A label-free differential quantitative mass spectrometry method for the characterization and identification of protein changes during citrus fruit development

Proteome Science

Volumn 8, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Katz, Ehud ^a   Fon, Mario ^a   Eigenheer, Richard A ^a   Phinney, Brett S ^a   Fass, Joseph N ^a   Lin, Dawei ^a   Sadka, Avi ^b   Blumwald, Eduardo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VOLCANI CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CITRUS FRUIT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FRUIT DEVELOPMENT; FRUIT JUICE; FRUIT JUICE SAC CELL; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METHODOLOGY; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NONHUMAN; PLANT METABOLISM; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE DATABASE;

CITRUS;

EID: 78650119788     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14775956     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-5956-8-68     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Sarry JE, Sommerer N, Sauvage FX, Bergoin A, Rossignol M, Albagnac G, Romieu C. Grape berry biochemistry revisited upon proteomic analysis of the mesocarp. Proteomics 2004, 4:201-215. 10.1002/pmic.200300499, 14730682.
2. Carrari F, Baxter C, Usadel B, Urbanczyk-Wochniak E, Zanor M-I, Nunes-Nesi A, Nikiforova V, Centero D, Ratzka A, Pauly M, et al. Integrated analysis of metabolite and transcript levels reveals the metabolic shifts that underlie tomato fruit development and highlight regulatory aspects of metabolic network behavior. Plant Physiology 2006, 142:1380-1396. 10.1104/pp.106.088534, 1676044, 17071647.
3. Rocco M, D'Ambrosio C, Arena S, Faurobert M, Scaloni A, Marra M. Proteomic analysis of tomato fruits from two ecotypes during ripening. Proteomics 2006, 6:3781-3791. 10.1002/pmic.200600128, 16739135.
4. Deluc L, Grimplet J, Wheatley M, Tillett R, Quilici D, Osborne C, Schooley D, Schlauch K, Cushman J, Cramer G. Transcriptomic and metabolite analyses of Cabernet Sauvignon grape berry development. BMC Genomics 2007, 8:429. 10.1186/1471-2164-8-429, 2220006, 18034876.
5. Faurobert M, Mihr C, Bertin N, Pawlowski T, Negroni L, Sommerer N, Causse M. Major proteome variations associated with cherry tomato pericarp development and ripening. Plant Physiology 2007, 143:1327-1346. 10.1104/pp.106.092817, 1820912, 17208958.
6. Mounet F, Lemaire-Chamley M, Maucourt M, Cabasson C, Giraudel JL, Deborde C, Lessire R, Gallusci P, Bertrand A, Gaudillere M, et al. Quantitative metabolic profiles of tomato flesh and seeds during fruit development: complementary analysis with ANN and PCA. Metabolomics 2007, 3:273-288.
7. Fait A, Hanhineva K, Beleggia R, Dai N, Rogachev I, Nikiforova VJ, Fernie AR, Aharoni A. Reconfiguration of the achene and receptacle metabolic networks during strawberry fruit development. Plant Physiology 2008, 148:730-750. 10.1104/pp.108.120691, 2556830, 18715960.
8. Zanor MI, Rambla J-L, Chaib J, Steppa A, Medina A, Granell A, Fernie AR, Causse M. Metabolic characterization of loci affecting sensory attributes in tomato allows an assessment of the influence of the levels of primary metabolites and volatile organic contents. Journal of Experimental Botany 2009, 60:2139-2154. 10.1093/jxb/erp086, 2682503, 19346240.
9. Bantscheff M, Schirle M, Sweetman G, Rick J, Kuster B. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review. Analytical Biochemistry 2007, 389:1017-1031.
10. America AHP, Cordewener JHG. Comparative LC-MS: A landscape of peaks and valleys. Proteomics 2008, 8:731-749. 10.1002/pmic.200700694, 18297651.
11. Schulze WX, Usadel B. Quantitation in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics. Annual Review of Plant Biology 2010, 61:491-516. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112132, 20192741.
12. Panchaud A, Affolter M, Moreillon P, Kussmann M. Experimental and computational approaches to quantitative proteomics: Status quo and outlook. Journal of Proteomics 2008, 71:19-33. 10.1016/j.jprot.2007.12.001, 18541471.
13. Ünlü M, Morgan ME, Minden JS. Difference gel electrophoresis. A single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts. Electrophoresis 1997, 18:2071-2077.
14. Tonge R, Shaw J, Middleton B, Rowlinson R, Rayner S, Young J, Pognan F, Hawkins E, Currie I, Davison M. Validation and development of fluorescence two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis proteomics technology. Proteomics 2001, 1:377-396. 10.1002/1615-9861(200103)1:3<377::AID-PROT377>3.0.CO;2-6, 11680884.
15. Washburn MP, Wolters D, Yates JR. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nature Biotechnology 2001, 19:242-247. 10.1038/85686, 11231557.
16. Washburn MP, Ulaszek R, Deciu C, Schieltz DM, Yates JR. Analysis of quantitative proteomic data generated via multidimensional protein identification technology. Analytical Chemistry 2002, 74:1650-1657. 10.1021/ac015704l, 12043600.
17. Wu CC, MacCoss MJ, Howell KE, Yates JR. A method for the comprehensive proteomic analysis of membrane proteins. Nature Biotechnology 2003, 21:532-538. 10.1038/nbt819, 12692561.
18. Katz E, Fon M, Lee Y, Phinney B, Sadka A, Blumwald E. The citrus fruit proteome: insights into citrus fruit metabolism. Planta 2007, 226:989-1005. 10.1007/s00425-007-0545-8, 17541628.
19. Ong S-E, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, Kristensen DB, Steen H, Pandey A, Mann M. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2002, 1:376-386. 10.1074/mcp.M200025-MCP200, 12118079.
20. Hansen KC, Schmitt-Ulms G, Chalkley RJ, Hirsch J, Baldwin MA, Burlingame AL. Mass spectrometric analysis of protein mixtures at low levels using cleavable 13C-isotope-coded affinity tag and multidimensional chromatography. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2003, 2:299-314.
21. Li J, Steen H, Gygi SP. Protein profiling with cleavable isotope-coded affinity tag (cICAT) reagents: The yeast salinity stress response. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2003, 2:1198-1204. 10.1074/mcp.M300070-MCP200, 14506205.
22. Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN, Williamson B, Parker K, Hattan S, Khainovski N, Pillai S, Dey S, Daniels S, et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2004, 3:1154-1169. 10.1074/mcp.M400129-MCP200, 15385600.
23. Miyagi M, Rao KC. Proteolytic 18O-labeling strategies for quantitative proteomics. Mass Spectrometry Reviews 2007, 26:121-136. 10.1002/mas.20116, 17086517.
24. Wang M, You J, Bemis KG, Tegeler TJ, Brown DPG. Label-free mass spectrometry-based protein quantification technologies in proteomic analysis. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2008, 7:329-339. 10.1093/bfgp/eln031, 18579615.
25. Old WM, Meyer-Arendt K, Aveline-Wolf L, Pierce KG, Mendoza A, Sevinsky JR, Resing KA, Ahn NG. Comparison of label-free methods for quantifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2005, 4:1487-1502. 10.1074/mcp.M500084-MCP200, 15979981.
26. Stevenson SE, Chu Y, Ozias-Akins P, Thelen JJ. Validation of gel-free, label-free quantitative proteomics approaches: Applications for seed allergen profiling. Journal of Proteomics 2009, 72:555-566. 10.1016/j.jprot.2008.11.005, 19049836.
27. Bondarenko PV, Chelius D, Shaler TA. Identification and relative quantitation of protein mixtures by enzymatic digestion followed by capillary reversed-phase liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 2002, 74:4741-4749. 10.1021/ac0256991, 12349978.
28. Chelius D, Bondarenko PV. Quantitative profiling of proteins in complex mixtures using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Journal of Proteome Research 2002, 1:317-323. 10.1021/pr025517j, 12645887.
29. Wang W, Zhou H, Lin H, Roy S, Shaler TA, Hill LR, Norton S, Kumar P, Anderle M, Becker CH. Quantification of proteins and metabolites by mass spectrometry without isotopic labeling or spiked standards. Analytical Chemistry 2003, 75:4818-4826. 10.1021/ac026468x, 14674459.
30. Liu H, Sadygov RG, Yates JR. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Analytical Chemistry 2004, 76:4193-4201. 10.1021/ac0498563, 15253663.
31. Gilchrist A, Au CE, Hiding J, Bell AW, Fernandez-Rodriguez J, Lesimple S, Nagaya H, Roy L, Gosline SJC, Hallett M. Quantitative proteomics analysis of the secretory pathway. Cell 2006, 127:1265-1281. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.036, 17174899.
32. Wang G, Wu WW, Zeng W, Chou C-L, Shen R-F. Label-free protein quantification using LC-coupled ion trap or FT mass spectrometry: reproducibility, linearity, and application with complex proteomes. Journal of Proteome Research 2006, 5:1214-1223. 10.1021/pr050406g, 16674111.
33. Baginsky S. Plant proteomics: Concepts, applications, and novel strategies for data interpretation. Mass Spectrometry Reviews 2009, 28:93-120. 10.1002/mas.20183, 18618656.
34. Bianco L, Lopez L, Scalone AG, Di Carli M, Desiderio A, Benvenuto E, Perrotta G. Strawberry proteome characterization and its regulation during fruit ripening and in different genotypes. Journal of Proteomics 2009, 72:586-607. 10.1016/j.jprot.2008.11.019, 19135558.
35. Shi JX, Chen S, Gollop N, Goren R, Goldschmidt EE, Porat R. Effects of anaerobic stress on the proteome of citrus fruit. Plant Science 2008, 175:478-486.
36. Muccilli V, Licciardello C, Fontanini D, Russo MP, Cunsolo V, Saletti R, Reforgiato Recupero G, Foti S. Proteome analysis of Citrus sinensis L. (Osbeck) flesh at ripening time. Journal of Proteomics 2009, 73:134-152. 10.1016/j.jprot.2009.09.005, 19775598.
37. Tanou G, Job C, Rajjou L, Arc E, Belghazi M, Diamantidis G, Molassiotis A, Job D. Proteomics reveals the overlapping roles of hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide in the acclimation of citrus plants to salinity. The Plant Journal 2009, 60:795-804. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04000.x, 19682288.
38. Yun Z, Li W, Pan Z, Xu J, Cheng Y, Deng X. Comparative proteomics analysis of differentially accumulated proteins in juice sacs of ponkan (Citrus reticulata) fruit during postharvest cold storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology 2010, 56:189-201.
39. Zhang B, VerBerkmoes NC, Langston MA, Uberbacher E, Hettich RL, Samatova NF. Detecting differential and correlated protein expression in label-free shotgun roteomics. Journal of Proteome Research 2006, 5:2909-2918. 10.1021/pr0600273, 17081042.
40. Foss EJ, Radulovic D, Shaffer SA, Ruderfer DM, Bedalov A, Goodlett DR, Kruglyak L. Genetic basis of proteome variation in yeast. Nature Genetics 2007, 39:1369-1375. 10.1038/ng.2007.22, 17952072.
41. Gstaiger M, Aebersold R. Applying mass spectrometry-based proteomics to genetics, genomics and network biology. Nature Reviews Genetics 2009, 10:617-627. 10.1038/nrg2633, 19687803.
42. Choudhary C, Mann M. Decoding signalling networks by mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 2010, 11:427-439. 10.1038/nrm2900, 20461098.
43. Zybailov B, Rutschow H, Friso G, Rudella A, Emanuelsson O, Sun Q, van Wijk KJ. Sorting signals, N-terminal modifications and abundance of the chloroplast proteome. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e1994. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001994, 2291561, 18431481.
44. Talon M, Gmitter FG. Citrus Genomics. Interbational Journal of Plant Genomics 2008,
45. Ebine K, Ueda T. Unique mechanism of plant endocytic/vacuolar transport pathways. Journal of Plant Research 2009, 122:21-30. 10.1007/s10265-008-0200-x, 19082690.
46. Zerial M, McBride H. Rab proteins as membrane organizers. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 2001, 2:107-117. 10.1038/35052055, 11252952.
47. Nielsen E, Cheung AY, Ueda T. The regulatory RAB and ARF GTPases for vesicular trafficking. Plant Physiology 2008, 147:1516-1526. 10.1104/pp.108.121798, 2492611, 18678743.
48. Vernoud V, Horton AC, Yang Z, Nielsen E. Analysis of the small GTPase gene superfamily of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 2003, 131:1191-1208. 10.1104/pp.013052, 166880, 12644670.
49. Winter V, Hauser M-T. Exploring the ESCRTing machinery in eukaryotes. Trends in Plant Science 2006, 11:115-123. 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.01.008, 2865992, 16488176.
50. Smith LG, Oppenheimer DG. Spatial control of cell expansion by the plant cytoskeleton. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 2005, 21:271-295. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.122303.114901, 16212496.
51. Reddy VS, Safadi F, Zielinski RE, Reddy ASN. Interaction of a kinesin-like protein with calmodulin isoforms from Arabidopsis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1999, 274:31727-31733. 10.1074/jbc.274.44.31727, 10531384.
52. McCormack E, Tsai Y-C, Braam J. Handling calcium signaling: Arabidopsis CaMs and CMLs. Trends in Plant Science 2005, 10:383-389. 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.07.001, 16023399.
53. Smertenko AP, Chang H-Y, Sonobe S, Fenyk SI, Weingartner M, Bogre L, Hussey PJ. Control of the AtMAP65-1 interaction with microtubules through the cell cycle. Journal of Cell Science 2006, 119:3227-3237. 10.1242/jcs.03051, 16847052.
54. Smertenko AP, Kaloriti D, Chang H-Y, Fiserova J, Opatrny Z, Hussey PJ. The C-terminal variable region specifies the dynamic properties of Arabidopsis microtubule-associated protein MAP65 isotypes. Plant Cell 2008, 20:3346-3358. 10.1105/tpc.108.063362, 2630438, 19060108.
55. Katz E, Lagunes PM, Riov J, Weiss D, Goldschmidt EE. Molecular and physiological evidence suggests the existence of a system II-like pathway of ethylene production in non-climacteric Citrus fruit. Planta 2004, 219:243-252. 10.1007/s00425-004-1228-3, 15014996.
56. Bain JM. Morphological, anatomical, and physiological changes in the developing fruit of the Valencia orange, Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck. Australian Journal of Botany 1958, 6:1-23.
57. Oeljeklaus S, Meyer HE, Warscheid B. Advancements in plant proteomics using quantitative mass spectrometry. Journal of Proteomics 2009, 72:545-554. 10.1016/j.jprot.2008.11.008, 19049910.
58. Choi H, Fermin D, Nesvizhskii AI. Significance analysis of spectral count data in label-free shotgun proteomics. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2008, 7:2373-2385. 10.1074/mcp.M800203-MCP200, 2596341, 18644780.
59. Aleza P, Juarez J, Hernandez M, Pina J, Ollitrault P, Navarro L. Recovery and characterization of a Citrus clementina Hort. ex Tan. 'Clemenules' haploid plant selected to establish the reference whole Citrus genome sequence. BMC Plant Biology 2009, 110.
60. Elias JE, Haas W, Faherty BK, Gygi SP. Comparative evaluation of mass spectrometry platforms used in large-scale proteomics investigations. Nature Methods 2005, 2:667-675. 10.1038/nmeth785, 16118637.
61. Keller A, Nesvizhskii AI, Kolker E, Aebersold R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Analytical Chemistry 2002, 74:5383-5392. 10.1021/ac025747h, 12403597.
62. Listgarten J, Emili A. Statistical and computational methods for comparative proteomic profiling using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2005, 4:419-434. 10.1074/mcp.R500005-MCP200, 15741312.
63. Qian W-J, Jacobs JM, Liu T, Camp DG, Smith RD. Advances and challenges in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based proteomics profiling for clinical applications. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2006, 5:1727-1744. 10.1074/mcp.M600162-MCP200, 1781927, 16887931.
64. Lu P, Vogel C, Wang R, Yao X, Marcotte EM. Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation. Nature Biotechnology 2007, 25:117-124. 10.1038/nbt1270, 17187058.
65. Lu C, Zainal Z, Tucker GA, Lycett GW. Developmental abnormalities and reduced fruit softening in tomato plants expressing an antisense Rab11 GTPase gene. Plant Cell 2001, 13:1819-1833. 10.1105/tpc.13.8.1819, 139129, 11487695.
66. Abbal P, Pradal M, Muniz L, Sauvage F-X, Chatelet P, Ueda T, Tesniere C. Molecular characterization and expression analysis of the Rab GTPase family in Vitis vinifera reveal the specific expression of a VvRabA protein. Journal of Experimental Botany 2008, 59:2403-2416. 10.1093/jxb/ern132, 18499650.
67. Lycett G. The role of Rab GTPases in cell wall metabolism. Journal of Experimental Botany 2008, 59:4061-4074. 10.1093/jxb/ern255, 18945942.
68. Bassham DC, Brandizzi F, Otegui MS, Sanderfoot AA. The secretory system of Arabidopsis. The Arabidopsis Book 2008, 1-29. The American Society of Plant Biologists, The Arabidopsis Book].
69. Dettmer J, Hong-Hermesdorf A, Stierhof Y-D, Schumacher K. Vacuolar H+-ATPase activity is required for endocytic and secretory trafficking in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18:715-730. 10.1105/tpc.105.037978, 1383645, 16461582.
70. Marshansky V, Futai M. The V-type H+-ATPase in vesicular trafficking: targeting, regulation and function. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2008, 20:415-426. 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.03.015, 18511251.
71. Soule J, Grierson W. Anatomy and physiology. Fresh citrus fruit 1986, 1-22. W. G: AVI, Westport, Conn, Wardowski W, Nagy s.
72. Spiegel-Roy P, Goldschmidt EE. Biology of Citrus 1996, Cambridge University Press.
73. Etxeberria E, Gonzalez P, Pozueta J. Evidence for two endocytic transport pathways in plant cells. Plant Science 2009, 177:341-348.
74. Etxeberria E, Gonzalez P, Pozueta-Romero J. Sucrose transport into citrus juice cells: evidence for an endocytic transport system. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 2005, 130:269-274.
75. Wessel D, Fluegge UI. A method for the quantitative recovery of protein in dilute solution in the presence of detergents and lipids. Analytical Biochemistry 1984, 138:141-143. 10.1016/0003-2697(84)90782-6, 6731838.
76. Rosenfeld J, Capdevielle J, Guillemot JC, Ferrara P. In-gel digestion of proteins for internal sequence analysis after one- or two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Analytical Biochemistry 1992, 203:173-179. 10.1016/0003-2697(92)90061-B, 1524213.
77. Nesvizhskii AI, Keller A, Kolker E, Aebersold R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 2003, 75:4646-4658. 10.1021/ac0341261, 14632076.