Developing pedagogically effective tutorial dialogue tactics: Experiments and a testbed

Speech and Language Technology in Education, SLaTE 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 17-20

  VanLehn, Kurt ^a   Jordan, Pamela ^a   Litman, Diane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIALOGUE STRATEGY; SINGLE-STEP;

TESTBEDS;

EID: 85133203144     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. B. S. Bloom, “The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring.,” Educational Researcher, no. 13, pp. 4–16, 1984.
2. A. C. Graesser, N. Person, and J. Magliano, “Collaborative dialog patterns in naturalistic one-on-one tutoring,” Applied Cognitive Psychology, no. 9, pp. 359–387, 1995.
3. S. Katz, G. O’Donnell, and H. Kay, “An approach to analyzing the role and structure of reflective dialogue,” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, no. 11, pp. 320–343, 2000.
4. K. VanLehn, “The behavior of tutoring systems,” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, no. 16, 2006.
5. J. R. Anderson, A. T. Corbett, K. R. Koedinger, and R. Pelletier, “Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned,” The Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 167–207, 1995.
6. K. VanLehn, C. Lynch, K. Schultz, J. A. Shapiro, R. H. Shelby, and L. Taylor, “The Andes physics tutoring system: Lessons learned,” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, vol. 3, no. 15, pp. 147–204, 2005.
7. M. Evens and J. Michael, One-on-One Tutoring by Humans and Computers, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2006.
8. K. VanLehn, A. C. Graesser, G. T. Jackson, P. Jordan, A. Olney, and C. P. Rose, “When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading?,” Cognitive Science, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 3–62, 2007.
9. A. Collins, J. S. Brown, and S. E. Newman, “Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics,” in Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, L. B. Resnick, Ed., pp. 453–494. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1989.
10. M. T. H. Chi, S. Siler, H. Jeong, T. Yamauchi, and R. G. Hausmann, “Learning from human tutoring,” Cognitive Science, vol. 25, pp. 471–533, 2001.
11. R. Sutton and A. Barto, Reinforcement Learning, The MIT Press, 1998.
12. E. Levin and R. Pieraccini, “A stochastic model of computer-human interaction for learning dialog ues,” in Proc. of EUROSPEECH’97, 1997.
13. M. Walker, “An application of reinforcement learning to dialogue strategy select ion in a spoken dialogue system for email,” JAIR, vol. 12, 2000.
14. S. Singh, D. Litman, M. Kearns, and M. Walker, “Optimizing dialogue managment with reinforcement learning: Ex-perimen ts with the njfun system,” JAIR, vol. 16, 2002.
15. J. Tetreault, D. Bohus, and D. Litman, “Estimating the reliability of mdp policies: a confidence interval ap proach,” in NAACL, 2007.
16. P. W. Jordan, M. Ringenberg, and B. Hall, “Rapidly developing dialogue systems that support learning studies,” in Proceedings of ITS06 Workshop on Teaching with Robots, Agents, and NLP, 2006.
17. P. W. Jordan, B. Hall, M. Ringenberg, Y. Cui, and C.P. Rosé, “Tools for authoring a dialogue agent that participates in learning studies,” in Proceedings of AIED 2007, 2007.