Conceptual Change in Response to Persuasive Messages

Intentional Conceptual Change

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 291-314

  Hynd, Cynthia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85142585500     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410606716-16     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Alvermann, D.E., and Hynd, C.R. (1989). Effects of prior knowledge activation modes and text structure on nonscience majors’ comprehension of physics. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 97-102.
2. Bem, D.J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183-200.
3. Buehl, M.M., Alexander, P.A., Murphy, P.K., and Sperl, C.T. (2001). Profiling persuasion:The role of beliefs, knowledge, and interest in the processing of persuasive texts that vary by argument structure, Journal of Literacy Research, 33, 269-301
4. Burnkrant, R.E., and Howard, D.J. (1984), Effects of the use of introductory rhetorical questions versus statements on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1218-1230.
5. Cacioppo, J.T., and Petty, R.E. (1979). Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 97-109.
6. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., and Kao, C. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Assessment, 48, 306-307.
7. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
8. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M.P.Zanna, J.M.Olson, and C.P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Chaiken, S., and Eagly, A.H. (1976). Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 605-614.
10. Chaiken, S., and Maheswaren, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460-475.
11. Chi, M.T.H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories:Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R.N.Giere (Ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. XV), Cognitive models of science (pp. 129-186). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12. Chinn, C.A., and Brewer, W.F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1-49.
13. Dole, J.A., and Sinatra, G.M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 109-128.
14. Eagly, A.H., and Telaak, K. (1972). Width of the latitude of acceptance as a determinant of attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 388-397.
15. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16. Festinger, L., and Carlsmith, J.M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210.
17. Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 41-80.
18. Guzzetti, B., and Hynd, C. (1998). Perspectives on conceptual change: Multiple ways to understand knowing and learning in a complex world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Guzzetti, B., Hynd, C., Skeels, S., and Williams, W. (1995). Improving physics exts:Students speak out. Journal of Reading, 38(8), 656-665.
20. Guzzetti, B.J., Snyder, T.E., Glass, G.V., and Gamas, W.S. (1993). Meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education to promote conceptual change in science. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 116-161.
21. Harkins, S.G., and Petty, R. (1981). The effects of source magnification of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 401-413.
22. Hewitt, P.G. (1987). Conceptual physics. Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley.
23. Hovland, C., Janis, I., and Kelley, H.H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24. Hynd, C., Alvermann, D.E., and Qian, G. (1993). Prospective teachers’ comprehension and teaching of a complex science concept. (Reading Research Report No. 4). Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center, Universities of Georgia and Maryland.
25. Hynd, C., Guzzetti, B., Fowler, P., Williams, W., and Seward, A. (2002). Text in physics class: The contribution of reading to learning counter-intuitive physics principles. Unpublished manuscript, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
26. Hynd, C., Holschuh, J., and Nist, S. (2000). Learning complex, scientific information:Motivation theory and its relation to student perceptions. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 36(1), 23-58.
27. Hynd, C., McWhorter, Y., Phares, V., and Suttles, W. (1994). The role of instructional variables in conceptual change in high school physics topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 933-946.
28. Karlins, M., and Abelson, H.I. (1970). How opinions and attitudes are changed (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
29. Kinder, D.R. (1978). Political person perception: The asymmetrical influence of sentiment and choice on perceptions of political candidates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 859-871.
30. Leippe, M.R., and Elkin, R.A. (1987), When motives clash: Issue involvement and response involvement as determinants of persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 269-278.
31. Lumsdaine, A., and Janis, I. (1953). Resistance to counter-propaganda produced by a onesided versus a two-sided propaganda presentation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 17, 311-318.
32. Petty, R.E., and Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
33. Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. New York:Grossman.
34. Pintrich, P.R., Marx, R.W., and Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-199.
35. Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., and Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
36. Sherif, M., and Cantrell, H. (1947). The psychology of ego-involvements. New York:Wiley.
37. Sheth, J.N., Mittal, B., and Newman, B.I. (1999). Customer behavior: Consumer behavior and beyond. Fort Worth: The Dryden Press.
38. Siegler, R.S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children’s thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Smith, J.P., diSessa, A.A., and Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 115-163.
40. Stahl, S.A., Hynd, C., Montgomery, T., and McCIain, V. (1997). In fourteen hundred and ninetytwo, Columbus sailed the ocean blue: The effects of multiple document readings on student attitudes and misconceptions (Reading Research Report No. 82). National Reading Research Center, University of Georgia.
41. Strike, K.A., and Posner, G.J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R.Duschl and R.Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 174-176). Albany, NY: State University of New York.
42. Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43. Vosniadou, S., and Brewer, W.F. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development. Review of Educational Research, (57), 51-67.
44. Wineburg, S.S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 7-87.