Content, social, and metacognitive statements: An empirical study comparing human-human and human-computer tutorial dialogue

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6383 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 93-108

  Dzikovska, Myroslava O ^a   Steinhauser, Natalie B ^b   Moore, Johanna D ^a   Campbell, Gwendolyn E ^b   Harrison, Katherine M ^c   Taylor, Leanne S ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER   (United States)

^c Kaegan Corporation   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL STUDIES; HUMAN-COMPUTER; INTERACTION STYLES; LEARNING GAIN; METACOGNITIVES; TUTORING SYSTEM; USER SATISFACTION;

INNOVATION;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 78049363690     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16020-2_7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED 2001 (2001)
2. Goguadze, G., González Palomo, A., Melis, E.: Interactivity of exercises in activemath. Towards Sustainable and Scalable Educational Innovations Informed by the Learning Sciences Sharing. Good Practices of Research Experimentation and Innovation 133, 109-115 (2005)
3. Bloom, B. S.: The two sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher 13, 3-16 (1984)
4. Rosé, C., Jordan, P., Ringenberg, M., Siler, S., Van Lehn, K., Weinstein, A.: Interactive conceptual tutoring in atlas-andes. In: Proceedings of AI in Education 2001 Conference (2001)
5. Van Lehn, K., Jordan, P., Litman., D.: Developing pedagogically effective tutorial dialogue tactics: Experiments and a testbed. In: Proceedings of SLaTE Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education, Farmington, PA (October 2007)
6. Aleven, V., Popescu, O., Koedinger, K.: Pilot-testing a tutorial dialogue system that supports self-explanation. In: Cerri, S. A., Gouardéres, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2363, pp. 344-354. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
7. Pon-Barry, H., Clark, B., Schultz, K., Bratt, E. O., Peters, S.: Advantages of spoken language interaction in dialogue-based intelligent tutoring systems. In: Lester, J. C., Vicari, R. M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 390-400. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
8. Graesser, A. C., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Kreuz, R.: Autotutor: A simulation of a human tutor. Cognitive Systems Research 1, 35-51 (1999)
9. Callaway, C., Dzikovska, M., Matheson, C., Moore, J., Zinn, C.: Using dialogue to learn math in the LeActiveMath project. In: Proceedings of the ECAI Workshop on Language-Enhanced Educational Technology, pp. 1-8 (August 2006)
10. Khuwaja, R. A., Evens, M. W., Michael, J. A., Rovick, A. A.: Architecture of CIRCSIM-tutor (v. 3): A smart cardiovascular physiology tutor. In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual IEEE Computer-Based Medical Systems Symposium (1994)
11. Nielsen, R. D., Ward, W., Martin, J. H.: Learning to assess low-level conceptual understanding. In: Proceedings 21st International FLAIRS Conference, Coconut Grove, Florida (May 2008)
12. Dzikovska, M. O., Campbell, G. E., Callaway, C. B., Steinhauser, N. B., Farrow, E., Moore, J. D., Butler, L. A., Matheson, C.: Diagnosing natural language answers to support adaptive tutoring. In: Proceedings 21st International FLAIRS Conference, Coconut Grove, Florida (May 2008)
13. Jordan, P. W.: Using student explanations as models for adapting tutorial dialogue. In: Barr, V., Markov, Z. (eds.) FLAIRS Conference. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2004)
14. Purandare, A., Litman, D.: Content-learning correlations in spoken tutoring dialogs at word, turn and discourse levels. In: Proceedings 21st International FLAIRS Conference, Coconut Grove, Florida (May 2008)
15. Litman, D., Moore, J., Dzikovska, M., Farrow, E.: Using natural language processing to analyze tutorial dialogue corpora across domains and modalities. In: Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), Brighton, UK (July 2009)
16. Campbell, G. C., Steinhauser, N. B., Dzikovska, M. O., Moore, J. D., Callaway, C. B., Farrow, E.: Metacognitive awareness versus linguistic politeness: Expressions of confusions in tutorial dialogues. Poster presented at the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Amsterdam, Netherlands (July 2009)
17. Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)
18. Zanbaka, C., Ulinski, A., Goolkasian, P., Hodges, L. F.: Effects of virtual human presence on task performance. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence (ICAT), pp. 174-181 (2004)
19. Pertaub, D. P., Slater, M., Barker, C.: An experiment on public speaking anxiety in response to three different types of virtual audience. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 11(1), 68-78 (2002)
20. Shechtman, N., Horowitz, L. M.: Media inequality in conversation: how people behave differently when interacting with computers and people. In: CHI 2003: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 281-288. ACM, New York (2003)
21. Rosé, C., Torrey, C.: Interactivity versus expectation: Eliciting learning oriented behavior with tutorial dialogue systems. In: Proceedings of Interact 2005 (2005)
22. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., LaVancher, C.: Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science 18(3), 439-477 (1994)
23. Van Lehn, K., Graesser, A. C., Jackson, G. T., Jordan, P., Olney, A., Rosé, C. P.: When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cognitive Science 31(1), 3-62 (2007)
24. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R. (eds.): How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education of the National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington (2000)
25. Steinhauser, N. B., Campbell, G. E., Harrison, K. M., Taylor, L. S., Dzikovska, M. O., Moore, J. D.: Comparing human-human and human-computer tutorial dialogue. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society poster session (2010)
26. Dzikovska, M. O., Callaway, C. B., Farrow, E., Moore, J. D., Steinhauser, N. B., Campbell, G. C.: Dealing with interpretation errors in tutorial dialogue. In: Proceedings of SIGDIAL 2009, London, UK (September 2009)
27. Litman, D., Rosé, C. P., Forbes-Riley, K., Van Lehn, K., Bhembe, D., Silliman, S.: Spoken versus typed human and computer dialogue tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 16, 145-170 (2006)
28. Dzikovska, M. O., Moore, J. D., Steinhauser, N., Campbell, G.: The impact of interpretation problems on tutorial dialogue. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2010) (2010)
29. Jackson, G. T., Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S.: What students expect have more impact than what they know or feel. In: Proceedings 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), Brighton, UK (2009)
30. Papadopoulos, P. M., Demetriadis, S. N., Stamelos, I.: The impact of prompting in technology-enhanced learning as moderated by students' motivation and metacognitive skills. In: Cress, U., Dimitrova, V., Specht, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5794, pp. 535-548. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
31. Forbes-Riley, K., Litman, D.: Adapting to student uncertainty improves tutoring dialogues. In: Proceedings 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), Brighton, UK (2009)