Cognitive conflict and situational interest as factors influencing conceptual change;Kavramsal deg̈işimi etkileyen faktörler olarak bilişsel uyuşmazlık ve bag̈lamsal ilgi

International Journal of Environmental and Science Education

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 383-405

  Kang, Hunsik ^a   Scharmann, Lawrence C ^b   Kang, Sukjin ^c   Noh, Taehee ^d  

^a Chuncheon National University of Education   (South Korea)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Jeonju National University of Education   (South Korea)

^d Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Attention; Cognitive conflict; Conceptual change; Discrepant event; Effort; Situational interest

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649397315     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13063065     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 391-405.
2. Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545-561.
3. Anderson, R. C. (1982). Allocation of attention during reading. In A. Flammer, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Discourse processing (pp. 292-305). New York, NY: North-Holland.
4. Andre, T., & Windschitl, M. (2003). Interest, epistemological belief, and intentional conceptual change. In G. M. Sinatra, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 173-197). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 user's guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
6. Awang-Hashim, R., O'Neil, H. F., Jr., & Hocevar, D. (2002). Ethnicity, effort, self-efficacy, worry, and statistics achievement in Malaysia: A construct validation of the state-trait motivation model. Educational Assessment, 8(4), 341-364.
7. Baddock, M., & Bucat, R. (2008). Effectiveness of a classroom chemistry demonstration using the cognitive conflict strategy. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1115-1128.
8. Bergin, D. A. (1995). Effects of a mastery versus competitive motivation situation on learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 63(4), 303-314.
9. Bergin, D. A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 87-98.
10. Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychology. New York, NY: Meredith Corporation.
11. Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
12. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Buckley, S., Hasen, G., & Ainley, M. (2004). Affective engagement: A person-centred approach to understanding the structure of subjective learning experiences. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne, Australia.
14. Carroll, J. B. (1985). The model of school learning: Progress of an idea. In C. W. Fisher, & D. C. Berliner (Eds.), Perspectives on instructional time (pp. 29-58). New York, NY: Longman.
15. Chan, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 1-40.
16. Chen, A., & Darst, P. W. (2002). Individual and situational interest: The role of gender and skill. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 250-269.
17. Chen, A., Darst, P. W., & Pangrazi, R. P. (2001). An examination of situational interest and its sources. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(3), 383-400.
18. Chen, C., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Motivation and mathematics achievement: A comparative study of Asian-American, Caucasian-American, and East Asian high school students. Child Development, 66(4), 1215-1234.
19. Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1-49.
20. Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623-654.
21. Dahlin, B., & Watkins, D. (2000). The role of repetition in the processes of memorising and understanding: A comparison of the views of German and Chinese secondary school students in Hong Kong. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(1), 65-84.
22. Dandy, J., & Nettelbeck, T. (2000). The model student? An investigation of Chinese Australian students' academic achievement, studying, and causal attributions for academic success and failure. Australian Psychologist, 35(3), 208-215.
23. Dekkers, P. M., & Thijs, G. D. (1998). Making productive use of students' initial conceptions in developing the concept of force. Science Education, 82(1), 31-51.
24. Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 109-128.
25. Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688.
26. Efron, B. (1982). The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans (SIAM Monograph #38). Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
27. Elizabeth, L. L., & Galloway, D. (1996). Conceptual links between cognitive acceleration through science education and motivational style: A critique of Adey and Shayer. International Journal of Science Education, 18(1), 35-49.
28. Evans, E. M., Schweingruber, H., & Stevenson, H. W. (2002). Gender differences in interest and knowledge acquisition: The United States, Taiwan, and Japan. Sex Roles, 47(3-4), 153-167.
29. Fisher, C. W. (1996). Academic learning time. In E. De Corte, & F. E. Weinert (Eds.), International encyclopedia of developmental and instructional psychology (pp. 675-694). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
30. Frick, R. W. (1992). Interestingness. British Journal of Psychology, 83(1), 113-128.
31. Gungor, A. A., Eryilmaz, A., & Fakioglu, T. (2007). The relationship of freshmen's physics achievement and their related affective characteristics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1036-1056.
32. Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. E., Glass, G. V., & Gamas, W. S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(2), 116-159.
33. Hennessey, M. G. (2003). Metacognitive aspects of students' reflective discourse: Implications for intentional conceptual change teaching and learning. In G. M. Sinatra, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 103-132). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Hess, R. D., & Azuma, H. (1991). Cultural support for schooling: Contrasts between Japan and the United States. Educational Researcher, 20(9), 2-8.
35. Hidi, S. (1995). A reexamination of the role of attention in learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 323-350.
36. Hidi, S. (2000). An interest researcher's perspective: The effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on motivation. In C. Sansone, & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 309-339). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37. Hidi, S. (2001). Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical considerations. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 191-209.
38. Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1992). Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 215-238). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151-179.
40. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
42. Huang, D., & O'Neil, H. F., Jr. (1997). The role of parental expectation, effort, and self-efficacy in the achievement of high and low track high school students in Taiwan. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED 415242)
43. Hynd, C. (2003). Conceptual change in response to persuasive messages. In G. M. Sinatra, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 291-315). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Hynd, C., Holschuh, J., & Nist, S. (2000). Learning complex, scientific information: Motivation theory and its relation to student perceptions. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 16(1), 23-57.
45. Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., & Noh, T. (2004). Reexamining the role of cognitive conflict in science concept learning. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 71-96.
46. Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., Noh, T., & Koh, H. (2005). The influence of students' cognitive and motivational variables in respect of cognitive conflict and conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1037-1058.
47. Kang, S., Shin, S., & Noh, T. (2002). Relationships among students' self-regulation strategy, cognitive conflict, and conceptual change in learning density. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 46(1), 83-89 (written in Korean).
48. Keller, J. M. (1979). Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Instructional Development, 2(4), 26-34.
49. Keller, J. M. (1987a). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance & Instruction, 26(8), 1-7.
50. Keller, J. M. (1987b). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivation design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10.
51. Keller, J. M. (1993). IMMS: Instructional materials motivation survey. Florida State University.
52. Kim, Y., & Kwon, J. (2004). Cognitive conflict and causal attributions to successful conceptual change in physics learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 24(4), 687-708.
53. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
54. Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(1), 23-40.
55. Lee, G. (2000). The effects of cognitive conflict, learning motivation, and learning strategy on high school students' conceptual changes in physics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea (written in Korean).
56. Lee, G., Kwon, J., Park, S.-S., Kim, J.-W., Kwon, H.-G., & Park, H.-K. (2003). Development of an instrument for measuring cognitive conflict in secondary-level science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(6), 585-603.
57. Limón, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11(4-5), 357-380.
58. Limón, M. (2003). The role of domain-specific knowledge in intentional conceptual change. In G. M. Sinatra, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 133-170). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Lin, J.-Y. (2007). Responses to anomalous data obtained from repeatable experiments in the laboratory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 506-528.
60. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Achievement goals and intentional conceptual change. In G. M. Sinatra, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 347-374). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Litman, J. A., & Jimerson, T. L. (2004). The measurement of curiosity as a feeling of deprivation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(2), 147-157.
62. Malpass, J. R. (1994). A structural model of self-efficacy, goal orientation, worry, self-regulated learning, and high-stakes mathematics achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
63. Malpass, J. R., O'Neil, H. F., Jr., & Hocevar, D. (1999). Self-regulation, goal orientation, self-efficacy, worry, and high-stakes math achievement for mathematically gifted high school students. Roeper Review, 21(4), 281-288.
64. Mason, L. (2001). Responses to anomalous data on controversial topics and theory change. Learning and Instruction, 11(6), 453-483.
65. Mason, L., & Boscolo, P. (2004). Role of epistemological understanding and interest in interpreting a controversy and in topic-specific belief change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 103-128.
66. Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424-436.
67. Naylor, F. D. (1981). A state-trait curiosity inventory. Australian Psychologist, 16(2), 172-183.
68. Niaz, M. (2006). Facilitating chemistry teachers' understanding of alternative interpretations of conceptual change. Interchange, 37(1-2), 129-150.
69. Nieswandt, M. (2007). Student affect and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 908-937.
70. Noh, T., Kang, S., Kim, H., Chae, W., & Noh, S. (1997). Development and application of a conceptual change model for effective laboratory teaching. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 17, 179-189 (written in Korean).
71. Palmer D. (2005). A motivational view of constructivist-informed teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 27(15), 1853-1881.
72. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). Motivational beliefs as resources for and constraints on conceptual change. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 33-50). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.
73. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-199.
74. Pintrich, P. R., & Sinatra, G. M. (2003). Future directions for theory and research on intentional conceptual change. In G. M. Sinatra, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 429-441). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
76. Sacco, K., & Bucciarelli, M. (2008). The role of cognitive and socio-cognitive conflict in learning to reason. Mind and Society, 7, 1-19.
77. Salomon, G. (1983). The differential investment of mental effort in learning from different sources. Educational Psychologist, 18(1), 42-50.
78. Schiefele, U. (1992). Topic interest and levels of text comprehension. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 151-182). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
79. Schraw, G. (1997). Situational interest in literary text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(4), 436-456.
80. Schraw, G. (1998). Processing and recall differences among seductive details. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 3-12.
81. Schraw, G., Bruning, R., & Svoboda, C. (1995). Sources of situational interest. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27(1), 1-17.
82. Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 211-224.
83. Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 23-52.
84. Shepardson, D. P., & Moje, E. B. (1999). The role of anomalous data in restructuring fourth graders' frameworks for understanding electric circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 77-94.
85. Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323-332.
86. Sinatra, G. (2005). The "warming trend" in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 107-115.
87. Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
88. Smith, C., Carey, S., & Wiser, M. (1985). On differentiation: A case study of the development of the concepts of size, weight, and density. Cognition, 21(3), 177-237.
89. Smith, C., Snir, J., & Grosslight, L. (1992). Using conceptual models to facilitate conceptual change: The case of weight-density differentiation. Cognition and Instruction, 9(3), 221-283.
90. Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl, & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147-176). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
91. Tirosh, D., Stavy, R., & Cohen, S. (1998). Cognitive conflict and intuitive rules. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1257-1269.
92. Tsai, C.-C. (2000). Enhancing science instruction: The use of -conflict maps'. International Journal of Science Education, 22(3), 285-302.
93. Vosniadou, S. (1999). Conceptual change research: State of the art and future directions. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 3-13). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.
94. Wade, S. E., Buxton, W. M., & Kelly, M. (1999). Using think-alouds to examine reader-text interest. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(2), 194-216.
95. Wang, S.-L. (1997). The role of perceived beliefs in effort, self-efficacy, and task value on high school students' effort and math achievement in Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
96. Weiner, B. (1980). The role of affect in rational (attributional) approaches to human motivation. Educational Researcher, 9(7), 4-11.
97. Yarlas, A. S., & Gelman, R. (1998). Learning as a predictor of situational interest. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, California. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED 437405)
98. Zimmerman, B. J., & Blom, D. E. (1983). Toward an empirical test of the role of cognitive conflict in learning. Developmental Review, 3(1), 18-38.
99. Zohar, A., & Aharon-Kravetsky, S. (2005). Exploring the effects of cognitive conflict and direct teaching for students of different academic levels. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 829-855.
100. Zusho, A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1081-1094.