Media inequality in conversation: How people behave differently when interacting with computers and people

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 281-288

  Shechtman, Nicole ^a   Horowitz, Leonard M ^b  

^a SRI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Human human interaction; Media Equation; Personality; Social interfaces; SRCT (social reactions to communication technology)

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER PROGRAM LISTINGS; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); SOCIAL ASPECTS; HUMAN ENGINEERING;

HUMAN-HUMAN INTERACTION;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; HUMAN-HUMAN INTERACTIONS; MEDIA EQUATION; PERSONALITY; SOCIAL INTERFACES;

EID: 0037699524     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Berzins, J. I. (1977). Therapist-patient matching. In A. S. Gurman (Ed.), Effective psychotherapy (pp. 221-251). New York: Pergamon.
2. Blatt, S. J. (1990). Interpersonal relatedness and self-definition: Two personality configurations and their implications for psychopathology and psychotherapy. In J. L. Singer (Ed.), Repression and dissociation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Carson, R. (1969). Interaction concepts of personality. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
4. Clark, H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Dryer, D. C., & Horowitz, L. M. (1997). When do opposites attract? Interpersonal complementarity versus similarity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 72, 592-603.
6. Hobbs, J. R., & Evans, D. A. (1980). Conversation as planned behavior. Cognitive Science, 4, 349-377.
7. Horowitz, L. (in press). An interpersonal approach to psychopathology. Washington D.C.: APA Books.
8. Kiesler, D. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research. New York: Wiley.
9. Lafferty, J., & Eady, P. (1974). The desert survival problem. Plymouth, MI: Experimental Learning Methods.
10. LaForge, R., & Suczek, R. F. (1955). The interpersonal domain of personality: An interpersonal checklist. Journal of Personality, 24.
11. Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press Co.
12. Moon, Y. (2000). Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. Journal of Consumer Research.
13. Morkes, J., Kernal, H. K., & Nass, C. (1999). Effects of humor in task-oriented human-computer interactions and computer-mediated communication: A direct test of SRCT theory. Human-Computer Interaction, 14, 395-435.
14. Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 81-103.
15. Nass, C., Isbister, K., & Lee, E-J. (2000). Truth is beauty: Research conversational agents. In J. Castells (Ed.), Embodied conversational agents . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Nass, C., Fogg, B. J., & Moon, Y. (1996). Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 669-678.
17. Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Carney, P. (1999). Are people polite to computers? Responses to computer-based interviewing systems. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1093-1110.
18. Nass, C., Moon, Y., Fogg, B. J., Reeves, B., & Dryer, D. C. (1995). Can computer personalities be human personalities? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43, 223-239.
19. Person, E. (2000). The effect of polite language on the assertive person's reaction to advice. Stanford: Stanford University.
20. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: how people treat computers, televisions, and new media like real people and places. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.