The Role of Domain-Specific Knowledge in Intentional Conceptual Change

Intentional Conceptual Change

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 135-172

  Luque, Margarita Limón ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85142598724     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410606716-11     Document Type: Chapter

References (66)

1. Alexander, P.A. (1995). Superimposing a situation-specific and domain-specific perspective on an account of self-regulating learning. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 189-194.
2. Baron, J., Granato, L., Spranca, M., and Teubal, E. (1993). Decision-making biases in children and early adolescence: Exploratory studies. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 22-46.
3. Boekaerts, M. (1992). The adaptable learning process: Initiating and maintaining behavioural change. Journal of Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41, 377-397.
4. Boekaerts, M. (1995). Self-regulated learning: Bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 195-200.
5. Boekaerts, M. (1996). Personality and the psychology of learning. European Journal of Personality, 10, 377-404.
6. Boekaerts, M., and Niemivirta, M. (2000). Self-regulated learning. Finding a balance between learning goals and ego-protective goals. In M.Boekaerts, P.R.Pintrich, and M.Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 417-450). San Diego: Academic Press.
7. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R., and Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of Self-regulation. San Diego: Academic Press.
8. Boshuizen, H.P.A., and Schmidt, H.G. (1992). On the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning by experts, intermediates and novices. Cognitive Science, 26, 153-184.
9. Brammer, R. (1997). Case Conceptualization Strategies: The relationship between psychologists’ experience levels, academic training, and mode of clinical inquiry. Educational Psychology Review, 9(4), 333-351.
10. Brophy, J. (1999). Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation in education:Developing appreciation for particular learning domains and activities. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 75-85.
11. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood, Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.
12. Chan, C., Burtis, J., and Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 1-40.
13. Chi, M.T.H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories:Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R.Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 129-186). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
14. Chinn, C.A., and Brewer, W.F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: a theoretical framework and implications for science education. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1-49.
15. Covington, M.V. (1992). Making the grade. A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Custers, J.F.M., Boshuizen, H.P.A., and Schmidt, H.G. (1998). The role of illness scripts in the development of medical diagnostic expertise: Results from an interview study. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 367-398.
17. diSessa, A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2/3), 105-225.
18. Ditto, P.H., and López, D.F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568-584.
19. Dole, J.A., and Sinatra, G.M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 109-128.
20. Eccles, J.S. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J.T.Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: Freeman.
21. Evans, J.St.B.T. (1989). Bias in human reasoning. Causes and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Hacker, D. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations. In D.J.Hacker, J.Dunlosky, and A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 1-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Hofer, B.K., and Pintrich, P.R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories:Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140.
24. Ivarsson, J., Schoultz, J., and Säljo, R. (2002). Map reading versus mind reading:Revisiting children’s understanding of the shape of the earth. In M.Limón and L.Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change. Issues in theory and practice. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
25. James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Co.
26. Jones, E.E., and Berglas, S. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through selfhandicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 200-206.
27. Kardash, C.M., and Scholes, R.J. (1996). Effects of pre-existing beliefs, epistemological beliefs and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 260-271.
28. Klaczynski, P.A. (1997). Bias in adolescents’ everyday reasoning and its relationship with intellectual ability, personal theories, and self-serving motivation. Developmental Psychology, 33(2), 273-283.
29. Klaczynski, P.A., and Fauth, J.M. (1997). Developmental differences in memory-based intrusions and self-serving statistical reasoning biases. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43(4), 539-566.
30. Klaczynski, P.A., and Gordon, D.H. (1996), Self-serving influences on adolescents’ evaluations of belief-relevant evidence, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 317-339.
31. Klaczynski, P.A., Gordon, D.H., and Fauth, J.M. (1997). Goal-oriented critical reasoning and individual differences in critical reasoning biases. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 470-485.
32. Kruglanski, A.W., and Webster, D.M. (1996). Motivated closing the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing.” Psychological Review, 103, 263-283.
33. Kuhn, D., and Lao, J. (1998). Contemplation and conceptual change: integrating perspectives from social and cognitive psychology. Developmental Review, 18(2), 125-154.
34. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 480-498.
35. Lazarus, R.S., and Folkman, S. (1984). Stress appraisal and coping. New York: Springer-Verlag.
36. Limón, M. (1995). Procesos de razonamiento en la solution de problemas con contenido histórico [Reasoning and problem solving in history]. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid.
37. Limón, M. (2000). Motivation y cambio conceptual; implications para el aprendizaje y la enseñanza de las Ciencias Sodales y Naturales en la ESO. [Motivation and conceptual change: Implications for learning and teaching science and social sciences in secondary school]. Final Research Report for the Spanish Ministry of Education (CIDE). Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
38. Limón, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: a critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11(4/5), 357-380.
39. Limón, M. (2002). Conceptual change in history. In M.Limón and L.Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change. Issues in theory and practice (pp. 259-289). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
40. Limón, M., and Carretero, M. (1997). Conceptual change and anomalous data: a case study in the domain of natural sciences. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XII(2), 213-230.
41. Limón, M., and Carretero, M. (1998). Evidence evaluation and reasoning abilities in the domain of history: An empirical study. In J.F.Voss and M.Carretero (Eds.), Learning and reasoning in history (pp. 252-271). London: The Woburn Press.
42. Limón, M., and Carretero, M. (1999). Conflicting data and conceptual change in history experts. In W.Schnotz, S.Vosniadou, and M.Carretero (Eds.), New Perspectizws on Conceptual Change (pp. 137-160). Oxford: Elsevier.
43. Mason, L. (2000). Role of anomalous data and epistemological beliefs in middle school students’ theory change about two controversial topics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(2), 239-346.
44. Mayer, R.E. (2002). Understanding conceptual change. In M.Limón and L.Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change. Issues in theory and practice (pp. 101-111). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
45. Norman, G.R., Brooks, L.R., Colle, C.L., and Hatala, R.M. (2000). The benefit of diagnostic hypotheses: Experimental study of an instructional intervention for forward and backward reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 433-448.
46. O’Byrne, K., and Goodyear, R.K. (1997). Client assessment by novice and expert psychologists: A comparison of strategies. Educational Psychology Review, 9(3), 267-278.
47. Patel, V.L., Kaufman, D.R., and Arocha, J.F. (2000), Conceptual change in the biomedical and health sciences domain. In R.Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology, educational design, and cognitive science (pp. 329-392). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48. Pintrich, P.R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M.Boekaerts, P.R.Pintrich, and M.Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452-502). San Diego: Academic Press.
49. Pintrich, P.R., Marx, R.W., and Boyle, R.A. (1993), Beyond cold conceptual change: the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-200.
50. Rikers, R.M.J.P., Schmidt, H.G., and Boshuizen, H.P.A. (2000). Knowledge encapsulation and the intermediate effect. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 150-166.
51. Sá, W.C., West, R.F., and Stanovich, K.E. (1999). The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 497-510.
52. Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498-504.
53. Schommer, M. (1993). Epistemological Development and academic performance among secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 406-411.
54. Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113-125.
55. Schraw, G., and Dennison, R.S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
56. Schunk, D.H., and Zimmerman, B.J. (Eds.), (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues on educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57. Stanovich, K.E., and West, R.F. (1997). Reasoning independently if prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 342-357.
58. Strike, K.A., and Posner, G.J. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In L.West and L.Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 211-231). New York: Academic Press.
59. Strike, K.A., and Posner, G.J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R.A.Duschl and R.J.Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147-176). Albany: State University of New York Press.
60. Sutherland, N.S. (1992). Irrationality: why we don’t think straight!. Sussex, UK:Constable Co. Also New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
61. Tillema, H.H., and Knol, W.E. (1997). Promoting student teacher learning through conceptual change or direct instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(6), 579-595.
62. Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45-70.
63. Vosniadou, S., and Brewer, W.F. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development. Review of Educational Research, 57(1), 51-67.
64. White, R.T. (1994). Conceptual and conceptional change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 117-121.
65. Winne, P.H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173-188.
66. Zeitz, C.M. (1994). Expert-novice differences in memory, abstraction, and reasoning in the domain of literature. Cognition and Instruction, 12(4), 277-312.