Psychology Letters, 3, 75-89.
16. COELLO, Y., RICHAUD, S., MAGNE, P., & ROSSETTI, Y. (2003). Vision for spatial perception and vision for action: A dissociation between the left-right and near-far dimensions. Neuropsychologia, 41, 622-633.
17. COELLO, Y., & ROSSETTI, Y. (2004). Planning and controlling action in a structured environment: Visual illusion without dorsal stream. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 27, 29-31.
18. CONTI, P., & BEAUBATON, D. (1980). Role of structured visual field and visual reafference in accuracy of pointing movements. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 50, 239-244.
19. DECETY, J., PERANI, D., JEANNEROD, M., BETTINARDI, V., TADARY, B., WOODS, R., ET AL. (1994). Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature, 371, 600-602.
20. DEIBER, M.-P., IBAÑEZ, V., SADATO, N., & HALLETT, M. (1996). Cerebral structures participating in motor preparation in humans: A positron emission tomography study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 75, 233-247.
21. DESIMONE, R., & DUNCAN, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.
22. DUKERMAN, H. C., MILNER, A. D., & CAREY, D. P. (1996). The perception and prehension of objects oriented in the depth plane: I. Effects of visual form agnosia. Experimental Brain Research, 112, 442-451.
23. FISCHER, M. H. (2000). Estimating reachability: Whole body engagement or postural stability? Human Movement Science, 19, 297-318.
24. FLANDERS, M., HELMS TILLERY, S. I., & SOECHTING, J. F. (1992). Early stages in sensorimotor transformation. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 15, 309-362.
25. FOLEY, J. M. (1991). Stereoscopic distance perception. In S. R. Ellis, M. K. Kaiser, & A. C. Grunwald (Eds.), Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments (pp. 558-566). New York: Taylor & Francis.
26. FOLEY, J. M., & HELD, R. (1972). Visually directed pointing as a function of target distance, direction, and available cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 263-268.
27. FRANZ, V. H., GEGENFURTNER, K. R., BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & FAHLE, M. (2000). Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science, 11, 20-25.
28. GLOVER, S. (2004). Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 27, 3-78.
29. GLOVER, S., & DIXON, P. (2002). Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: Support for a planning/control model of action. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 266-278.
30. GOODALE, M. A., & MILNER, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20-35.
31. GOODMAN, S. J., & ANDERSON, R. A. (1989). Microstimulation of aneural network model for visually guided saccades. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 317-327.
32. GRAFTON, S. T., ARBIB, M., FADIGA, L., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography: II. Observation compared with imagination. Experimental Brain Research, 112, 103-111.
33. GREALY, M. A., COELLO, Y., & HEFFERNAN, D. (2003). Apparent motion cues distort object localisation in egocentric space. Experimental Brain Research, 150, 356-362.
34. HUMPHREYS, G. W., RIDDOCH, M. J., FORTI, S., & ACKROYD, K. (2004). Action influences spatial perception: Neuropsychological evidence. Visual Cognition, 11, 401-427.
35. JEANNEROD, M., & ROSSETTI, Y. (1993). Visuomotor coordination as a dissociable function: Experimental and clinical evidence. Baillière's Clinical Neurology, 2, 439-460.
36. KOSSLYN, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. MAGNE, P., & COELLO, Y. (2002). Retinal and extra-retinal contribution to position coding. Behavioural Brain Research, 136, 277-287.
38. MATTINGLEY, J. B., & DRIVER, J. (1997). Distinguishing sensory and motor deficits after parietal damage: An evaluation of response selection biases in unilateral neglect. In P. Thier & H. O. Karnath (Eds.), Parietal lobe contributions to orientation in 3D space (pp. 309-337). Berlin: Springer.
39. MATTINGLEY, J. B., HUSAIN, M., RORDEN, C., KENNARD, C., & DRIVER, J. (1998). Motor role of human inferior parietal lobe revealed in unilateral neglect patients. Nature, 392, 179-182.
40. MILNER, A. D., & GOODALE, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. MON-WILLIAMS, M., TRESILIAN, J. R., MCINTOSH, R. D., & MILNER, A. D. (2001). Monocular and binocular distance cues: Insights from visual form agnosia I (of III). Experimental Brain Research, 139, 127-136.
42. PAGANO, C. C., & BINGHAM, G. P. (1998). Comparing measures of monocular distance perception: Verbal and reaching errors are not correlated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1037-1051.
43. PAILLARD, J. (1987). Cognitive versus sensorimotor encoding of spatial information. In P. Ellen & C. Thinus-Blanc (Eds.), Cognitive processes and spatial orientation in animal and man (pp. 43-77). Dordrecht: Nijhoff.
44. PRABLANC, C., ECHALLIER, J. E., JEANNEROD, M., & KOMILIS, E. (1979). Optimal response of eye and hand motor systems in pointing at a visual target: II. Static and dynamic visual cues in the control of hand movement. Biological Cybernetics, 35, 183-187.
45. RIZZOLATTI, G., & MATELLI, M. (2003). Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: Anatomy and functions. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 146-157.
46. ROCHAT, P., & WRAGA, M. (1997). An account of the systematic error in judging what is reachable. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 199-212.
47. ROSSETTI, Y. (1998). Implicit short-lived motor representation of space in brain-damaged and healthy subjects. Consciousness & Cognition, 7, 520-558.
48. ROSSETTI, Y., & PISELLA, L. (2002). Several "vision for action" systems: A guide to dissociating and integrating dorsal and ventral functions. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 62-119). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. RUSHWORTH, M. F., KRAMS, M., & PASSINGHAM, R. E. (2001). The attentional role of the left parietal cortex: The distinct lateralization and localization of motor attention in the human brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 698-710.
50. SCHNEIDER, G. E. (1969). Two visual systems. Science, 163, 895-902.
51. TIPPER, S. P., LORTIE, C., & BAYLIS, G. C. (1992). Selective reaching: Evidence for action-centered attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 891-905.
52. TRESILIAN, J. R., MON-WILLIAMS, M., & KELLY, B. M. (1999). Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 266, 39-44.
53. TREVARTHEN, C. B. (1968). Two mechanisms of vision in primates. Psychologische Forschung, 31, 299-337.
54. UNGERLEIDER, L., & MISHKIN, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. VISHTON, P. M., REA, J. G., CUTTING, J. E., & NUÑEZ, L. N. (1999). Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: Relative versus absolute, not perception versus action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1659-1672.
56. WATT, S. J., BRADSHAW, M. F., & RUSHTON, S. K. (2000). Field of view affects reaching, not grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 135, 411-416.