Molecular dynamics simulations of protein dynamics and their relevance to drug discovery

Current Opinion in Pharmacology

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 738-744

  Salsbury, Freddie R ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OSELTAMIVIR; PROTEIN MSH2; PROTEIN MSH6; TRANSFER RNA; VIRUS SIALIDASE; ZANAMIVIR;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; CALCULATION; CELL DEATH; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DNA REPAIR; DRUG DESIGN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; SOLVATION;

DRUG DISCOVERY; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 78149495374     PISSN: 14714892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2010.09.016     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. McCammon J.A., Gelin B.R., Karplus M. Dynamics of folded proteins. Nature 1980, 267:585-590.
2. Zhang J., Li W.F., Wang J., Qin M., Wu L., Yan Z.Q., Xu W.X., Zuo G.H., Wang W. Protein folding simulations: from coarse-grained Model to all-atom model. IUBMB LIFE 2009, 61:627-643.
3. Cho S.S., Weinkam P., Wolynes P.G. Origins of barriers and barrierless folding in BBL. PNAS 2009, 105:118-123.
4. Radkiewicz J.L., Brooks C.L. Protein dynamics in enzymatic catalysis: exploration of dihydrofolate reductase. JACS 2000, 122:225-231.
5. Salsbury F.R., Crowley M.F., Brooks C.L. Modeling of the metallo-beta-lactamase from B-fragilis: structural and dynamic effects of inhibitor binding. Proteins 2001, 44:448-459.
6. Salsbury F.R., Crowder M.W., Kingsmore S.F., Huntley J.J.A. Molecular dynamic simulations of the metallo-beta-lactamase from Bacteroides fragilis in the presence and absence of a tight-binding inhibitor. J Mol Model 2009, 15:133-145.
7. Gunasekaran K., Ma B.Y., Nussinov R. Is allostery an intrinsic property of all dynamic proteins?. Proteins 2004, 57:433-443.
8. Vasilyeva A., Clodfelter J.E., Rector B., Hollis T., Scarpinato K.D., Salsbury F.R. Small molecule induction of MSH2-dependent cell death suggests a vital role of mismatch repair proteins in cell death. DNA Repair 2009, 8:103-113.
9. Schlick T. Molecular Modeling and Simulation: An Interdisciplinary Guide 2010, Springer.
10. Wrabl J.O., Shortle D., Woolf T.B. Correlation between changes in nuclear magnetic resonance order parameters and conformational entropy: molecular dynamics simulations of native and denatured staphylococcal nuclease. Proteins 2000, 38:123-133.
11. Salsbury F.R., Clodfelter J.E., Gentry M.B., Hollis T., Scarpinato K.D. The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:2173-2185.
12. MacKerell A.D., Bashford D., Bellott M., Dunbrack R.L., Evanseck J.D., Field M.J., Fischer S., Gao J., Guo H., Ha S., et al. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 1998, 102:3586-3616.
13. Ponder J.W., Case D.A. Force fields for protein simulations. Adv Prot Chem 2003, 66:27-85.
14. Oostenbrink C., Villa A., Mark A.E., van Gunsteren W.F. A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6. J Comput Chem 2004, 25:1656-1676.
15. Price D.J., Brooks C.L. Modern protein force fields behave comparably in molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 2002, 23:1045-1057.
16. Brooks B.R., Brooks C.L., MacKerell A.D., Nilsson L., Petrella R.J., Roux B., Won Y., Archontis G., Bartels C., Boresch S., et al. CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comp Chem 2009, 30:1545-1615.
17. Case D.A., Cheatham T.E., Darden T., Gohlke H., Luo R., Merz K.M., Onufriev A., Simmerling C., Wang B., Woods R.J. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comp Chem 2005, 26:1668-1688.
18. Hess B., Kutzner C., van der Spoel D., Lindahl E. GROMACS 4, Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 2008, 4:435-447.
19. Phillips J.C., Braun R., Wang W., Gumbart J., Tajkhorshid E., Villa E., Chipot C., Skeel R.D., Kale L., Schulten K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 2009, 26:1781-1802.
20. Jo S., Kim T., Iyer V.G., Im W. CHARMM-GUI: a web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM. J Comput Chem 2008, 29:1859-1865.
21. Gumbart J., Trabuco L.G., Schreiner E., Villa E., Schulten K. Regulation of the protein-conducting channel by a bound ribosome. Structure 2009, 17:1453-1464.
22. Yao Y., Harrison C.B., Freddolino P.L., Schulten K., Mayer M.L. Molecular mechanisms of ligand recognition by NR3 subtype glutamate receptors. EMBO J 2008, 27:2158-2170.
23. Ghosh A., Vishveshwara S. A study of communication pathways in methionyl-tRNA synthetase by molecular dynamics simulations and structure network analysis. PNAS 2007, 104:15711-15716.
24. Lee M.S., Salsbury F.R., Brooks C.L. Novel generalized Born methods. J Chem Phys 2002, 14:10606-10614.
25. Mongan J., Simmerling C., McCammon J.A., Case D.A., Onufrit A. Generalized Born with a simple, robust molecular volume correction. J Chem Theory Comput 2006, 3:156-169.
26. Lee M.S., Feig M., Salsbury F.R., Brooks C.L. New analytic approximation to the standard molecular volume definition and its application to generalized born calculations. J Comp Chem 2003, 24:1348-1356.
27. Thomas L.R., Henson A., Reed J.C., Salsbury F.R., Thorburn A. Direct binding of Fas-associated death domain (FADD) to the tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor DR5 is regulated by the death effector domain of FADD. J Biol Chem 2004, 31:32780-32785.
28. Khalili M., Wales D.J. Computer simulations of peptides from the p53 DNA binding domain. J Chem Theory Comput 2009, 5:1380-1392.
29. Ganguly D., Chen J.H. Atomistic details of the disordered states of KID and pKID. Implications in coupled binding and folding. JACS 2009, 131:5214-5223.
30. Liu J., Nussinov R. Allosteric effects in the marginally stable von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein and allostery-based rescue mutant design. PNAS 2008, 105:901-906.
31. Ma B., Levine A.J. Probing potential binding modes of the p53 tetramer to DNA based on the symmetries encoded in p53 response elements. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 35:7733-7747.
32. Salsbury F.R. Analysis of errors in Still's equation for macromolecular electrostatic solvation energies. Mol Phys 2006, 104:1299-1309.
33. Sigalov G., Fenley A., Onufriev A. Analytical electrostatics for biomolecules: beyond the generalized Born approximation. J Chem Phys 2006, 124:124902.
34. Chen J.H. Effective approximation of molecular volume using atom-centered dielectric functions in generalized Born models. J Chem Theory Comput 2010, 6:2790-2803.
35. Wang J., Tan C.H., Tan Y.H., Lu Q., Luo R. Poisson-Boltzmann solvents in molecular dynamics simulations. Comm Comput Phys 2008, 3:1010-1031.
36. Roe D.R., Okur A., Wickstrom L., Hornak V., Simmerling C. Secondary structure bias in generalized Born solvent models: comparison of conformational ensembles and free energy of solvent. J Phys Chem B 2007, 111:1846-1857.
37. Huang Z.A., Wong C.F. Docking flexible peptide to flexible protein by molecular dynamics using two implicit-solvent models: an evaluation in protein kinase and phosphatase systems. J Phys Chem B 2009, 113:14343-14354.
38. Yeh I.C., Wallqvist A. Structure and dynamics of end-to-end loop formation of the penta-peptide Cys-Ala-Gly-Gln-Trp in implicit solvents. J Phys Chem B 2009, 113:12382-12390.
39. Knaggs M.H., Salsbury F.R., Edgell M.H., Salsbury F.R. Insights into correlated motions and long-range interactions in CheY derived from molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys J 2007, 6:2062-2079.
40. Murtagh F. A survey of recent advances in hierarchical clustering algorithms. Comput J 1983, 26:354-359.
41. Kelley L.A., Gardner S.P., Sutcliffe M.J. An automated approach for clustering an ensemble of NMR-derived protein structures into conformationally related subfamilies. Protein Eng 1996, 9:1063-1065.
42. Madei A. Essential dynamics of proteins. Proteins 1993, 17:412-423.
43. Case D.A. Normal-mode analysis of protein dynamics. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1994, 4:285-290.
44. Tsai C.J., Del Sol A., Nussinov R. Protein allostery, signal transmission and dynamics: a classification scheme of allosteric mechanisms. Mol Biosys 2009, 5:207-216.
45. Yuan Y., Knaggs M.H., Poole L.B., Fetrow J.S., Salsbury F.R. Conformational and oligomeric effects on the cysteine pK(a) of tryparedoxin peroxidase. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2010, 28:51-70.
46. Salsbury F.R. Effects of cisplatin binding to DNA on the dynamics of the E. coli MutS dimer. Prot Pept Lett 2010, 17:744-750.
47. Le L., Lee E.H., Schulten K., Truong T. Molecular modeling of swine influenza A/H1N1, Spanish H1N1, and avian H5N1 flu N1 neuraminidases bound to Tamiflu and Relenza. PLoS Currents: Influenza 2009, 1:RRN1015.
48. Drotschmann K., Topping R.R., Clodfelter J.E., Salsbury F.R. Mutations in the nucleotide-binding domain of MutS homologs uncouple cell death from cell survival. DNA Repair 2004, 3:729-742.
49. Vasilyeva A., Clodfelter J.E., Gorczynski M.J., Gerardi A.R., King S.B., Salsbury F.R., Scarpinato K.D. Parameters of reserpine analogs that induce MSH2/MSH6-dependent cytotoxic response. J Nucleic Acids 2010, 162018.
50. Fetrow J.S., Knutson S.T., Edgell M.H. Mutations in alpha-helical solvent-exposed sites of eglin c have long-range effects: evidence from molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 2006, 63:356-372.
51. Scrofani S.D.B., Chung J., Huntley J.J.A., Benkovic S.J., Wright P.E., Dyson H.J. NMR characterization of the metallo-beta-lactamase from Bacteroides fragilis and its interaction with a tight-binding inhibitor: role of an active-site loop. Biochemistry 1999, 37:14507-14514.
52. Tsai C.J., del Sol A., Nussinov R. Allostery: absence of a change in shape does not imply that allostery is not at play. J Mol Biol 2008, 378:1-11.
53. Knight J.L., Brooks C.L. Validating CHARMM parameters and exploring charge distribution rules in structure-based drug design. J Chem Theory Comput 2006, 5:1680-1691.