Learning complex scientific information: Motivation theory and its relation to student perceptions

Reading and Writing Quarterly

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 23-57

  Hynd, Cynthia ^a   Holschuh, Jodi ^a   Nist, Sherrie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937325443     PISSN: 10573569     EISSN: 15210693     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/105735600278051     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alexander, P. A. (1908). The nature of disciplinary and domain learning. The know-lodge, internet, and strategic dimensions of learning from subject matter text. In C. Ilynd B (EA) Leur rung from text across conceptual domains (pp. 283-887). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishons.
2. Alexander, P. A., Jetton, T. L. & Kulikowich, J. M. (1995). Intermlntionahip of knowledge, interest, and recall: Assessing n model of domain learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 666-757.
3. Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Schulzet, S. K. (1904). How suhjec Mnattar knowledge affects recall and interest American Educational Rutarth Journal, 81, 318-337.
4. Alverroann, D. B., Hynd, C. R., & Qian, U. (1995). The effects of interactive discnaaion fine text type on the learning of counter-intuitive science concepts. Journal of Educational Research, 88, 146-153.
5. Amnbile, T. (1983). The social psychology of crcativity. New York: Springer-V«r log.
6. Andermaji, E. M., & Young, A. J. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differonais and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31,811-831.
7. Andereon, O. R. (1990). The teaching and learning of biology in the United States. New York: Columbia University.
8. Clifford, M. M. (1900). Students need challenge, not easy success. Educational Leadership, 43,22-26.
9. Como, L., & K'ufer, R (1893). The role of volition in learning and performance. In L. D Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 301-341). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
10. Donald, J. G. (1991). Sdence students learning: Rthnogruphic studies fat three discipline. In P. R. Pintrich. D. R. Brown. & C. E. Weinstein (Edo.), Student motivation, cognition, and learning: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie (pp. 79-112). HilI-Btlalo, NJ: Krlbaum.
11. Guzzotti, B-, Hynd, C., Skoels, S., & Williams, W. (1995). Improving physics text: Students speak out. Journal of Heading, 88,636-665.
12. Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. K., Glass, G. V., & Ganrnu, W. S. (1993). Meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education to promote conceptual change in science. Reading Research Quarterly, 28.116-161.
13. Hommur, D. (1994a). Kpistemologicol beliefe in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12,151-183.
14. Hammer, D. (1994b). Students’ beliefe about conceptual knowledge in introductory physics. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 385-403.
15. Hynd, C., Guzzetti, B., Fowler, P., & Williams, W. (Unpublished manuscript). Tost in physics class: The role of text in learning counterintuitive scientific information.
16. Hynd, C, McNish, M., Lay, K., & Fowler, P. (1996). High school physics: The role of text in learning counterintuitive information. Reading Research Report, National Reading Research Conter.
17. Hynd, C., McWhorter, Y., I'hures, V., & Sultics, W. (1997). The role of instructional variables in conceptual change in high school physics students. Jownal of Research in Science Teaching, 81, 915-946.
18. Hynd, C., Qian, G., McNish, M., Keith, M., & Lay, K. (1994). Learning counterintuitive concepts in physics: The effect of text and the educational environment. Reading Research Report National Reading Research Center.
19. Lopper, M., & Gtomw, D. (1978). The hidden cant# of reward: New perspectives on the. psychology1 of human motivation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. McCombs, B. L. (1906). Alternative perspectives for motivation. In L. Baker, P. Afflertvach. & D. Reicikiiig (Eds.), Developing engaged readers in school and home communities (pp. 77-87). Mahwah, NJ: Rrlbaum.
21. McGraw, K. (1978). The detrimental effects of reward on performance: A literature review and prediction model In M. Lepper, & D. Greene (Eds.), The hidden costs of retcard: New perspectives on the psychology of human motivation (pp. 31-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Rrlbaum.
22. O'Brien, D., & Dillon, D. (1997). Promoting the. engagement of "Al-Rish" high school students: Perspectives from an innovative program. Technical Report of the National Reading Research Center. Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center (NRRC).
23. Oldfacher, P. (1903). What students any about motivating experience« in a whole lan-gung» classroom. The Readuig Teacher, 46, 72-88.
24. Paria, S. G. & Turner, J. C. (1994). Situated motivation. In P. R Pintrich, D. R. Brown, & C. E. Weinstein (Eds.), Student motivation, cognition, and learning: Eeuxft in honor of Hilbert J. McKrachie (pp. 213-238). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R W., & Boyle, R. (1963). Beyond cold conceptual change: Tliu role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change, Riview of Educational Research. 3(2). 167-199.
26. Posner, D. J., Strike, K. A., Ilewison, P. W., & Gertru, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66.211-227.
27. Schiefeie, U. (1991). Interest, learning, arid motivation. Educational Psychologist-, 26, 290-323.
28. Spiro, R. J. (1980). Constructive procame in prose comprehension and recall. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, and W. O. F. Brewer. Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 245-271). Hillsdale. NJ: Rrlbaum.
29. Strause, A., & Corbin, J. (1991). Basies of qualitative research: Grounded theory, procedures, and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Safe.
30. Winne, P. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist. 30.173-188.