Online learning: Patterns of engagement and interaction among in-service teachers

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 119-140

  Pawan, Faridah ^a,b,c   Paulus, Trena M ^a,c,d,e,f   Yalcin, Senom ^a,c   Chang, Ching Fen ^a,c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Interdisc Collaborative Program   (United States)

^c Interdisc Collaborative Program ^*  (United States)

^d OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e EFL/ESL   (United States)

^f EFL/ESL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042595329     PISSN: 10943501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. JALN, 5(2), 2-17. Retrieved April 29, 2003, from http://www.sloanc. org/publications/jaln/v5n2/v5n2_anderson.asp
2. Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.
3. Bauer, M. (2000). Classical content analysis: A review. In M. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound (pp. 131-151). London: Sage Publications.
4. Bonk, C. J., & Cunningham, D. J. (1998). Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In C. J. Bonk & K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators (pp. 33-34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Chickering, A. W., & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996, October). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin, 3-6. Available at http://www.tltgroup.org/programs/seven.html
6. Connolly, B., & Smith, M. W. (2000, September). Teachers and students talk about talk: Class discussion and the way it should be. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46(1), 16-26.
7. Curtis, D., & Lawson, M. (2001). Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1), 21-34.
8. Dewey, J. (1959). My pedagogic creed. In M. S. Dworkin (Ed.), John Dewey on education: Selections, (pp. 19-32). New York Teachers College, Columbia University.
9. Duffy, T. M., Dueber, B., & Hawley, C. L. (1998). Critical thinking in a distributed environment: A pedagogical base for the design of conferencing systems. In C. J. Bonk & K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse, (pp. 51-78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
10. Garrison, D. R. (1992). Critical thinking and self-directed learning in adult education: An analysis of responsibility and control issues. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(3), 136-148.
11. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23. Retrieved December 1, 2002, from http://www.atl.ualberta.ca/cmc/CTinTextEnvFinal.pdf
12. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431.
13. Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 23(2), 115-152.
14. Hathorn, L. G., & Ingram, A. L. (2002). Online collaboration: Making it work. Educational Technology, 42(1), 33-40.
15. Henri, F. (1991). Distance learning and computer-mediated communication: Interactive, quasi-interactive or monologue? In C. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 145-161). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
16. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Online education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp. 115-136). New York: Praeger.
17. Henri, F., & Rigault, C. (1996). Collaborative distance education and computer conferencing. In T. T. Liao (Ed.), Advanced educational technology: Research issues and future potential (pp. 45-76). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
18. Howell-Richardson, C., & Mellar, H. (1996). A methodology for the analysis of patterns of participation within computer mediated communication courses. Instructional Science, 24, 47-69.
19. Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1998). Online social interchange, discord and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 57-74.
20. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, C. A.: Sage Publications.
21. Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
22. Kaufman, D., & Brooks, J. G. (1996, Summer). Interdisciplinary collaboration in teacher education: A constructivist approach. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 231-251.
23. McKenzie, W., & Murphey, D. (2000) "I hope this goes somewhere": Evaluation of an online discussion group. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(3), 239-257. Retrieved November 26, 2002, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet16/mckenzie.html
24. Morgan, M. (2000). Guiding online discussions: A social argument framework. Retrieved November 26, 2002, from http://as1.ipfw.edu/2000tohe/papers/morgan.htm
25. Newman, D. R., Johnson, C., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1997). Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported co-operative learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(6), 484-495.
26. Woods, L., Priest, H., & Roberts, P. (2002). An overview of three different approaches to the interpretation of qualitative data. Part 2: practical illustrations. Nurse Researcher, 10(1), 43-51.