Online collaboration and offline interaction between students using asynchronous tools in blended learning

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 830-846

  Wang, Mei Jung ^a  

^a NATIONAL KAOHSIUNG UNIVERSITY OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78349242832     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1045     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abrams, Z. I. (2003). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 157-167.
2. Althaus, S. (1996). Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with on-line discussions. Communication Education, 46, 158-174.
3. An, Y.-J. & Frick, T. (2006). Student perceptions of asynchronous computer-mediated communication in face-to-face courses. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), article 5. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/an.html
4. Belz, A. J. (2002). Social dimension of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 61-80. http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/belz/default.html
5. Belz, A. J. & Kinginger, C. (2002). The cross-linguistic development of address form use in telecollaborative language learning: Two case studies. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(2), 189-214.
6. Berg, E. C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3) 215-241.
7. Birch, D. & Volkov, M. (2007). Assessment of online reflections: Engaging English second language (ESL) students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(3), 291-306. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet23/birch.html
8. Blake, R. J. (2005). Bimodal CMC: The glue of language learning at a distance. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 497-511. [verified 16 Oct 2010] https://www.calico.org/a-146-Bimodal%20CMC%20The%20Glue%20of%20Language%20Learning%20at%20a%20Distance.html
9. Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
10. Bonk, C. & Graham, C. (2005). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. New York: Jossey Bass.
11. Branon, R. F. & Essex, C. (2001). Synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in distance education: A survey of instructors. TechTrends, 45, 36-42.
12. Bulman, C. & Schutz, S. (2004). Reflective practice in nursing (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Bulu, S. T. & Yildirim , Z. (2008). Communication behaviors and trust in collaborative online teams. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 132-147. http://www.ifets.info/journals/11_1/10.pdf
14. Chen, W. & Looi, C.-K. (2007). Incorporating online discussion in face to face classroom learning: A new blended learning approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(3), 307-326. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet23/chen.html
15. Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22, 17-31.
16. Curtis. D. & Lawson, M. (2001). Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1), 21-34.
17. DeSanctis, G. & Monge, P. (1998). Communication processes for virtual organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4). [viewed 3 Jun 2008, verified 17 Oct 2010] http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/120837743/HTMLSTART
18. Donnelly, R. & McSweeney, F. (2008). Applied e-learning and e-teaching in higher education. London: Information Science Reference.
19. Downes, S. (2000). Nine rules for good technology. [viewed 16 Oct 2000, verified 17 Oct 2010] http://technologysource.org/article/nine_rules_for_good_technology/
20. Edwards, C. & Willis, J. (2005). Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
21. Felix, U. (2002). The web as vehicle for constructivist approaches in language teaching. ReCALL, 14(1), 2-15.
22. Farmer, B., Yue, A. & Brooks, C. (2008). Using blogging for higher order learning in large cohort university teaching: A case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 123-136. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet24/farmer.html
23. Ferdig, R. E. & Trammell, K. D. (2004). Content delivery in the 'blogosphere'. THE Journal, 31(7), 12-20. [viewed 27 Jan 2007, verified 17 Oct 2010] http://thejournal.com/articles/16626
24. Ginns, P. & Ellis, R. (2009). Evaluating the quality of e-learning at the degree level in the student experience of blended learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 652-663.
25. Guzdial, M. & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 437-470.
26. Hanson-Smith, E. (1997). Technology in the classroom: Practice and promise in the 21st century. [viewed 6 Mar 2000, verified 17 Oct 2010] http://www.tesol.org/s_tesol/sec_document.asp?CID=403&DID=1064
27. Hara, N. & Kling, R. (1999). Students' frustrations with a Web-based distance education course. First Monday, 4(12). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/710/620
28. Herrington, J. & Oliver, O. (1997). Multimedia, magic and the way students respond to a situated learning environment. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 127-143. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet13/herrington.html
29. Hoven, D. (2003). Strategic uses of CALL: What learners use and how they react. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, Series S No. 17, 125-147. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/7653/
30. Hoven, D. (2006). Communicating and interacting: An exploration of the changing roles of media in CALL/CMC. Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium Journal, 23(2), 233-256. [verified 17 Oct 2010] https://www.calico.org/a-114-Communicating%20and%20Interacting%20An%20Exploration%20of%20the%20Changing%20Roles%20of%20Media%20in%20CALL/CMC.html
31. Hourigan, T. & Murray, L. (2010). Using blogs to help language students to develop reflective learning strategies: Towards a pedagogical framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 209-225. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/hourigan.html
32. Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 78-82.
33. Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476.
34. Kern, R. G. & Warschauer, M. (2000). Theory and practice of network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 1-19). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
35. Kitade, K. (2008). The role of offline metalanguage talk in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Language Learning & Technology, 12(1), 64-84. http://llt.msu.edu/vol12num1/kitade/default.html
36. Levy, M. & Kennedy, C. (2004). A task-cycling pedagogy using stimulated reflection and audioconferencing in foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2), 50-68. http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num2/levy/default.html
37. Liu, S. H. & Yin, M. C. (2006). A study of improve learning understanding and develop instructional strategies in asynchronous learning. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 9(4), 155-176.
38. Liu, M. & Jackson, J. (2008). An exploration of Chinese EFL learners' unwillingness to communicate and foreign language anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 71-86.
39. Loewen, S. & Erlam, R. (2006). Corrective feedback in the chatroom: An experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 1-14.
40. Lomicka, L., Lord, G., Ducate, L. & Arnold, N. (2007). Teaching, learning and collaborating: A foreign language teacher wiki community. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX.
41. Meyer, K. A. (2004). Evaluating online discussions: Four different frames of analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2), 101-114.
42. Moisseeva, M., Steinbeck, R. & Seufert, S. (2007). Online learning communities and collaborative learning. [viewed 12 Jan 2008, verified 17 Oct 2010] http://www.iienetwork.org/?p=41543
43. Murphy, E. (2004). An instrument to support thinking critically about critical thinking in online asynchronous discussions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(3), 295-315. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet20/murphy.html
44. Ng, C. S. L. & Cheung, W. S. (2007). Comparing face to face, tutor led discussion and online discussion in the classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(4), 455-469. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet23/ng.html
45. O'Down, R. (2007). Evaluating the outcomes of online intercultural exchange. ELT Journal, 61(2), 144-152.
46. Ortega, L. (1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 82-93. http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/ortega/default.html
47. Pawan, F., Paulus, T. M., Yalcin, S. & Chang, C.-F. (2003). Online learning: Patterns of engagement and interaction among in-service teachers. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 119-140. http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/pdf/pawan.pdf
48. Payne, J. S. & Ross, B. M. (2005). Synchronous CMC, working memory, and L2 oral proficiency development. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 35-54. http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num3/payne/default.html
49. Redmond, B. (2004). Reflection in action: Developing reflective practice in health and social services. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
50. Roblyer, M. D., & Wiencke , W. R. (2004). Exploring the interaction equation: Validating a rubric to assess and encourage interaction in distance courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(4).
51. Romiszowski, A. & Mason, R. (2004). Computer-mediated communication. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, 2nd ed. (pp. 397-431). New York: Macmillan.
52. Rovai, A. P. (2001). Classroom community at a distance - a comparative analysis of two ALNbased university programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 4, 105-118.
53. Schellens, T. & Valcke, M. (2006). Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups. Computers & Education, 46, 349-370.
54. Self, J. A., Karakirik, E., Kor, A. L., Tedesco, P. & Dimitrova, V. (2000). Computer-based strategies for articulate reflection. In Young, S. S., Greer, J., Maurer, H. & Chee, Y. S. (Eds), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education/International Conference on Computer-Assisted Instruction, pp.3-12.
55. Shih, Y.-C. & Yang, M.-T. (2008). A collaborative virtual environment for situated language learning using VEC3D. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 56-68. http://www.ifets.info/journals/11_1/5.pdf
56. Tse, S. K., Yuen, A. H. K., Loh, E. K. Y., Lam, J. W. I. & Ng, R. H. W. (2010). The impact of blogging on Hong Kong primary school students' bilingual reading literacy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 164-179. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/tse.html
57. Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. The Internet and Higher Education, 6, 77-90.
58. Vygosky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59. Wang, M. J. (2009). Web based projects enhancing English language and generic skills development for Asian hospitality industry students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 611-626. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet25/wang.html
60. Warschauer, M. (2002). A developmental perspective on technology in language education. TESOL Quarterly, 36(3), 453-475.