Erratum: Student affect and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry (Journal of Research in Science Teaching (2007) 44:7 (908-937) DOI:10.1002/tea.20169);Student affect and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 44, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 908-937

  Nieswandt, Martina ^a  

^a NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Chemistry; Cognitive development

Indexed keywords

CHEMISTRY; CURRICULA; TEACHING;

COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT; COGNITIVE VARIABLES; INTERMEDIARY CONSTRUCTS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 34548782707     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20246     Document Type: Erratum

References (87)

1. Ainley, M.D. (1998). Interest in learning in the disposition of curiosity in secondary students: Investigating process and context. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon conference on interest and gender (pp. 257-266). IPN Series 164, Kiel: Institute for Science Education (IPN).
2. Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal or Educational Psychology, 94, 545-561.
3. Alao, S., & Guthrie, J.T. (1999). Predicting conceptual understanding with cognitive and motivational variables. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 243-254.
4. Ames, C. (1983). Help-seeking and achievement orientation: Perspectives from attribution theory. In B. DePaulo, A. Nadler, & J. Fisher (Eds.), New directions in helping (pp. 165-188). New York: Academic Press.
5. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261 -271.
6. Arbuckle, J.A., & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 user's guide. Chicago: Small Waters Corporation.
7. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67, 1206-1222.
9. Bandura, A., & Schunk, D.H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586-598.
10. Baumert, J., Schnabel, K., & Lehrke, M. (1998). Learning math in school: Does interest really matter? In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K.A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning. Proceedings of the Seeon conference on interest and gender (pp. 327-336). IPN Series 164, Kiel: Institute for Science Education (IPN).
11. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An enquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
12. Bergin, D.A. (1999). Influence on classroom interest. Educational Psychologist, 34, 87-98.
13. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Motivated learning: Studying student-situation transactional units. European Journal of Psychology in Education, 14, 41-55.
14. Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
15. Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E.M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15, 1-40.
16. Byrne, B.M. (1984). The general/academic self-concept nomological network: A review of construct validation research. Review of Educational Research, 54, 427-456.
17. Chan, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 1-40.
18. Dalgety, J., Coll, R.K., & Jones, A. (2003). Development of chemistry attitudes and experience questionnaire (CAEQ). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 649-668.
19. Davis, J.A. (1985). The logic of causal order. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
20. Ding, L., Velicer, W.F., & Harlow, L.L. (1995). Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2, 119-143.
21. Eccles, J.S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 1017-1095). New York: Wiley.
22. Elemente Chemie, I. (1994). Ausgabe A (Elements 1. Edition A). Stuttgart, Germany: Ernst Klett Schulbuchverlag.
23. Freedman, M.P. (2002). The influence of laboratory instruction on science achievement and attitude toward science across gender differences. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8, 191-200.
24. Gibson, H.L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students' attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86, 693-705.
25. Gräber, W. (1992). Interesse am Unterrichtsfach Chemie, an Inhalten und Tätigkeiten (Interest in chemistry classes, in content and activities) (part 1). Chemie in der Schule (Chemistry in the School), 39, 354-358.
26. Greenfield, T.A. (1997). Gender- and grade-level differences in science interest and participation. Science Education, 81, 259-276.
27. Häußler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (1995). Physikunterricht-An den Interessen von Mädchen und Jungen orientiert (Physics instruction oriented at the interests of girls and boys). Unterrichtswissenschaft (Theory of instruction), 23, 107-126.
28. Häußler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (2000). A curricular frame for physics education. Development, comparison with students' interests, and impact on students' achievement and self-concept. Science Education, 84, 689-705.
29. Häußler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (2002). An intervention study to enhance girls' interest, self-concept, and achievement in physics classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 870-888.
30. Harackiewicz, J.M., Barron, K.E., Pintrich, P.R., Elliot, A.J., & Thrash, TM. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638-645.
31. Helmke, A., & van Aken, M.A.G. (1995). The causal ordering of academic achievement and self-concept of ability during elementary school: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 624-637.
32. Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549-571.
33. Hidi, S. (2000). An interest researcher's perspective on the effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on motivation. In C. Sansone, & J.M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The secret for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 309-339). New York: Academic Press.
34. Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (1998). Situational interest and learning. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K.A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning. Proceedings of the Seeon conference on interest and gender (pp. 74-90). IPN Series 164, Kiel: Institute for Science Education (IPN).
35. Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151-179.
36. Jerusalem, M. (1984). Selbstbezogene Kognitionen in schulischen Bezugsgruppen-Eine Längsschnittstudie (Self-related cognition in pear groups in schools. A longitudinal study). Berlin: Department of Psychology, Freie University of Berlin.
37. Koballa, T.R., Jr. (1988). Attitude and related concepts in science education. Science Education, 72, 115-126.
38. Koballa, T.R., Jr. (1995). Children's attitudes toward learning science. In S.M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice (pp. 59-84). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Koballa, T.R., Jr., & Crawley, F.E. (1985). The influence of attitude on science teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 85, 222-232.
40. Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K.A. (1992). Interest, learning, and development. In K.A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3-26). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Laforgia, J. (1988). The affective domain related to science education and its evaluation. Science Education, 72, 407-421.
42. Marsh, H.W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129-149.
43. Marsh, H.W. (1992). Content specificity of relations between academic achievement and academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 35-42.
44. Marsh, H.W., & Yeung, A.S. (1997). Causal effects of academic self-concept on academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 41-54.
45. Mattern, N., & Schau, C. (2002). Gender differences in science attitude-achievement relationships over time among white middle-school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 324-340.
46. Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 424-436.
47. Müller-Harbich, G., & Wenck, H. (1990a). Die Einstellung von Realschülern zum Chemieunterricht, zu Umweltproblemen und zur Chemie. Part 1 : Entwicklung eines Tests zur Erfassung der Einstellung von Schülern zum Chemieunterricht, zu Umweltproblemen und zur Chemie (The attitudes of students towards chemistry instruction, environmental problems and chemistry as a discipline. Part 1. The development of a test instrument to assess students' attitudes in chemistry classes). Chimica Didactica (Chemistry Education), 16, 150-169.
48. Müller-Harbich, G., & Wenck, H. (1990b). Die Einstellung von Realschülern zum Chemieunterricht, zu Umweltproblemen und zur Chemie. Part 2: Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung an einer Stichprobe von 2200 Realschülern in Nordrhein-Westfalen (The attitudes of students towards chemistry instruction, environmental problems and chemistry as a discipline. Part 2. Results of an empirical study of sample of 2220 students in Nordrhein-Westfalen). Chemica Didactica (Chemistry Education), 16, 233-253.
49. National Science Board. (2004). Science and engineering indicators 2004. (Two volumes). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
50. Nieswandt, M. (2001a). Problems and possibilities for learning in an introductory chemistry course from a conceptual change perspective. Science Education, 85, 158-179.
51. Nieswandt, M. (2001b). Von Alltagsvorstellungen zu wissenschaftlichen Konzepten: Lernwege von Schülerinnen und Schülern im einführenden Chemieunterricht. (From everyday conceptions to scientific concepts: Students' learning paths in an introductory chemistry course). Zeitschrift für die Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften (Journal of Science Education), 7, 33-52.
52. Novak, J.D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 937-949.
53. Novak, J.D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitating tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Pajares, F., & Miller, M.D. (1995). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193-203.
55. Paris, S.G., Cross, D.R., & Lipson, M.Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1239-1252.
56. Pintrich, P.R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667-687.
57. Pintrich, P.R., & Schunk, D.H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
58. Rani, G. (2000). Measuring change in students' attitudes toward science over time: An application of latent variable growth modeling. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9, 213-225.
59. Renninger, K.A. (1992). Individual interest and development: Implications for theory and practice. In K.A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 361-395). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Renninger, K.A. (1998). What are the roles of individual interest, task difficulty, and gender in student comprehension? In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K.A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning. Proceedings of the Seeon conference on interest and gender (pp. 228-238). IPN Series 164, Kiel: Institute for Science Education (IPN).
61. Renninger, K.A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone, & J.M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 373-404). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
62. Schiefele, U. (1996). Topic interest, text representation, and quality of experience. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 3-18.
63. Schiefele, U. (1998). Individual interest and learning-What do we know and what we don't know. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K.A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning. Proceedings of the Seeon conference on interest and gender (pp. 91-104). IPN Series 164, Kiel: Institute for Science Education (IPN).
64. Schiefele, U., & Krapp, A. (1996). Topic interest and free recall of expository text. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 141-160.
65. Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., & Winteler, A. (1992). Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research. In K.A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 183-212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Schiefele, U., Winteler, A., & Krapp, A. (1988). Studieninteresse und fachbezogene Wissensstruktur (Study interest and the structure of subject matter-related knowledge. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht (Psychology in Education and Instruction), 35, 106-118.
67. Schraw, G., Bruning, R., & Svoboda, C. (1995). Sources of situational interest. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 1-15.
68. Schumacker, R.E., & Lomax, R.G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Schwab, J.J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In RF. Brandwein (Ed.), The teaching of science (pp. 3-103). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
70. Shavelson, R.J., & Bolus, R. (1982). Self-concept: The interplay of theory and methods. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 3-17.
71. Shavelson, R.J., Hubner, J.J., & Stanton, G.C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441.
72. Simpson, R.D., & Oliver, J.S. (1990). A summary of major influences on attitude toward achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74, 1-18.
73. Simpson, R.D., Koballa, T.R., Jr., Oliver, J.S., & Crawley, FE. (1994). Research on the affective dimension of science learning. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 211 -234). New York: Macmillan.
74. Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academics. Journal of Educational Research, 95, 323-332.
75. Skaalvik, E.M., & Rankin, R.J. (1995). A test of the internal/external frame of reference model at different levels of math and verbal self-perceptions. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 161-184.
76. Skaalvik, E.M., & Rankin, R.J. (1996). Self-concept and self-efficacy: Conceptual analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
77. Skinner, E.A., Wellborn, J., & Connell, J. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: A process model of perceived control and children's engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 22-32.
78. Stork, H. (1988). Zum Chemieunterricht in der Sekundarstufe I. (Chemistry on the secondary level-grades 9 & 10). Institute for Science Education: Kiel, Germany.
79. Stork, H., Schulz, P., & Johannsen, R. (1993). Auf dem Weg in die Chemie. Einfuehrender Chemieunterricht in der Sekundarstufe I (On the road to chemistry. Introduction into chemistry on the secondary level-grades 9 & 10). IPN Blaetter (Institute for Science Education Newsletter), 3, 1-3.
80. Soyibo, K., & Evans, H.G. (2002). Effects of co-operative learning strategy on ninth-graders' understanding of human nutrition. Australian Science Teachers' Journal, 48, 32-35.
81. Sullins, E., Hernandez, D., Fuller, C., & Tashiro, J. (1995). Predicting who will major in a science discipline: Expectancy-Value theory as part of an ecological model for studying academic communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 99-119.
82. Todt, E., & Schreiber, S. (1998). Development of Interest. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K.A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning. Proceedings of the Seeon conference on interest and gender (pp. 25-40). IPN Series 164, Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education (IPN).
83. Wade, S.E., Buxton, W.M., & Kelly, M. (1999). Using think-alouds to examine reader-text interest. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 194-216.
84. Weinburgh, M.H. (2000). Gender, ethnicity, and grade level as predictors of middle school students' attitudes toward science. ERIC, ED442662.
85. Wigfield, A., & Karpathian, M. (1991). Who am I and what can I do? Children's self-concepts and motivation in achievement situations. Educational Psychology, 26, 233-261.
86. Wong, A.F.L., Young, DJ., & Fraser, B.J. (1997). A multilevel analysis of learning environments and student attitudes. Educational Psychology, 17, 449-468.
87. Zimmerman, B.J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 663-676.